Non-Discrimination Rules Under PPACA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented by Jaeger & Flynn Assoc., Inc.
Advertisements

Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) Presented by: Cafro Agency, LLC David L. Cafro, CIC (860) 779-DAVE.
Course # Cafeteria Plan Defined: Plan sponsored by the employer for the benefit of the employees which gives the employee a choice between pretax.
Dealing with 401k Testing Failures. DEALING WITH 401(k) TESTING FAILURES.
Massachusetts HC Reform November 29, The Context The problem of the “uninsured” and “underinsured” is perennial issue Clinton Health Security Act.
Section 401(k) Chapter 20 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it? qualified profit sharing.
Health Savings Accounts Update 2007! Presented by: Sharon Alt President Alt Benefit Consultants, Inc. Fort Worth, TX
William E. Hardy, CPA Principal
Effectively Manage PPACA Compliance ©PrimePay LLC. All Rights Reserved 1.
PPACA IMPACT ON MEMBER INSTITUTIONS Why would you be Confused?
Retirement Savings and Deferred Compensation
Welcome To Consumer Driven Health Care aka Individual Health Savings Accounts P.L. No , section 223.
Continuing Education - Presented by Susan P. Luskin, FLMI, CLU, CEBS, RHU.
1 Health Care Reform Health Care Reform Overview On March 23, 2010 President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The law.
2014 Update of Affordable Care Act Provisions for Large Employers South Dakota Association of School Business Officials Annual Fall Conference September.
NONDISCRIMINATION TESTING AND PLAN DESIGN Presented by: Suzanne Chouljian Assistant Vice President, Compliance Pentegra Retirement Services February, 2011.
Affordable Care Act (ACA)
Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) Chapter 48 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 What is it?
Health Reimbursement Arrangement Chapter 54 Tools & Techniques of Estate Planning Copyright 2011, The National Underwriter Company1 An HRA is an arrangement.
What Employers are at Risk ?.  Employers that meet the definition of “an applicable large employer.”
©2015, College for Financial Planning, all rights reserved. Session 8 SIMPLEs and SEPs CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER CERTIFICATION PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION.
1 Health Benefits Under COBRA Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration.
Fringe Benefit Plans and the PPACA Tax Savings for the Small Business Owner.
Nondiscrimination Testing Rules for Health Plans WASBO Accounting Seminar March 20, 2013 March 21, 2012 Speakers: Matthew J. Flanary Linda R. Mont.
Plan for Today Class Presentations Other Group Insurance Life Disability Cafeteria Plans A Few Words about Grading Course Evaluation.
Changes for 2010 Premium increase for HMO - Blue Choice and CIGNA Opportunity to increase Optional Life level New Optional Life Provider Health Savings.
Affordable Care Act (ACA) Updates and Strategies What Employers Need to Know for 2015 and Beyond June 3, 2014.
Stratfor Medical Plan Review Plan Year
Basics of Health Care Reform Introduction (IF) Plan Requirements Grandfathered Plans and Non-Discrimination New Taxes and Credits Employer Mandate Employer.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 13 Retirement Savings and Deferred Compensation.
Understanding Measurement & Stability Periods. Benefits Brokerage established in 2005 Considered one of the fastest growing insurance brokerages nationwide.
Affordable Care Act: Compliance Issues for West Virginia Boards of Education ASBO May 14, 2014 Jill E. Hall, Esquire Bowles Rice LLP 600 Quarrier Street.
An Overview of HSAs Presented by: Barry Hill Director - Sales & Marketing MMIC Agency, Inc. North Carolina Medical Society Employee Benefit Plan.
Group-Term Life Insurance Chapter 41 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 Life insurance provided to.
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Long-Term Care Tax Issues LC2439 4/02 FOR PRODUCER USER ONLY.
Responding Strategically to The Patient Protection And Affordable Health Care Act.
1 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Cheri D. Green This Presentation is not designed or intended to provide legal or professional.
ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATORS OF ALABAMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY , 2015 PERDIDO BEACH RESORT Revisiting the Affordable Care Act.
Non-Discrimination Rules in a Post-PPACA World October 19, 2011 Stacy H. Barrow © 2011 Proskauer. All Rights.
MINNESOTA HEALTH ACTION GROUP: 6 TH ANNUAL EMPLOYER LEADERSHIP SUMMIT ON RAMPS OR EXIT RAMPS? RAMPING UP FOR YOUR 2014 HEALTH CARE STRATEGIES February.
Flexible Benefit Service Corporation 888-FLEX1ST HSA 2008 Round-Up Presented by: Mark Lam, CFCI.
ESB From Health Care Reform This is only a brief summary that reflects our current understanding of select provisions of the law, often in.
Legal Issues Regarding Section 125 Plans Patricia A. Butler, JD, DrPH SCI/NASHP/NGA Cafeteria Plan Meeting, Denver, July18, 2008.
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT (FSA) What is an FSA? Lets find out!
Retirement Savings and Deferred Compensation
1 Implementing Health Care Reform in the Workplace Nancy E. Taylor Greenberg Traurig April 27, 2010.
WELLNESS: Buying Your Way to Good Health June 10, 2008 James R. Griffin Jackson Walker L.L.P. 901 Main Street, Suite 6000 Dallas, Texas
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.
Copyright © 2007, The American College. All rights reserved. Used with permission. Planning for Retirement Needs Coverage, Eligibility, and Participation.
Lecture 18 Cafeteria Plans
Top Ten Steps To Prepare For Health Care Reform 1)Health Coverage- Make sure you are providing group health coverage to your employees, either directly.
Health Care Reform: Are You Ready for 2011? November 11, 2010.
June 16, Rules Governing Mid-Year Cafeteria Plan Election Changes Stacy H. Barrow, Esq. Proskauer Rose LLP June.
Affordable Care Act Reporting Requirements for Applicable Large Employers Andrew W. Johnson Director of Compliance.
Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions and Information Returns for Tax Year 2015 Main Line Association for Continuing Education Penn State Great Valley.
Group Insurance  Characteristics  Provides insurance for a group  Typically 10 or more employees  Under master contract between the insurer.
1 Affordable Care Act Update September Agenda  Counting hours refresher  IRS reporting  Penalties  1411 certifications  Questions.
© 2013 Sapers & Wallack, Inc. All rights reserved. sapers-wallack.com Tel: ACA: "Cliffs Notes" for the Busy Employer How do you meet the compliance.
Cadillac Tax.  Added to the Internal Review Code (IRC) by the Affordable Care Act (ACA)  Imposes a 40% excise tax on any “excess” health benefit provided.
Workshop 33: New Comparability Plans in 2015 Presented by Lawrence Deutsch, FSPA, MAAA, EA.
Qualified Plans: General Rules for Qualification Chapter 7 Employee Benefit & Retirement Planning Copyright 2009, The National Underwriter Company1 Qualification.
CAMPBELL COUNTY EMPLOYEES BENEFIT PLAN Status Update September 2014.
Implications for School Systems.  Employer Mandate ◦ Schools systems with 50 or more employees will be required to provide insurance to all full-time.
Affordable Health Care: Impact and Implementation April 21, 2015 Lotta Crabtree, Deputy Executive Administrator.
Retirement Services University 401(K) Testing Review David Hiss The Ritz-Carlton, Bachelor Gulch, Colorado September 17-19, 2003.
Employer Reporting June 2015.
Overview of Nondiscrimination Testing for 401(k) Plans
Nondiscrimination Rules & Creative Plan Design
Plan Qualification Requirements
Qualification Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Non-Discrimination Rules Under PPACA September 2010 Stacy H. Barrow sbarrow@proskauer.com 617.526.9648 September 2010 © Proskauer 20436365

Today’s agenda Brief Overview of PPACA Grandfather Rules Discussion about Code Section 105(h) application to fully insured plans under PPACA Review of Cafeteria Plan nondiscrimination rules Review of Group Term Life Insurance nondiscrimination rules Discussion of “Simple” Cafeteria Plans under PPACA Note: Materials are up-to-date as of September 15, 2010

What are “grandfathered” health plans? If a plan/benefit option is grandfathered, there are certain mandates that do not apply to it But grandfathered status is NOT a free pass. Many requirements, including many of those that are “in the press” still apply! Grandfathering does not apply to all of health reform – the employer play-or-pay mandate and other revenue-raising provisions apply regardless of grandfathered status

How do we know if a plan is grandfathered? To be grandfathered, plan must have enrolled individuals continuously since March 23, 2010 Do not have to be the same individuals Plan may add new employees (newly hired or newly enrolled) and retain grandfathered status

How long does grandfathered status last? Changes that terminate grandfathered status : Switching carriers Elimination of benefits (includes the elimination of necessary element to diagnose or treat a condition) Any increase to coinsurance percentage Example: Grandfathered health plan has a coinsurance requirement of 20% for inpatient surgery. Plan amended to increase the coinsurance requirement to 25%. Increase in percentage causes loss of grandfathered status Increase to copayment, deductible, or out-of-pocket maximum If increase is to a deductible or out-of-pocket maximum, cannot exceed medical inflation plus 15 percentage points If increase is to a copayment, cannot exceed greater of Medical inflation plus 15 percentage points or Medical inflation plus $5 (e.g., $5 + ($5 × medical inflation))

How long does grandfathered status last? Decrease in employer’s contribution rate A decrease of more than 5% below the contribution rate that was in effect on March 23, 2010 will end grandfather status Measured based on each “tier” of coverage (e.g., self-only, family) Determine contribution rate based on applicable COBRA premium (without the 2% surcharge) Changes to overall annual dollar limit Addition of a new overall annual limit on the dollar value of benefits will end grandfather status Decrease in an existing annual limit will end grandfather status Change a lifetime limit to an annual limit will end grandfather status if the annual limit is lower than the lifetime limit

How long does grandfathered status last? Changes made in disregard of anti-abuse rules Merger/acquisition: Grandfathered status lost if the principal purpose of a transaction is to cover new individuals under a grandfathered plan Employee transfer: Grandfathered status lost, if employees are transferred from a grandfathered plan; the “change” to transferor plan (if made as an amendment) would have caused a loss of grandfathered status; and there was no bona fide employment-based reason for the transfer (an employer’s concerns over cost of coverage is not considered an employment-based reason)

Documenting grandfathered status Must provide notice in all plan materials that plan “believes” it is grandfathered Must explain what grandfathering means and that it can be lost Regulations include model notice Must maintain records documenting plan grandfathered status Must make records available upon request

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) Applies later of (i) first plan year beginning on or after September 23, 2010 or (ii) when plan loses its grandfathered status Already applies to self-funded plans For insured plans, however, the penalty is $100/day with respect to each individual to whom the failure relates, not taxation of benefit payment, capped at the lesser of 10% of premium costs in the prior year or $500,000

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) Under Code §105(h): a plan cannot discriminate in favor of highly compensated individuals (“HCEs”) as to eligibility to participate (referred to as the “Eligibility Test”); and the benefits provided under the plan cannot discriminate in favor of participants who are HCEs (referred to as the “Benefits Test”) An individual is an HCE if he or she is: One of the five highest paid officers; A shareholder who owns more than 10 percent of the employer’s stock; or Among the highest paid 25 percent of all employees (other than excludable employees who do not participate in any plan sponsored by the employer) Assessment of HCE and Testing Performed on a Controlled Group Basis Look for subsidiaries, brother-sister controlled group, affiliated service groups Note: Don’t believe the myth—separate EIN is meaningless 10 10

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) ELIGIBILITY TEST Three alternative tests: the 70% test; the 70%/80% test; or a nondiscriminatory reasonable classification test For testing, employers may exclude employees who: Have less than three years of service; Are under age 25; Are “part-time” or “seasonal employees”; and Belong to a union or who are nonresident aliens Note: Part-time employees for this purpose are those whose customary weekly employment is less than 35 hours, if other employees have substantially more hours; provided, however, that any employee whose customary weekly employment is less than 25 hours may be considered as a part-time employee. 11 11

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) ELIGIBILITY TEST The 70% test: The plan benefits 70% or more of all non-excludable employees e.g., 100 non-excludable employees, at least 70 must be covered The 70%/80% test: The plan “benefits” 80% or more of all non-excludable employees who are eligible to benefit under the plan and 70% or more of all non-excludable employees are eligible to benefit under the plan e.g., 100 non-excludable employees, at least 70 must be eligible for coverage and at least 80% of those employees (56) are covered Reasonable Classification test: The plan benefits a classification of employees set up by the employer which is found by the Internal Revenue Service not to be discriminatory in favor of HCEs In general, made based upon the facts and circumstances of each case, applying the same standards as are applied under section 410(b)(1)(B) 12 12

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) Example Employer sponsors a self-insured HMO in which its rank and file participate Employer establishes an executive-only fully insured plan which is a POS plan and in which only the executives of the Company may participate There are 100 employees; only 10 executives are eligible to participate Result: Once executive plan loses its grandfathered status, this arrangement will fail the Eligibility Test, as only 10% of the workforce is eligible to participate. Penalty of $100 per day will apply 13 13

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) BENEFITS TEST All benefits provided to any one HCE are provided to all non-HCES on the same basis; and The plan must also not discriminate in favor of HCEs in actual operation Essentially, if any benefit is provided to an HCE that any non-HCEs do not receive, the plan will fail the benefits test Myth Buster: Benefits are not only those benefits included in the plan—IRS has ruled that benefits include any premium contribution that is greater for HCEs, shorter waiting periods, longer COBRA, etc. are all benefits 14 14

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) BENEFITS TEST Example: If an employer pays a greater percentage of premium for any of its HCEs than for all of its non-HCEs, the plan will fail the Benefits Test Similarly, if an employer extends the post-termination COBRA or other coverage for an HCE and does not provide the same extension to all non-HCEs, the plan will fail this test 15 15

Nondiscrimination for Insured Plans Determined Under IRC 105(h) Observations Are executive insurance products dead? Under 50 exclusion from penalty Potential work arounds for other practices 16 16

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans The proposed cafeteria plan regulations released in 2007 reinforce that nondiscrimination testing must be performed annually for all cafeteria plans. Testing must be performed as of the last day of the plan year and must take into account all non-excludable employees (and former employees) who were employed on any day during the plan year. 17 17

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans There are three cafeteria plan nondiscrimination tests 1. Key Employee Test If a plan provides nontaxable benefits to key employees (as defined under Code section 416(i)(1)) in excess of 25% of the aggregate nontaxable benefits provided to all employees through the cafeteria plan, key employees will be taxed on the amounts that have been deducted from their pay on a pre-tax basis 18 18

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans There are three cafeteria plan nondiscrimination tests 2. Eligibility Test A cafeteria plan must not discriminate in favor of HCEs as to eligibility to participate. An HCE is any employee who, for the prior year (or current year if a new employee) is an officer, 5% shareholder, or an employee who received compensation greater than $110,000 in 2010 (indexed for inflation) and is among the top 20 % of the employees ranked by compensation. Note: This is a different definition of HCE than is used for purposes of 105(h) 19 19

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans There are three cafeteria plan nondiscrimination tests 3. Contributions and Benefits Test A cafeteria plan must not discriminate in favor of HCEs as to contributions and benefits. This means that a plan must: give each similarly situated participant a uniform opportunity to elect qualified benefits, and the actual election of qualified benefits through the plan must not be disproportionate by HCEs; and give each similarly situated participant a uniform election with respect to employer contributions, and the actual election with respect to employer contributions for qualified benefits through the plan must not be disproportionate by HCEs 20 20

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans Nondiscrimination in Actual Operation In addition to not discriminating as to either benefit availability or utilization, a cafeteria plan cannot discriminate in favor of HCEs in actual operation For example, a particular nontaxable benefit offered through the plan for a period during which only HCEs would utilize the plan or benefit 21 21

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans “Safe Harbor” for Cafeteria Plans providing health benefits A safe harbor test is available for plans that provide health benefits (excluding health care FSA coverage) The safe harbor from the contribution and benefits test exists if contributions for each participant include an amount that either: equals 100% of the cost of the benefits selected by the majority of similarly situated HCEs; or is at least 75% of the cost of the highest cost benefits selected by any similarly situated participants Note that any contributions above the safe harbor must be proportionate to participants’ compensation 22 22

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans “Safe Harbor” for premium-only plans A cafeteria plan that offers the same benefits at the same cost to all HCEs and non-HCEs is deemed to meet the nondiscrimination requirements This safe harbor is not available for plans offering a health care FSA 23 23

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans Anti-abuse rule for cafeteria plan nondiscrimination testing A plan will not be treated as satisfying the applicable nondiscrimination requirements if there are repeated changes to testing procedures or plan provisions that have the effect of manipulating the nondiscrimination testing requirements “if a principal purpose of the changes was to achieve this result” 24 24

Nondiscrimination Rules for Group Term Life Insurance Plans Nondiscrimination for Group Term Life (GTL) Plans If employer-provided group term life insurance is discriminatory, key employees lose the exclusion from income for the first $50,000 of coverage. Additionally, the key employees’ coverage will be taxed at the greater of the “table value” (i.e., the value determined using the Table I rates) or the actual cost 25 25

Nondiscrimination Rules for Group Term Life Insurance Plans Group Term Life Insurance Eligibility Test Employer-provided group term life insurance cannot discriminate in favor of key employees as to eligibility to participate. This test is passed by meeting one of four alternative tests: the Cafeteria Plan Piggyback Test; the 70% Test; the 85% Test; or the Reasonable Classification Test 26 26

Nondiscrimination Rules for Group Term Life Insurance Plans Group Term Life Insurance Eligibility Test 1. the Cafeteria Plan Piggyback Test A group term life insurance plan does not discriminate as to eligibility if it is part of a cafeteria plan that meets the requirements of Code §125 This provision simplifies nondiscrimination testing for employers that offer group term life insurance coverage through their cafeteria plans, because only one eligibility test (the cafeteria plan eligibility test) must be run 27 27

Nondiscrimination Rules for Group Term Life Insurance Plans Group Term Life Insurance Eligibility Test 2. the 70% Test A group term life insurance plan does not discriminate as to eligibility if the plan benefits 70% or more of all employees of the employer, including employees of controlled group members and leased employees 28 28

Nondiscrimination Rules for Group Term Life Insurance Plans Group Term Life Insurance Eligibility Test 3. the 85% Test A group term life insurance plan does not discriminate as to eligibility if at least 85% of all employees who are participants under the plan are non-key employees. There is some data collection involved in this test, and a mathematical comparison between the number of key employees and non-key employees participating is required, but this is a relatively simple test to run 29 29

Nondiscrimination Rules for Group Term Life Insurance Plans Group Term Life Insurance Eligibility Test 4. the Reasonable Classification Test A group term life insurance plan does not discriminate as to eligibility if it benefits a classification of employees set up by the employer which is found by the Internal Revenue Service not to be discriminatory in favor of HCEs 30 30

“Simple” Cafeteria Plans under PPACA Effective January 1, 2011, PPACA provides eligible small employers with a safe harbor from the nondiscrimination requirements for cafeteria plans, group term life insurance, and health care and dependent care FSAs Under the safe harbor, the plan will be treated as meeting the specified nondiscrimination requirements if the cafeteria plan satisfies minimum eligibility and participation requirements and minimum contribution requirements 31 31

“Simple” Cafeteria Plans under PPACA Simple Cafeteria Plans – Eligible Employer An eligible employer is an employer who employed an average of 100 or fewer employees on business days during either of the two preceding years. If an employer was an eligible employer for any given year, then the employer remains an eligible employer until the employer employs an average of 200 or more employees during any year preceding any such subsequent year. Tax-controlled group rules apply 32 32

“Simple” Cafeteria Plans under PPACA Simple Cafeteria Plans – Eligibility Requirement The eligibility requirement is met only if all employees (other than excludable employees) are eligible to participate, and each employee eligible to participate can elect any benefit available under the plan Excludable employees for purposes of a simple cafeteria plan are those who: have not attained age 21 before the end of the plan year; have fewer than 1,000 hours of service in the preceding year; have not completed one year of service as of any day during the plan year; or are covered under a CBA or are nonresident aliens 33 33

“Simple” Cafeteria Plans under PPACA Simple Cafeteria Plans – Minimum Contribution The minimum contribution requirement is met if the employer provides a minimum contribution for each non-HCE in addition to any salary reduction contributions made by the employee The minimum must be able to be applied toward the cost of any qualified benefit (other than a taxable benefit) offered under the plan The contribution must be equal to: A uniform percentage (not less than 2%) of the employee’s compensation for the plan year, or An amount which is not less than the lesser of: 6% of the employee’s compensation for the year, or 2x the amount of employees’ salary reductions 34 34

Questions? September 2010 Stacy H. Barrow sbarrow@proskauer.com 617.526.9704