George D. Kuh NACADA National Conference October 18, 2006 Thinking DEEPly about Academic Advising and Student Engagement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
George D. Kuh THECB 2005 Governing Board Conference Austin TX October 11, 2005 Building an Excellent Undergraduate Experience: Taking Student Success Seriously.
Advertisements

The Role of Academic Leadership in Student Success August 21, 2012 Deans and Department Chairs` Dialogue Southern Utah University Charles Schroeder, Consultant.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Northern Convening Butte College April 26, 2013 College Team Facilitators’ Presentation Student Support (Re)defined.
George D. Kuh Oklahoma Enrollment Management Conference February 20, 2007 What Really Matters to Student Success: Lessons from High Performing Colleges.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Maximizing Your NSSE & CCSSE Results
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
1 Accreditation and the First-Year Experience Kay H. Smith, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for the Academic Experience College of Charleston.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
Intro Tour of the Male Student Mind In American Higher Education European Access Network National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland June 28, 2007 Tom.
What Matters to Student Success George D. Kuh University of British Columbia May 7, 2009.
Students who are… …engaged in the classroom – pass; …engaged in their academic program - return; …engaged in deep learning – graduate. What constitutes.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
Student Success Programs Where Retention Theory and Practice Converge Mary Stuart Hunter Houghton Mifflin College Survival National Conference July 12,
Lessons from the National Survey of Student Engagement Dan BureauMahauganee Shaw Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
What Matters to Student Success: The Promise of High- Impact Practices George D. Kuh RIT Faculty Institute Rochester, NY May 26, 2010.
DEEP Lessons about Student Success in College Jillian Kinzie NSSE User Workshop October, 2005.
DEEP Lessons about Student Success in College Jillian Kinzie NSSE User Workshop October, 2005.
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
Student Engagement: Promoting Better Learning Rick Vaz Associate Dean Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, Massachusetts,
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Using the National Survey of Student Engagement to Enhance Student Academic Success: Best Practices on Canadian Campuses Debra Dawson Ryerson University.
Student Success Factors Faculty In-Service Program Tuesday, August 25.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
What Matters to Student Success in the First Year of University? George D. Kuh Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference QUT Gardens Point,
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
George D. Kuh U of Maine System March 20, 2007 Strengthening Institutional Responsibility for Student Success: Lessons from NSSE.
Presentation of Results NSSE 2003 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
George D. Kuh Fall Faculty Conference Arkansas State University August 18, 2010 What Matters to Student Success: Lessons for ASU.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
What Matters to Student Success? Lessons for ANAC Institutions George D. Kuh Elon University June 13, 2007.
TENN TLC addresses retention through student engagement UT SIFE students 13 May 2010.
An Introduction: NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement.
Enhancing Transfer Enhancing Transfer Student Success George D. Kuh Indiana University January 2004.
Student engagement varies more within than between institutions.
Improving Undergraduate Success Through Student Engagement George D. Kuh Council on Higher Education Council on Higher Education Pretoria SA May 22, 2009.
Fostering Student Success at SCSU Melanie Guentzel Peg Furshong Matt Trombley Victoria Williams Work cited: Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H., Whitt,
Never Let it Rest: Building Educationally Effective Institutions to Enhance Student Success Jillian Kinzie National Consortium for Continuous Improvement.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
An Overview.  Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U)  Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP)  aacu.org/leap.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Click here to add N A C A D A National ACademic ADvising Association Presentation by Dr. Nutt at MSU, February 9, 2007 Sponsored by: Academic Affairs Academic.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
What Matters to Student Success in College: A Review of the Literature
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
Intro The Trouble with Boys Ross School Ross, California August 30, 2010 Tom Mortenson Senior Scholar The Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Why Learning Communities Work: A DEEPer Look at Effective Educational Practice George D. Kuh Center for Postsecondary Research Indiana University Bloomington.
George D. Kuh CAUCUS/ASEUCCSaskatoon June 11, 2007 What Matters to Student Success in College and University.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
Stargazing 2019: What Will Matter to Student Success George D. Kuh TACUSPA October 5, 2009.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Enhancing the Culture of Student Success and Persistence From Application to Graduation NACADA Executive Office Kansas State University 2323 Anderson Ave,
Closing the Experience Gap March 30, 2017
NSSE Results for Faculty
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
TENN TLC addresses retention
Jeanne Butler, Director Office of Assessment
Presentation transcript:

George D. Kuh NACADA National Conference October 18, 2006 Thinking DEEPly about Academic Advising and Student Engagement

We all want the same thing—an undergraduate experience that results in high levels of learning and personal development for all students.

Overview  What matters to student success  The role of engagement  What students say about advising  Lessons for advisors from high-performing institutions

Advance Organizers  To what extent do your students engage in productive learning activities, inside and outside the classroom?  How do you know?  What mighty you do differently -- or better -- to foster student success?

Student Success in College Academic achievement, engagement in educationally purposeful activities, satisfaction, acquisition of desired knowledge, skills and competencies, persistence, attainment of educational objectives, and post- college performance

Pre-college Characteristics Associated with Student Success  Academic preparation  Ability and college-level skills  Family education and support  Financial wherewithal

Early College Indicators of Persistence and Success  Goal realization  Psycho-social fit  Credit hours completed  Academic and social support  Involvement in the “right” kinds of activities

What Really Matters in College: Student Engagement Because individual effort and involvement are the critical determinants of impact, institutions should focus on the ways they can shape their academic, interpersonal, and extracurricular offerings to encourage student engagement. Pascarella & Terenzini, How College Affects Students, 2005, p. 602

Student Engagement Trinity  What students do -- time and energy devoted to educationally purposeful activities  What institutions do -- using effective educational practices to induce students to do the right things  Educationally effective institutions channel student energy toward the right activities

Good Practices in Undergraduate Education (Chickering & Gamson, 1987; Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005) Student-faculty contact Student-faculty contact Active learning Active learning Prompt feedback Prompt feedback Time on task Time on task High expectations High expectations Respect for diverse learning styles Respect for diverse learning styles Cooperation among students Cooperation among students

National Survey of Student Engagement Community College Survey of Student Engagement National Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced “nessie”) Community College Survey of Student Engagement (pronounced “cessie”) College student surveys that assess the extent to which students engage in educational practices associated with high levels of learning and development

NSSE Survey Student Behaviors Institutional Actions & Requirements Reactions to People & Environment Student Background Information Student Learning & Development

In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following? 1

Effective Educational Practices Level of Academic Challenge Active & Collaborative Learning Enriching Educational Experiences SupportiveCampusEnvironment Student- Faculty Interaction

Grades, persistence, student satisfaction, and engagement go hand in hand

Behold the compensatory effects of engagement

Student Success Quiz What is the best predictor of satisfaction with the campus climate for learning? (a) high school rank (b) college gpa (c) credit hours completed (d) quality of academic advising (e) none of the above d. academic advising d. academic advising

Accurate and current information from advisors

Primary source of academic advising Primary source of academic advising

First-Year Student Use of Campus Services

What do “engaging” colleges look like? And what do advisors there do?!?

What We Learned from Project DEEP Jossey-Bass 2005

DEEP Guiding Questions  What do strong-performing institutions do to promote student success?  What campus features -- policies, programs, and practices – are related to higher-than-predicted graduation rates and student engagement?

DEEP Selection Criteria Controlling for student and institutional characteristics (i.e., selectivity, diversity, institutional type), DEEP schools have:  Higher-than-predicted graduation rates  Higher-than-predicted NSSE scores  Region, institutional type, special mission type, special mission

Research Approach Case study method Team of 24 researchers review institutional documents and conduct multiple-day site visits Team of 24 researchers review institutional documents and conduct multiple-day site visits Observe individuals, classes, group meetings, activities, events Observe individuals, classes, group meetings, activities, events 2,700+ people, 60 classes, 30 events 2,700+ people, 60 classes, 30 events Discover and describe effective practices and programs, campus culture Discover and describe effective practices and programs, campus culture

Project DEEP Schools Doctoral Extensives University of Kansas University of Michigan Doctoral Intensives George Mason University Miami University (Ohio) University of Texas El Paso Master’s Granting Fayetteville State University Gonzaga University Longwood University Liberal Arts California State, Monterey Bay California State, Monterey Bay Macalester College Macalester College Sweet Briar College Sweet Briar College The Evergreen State College The Evergreen State College Sewanee: University of the South Sewanee: University of the South Ursinus College Ursinus College Wabash College Wabash College Wheaton College (MA) Wheaton College (MA) Wofford College Wofford College Baccalaureate General Alverno College Alverno College University of Maine at Farmington University of Maine at Farmington Winston-Salem State University Winston-Salem State University

Six Common Conditions  “Living” Mission and “Lived” Educational Philosophy  Unshakeable Focus on Student Learning  Environments Adapted for Educational Enrichment  Clearly Marked Pathways to Student Success  Improvement-Oriented Ethos  Shared Responsibility for Educational Quality

Five DEEP Lessons for Academic Advisors We can’t leave serendipity to chance

Points to Ponder  To what extent do these ideas characterize your work and your institution?  What are the implications for: You? You? For faculty members? For faculty members? For academic administrators For academic administrators For student affairs staff? For student affairs staff? For others (e.g., librarians, info tech personnel, etc.)? For others (e.g., librarians, info tech personnel, etc.)?

1. Adopt a talent development approach to advising a.“Know” your students  Who are they?  What are they telling us?

Student Success Quiz What percent of high school seniors have college-level reading skills? (a) 51% (b) 59% (c) 68% (d) 77% (e) none of the above 51% ACT a. 51% (ACT, 2006)

Student Success Quiz True or false: 25% of first-year first-time frosh at two-year colleges are required to take one or more remedial courses in college. False. 60%

Student Success Quiz What percent of students who take at least one remedial course in reading do not earn a certificate or degree within 8 years of first enrollment? (a) 18% (b) 33% (c) 43% (d) 61% (e) 70% e. 70%

Student Success Quiz About what percent of community college students return for the second year? (a) 29% (b) 33% (c) 50% (d) 61% (e) 77%. 50% c. 50% 15% do not complete one academic term

Students Today  An entitlement mentality

Trends in High School Grades

Students Today  An entitlement mentality  Cumulative deficit re: attitudes, study habits, academic skills

Students Today  More diverse than previous cohorts  Techno-savvy “NetGens”

Factors That Threaten Persistence and Graduation from College  academically underprepared for college-level work  gap between high school and college  part-time enrollment  single parent  financially independent  children at home  30+ hours working per week  first-generation college student

1. Adopt a talent development approach to advising a.“Know” your students b.Meet students “where they are” – academically, socially, psychologically.

Fayetteville State  Faculty members “teach the students they have, not those they wish they had”  Center for Teaching and Learning sponsors development activities on diverse learning needs Cal State Monterey Bay  “Assets” philosophy acknowledges students’ prior knowledge “Meet students where they are”

1. Adopt a talent development approach to advising a.“Know” your students b.Meet students “where they are” – academically, socially, psychologically. c.Set high expectations – challenge, implore, cajole and support

Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement  Annual survey of entering first-year students  pilot test at 70 institutions  Administered prior to start of classes Ty M. Cruce Julie M. Williams John V. Moore Indiana University

It Takes a Whole Campus to Educate a Student

2. Make advising a tag team activity a.Share responsibility for student success b.Draw on multiple sources of expertise and perspectives on students

Redundant early warning systems: “Tag Teaming”  Wheaton first-year student advising team includes faculty, student preceptors, librarians and administrative staff.  At Ursinus, Miami, and Wheaton representatives from both academic affairs and student affairs serve as academic advisors.

3. Help students map out a path to success a.Draw a map for student success

3. Help students map out a path to success a.Draw a map for student success b.Teach newcomers about the campus culture

Socialization to academic expectations “Enter to Learn, Depart to Serve,” Winston Salem’s motto, reflects an educational philosophy that emphasizes that students must repay a societal debt for the privileges of freedom and responsibility. Freshman Seminar and Nursing Strategies courses include service responsibilities for new students.

3. Help students map out a path to success a.Draw a map for student success b.Teach newcomers about the campus culture c.Emphasize student initiative d.Point students to programs, resources and activities that work!

Potential “High Impact” Activities  First-year seminars and experiences  Common intellectual experiences  Learning communities  Writing-intensive courses  Collaborative assignments  “Science as science is done”  Diversity/global learning  Service learning/community service  Internships  Capstone experiences/projects

What to Do?!? Student success requires that we explain more things to today’s students that we once took for granted – “You must buy the book, you must read it and come to class, you must observe deadlines or make special arrangements when you miss one” Prof. Richard Turner (1998, p.4)

Lessons from National Center for Academic Transformation If doing something is important, require it (first-year students don’t do ‘optional’) If doing something is important, require it (first-year students don’t do ‘optional’) Assign course points to the activity Assign course points to the activity Monitor and intervene when necessary Monitor and intervene when necessaryhttp://

Intrusive advising University of Kansas “Graduate in Four” advising notebook: Distributed at orientation Distributed at orientation Describes to students how to make the most of undergraduate study Describes to students how to make the most of undergraduate study Students required to meet with advisor to review progress to degree Students required to meet with advisor to review progress to degree Section for each of the four undergraduate years Section for each of the four undergraduate years “Checklist” for students to weigh choices and monitor if they are making progress. “Checklist” for students to weigh choices and monitor if they are making progress.

4. Make every interaction meaningful a.Participate and connect before college and during orientation b.Provide accurate information c.Push students to think! d.Develop peer mentoring programs e.Imbed advising into a first-year course f.Encourage students to experience diversity

Who Is Most Likely to Experience Diversity? More Students of color Traditional-age students Women First-year students Less White students Older students Men Upper-division students

Something Else That Really Matters in College The greatest impact appears to stem from students ’ total level of campus engagement, particularly when academic, interpersonal, and extracurricular involvements are mutually reinforcing … Pascarella & Terenzini, How College Affects Students, 2005, p. 647

Linking campus and community California State University, Monterey Bay (CSUMB) requires all students to complete both a lower and upper-level service learning experience as a means to apply knowledge and connect with the local community.

5. Focus on culture sooner than later Ultimately, it’s all about the culture… a.Identify cultural properties that impede advisor effectiveness and student success b.Expand the number of cultural practitioners on campus c.Instill an ethic of positive restlessness

Positive restlessness “We know who we are and what we aspire to.” “We know who we are and what we aspire to.” Confident, responsive, but never quite satisfied… Confident, responsive, but never quite satisfied… Self-correcting orientation Self-correcting orientation Continually question, “are we performing as well as we can?” Continually question, “are we performing as well as we can?”

Checking the Truth How well does our advising system work? How do we know?  How well does our advising system work? How do we know?  How many students do our efforts reach in meaningful ways and how do we know?  To what degree are our efforts complementary?  What are we not doing that we should?

Last Word We cannot change the lineage of our students. Campus cultures do not change easily or willingly. But we can do far more to shape the way students approach college and what they do after they arrive. Do we have the will to more consistently use promising policies and practices to increase the odds that more students “get ready,” “get in,” and “get through?”

Questions & Discussion