Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona [ Georgia Power – DoD Partnership ] [Track Title][Session Title] [Jim Holton] [Georgia Power Company] [August.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Advertisements

Adapting to a Changing Energy Environment Russ Girling, President and CEO, TransCanada Corporation May 15, 2012 STRIKING A BALANCE IN THE MIDST OF CHANGE.
Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International.
Template Theme Colors Secondary + Chart Colors
1 Transformation Presentation to the Public Sector Management Workshop June 1,
Fuel Cell Forum-12 March 2007 Considerations on the purpose, feasibility, and design of incentives for Alternative Energy adoption.
2011 ADC WINTER FORUM | PAGE 1 Developing Renewable Energy Projects on DoD Land Mr. Alan D. King Assistant Secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy.
E&CS Overview & Major Construction Update Eddie Clayton.
Power ”Today’s Vision & Tomorrows Reality” Ed Day EVP - Engineering & Construction Southern Company Generation Ed Day EVP - Engineering & Construction.
Identification of needed competences Socio-economic development in the era of renewable energies: Towards the creation of a research institution for the.
South Boston Energy Project South Boston, VA
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Unlocking value from existing utility assets NARUC Meeting – February 2012
Structure and Financing For Change Princeton, NJ November 6, 2009 Lee Davis Vice President, Development.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Jeff Delmon FEU Financial Solutions World Bank. Why PPP? Procurement efficiency Lifecycle management Design/construction/operation management Monetizing.
Georgia Power and Energy Planning Julie Paul Environmental Affairs Georgia Power Company January 14, 2013.
1 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulation Gocha Shonia Department of Methodology and informational provision.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A BIOMASS-TO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY IN CALIFORNIA Pat Perez- Energy Commission May 8, rd Symposium on Biotechnology for.
Corporate Overview September Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (the "Company") makes forward-looking statements in this.
Resource Planning Georgia Power’s Diverse Plan to Meet Georgia’s Energy Needs AWMA Fall 2010 Conference October 7, 2010 Jeff Burleson Director of Resource.
Grattan Institute / MEI Energy Futures Event Dr Fiona Wild Vice President, Environment and Climate Change 5 March 2015 Newman, Iron Ore.
Name Paul Kobyra Location Norwalk, CT Insurance Market Report - 2nd Quarter 2003.
Oregon Renewable Energy Action Plan April 2005 with Geothermal Energy highlights by Carel DeWinkel Senior Policy Analyst.
Eagle Crest Energy Company February Page 2 New Hydro: Making it Happen Background on the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Need for Eagle.
GE Energy Financial Services Policy Options Shaping Private Investments in Clean Tech Kevin Walsh Managing Director, Power & Renewables May 1, 2009.
Gas Market Dynamics – The Ups and Downs March 11, 2009.
RENEWABLE ENERY & BIOMASS COGENERATION TRAINING – KENYA BY LEWIS B. MHANGO.
CALPINE July 22, 2003 Wyoming Pipeline Authority Calpine Corporation KEY ISSUES FOR NATURAL GAS AND POWER COLIN COE DIRECTOR, FUELS.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project April 23, 2012.
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
Coal as a Future Generation Fuel Chris M. Hobson S enior Vice President and Chief Environmental Officer December 3, 2009.
Liberalization of Electricity Market in Taiwan Su, Jin-sheng Energy Commission Ministry of Economic Affairs August 8, 2001.
Indiana’s “NowGen” 630 MW IGCC Plant On-line the Summer 2012 Chairman David Lott Hardy.
Sec. 5 RE-REGULATION- EPAct 1992 FERC Orders 888 and 889 (1996) EPAct 2005 In short these three laws move the power industry towards an increase in competition.
Michael R. Walker Research Director IGCC Financing Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University PH: , FX:
Introducing the Atlantic City Alternative Energy Authority ACAEA A Municipal Utilities Authority Pursuant to NJSA 40:62-12.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ANDREA L. KINCAID DLA Energy Track 5 Project FinanceSession 6 Renewables Through Private Financing.
RDL Utility Based Financial Incentives for Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency in New Zealand EGNRET Workshop Honolulu, Hawaii, USA 30 March – 1 April,
Robert McFarlane EVP & Chief Financial Officer January 7, 2009 Citigroup Annual Global Entertainment, Media and Telecommunications Conference.
New York City DTP/ Q1.ppt 05/04/07 1 Earnings Release 1st Quarter — 2007 Weyerhaeuser Company May 4, 2007 Earnings Release 1st Quarter — 2007.
New Nuclear Generation Ellen Ruff President, Duke Energy Carolinas.
Seattle Investor Meeting February 26, PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE These presentation materials.
FPL Rate Stipulation and Settlement August 25, 2005.
TELUS forward looking statements This session and answers to questions contains forward-looking statements that require assumptions about expected future.
Vogtle Nuclear Plant Update Moderator: Honorable Greg White, Michigan Panelists: Honorable Lauren “Bubba” McDonald, Georgia Public Service Commission Buzz.
Acquisition of Point Beach Nuclear Plant December 20, 2006.
2011 Annual Meeting. Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933.
The New York State Benefit Cost Analysis in the Reforming the Energy Vision Proceeding (Case 14-M-0101) Kevin M. Bronner, Ph.D. University at Albany Nelson.
Florida PSC Storm Cost Recovery Decision May 17, 2006.
Overview November Safe Harbor Statement ♦Some of the statements included herein may include forward-looking statements which reflect our current.
BB&T Capital Markets 10 th Annual Commercial & Industrial Investor Conference March 23, 2016.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Energy and Environmental Policy Renewable Energy: Wind Presented by: Adam Smith Damien Hammond Veera Kondapi Jeff Gruppo.
WHAT ROLE DOES THE GOVERNMENT PLAY???. WHAT DOES THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDE FOR IN A MARKET ECONOMY? The government provides goods and services such as military.
Japanese Electricity Market M. Hossein Javidi Iran Electricity Market Regulatory Organization & Administrative Department for Electricity Market Regulatory.
DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GLOBAL COMMERCE August 27, 2014.
1 The Power of Dividend Growth DISCLOSURE This information has been provided by RBC Global Asset Management Inc. (RBC GAM) and is for informational.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
First Quarter Fiscal Year 2009 Financial Results December 19, 2008
2nd Quarter 2016 Earnings Call
4th Quarter 2016 Earnings Call
Infosys Investor Relations © Infosys Technologies Limited
Fiscal 3Q’13 Earnings Presentation
Arizona Public Service Company 2012 Renewable Energy Standard Implementation Plan Arizona Corporation Commission Open Meeting August 17, 2011.
Wind Development & Policy Options
UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT AND ASSESSING THE RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT Topic 5.
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Presentation transcript:

Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona [ Georgia Power – DoD Partnership ] [Track Title][Session Title] [Jim Holton] [Georgia Power Company] [August 12, 2015]

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Forward-Looking Statement Disclosure Certain information contained in this presentation is forward‐looking information based on current expectations and plans that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward‐looking information includes, among other things, statements concerning cost and schedule for completion of ongoing construction projects, the economy, sales growth and customer growth. Southern Company cautions that there are certain factors that can cause actual results to differ materially from the forward‐looking information that has been provided. The reader is cautioned not to put undue reliance on this forward‐looking information, which is not a guarantee of future performance and is subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Southern Company; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such suggested results will be realized. The following factors, in addition to those discussed in Southern Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‐K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and subsequent securities filings, could cause actual results to differ materially from management expectations as suggested by such forward‐looking information: the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding deregulation and restructuring of the electric utility industry, environmental laws including regulation of water, coal combustion residuals, and emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, soot, particulate matter, hazardous air pollutants, including mercury, and other substances, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations; current and future litigation, regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries, including pending Environmental Protection Agency civil actions against certain Southern Company subsidiaries, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission matters, and Internal Revenue Service and state tax audits; the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which Southern Company’s subsidiaries operate; variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy and recovery from the last recession, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self‐generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions; available sources and costs of fuels; effects of inflation; ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of facilities, which include the development and construction of generating facilities with designs that have not been finalized or previously constructed, including changes in labor costs and productivity factors, adverse weather conditions, shortages and inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor, contractor or supplier delay, non‐performance under construction or other agreements, operational performance, operational readiness, including specialized operator training, unforeseen engineering or design problems, delays associated with start‐up activities (including major equipment failure and system integration), and/or operations; ability to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses, to satisfy any operational and environmental performance standards, including any Public Service Commission (“PSC”) requirements and the requirements of tax credits and other incentives, and to integrate facilities into the Southern Company system upon completion of construction; investment performance of Southern Company’s employee and retiree benefit plans and the Southern Company system’s nuclear decommissioning trust funds; advances in technology; state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms; legal proceedings and regulatory approvals and actions related to the Plant Vogtle expansion, including Georgia PSC approvals and Nuclear Regulatory Commission actions and related legal proceedings involving the commercial parties; actions related to cost recovery for the Kemper County IGCC project.; the ability of counterparties of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to make payments as and when due and to perform as required; the ability to obtain new short‐ and long‐term contracts with wholesale customers; the direct or indirect effect on the Southern Company system’s business resulting from terrorist incidents and the threat of terrorist incidents, including cyber intrusion; interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts, including Southern Company’s and its subsidiaries’ credit ratings; the impacts of any potential U.S. credit rating downgrade or other sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general, as well as potential impacts on the benefits of the U.S. Department of Energy loan guarantees; the ability of Southern Company’s subsidiaries to obtain additional generating capacity at competitive prices; catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, hurricanes, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences; the direct or indirect effects on the Southern Company system’s business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or operation of generating resources; and the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard setting bodies. Southern Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward‐looking information. 2 Certain information contained in this article is forward‐looking information based on current expectations and plans that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward‐looking information includes, among other things, statements concerning cost and schedule for completion of ongoing construction projects, the economy, sales growth and customer growth. Southern Company cautions that there are certain factors that can cause actual results to differ materially from the forward‐looking information that has been provided. The reader is cautioned not to put undue reliance on this forward‐looking information, which is not a guarantee of future performance and is subject to a number of uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Southern Company; accordingly, there can be no assurance that such suggested results will be realized. The following factors, in addition to those discussed in Southern Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‐K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and subsequent securities filings, could cause actual results to differ materially from management expectations as suggested by such forward‐looking information: the impact of recent and future federal and state regulatory changes, including legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding deregulation and restructuring of the electric utility industry, environmental laws including regulation of water, coal combustion residuals, and emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, soot, particulate matter, hazardous air pollutants, including mercury, and other substances, and also changes in tax and other laws and regulations to which Southern Company and its subsidiaries are subject, as well as changes in application of existing laws and regulations; current and future litigation, regulatory investigations, proceedings, or inquiries, including pending Environmental Protection Agency civil actions against certain Southern Company subsidiaries, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission matters, and Internal Revenue Service and state tax audits; the effects, extent, and timing of the entry of additional competition in the markets in which Southern Company’s subsidiaries operate; variations in demand for electricity, including those relating to weather, the general economy and recovery from the last recession, population and business growth (and declines), the effects of energy conservation measures, including from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources such as self‐generation and distributed generation technologies, and any potential economic impacts resulting from federal fiscal decisions; available sources and costs of fuels; effects of inflation; ability to control costs and avoid cost overruns during the development and construction of facilities, which include the development and construction of generating facilities with designs that have not been finalized or previously constructed, including changes in labor costs and productivity factors, adverse weather conditions, shortages and inconsistent quality of equipment, materials, and labor, contractor or supplier delay, non‐performance under construction or other agreements, operational performance, operational readiness, including specialized operator training, unforeseen engineering or design problems, delays associated with start‐up activities (including major equipment failure and system integration), and/or operations; ability to construct facilities in accordance with the requirements of permits and licenses, to satisfy any operational and environmental performance standards, including any Public Service Commission (“PSC”) requirements and the requirements of tax credits and other incentives, and to integrate facilities into the Southern Company system upon completion of construction; investment performance of Southern Company’s employee and retiree benefit plans and the Southern Company system’s nuclear decommissioning trust funds; advances in technology; state and federal rate regulations and the impact of pending and future rate cases and negotiations, including rate actions relating to fuel and other cost recovery mechanisms; legal proceedings and regulatory approvals and actions related to the Plant Vogtle expansion, including Georgia PSC approvals and Nuclear Regulatory Commission actions and related legal proceedings involving the commercial parties; actions related to cost recovery for the Kemper County IGCC project, including actions relating to any proposed securitization, Mississippi PSC approval of Mississippi Power Company’s proposed rate recovery plan, as ultimately amended, which currently includes the ability to complete the proposed sale of an interest in the Kemper County IGCC project to South Mississippi Electric Power Association, the ability to utilize bonus depreciation, which currently requires that assets be placed in service in 2014, and satisfaction of requirements to utilize investment tax credits and grants; Mississippi PSC review of the prudence of Kemper County IGCC project costs; the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings regarding any settlement agreement between Mississippi Power Company and the Mississippi PSC, the March 2013 rate order approving retail rate increases consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement, or the State of Mississippi legislation designed to enhance the Mississippi PSC’s authority to facilitate development and construction of baseload generation in the State of Mississippi; the inherent risks involved in operating and constructing nuclear generating facilities, including environmental, health, regulatory, natural disaster, terrorism, and financial risks; the performance of projects undertaken by the non‐utility businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities; internal restructuring or other restructuring options that may be pursued; potential business strategies, including acquisitions or dispositions of assets or businesses, which cannot be assured to be completed or beneficial to Southern Company or its subsidiaries; the ability of counterparties of Southern Company and its subsidiaries to make payments as and when due and to perform as required; the ability to obtain new short‐ and long‐term contracts with wholesale customers; the direct or indirect effect on the Southern Company system’s business resulting from terrorist incidents and the threat of terrorist incidents, including cyber intrusion; interest rate fluctuations and financial market conditions and the results of financing efforts, including Southern Company’s and its subsidiaries’ credit ratings; the impacts of any potential U.S. credit rating downgrade or other sovereign financial issues, including impacts on interest rates, access to capital markets, impacts on currency exchange rates, counterparty performance, and the economy in general, as well as potential impacts on the benefits of the U.S. Department of Energy loan guarantees; the ability of Southern Company’s subsidiaries to obtain additional generating capacity at competitive prices; catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, explosions, floods, hurricanes, droughts, pandemic health events such as influenzas, or other similar occurrences; the direct or indirect effects on the Southern Company system’s business resulting from incidents affecting the U.S. electric grid or operation of generating resources; and the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by standard setting bodies. Southern Company expressly disclaims any obligation to update any forward‐looking information.

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Southern Company Department of Defense Sites 3

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Major Utility Scale Solar Projects Georgia Power Company to develop three 30 MW renewable projects pursuant to 2007 Integrated Resource Plan below 4822 filed avoided cost Memorandum of Understanding between Company and the United States Army (Army) signed March 6, 2014 Three Army bases identified: Fort Benning, Fort Stewart, and Fort Gordon Added Kings Bay as a 4 th project July PSC approved Marine Corps Logistics Base as a 5 th July

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Major Utility Scale Solar Projects Georgia Power – Build, Own and Operate the arrays – Deliver energy to Georgia Power substation on each installation Army – Provide land access through 35 year easement – Step towards enhanced energy security Georgia Public Service Commission – 2007 Docket allowing up to 3, up to 30 MW projects – At or below avoided costs Projected Commercial Operation – Fort Benning: Spring 2016 – Forts Gordon and Stewart: early Fall 2016 – Kings Bay: late Fall

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Major Utility Scale Solar Projects Jim Holton Federal Segment Manager Office (404)