Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity 17 February 2006 Niklas Höhne, Jonathan Pershing, BASI C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prof. Dr. Olav Hohmeyer IPCC AR4 (2007) Results WG III Folie 1 A Short Overview of the IPCC Report on Climate Change Mitigation 2007 (WG III) Prof. Dr.
Advertisements

Climate Change: Frameworks for Policy and Action Chris Beauman 19 January 2006.
key drivers of the energy future
A Corporate Perspective on Climate Change Tom Jacob DuPont Climate Change and Business Opportunities Mexico City 18 October 1999.
Status of research SB May 2006 Luiz Pinguelli Rosa, Joyce Penner, Niklas Höhne.
RIVM/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency 1 Michel den Elzen, Paul Lucas and Marcel Berk National Institute of Public Health.
Ongoing discussions on international climate policy post October 2005 Niklas Höhne, ECOFYS Cologne, Germany.
National Climate Change Conference Climate Action Now South Africa, October 2005 Climate Change Consultative Conference The CDM and strengthening.
Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity 19 October 2005 Niklas Höhne, Esther Lahme, ECOFYS Cologne,
WRI CAIT Climate Analysis Indicators Tool Esther Lahme ECOFYS Cologne.
Quantifying future emission paths: What is needed from whom to keep stabilization in reach 18 October 2005 Niklas Höhne, ECOFYS Cologne,
South Africa Workshop October 2005 Looking to the Future – Challenges for Developing Countries Luiz Gylvan Meira Filho Visiting Professor Institute.
WRI International Climate Policy Post-2012 Quantitative Tools and Negotiating Capacity A Review of WRIs Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT) Beijing,
FAIR 2.1 Tool for analyzing mitigation commitments and costs of countries/regions for different post regimes Michel den Elzen, the Netherlands Environmental.
Sustainable Development Policies and Measures: Putting development first in a carbon-constrained world. BASIC MEETING February, 2005 Jonathan Pershing.
Beyond the Kyoto Firewall The Durban Platform, the Russian Proposal and Differentiation of Country Groups Anna Korppoo Moscow, 26 January 2012.
1 KYOTO PROTOCOL: UPDATE ON ACTIVITIES OF THE AD HOC WORKING GROUP ON FURTHER COMMITMENTS FOR ANNEX I PARTIES UNDER THE KP. PRESENTED BY SETH OSAFO AMCEN.
Distributive Politics and Global Climate Change October 2007.
1P. Criqui, LEPII-EPE Post 2012 Climate Policy Brussels November 22, 2004 Post-2012 climate policy : the participation challenge from the « Greenhouse.
The innovation challenge STAKEHOLDER CONFERENCE "Post-2012 climate policy for the EU" 22 NOVEMBER 2004 Niklas Höhne ECOFYS Cologne,
Agnieszka Janowska European Commission, DG Environment
Data needs in future GHG emission control regimes Technical Workshop on Emissions from Aviation and maritime Transport Oslo 4/5 October 2007 Jakob Graichen.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 The Second European Climate Change Programme Working Group III Carbon Capture and Geological.
1 Background EEA A European Union institution Established by EU Regulation Staff: about 80 Budget: 22 Meuro Copenhagen EEA home page:
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE LENERGIE Energy Technology Policy Progress and Way Forward Fridtjof Unander Energy Technology Policy.
Workshop recommendations: improving the quality of GHG inventories and projections for the LUCF sector part 2: Projections G. Seufert, Z. Somogyi S. Federici.
1 Achieving the 2ºC target in the Copenhagen Accord: an assessment using a global model E3MG Terry Barker Presentation to the Institute for Sustainable.
Climate change 2007, Mitigation of climate change The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report Your name Your institute.
Expert Meeting on the Assessment of Contributions to Climate Change Takanobu KOSUGI, Toshimasa TOMODA, Keigo AKIMOTO Research Institute of Innovative Technology.
Introduction to global climate change and impacts in Ukraine National Ecological Centre of Ukraine Iryna.
EEA June 2004 Copenhagen EEA scenario 2005 project : sustainable emission pathways Presentation by Hans Eerens EEA-ETC/ACC, RIVM/MNP It is not most.
Sharing the burden: the multistage approach Support of Shaping the Post Kyoto Climate Regime REC Workshop Developed by Ecofys presented by Zsolt Lengyel,
1 Sustainable development policies and measures A strategic approach for enhancing the climate regime post-2012 Presentation by South Africa to 2 nd Workshop.
Stabilisation of GHG concentrations in the atmosphere Findings of the IPCC Bert Metz co-chairman IPCC Working Group III INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE.
© dreamstime CLIMATE CHANGE 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.
Renewable Energy in New Zealand. Introduction NZ’s energy supply NZ’s renewable energy supply NZ’s renewable electricity supply NZ’s renewable energy.
The EU Emission Trading System (ETS) Henriëtte Bersee Henriëtte Bersee Environment Counselor Environment Counselor Royal Netherlands Embassy Royal Netherlands.
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on energy balances and energy related greenhouse gas emission inventories (under WG.
One Billion High Emitters: A New Approach for Sharing Global CO2 Emission Reductions Shoibal Chakravarty (PEI), Ananth Chikkatur (Harvard), Heleen de Coninck.
Stern review comments 1. UNFCCC goal – stabilisation of GHG concentration preventing dangerous impact to the climate system. The exact level is stil being.
Avoiding „Dangerous“ Climate Change Jennifer L. Morgan April 24, 2006.
IPCC Synthesis Report Part IV Costs of mitigation measures Jayant Sathaye.
1/18 Long-term Scenarios for Climate Change-Implications for Energy, GHG Emissions and Air Quality Shilpa Rao, International Institute of Applied Systems.
RIVM (the Netherlands) and ETH (Switzerland) 1 Emission implications of long-term climate targets - a work-in-progress report - Michel den Elzen (RIVM,
Technology in the ‘Triptych’ approach Michel den Elzen, the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, associated with RIVM.
Predicting our Climate Future
Adaptation to climate change: NGOs perspective Ruta Bubniene Climate Action Network Europe
Economic Implications of Global Convergence on Emission Intensities Govinda R. Timilsina Senior Economist The World Bank, Washington, DC 32 nd USAEE/IAEE.
Evolution of commitments under the UNFCCC: Involving newly industrialized economies and developing countries UNFCCC side event 4 June 2003 Niklas Höhne.
GREEN FUND (WORLD CLIMATE CHANGE FUND). CURRENT SITUATION AND TRENDS Current international instruments (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate.
Emissions Data and Trends from Developed and Developing Countries ______________ Pre COP Workshop for LDC Negotiators November 2007 Bali, Indonesia.
Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAS) Globally An overview Niklas Höhne 16/01/2014.
Harald Winkler, Randall Spalding-Fecher, Stanford Mwakasonda & Ogunlade Davidson Energy & Development Research Centre University of Cape Town Sustainable.
Mitigation prospects referring to Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the Convention IDDRI’s COP 9 Side Event “Climate, Energy and Development” Odile Blanchard LEPII-EPE,
EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on
The Cement Sustainability Initiative A Sectoral Approach for the Cement Sector December 2007 Patrick Verhagen, Holcim DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Advanced fossil fuel boiler technologies for reaching the goals of the Kyoto protocol OPET-Seminar Celje,
WRI Moderator: Christiana Figueres, Center for Sustainable Development in the Americas (CSDA) Speakers 1.Kevin Baumert, WRI 2.Harald Winkler, EDRC 3.Yong-Gun.
Future Emissions and Mitigation Modeling National Institute for Environmental Studies Mikiko Kainuma Asia-Pacific Forum for Collaborative Modeling on Climate.
Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 °Celsius The way ahead for 2020 and beyond Jos Delbeke DG ENV Director Climate Change & Air Energy for a changing world.
Newton Paciornik BRAZIL Policy Goals and Common Metrics Implications Bonn, 04 April 2012 Workshop on common metrics to calculate the CO 2 equivalence of.
What constitutes a fair level of effort for individual Parties? Ben Gleisner: Post-2012 Emission Reduction Targets.
© dreamstime CLIMATE CHANGE 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.
World Climate: Negotiate a Global Climate Agreement.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Research Domain Sustainable Solutions 1 Analysis of Post-2012 Climate Policy Regimes Marian Leimbach/Lavinia.
World Climate: Negotiating a Global Climate Agreement using the C-ROADS Climate Policy Simulation.
A Quantitative and Comparative Assessment of Architectures for Agreement IEW Venice, 17 June 2009 Valentina Bosetti, FEEM.
Project: “Third National Report to UNFCCC”
TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity 17 February 2006 Niklas Höhne, Jonathan Pershing, BASI C

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Content 1. Introduction on options for international climate policy post 2012 (30 min) 2. Interactive demonstration of the CAIT tool developed by WRI (30 min by J. Pershing) 3. Interactive demonstration of the EVOC model developed by Ecofys (30 min) 4. Interactive demonstration of the FAIR model developed by MNP/RIVM (30 min)

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Future international action on climate change network Collecting information -Activities -Institutions -Ideas Discussion forum Funded by -German Federal Environmental Agency -EU Commissions DG Environment

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Content 1. Introduction on options for international climate policy post Interactive demonstration of the CAIT tool developed by WRI 3. Interactive demonstration of the EVOC model developed by Ecofys 4. Interactive demonstration of the FAIR model developed by MNP/RIVM

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Time scales of stabilization Source: IPCC Synthesis Report, 2001

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Possible temperature trajectories 1000 to 1861, N. Hemisphere, proxy data; 1861 to 2000 Global, Instrumental; 2000 to 2100, SRES projections Source: IPCC Synthesis Report, 2001 EU climate target of 2°C above pre-industrial level

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Source: IPCC Syntheses Report, 2001 EU climate target Linking temperature to concentration Levels of CO 2 concentration Preindustrial: 280 ppm Current: 360 ppm

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Stabilization pathways Source: post SRES scenarios (stabilization paths), CO2 only 450ppm 550ppm 400/350ppm Reference

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Approaches Contraction and Convergence (C&C) Common but Differentiated Convergence (CDC) Multistage South North Dialogue – Equity in the Greenhouse Brazilian Proposal Sectoral approaches Triptych

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Contraction and Convergence Contraction: Agreement on a global emission pathway (e.g. towards 450ppmv) Convergence: Per capita emission converge until, e.g., 2050 Origin: Global Commons Institute CE.pdf

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Common but differentiated convergence (CDC) Three stages –No commitments –No-Lose targets –Convergence of per capita emission level to the same level in e.g. 40 years Participation threshold: –(time dependent) global average per capita emissions Höhne, den Elzen, Weiss: Common but differentiated convergence accepted at Climate Policy 2005

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Multistage approach Participation in e.g. four stages: Countries graduate to a next step, if threshold is passed, e.g. emissions/cap No commitments Sustainable development policies and measures Moderate reduction Reduction

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity South North Dialogue Quantitative commitment Qualitative commitment Financial support 1. Least developed countries -SD PAMS optional Receive payments 2. Other developing countries - SD PAMS obligatory, co-funded Receive payments 3. Rapidly industrializing developing countries Limitation if funding provided SD PAMS obligatory, co-funded Receive high payments 4. Newly industrialized countries LimitationSD PAMS obligatoryCo-funding 5. Annex I but not Annex II Absolute reduction - Low/no payments 6. Annex IIStrict absolute reduction -Make high payments Thresholds: CO 2 /GDP, GHG/cap, emission growth, cumulative emissions, GDP/cap, HDI; show members of the groups Adaptation commitment

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Brazilian Proposal Emission reductions by Annex I countries proportional to contribution to temperature increase Participation by Non-Annex I countries not defined The only proposal still discussed under the UNFCCC, but its implementation unclear

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Sectoral approaches Emission limits for particular sectors only Emission limits as a function of production (e.g. tCO 2 /tSteel) Common emission or energy efficiency standards on one sector globally

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Industry Adjusted BAU production growth with efficiency improvement Electricity Adjusted BAU production growth with limit on sources DomesticConverging per-capita emissions Fossil fuel production Decline to low level AgriculturalPercentage reduction below BAU WasteConverging per-capita emissions Land use change and forestry Decline to zero (here excluded) Triptych National emission target

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Overview of tools Country level historical data Emission allocation Mitigation costs CAITEVOCFAIR XXX(X) Contraction and Convergence (C&C) XX Common but Differentiated Convergence (CDC) X(X) Multistage XX South North Dialogue – Equity in the greenhouse X(X) Brazilian Proposal X Sectoral approaches (X) Triptych X(X) X

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Content 1. Introduction on options for international climate policy post Interactive demonstration of the CAIT tool developed by WRI 3. Interactive demonstration of the EVOC model developed by Ecofys 4. Interactive demonstration of the FAIR model developed by MNP/RIVM

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Content 1. Introduction on options for international climate policy post Interactive demonstration of the CAIT tool developed by WRI 3. Interactive demonstration of the EVOC model developed by Ecofys 4. Interactive demonstration of the FAIR model developed by MNP/RIVM

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity EVOC Tool Input Historical emission data per country (hierarchy of emissions sources, all Kyoto gases, sectors) Energy, population, GDP data from IEA Future reference development (emissions, population, GDP) based on RIVM IMAGE implementation of the IPCC SRES scenarios Output Emissions or emission allowances under various proposals for future international climate policy after 2012 –Contraction and convergence –Common but differentiated convergence –Multistage –Triptych –Proposal by the South North Dialogue – Equity in the Greenhouse

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Delayed participation Common but differentiated convergence GHG/cap Time Threshold Contraction & Convergence GHG/cap Time IC DC LDC

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Results towards 550 ppmv CO 2 Towards 550 ppmv CO 2: Threshold: 30% above world average, Convergence level: 4.5 tCO 2 eq/cap A1B scenario Excl. LUCF CO 2 GHG per capita

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Results towards 550 ppmv CO 2 Towards 550 ppmv CO 2: Threshold: 30% above world average, Convergence level: 4.5 tCO 2 eq/cap A1B scenario Excl. LUCF CO 2 GHG emissions

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Results towards 450 ppmv CO 2 Towards 450 ppmv CO 2: Threshold: 10% below world average, Convergence level: 2.9 tCO 2 eq/cap A1B scenario Excl. LUCF CO 2 GHG per capita

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Results towards 450 ppmv CO 2 Towards 450 ppmv CO 2: Threshold: 10% below world average, Convergence level: 2.9 tCO 2 eq/cap A1B scenario Excl. LUCF CO 2 GHG emissions

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Multistage Four stage emission reduction agreement 1.No commitments 2.Sustainable development policies and measures 3.Moderate emission limitation targets 4.Absolute emission reduction targets (shared according to Triptych approach) Threshold: Emissions/cap, decreasing over time

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Towards 550 ppmv CO 2 Stage 3 Entry at 6-10 tCO 2 eq./cap 10%-15% below reference Stage 4 Entry at 9-12 tCO 2 eq./cap 1-5% reduction per year

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Time of entry towards 550 ppmv CO 2

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Towards 450 ppmv CO 2 Stage 3 Entry at tCO 2 eq./cap ~30% below reference Stage 4 Entry at tCO 2 eq./cap ~5% reduction per year

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Time of entry towards 450 ppmv CO 2

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Towards 400 ppmv CO 2 Stage 3 Entry at 3.5 tCO 2 eq./cap ~30% below reference Stage 4 Entry at 4 tCO 2 eq./cap ~8% reduction per year

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Time of entry towards 400 ppmv CO 2

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Stabilization pathways Source: post SRES scenarios (stabilization paths), CO2 only 450ppm 550ppm 400/350ppm Reference

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Stabilization pathways Source: post SRES scenarios (stabilization paths), CO2 only 450ppm 550ppm +30% -25% +50% +45% +10% -60% 400/350ppm

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Change 1990 to 2020 towards 450 ppm CO 2 Annex I: -10% to –30% below 1990 No participation: South Asia and Africa. Deviate from their reference: Latin America, Middle East, East Asia and Centrally planned Asia

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Change 1990 to 2050 towards 450 ppm CO 2 Annex I: -70% to -90% below 1990 Substantial deviation from reference in all Non-Annex I regions

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Content 1. Introduction on options for international climate policy post Interactive demonstration of the CAIT tool developed by WRI 3. Interactive demonstration of the EVOC model developed by Ecofys 4. Interactive demonstration of the FAIR model developed by MNP/RIVM

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Backup slides

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Change 1990 to 2020 towards 550 ppm CO 2 Annex I: -5% to –25% below 1990 No participation: South Asia, Africa, Centrally Planned Asia or excess allowances under C&C or Triptych Deviate from their reference: Latin America, Middle East and East Asia

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Change 1990 to 2050 towards 550 ppm CO 2 Annex I: -40% to -80% below 1990 Deviate from reference: Most Non-Annex I regions, except South Asia Triptych: more reductions for coal intensive countries under these parameters

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Stabilization pathways Source: post SRES scenarios (stabilization paths), CO2 only 450ppm 550ppm +30% -25% +50% +45% +10% -60% 400/350ppm

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Stabilization pathways Source: post SRES scenarios (stabilization paths), CO2 only 450ppm 550ppm +30% -25% +50% +45% +10% -60% 400/350ppm

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Change 1990 to 2020 towards 400 ppm CO 2 Annex I: -25% to -50% below 1990 No participation: only a very few countries Deviate from their reference: all Non-Annex I regions

Workshop on Quantitative Tools & Negotiating Capacity Change 1990 to 2050 towards 400 ppm CO 2 Annex I: -80% to -90% below 1990 Substantial deviation from reference in all Non-Annex I regions