Lawful Engineering Legal Responsibilities of Engineers in the State of Texas Seamus Stegenga
Overview Introduction Criminal Law Tort Law Conclusion References Questions Seamus Stegenga
Introduction Two sources of law relevant to engineering: Criminal Law Tort Law Both vary from state to state Tort law is similar in every state except Louisiana This will only cover concept related to engineering List concepts, then discuss relevance
Criminal Law: Negligence Criminal Negligence Texas Penal Code § 6.03(d) Engage in “conduct when he ought to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk” Class C Misdemeanor (first offense) State jail felony (following offenses)
Criminal Law: TDTPA Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act Texas Business and Commerce Code § Engage in “false, misleading, or deceptive acts or practices” Class C Misdemeanor Up to $20,000 fine per offense Causes civil suits to be awarded treble damages
Criminal Law: TEPA Texas Engineering Practices Act Texas Occupations Code § 1001 “engage in the practice of engineering [without] a license” Class A Misdemeanor Restraining order for 30 days Up to $3,000 fine per day Numerous exceptions exist which limit the applicability of this law
Criminal Law: Summary Criminal law has a focus on honesty Penalties can include fines, injunctions, and jail time Applicable only in extreme circumstances Even TEPA is not typically applied to engineers Only around 20% of degreed engineers go on to get their license
Tort Law: Contracts Most contractual obligations are governed by the UCC Contracts can be used to waive rights, so contracts take precedence over other areas of tort law Contracts that require a party to break criminal law are void
Tort Law: Negligence Three conditions are required A duty exists The duty is breached The breach causes damage Engineers have several duties Act in good faith Ensure customer is reasonably informed Use good professional judgement
Tort Law: Premises liability Special type of negligence A person can be sued for failing to protect persons from dangers on their property Property caretaker is liable for dangers that that they knew or should have known about Engineers are expected to have greater-than-average knowledge of structural, mechanical, and chemical dangers
Tort Law: Warranties Warranty of merchantability Goods conform to an ordinary buyer’s expectations Warranty of fitness for a particular purpose Goods are fit for the purpose for which they are sold, only applies if seller helped the buyer select the goods Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code states that products must be made as safely as feasibly possible
Tort Law: Summary Tort law focuses on competence Penalties can include fines and injunctions Applicable whenever a product/property causes damages Even if lawsuit fails, you may be left with expensive lawyer bills Best to error on side of caution
Conclusion Engineers must Act in good faith Inform customer of risks Be licensed if offering services to public Honor contractual obligations Their products must Be as safe as feasibly possible Accomplish their intended purpose
References Cornell University Law School: Legal Information Institute. Duty of Care. n.d. Web. 19 March Holub, Cynthia. Theories of Liability Against Design Professionals. 20 February March Laird, Steven. "A Quick Cruise Through Personal Injury Causes of Action in Texas." 20 February Law Offices of Steven C. Laird. Web. 19 March Musselman, Craig. The 80% Myth in the Engineering Profession. 13 September Web. 19 March Texas BCC, Texas Legislative Council. "Business and Commerce Code." 1 September Texas Constitution and Statutes. Web. 19 March Texas CPRC, Texas Legislative Council. "Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code." 1 September Texas Constitution and Statutes. Web. 20 March Texas TEPA, Texas Legislative Council. "The Texas Engineering Practice Act." 28 June Texas Constitution and Statutes. Web. 19 March 2015.
ALSO This presentation is available at people.tamu.edu/~seamus
Questions ?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?