(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps Major Challenges Technical Review Visit (TRV)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Southern Regional Education Board 1 Preparing Students for Success in High School.
Advertisements

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Stonewall Jackson Middle School Committed to Success Parental Involvement and Title I Parental Involvement and Title I Student Leadership Staff Development.
Central Union High School District Board of Trustees Meeting April 16, 2013.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
TRMS ACTION PLAN Goal #1 O Throughout the school year, core content teams will develop pedagogy and strategies to integrate Common.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT for teachers of English Language Learners.
HSTW Southern Regional Education Board Orientation to HSTW Goals and Key Practices.
Bluebonnet Elementary School Celebrations and Recommendations for Continuous School Improvement Round Rock Independent School District Module 7 Assignment.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
1 Mobile County Public School System 2008 Accountability Report September 18, 2008.
Getting More Students to Meet Standards: Research-based Practices That Work Southern Regional Education Board.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Ten Conditions that Result in Students Making Greater Effort to Succeed Gene Bottoms.
Suggested template for your FY10 HSTW/MMGW TAV Site Presentation Add or delete slides to best describe your site.
Hollywood High School Testing Data Results WASC Goals and Instructional Focus October 6, 2009.
Salt Creek School District 48 Annual ISBE School Report Card Board of Education Report October 30, 2012.
Data Folders/Binders List items you would like to include in your students’ data folders. We Believe Involving Students in Data And Goal Setting.
School Improvement, Title I and Focus Parent Meeting
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Raising Achievement and Improving Graduation Rates: How Nine HSTW Sites Are Doing It Gene Bottoms Southern Regional.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Welcome and Introductions H.O.B. – Helping Our students “BE” successful!
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 2010 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Lawrence Public Schools August 9, 2010.
Goal 1: To successfully educate all students Objective 3 Identify subgroups and content areas which contributed Identify subgroups and content areas which.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW HSTW/CSR High Schools Making the Greatest Gains in Achievement: What did they do differently? Gene Bottoms Senior.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Sandpiper Elementary School Mrs. Camille LaChance.
WE ARE Gaston County Schools Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bessemer City Primary 9/16/13 1:00 & 5:45.
90/90/90 Leadership Summit District Leadership Team
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM Haymon-Morris Middle School NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
MID-YEAR STAKEHOLDER’S ASSESSMENT REVIEW TWIN LAKES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY JANUARY 23, 2014.
Elbert County Middle School School Improvement Goals
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
Title I Annual Public Meeting 2015/16. Welcome Parents! Agenda Title I Program Overview Read to Achieve Updates Our Title I Plan for Our Intervention.
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Sonoraville Elementary School
Anderson Elementary School
Data Overview Sandtown Middle School
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Presentation transcript:

(High/Middle School) HSTW/MMGW Site Presentation ( Month Date, 2006) Promising Practices Next Steps Major Challenges Technical Review Visit (TRV)

Our School (Customize – example only)  We are a 7 th & 8 th Grade Middle School with just over 500 students  Sending Elementary Schools:  Receiving High Schools:  2006 School’s Performance Rating:  AYP Status:

Our Faculty/Staff (Customize – example only)  Administrators:  Faculty:  Staff/Aides/Paraprofessionals:  Counselors:  # Highly Qualified:  # Elementary/Middle School Certified:  # High School Certified:

STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS Key: (Customize) A=African American, W=White, Other=O, ED=Economically Disadvantaged, SN=Special Needs, ESL= English as Second Language GradeTotalFM Single Parent Homes A WOEDSNESL 7 8 NT Non- Tested Total # %

DAILY SCHEDULE (A/B) Key: HR = Home Room (Customize) Grade HR 7:50- 7:58 1 st 7:58- 8:48 2nd3rd4thHR 7 ELAMath 8 SN DSTP Extra Help

Closing the Achievement Gap AYP Proficiency Comparisons Overall School Spring ‘05Spring ‘06AYP Status Reading Math L.A. ’05 AYP Reading –% ’05 AYP Math –% ’06 AYP Reading –% ’06 AYP Math –% NCLB

Sub-Group Comparisons Overall School Spring ’05 Reading Spring ’06 Reading + or – AYP met For ‘06 Spring ’05 Math Spring ’06 Math + or – AYP met For ‘06 White78.9%88.6%+9.7 yes 80%82.6%+2.6 yes Hispanic52.8%62.5%+9.7 yes 58.2%64.4%+6.2 yes SWD6.5%28.5%+22 yes 22.2%23.8%+1.6 No Limited English Speaking 36%32.8%-3.2 No 46.6%41.7%-4.9 No Econ Dis.60.7%73.9%+13.2 yes 61.5%68.3%+6.8 yes

Closing the Achievement Gap 85 percent of students to perform at the basic level with increasing numbers performing at the proficient and advanced levels on the HSTW/MG Assessment 2006 HSTW/MG Assessment Results Compared to High Scoring Sites Meeting Goal 2006 Site 2006 High Scoring Site % Gap (-/+) 2008 HSTW/ MGA Goal 2006 % Gap (-/+) Reading Mathematics Science Source: 2006 HSTW/MG Assessment

Closing the Achievement Gap All students to perform at proficient on the OAT/OGT 2006 OAT/OGT Results Compared to State Goal (Customize) All Students African American WhiteStudents With Disabilities Economically Dis- advantage 06Gap +/- 06Gap +/- 06Gap +/- 06Gap +/- 06Gap +/- Reading Writing Math Science Citizenship/ Social Studies Source: 2006 Ohio State Report Cards Gap Calculations: +/- for each group compared to the state goal

Goal # 1 Rigorous Academics (Customize – Examples only) What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”  OAT/OGT scores are up. (School), for the past several years, has shown an increase in proficiency scores by overall school results.  Most content areas have district adopted guides and maps in place and share common assessments.

Goal # 1 Rigorous Academics (Customize – Examples only) What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps”  Require all teachers post objectives on the board and students write in their agendas. Quality student work is displayed.

Goal # 1 Rigorous Academics (Customize – Examples only) Why We Need to Address This Goal Data shows students not meeting state, federal and HSTW/MMGW standards. Have not eliminated the general track. Not teaching all students to rigorous academic standards. Not requiring reading and writing in all classes. Not requiring all 7 th graders to take pre-algebra and all 8 th graders Algebra I.

Goal #2 High Expectations/Extra Help (Customize – Examples only) What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”  Higher Expectations (Effort, Pride, Respect)  All parents are notified if students drop to a “D” or below.  Reduced Tardy Rate as a result of higher expectations & effective consequences (lunch detention).

Goal #2 High Expectations/Extra Help (Customize – Examples only) What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps”  Academic Assembly  Homework policy  Required in school extra help for students earning a D or F

Goal #2 High Expectations/Extra Help (Customize – Examples only) Why We Need to Address This Goal Low attendance Rate. High Promotion/Low Retentions of low performing students. No policy for revision of work until it meets standards. Homework policy is not enforced. Summer School Program is needed.

Goal #3 Active Student Engagement (Customize – Examples only) What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”  Most teachers are practicing on a regular basis best instructional practices.  Staff implements many hands-on activities that are thought provoking and promotes higher order thinking.

Goal #3 Active Student Engagement (Customize – Examples only) What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps”  Provide all staff with professional development on Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) to improve instruction.

Goal #3 Active Student Engagement (Customize – Examples only) Why We Need to Address This Goal Not using students’ strengths/challenges to plan instruction and curricular experiences. Not providing time for teachers to develop integrated projects with a written paper, oral presentation, product or service.

Goal #4 Guidance/Advisement (Customize – Examples only) What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”  Students lead parents during P/T Conferences.

Goal #4 Guidance/Advisement (Customize – Examples only) What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps”  Require all 8 th/ 9-12 th to develop a five- year plan and review it annually with advisors, teachers and parents.  Explore successful advisor/advisee programs at high performing HSTW/MMGW sites.

Goal #4 Guidance/Advisement (Customize – Examples only) Why We Need to Address This Goal No strategies in place to provide career exploration for all students. No requirement of a five-year plan early in the eighth grade year that includes parental involvement/annual review by students, parents and teachers in grades No structured adviser/advisee program. Low parent conference participation rates. Little evidence of open & frequent communication with parents.

Goal #5 Climate of Continuous Improvement (Customize – Examples only) What We Have Done: “Promising Practices”  All departments share and analyze data to guide instruction. (Friday Department Meetings)  Active Leadership Team

Goal #5 Climate of Continuous Improvement (Customize – Examples only) What We Plan to Do: “Next Steps”  Professional Development 1. Continued implementation of best instructional practices. 2. Introduce Differentiated Instruction 3. Implement Literacy Plan: Classroom strategies in vocabulary, word analysis & comprehension.

Goal #5 Climate of Continuous Improvement (Customize – Examples only) Why We Need to Address This Goal Not all staff are participating on school improvement focus teams. Inconsistent use or analysis of data by all staff to adjust instruction. Irregular monitoring of classroom instruction to observe and support ongoing improvements in teaching & learning.