SupportSat CDR2 April, 2004 SupportSat Critical Design Review University of Colorado Boulder 2 April, 2004 Project Managers: John Chouinard Brian Taylor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design and Implementation of Low- Cost Optical Telemetry to Support Radiometric Analysis of the Atmosphere University of Colorado at Boulder Alexandra.
Advertisements

UP, UP, AND AWAY! CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Ty Bailey, Soo Park, Cameron Coupe, Trevor Arrasmith, Carolyn Mason, Sam Frakes, Brandon Harris, Peter VanderKley.
Robotics Club, Snt Council2 The 3 Schools of Robotics: Mechanical Design – Types of motors – Material selection –
Space Debris Conceptual Design Review Cole Bostrom Corey Godwin Jonathan Kirchmaier Emily Logan Sean Murphy Seanna Renworth
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM HAWAII. LEO HANO FULL SCALE LOW POWER March 13, 2011 Motor = K780R.
Gary MKIII University of Central Florida Chris Valle, Braden Urban, John Rowe, and Tyler Yoemans.
Team 2 Careful Harry Glenda Alvarenga J.J. Busse Emily Eggers Adam Kemp Gabrielle Massone Dalton Smith Corey Wilson Dynamo Critical Design Review.
Brynn Larson Trey Karsten Terek Campbell Marcus Flores Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki 2015/6/10 Team Ochocinco.
Team BIOHAZARD Presents: Project CRUENTO. CRUENTO: Latin – to make bloody; stain with blood.
CASTOR Jr. MIT 2LT Corey Crowell 2LT Matt McCormack Lucas de la Garza Spenser Parra.
Team MADD Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Team MADD Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Power Distribution Control.
Team Delta Special Recon Ops Launch Readiness Review Taylor Boe Andrew Gilbert Bobby Stillwell Emily Howard Grace Harsha Andrew Buckner November 11, 2008.
University of Kansas EPS of KUTEsat Pathfinder Leon S. Searl April 5, 2006 AE256 Satellite Electrical Power Systems.
Khufu’s Starship Jennifer Nill Chelsea Donaldson Graham Risch Henry Shennan Jonathan Lumpkin Jennifer Nill Chelsea Donaldson Graham Risch Henry Shennan.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn October 17, 2006.
P09561 – Visible Spectrum Imaging System: Final Project Review Dave Lewis Steve Sweet Joanna Dobeck Lenny Calabrese Jason Thibado Darrell Draper Customer:
Cube Root Georgia Institute of Technology Matt Bigelow, Gregory Hansen, Sarah McNeese, Luke Walker.
Critical Design Review Colorado State University - Pueblo April 15, 2005.
Arduino Week 3 Lab ECE 1020 Prof. Ahmadi. Objective Data acquisition (DAQ) is the process of measuring an electrical or physical phenomenon such as voltage,
GloboGym Fighting Cobras Conceptual Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards September 21, 2006 Project.
Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Michael Davies Andrew Mountain Dan Hoang Daniel Brink Power Distribution Control Unit.
Team DSRO Critical Design Review Taylor Boe Andrew Buckner Andrew Gilbert Emily Howard Grace Harsha Bobby Stillwell October 14, 2008.
Launch Readiness Review 11 Nov Brady Phillips, Elliot Guber, Brandon Campbell, Dushyant Dhundra, Joel Mendez, Cameron Trussell.
Critical Design Review Riley Pack, Sebastian Seeds, Greg Stahl, Paul Loeb, Nic Zinner, Pierce Edwards October 17, 2006 Project Frankenfine: A Near Space.
Design Review Corinne Desroches Saad Alqahtani Charles MacCraiger Alexa Warly Connor Jacobson Kyle Skjerven Matt Busby.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
Greg Rancourt, Sarah Flinn, Dominic Boiko, Kevin Stuth, Derek Houtz, Max LaFon.
Speed of Sound Team BalloonWorks. Table of Contents Mission Goal and Objectives Science and Technical Backgrounds Mission Requirements Payload Design.
Group Members: Brad Cox Kevin Burkett Tera Cline Arthur Perkins CS10 Battery Management System.
Techniques for establishing and maintaining constant temperature in ICT systems in order to reduce energy consumption Mihail Radu Cătălin Truşcă, Ş. Albert,
University at Buffalo GLADOS SHOT II Balloon Payload Presentation June 29, 2012 Andrew Dianetti, Alex Wende, Bryant Carlson, Joe Flannery 1.
Rob Hough CAP-HAB (Capstone-High Altitude Balloon) EE 476 Jad Lutfi Andrew Prosory Rob Hough Rob Conant.
Command and Data Handling Yousef Alyousef Michael Li.
DemoSat IV Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 21, 2006.
The 4 functions of a computer are 1.Input 2.Output 3.Storage 4.Processing.
M E T ROVER MSCD Engineering Technology Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 2004.
Project: Weather Video Sat 4/2/04 Mesa State College, Grand Junction.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Jason Rollins – Project Manager / Electrical Design Shawn Mullins.
DINO PDR 23 October 2015 DINO Systems Team Jeff Parker Anthony Lowrey.
Space Monkeys Launch Readiness Review Project Curious George November 11, 2008 Project Curious George November 11, 2008.
DINO Peer Review 29 October 2015 Command and Data Handling Li, Michael Jayaraman, Vijay Bhatia, Vishal Winkelman, Martin.
Team Parro Project HUSP. Team Members Josh Hignight – Project manager and software development Jason Rollins – Responsible for electrical work including.
ME456: Mechatronics Prof. Clark J. Radcliffe Mechanical Engineering
Subsystem Design Review 1 December 2015 Drawing Package Subsystem Design Review Deployment and Intelligent Nanosatellite Operations (DINO)
Team Magnaritaville Conceptual Design Review Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge, Shweta Maurya, Sydni Smith, Christopher Nie, Tyler Knappe 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Rev.
Team SSCSC Critical Design Review Nick Brennan, Kier Fortier, Tom Johnson, Shannon Martin, Dylan Stewart, and Adam Wright October 05, 2010 Fall 2010 Rev.
Victor Taberski, Ryan Walker, Allen Marshall, Matt Kerwin, Andrew Winthrop, Steven Ramm October 14, 2008 UANIOOU – (Upper Atmosphere Near-Infrared Optical.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
DemoSat IV: RedRoverSat University of Colorado at Boulder Jaime Catchen, Chris Homolac, Emily Walters August 9, 2006.
Team Hubble Jr. Critical Design Review Ryan Del Gizzi, Evan Levy, Kyle Norman, Chris Everhart, Holly Zaepfel, Rachel Small October 17, 2006.
BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Personal Computer
By Sonia Thakur James M.Conrad Presenter: Bin Huang
Microcontroller Enhancement Design Project
SCADA for Remote Industrial Plant
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
S^3 Launch Readiness Review
Launch Readiness Review
Instructor Materials Chapter 1: Introduction to the Personal Computer
Space Proximity Atmospheric Research above Tropospheric Altitudes
CSU DemoSAT-B 2010 DemoSat V: Colorado State University April 9, 2011
Attitude Determination and Control Preliminary Design Review
Team Up, Up, and Away Launch Readiness Review
Proposal Team 8: Grant Fritz, Jessica Brown, Stephanie Jalovec, Jennifer McGraw, Brian Roth, Evan Townsend.
Tablesat iid Kavin Kang, Matthew Coronis,
Command and Data Handling
Panoramic Rays Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

SupportSat CDR2 April, 2004 SupportSat Critical Design Review University of Colorado Boulder 2 April, 2004 Project Managers: John Chouinard Brian Taylor

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission Description Gather magnetometer interference data Test intelligent pixel matching operations

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission Goals and NASA Benefits Show effect of flight equipment on magnetometer readings Demonstrate intelligent pixel matching algorithm –Scale and make images linear –Find ground features –Match pixels between subsequent pictures Steps for stereoscopic imaging

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 System Requirements Testing equipment to be used on DINO spacecraft –Mission: determine cloud heights from space All sub-systems using DINO equipment except for power and thermal Power and thermal –Must remain powered throughout flight and above 0 o C –Components should be light weight

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 System Overview and Interfaces

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Project Organization

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Attitude and Determination Control Systems Team Lead: Lisa Hewitt

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To use gyroscopes to determine attitude of SupportSat aiding intelligent imaging operations To test DINO’s magnetometers, gyroscopes, and their respective interfaces

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Honeywell HMC 2003 Magnetic Hybrid The magnetometers were selected in order to test the equipment that DINO will be flying The magnetometers will test interface data to be analyzed for use by DINO Interface Requirements: Three channel analog to digital converter per magnetometer

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Analog Devices ADXRS150 The gyroscopes were chosen because DINO will be using them The gyroscopes will take frequent samples of the positioning of the satellite to maintain and monitor camera position Interface Requirements: One channel analog to digital converter per gyroscope

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Analog to Digital Converters Multiplexer: ADG channels -Low power -Low resistance Will sample data from each device then relay data through one output to converter A/D Converter Max bit -CMOS Will take analog input data from multiplexer and convert to digital data to be sent to the flight computer

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Order parts Test interfaces once parts are received Test equipment under wind simulations comparable to flight conditions

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Run equipment under similar flight circumstances to ensure proper operation and interface

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Possible software incompatibility of the converters with the flight computer

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Magnetometers Gyroscopes A/D converter Multiplexer $398 $99 Free (Samples) <200g < 1.5 g ~ 2g ~5g 20mA 6mA 20 mA -40C to 85C

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Science Team Team Lead: William Willcockson

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission Prepare Canon Digital Rebel camera for flight Develop image analysis algorithm to be used in-flight

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Canon Digital Rebel Identical to the cameras to be flown on DINO Terrain features in preview shots will trigger hi-res shots USB for picture downloads, digital I/O for camera configuration

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Sub-System Interfaces Digital I/O inputs from the flight controller to receive configuration commands USB for image capture commands and image uploading

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Camera must be hooked up to its digital I/O lines Camera must be integrated into the balloon-sat

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Image analysis algorithm will undergo ground testing Camera will be tested to confirm its operational readiness within the balloon- sat

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Digital I/O lines will need to be routed through the camera body

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Canon Digital Rebel <$800 with lens 690 gTBD 0° - 40°C Micro controller <$20<20 g<1 mW -20° - 40°C

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Command and Data Handling / Software Team Lead: Joe Wang

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To coordinate data handling and satellite operations Requirements: –Collect data from magnetometer, gyros and camera –Create software for subsystems –Create pixel matching software –Interface flight computer (Arcom VIPER) with peripheral devices

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Computer: VIPER

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Reasons this component was initially chosen: –Low power consumption of 1.6 W –Has most number of serial ports (5) as compared with other boards plus 2 USB –Has 8 general purpose I/O pins with expansion possibilities –Meets all interface and design requirements –Good processing speed of 400MHz –Allows for Compact Flash The flight computer will function as a central control unit, compiling data and running algorithms Flight Computer: VIPER

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Compact Flash Card (1 GB)

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Compact flash memory format is compatible with both the VIPER board and digital camera Provides inexpensive storage for large amounts of data, which will be necessary to hold the digital pictures taken in-flight Compact Flash Card (1 GB)

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Sub-System Interfaces The following devices are inputs to the flight computer: –Magnetometer –Gyros –Digital Camera –5 volt power supply

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Complete software for data transfers from peripheral devices Debug Software Obtain components and wire to the peripheral devices Test hardware and software once successfully implementation

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Hardware Testing –Automated scripts will test all functions of all subsystems in a logical and safe manner Low-level Code Testing –Language Unit Test Framework –Automatically tests code to make sure it performs as expected Document all code thoroughly as it is written

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns The proficient completion of all necessary software

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal VIPER$ g1.6 W (320 5 V) -20° C to +70° C 1.0 GB CF Card (2) $ gIncluded with VIPER’s power supply 0° C to +70° C

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Power / Thermal Team Lead: Paul Roberts

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To ensure that all subsystems retain power and temperature requirements throughout the duration of the flight.

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Kokam 3.7V Lithium Polymer and Charger Why battery was chosen: –Extremely light weight –Small dimensions –Acceptable cost Provides power to the satellite

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Space Blanket Why this was chosen: –Extremely light weight –Inexpensive –80% heat retention Provides insulation for satellite

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Ceramic Resistors Why this was chosen: –Extremely light weight –Inexpensive –Ceramic resistors used in the past Provides heat and correct power requirements

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Timer Circuit Why this was chosen: –Small –Relatively Inexpensive –Multiple timing periods –Adjusts from one minute to two hours Ensures hinge deployment time

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Schematic

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness Obtain parts Cold tests Interface, wire and solder

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Cold Tests –Resistors –Insulation Power –Timer circuit –Energy dissipated by resistors –Correct voltage requirements

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Heat from resistors Battery life due to resistors Voltage regulator for hinge deployment

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Battery(8)$ g3.7V (out)-40° c to 85° c Charger (2)$ 99.90N/A Blanket$ g (max)N/A Timer Circuit$ g12VDC 200mA -40° c to 85° c Wiring≈ $ 1/ft≈.1 gN/A Resistors (6)$.50≈ 1 gN/A-40° c min

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Structure and Mechanisms Team Lead: Andrew Young

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Mission To supply a sturdy structure that will aid in the success of the mission To keep components safe from the elements for reuse To deploy a magnetometer attached to a CTD hinge

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 CTD Hinge Chosen for ability to deploy components Mission will be complete upon deployment of the magnetometer Requires 10W at 28V for 3 minutes

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Satellite Structure Cube was selected for is stability and efficient use of space The mission will be accomplished if all of the parts can be reused on later missions. The structure must be capable of holding all of the components

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Satellite Structure

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Sub-System Interfaces The CTD hinge requires 28V of power from the batteries. The satellite is required to hold all of the Sub-Systems inside the structure. –ADCS, Science, Power/Thermal The CTD hinge must be mounted on the outside

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Flight Readiness The CTD hinge will be bent to the appropriate angle The structure will be closed up and sealed All of the components will be turned on The structure will be attached to the balloon

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Test Plan Impact testing- terminal velocity Thermal testing- temperature difference Stair pitched test- dropped down the stairs Whip test- circular motion with an abrupt change The CTD hinge will be deployed and bent multiple times

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Issues and Concerns Having the most efficient use of space The mounting of the camera The attachment of the satellite to the balloon The mount for the CTD hinge –Gives to much or not enough

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 CTD Hinge Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal CTD Hinge FREE21 grams10W at 28V for 3 minutes Space Blanket

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Budget NameCostWeightPowerThermal Aluminum$5085gn/a Foam Core $10125gn/a

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Total Mass/Cost Budget TeamMass (grams)Cost ADCS Science C&DH/Software Power/Thermal Structure21060 Mechanism21None Total

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Project Schedule

SupportSat CDR2 April 2004 Questions?