ECA working group 1: Mutual recognition PARIS, 6 December 2006 Europe in Transition: ACCEPTING & RESPECTING Marianne Cox NARIC/ENIC THE NETHERLANDS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STRUCTURE OF EDUCATION SYSTEM in Norway
Advertisements

Recognition of qualifications from joint programmes Recommendation from the perspective of the ENIC-NARICs Joint Programmes: Too many cooks in the kitchen?
Joint degrees in Flanders Seminar Joint Degrees 6-7 May 2004 in Stockholm Erwin Malfroy NARIC-Vlaanderen.
Recognition of qualifications Axel Aerden 14 March 2011.
Council of Europe ~ Ministry of Education,Youth and Sport of the Republic of Moldova ~ Rectors Council of the Republic of Moldova ~ The Institute for Public.
Towards 2010 – Common Themes and Approaches across Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training in Europe - New and emerging models in vocational.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
IMPROVING THE RECOGNITION SYSTEM Developments along subject lines and their impact on Recognition December 3rd, University of Latvia, Riga Dr. Julia González,
ECTS- the European Credit System Estela Pereira Universidade de Aveiro.
ECTS-A COMMON LANGUAGE FOR RECOGNITION Gayane Harutyunayn, Head of Bologna Secretariat, Armenia 4 December 2014, Yerevan, Armenia Baghdad, Iraq Online.
Pushing Forward Bologna and Prague A More Transparent Structure of Degrees: Next Steps Aims Tools Difficulties & Challenges Carmen Ruiz-Rivas Universidad.
For learning and competence Practical aspects of the Lisbon Recognition Convention UNICA Admission and Credential Evaluation University of Lausanne April.
External Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area: Challenges and Trends Rolf Heusser, Switzerland TechnoTN Forum, Brussels, 4 May 2007.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Bologna Process in Finland (Observations on the Bologna Process in Russia) Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and international comparability.
Changing the focus of International Credential Evaluation Assessment of non-traditional qualifications Jindra Divis “Bologna” Seminar, Lisboa 2002.
ITALIAN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Università degli Studi di Udine THE ITALIAN UNIVERSITY SYSTEM Franca Battigelli.
Vasyl Shynkaruk Deputy Minister of Education and Science of Ukraine “Qualifications Framework in Higher Education of Ukraine” International Seminar «National.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Yerevan, Armenia, 2008 European qualifications framework Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis,
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
September 2007Nathalie Depoorter Quality Assurance and ECTS Tempus project, Mostar, September 2007.
Doctoral education through students’ eyes Juuso Leivonen The 21st century doctorate – sharing European developments Scotland House Conference.
New Cultural Environment in the European Higher Education Area: Degree equivalence as a driving force for the international labour market Friedrich Roithmayr.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
For education and learning QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS (QFs) AND RECOGNITION New subsidiary text to the Lisbon Recognition Convention (LRC) Regional Meeting.
Credential evaluation – criteria and procedure Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assessment.
Higher Education and Research Council of Europe September 2006.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Workshop 1: Lisbon Convention and Global Recognition Seminar for Bologna and Higher Education Reform Experts Jessica Stannard, Nuffic, the Netherlands.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.4 Module/Course-Handbook and.
Recognition in Europe: Principles of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, implementation and challenges Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers, BFUG member Chairman of.
ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 Approved at Yerevan Ministers’ Meeting May 2015.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
Recognition: General Overview and Latest Developments Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC (Archimedes Foundation)
Improving the recognition system Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers President, Lisbon Convention Committee.
Tuning of Higher Education Programmes on the Basis of Profiles, Competences and Learning Outcomes WHYHOWWHAT.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY e: Kotnikova 38, 1000 Ljubljana p:
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
THE BOLOGNA PROCESS AND RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS Recognition as a key part of higher education policy in Europe.
Information on recognition Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC.
Bologna Process in Europe: Two-cycle degrees
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
Bologna Declaration: Professional Education for Landscape Architects LE:NOTRE Spring Workshop, Budapest, DRAFT, Summary 1. Bologna.
ECTS and the Recognition of Qualifications Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 27 May 2008.
Recognition of qualifications: legislation, policy and practice Sjur Bergan Council of Europe Baku, April 2005.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 3 – Right of establishment and freedom.
Academic and professional recognition in Europe International legal framework Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher.
Strengthening of Internationalization in B&H Higher Education Banja Luka, Recognition of Qualifications within European Higher Education.
Quality assurance in Europe The Bologna declaration.
Mobility, Recognition, ECTS Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Assessment and recognition of foreign qualifications in Estonia Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC 2016.
Recognition of Distance Learning Programmes
The Lisbon Recognition Convention: Outlining the Idea and its Implementation in 50 Countries Allan Bruun Pedersen – Danish Agency for Higher Education.
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
NATIONAL ACTION PLANS FOR RECOGNITION
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
THE BOLOGNA PROCESS AND RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS
Recognition Tools and Practices – Criteria and Procedure
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
Thinking and acting globally The role of recognition, quality assurance and qualifications frameworks for student and talent mobility: challenges and opportunities.
Republic of Macedonia - Ministry of Education and Science
Thinking and acting globally The role of recognition, quality assurance and qualifications frameworks for student and talent mobility: challenges and opportunities.
Presentation transcript:

ECA working group 1: Mutual recognition PARIS, 6 December 2006 Europe in Transition: ACCEPTING & RESPECTING Marianne Cox NARIC/ENIC THE NETHERLANDS

Academic Recognition evaluation in view of further study and/or award national titles Professional Recognition Evaluation of credentials for work purposes Terminology

Council of Europe / UNESCO: CONVENTIONS ON THE RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS European Convention on the Equivalence: of Diplomas leading to Admission to Universities, 1953 of Periods of University Study, 1956 on the Academic Recognition of University Qualifications, 1959 BILATERAL AGREEMENTS focus: EQUALITY/EQUIVALENCE Academic Recognition

After 1980: More mobility of students Expansion & diversification of higher education Recognition Programmes should be comparable: Level, function, status & content > specific purpose Approach & Methodology

Lisbon Recognition Convention (1997) Defines criteria and procedures Basic principles: -Mutual trust in educational systems Reversed burden of proof Respecting the differences Focus: Acceptance Academic Recognition

EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES Sectoral Directives: geared to harmonization - automatic recognition of diplomas General Directives geared to protection -case-by-case evaluation Professional Recognition

SECTORAL DIRECTIVE (Doctors, nurses, architects etc.) DIRECTIVES of the GENERAL SYSTEM: 1st Directive: 89/48/EEG ( higher education diplomas > 3 years) 2nd Directive: 92/51/EEG ( post-secondary vocational education) 3rd Directive ( trades and services) SLIM Directive: 2001/19/EG (reform General System and sectoral directives) NEW DIRECTIVE 2005/36/EC PROFESSIONAL RECOGNITION EUROPEAN DIRECTIVES

General Directives Focus: ACCEPTANCE Compensation mechanisms : Relevant professional experience Adaptation period or aptitude test (set by host country) Professional Recognition

Academic recognition LISBON CONVENTION (1997) => instruments: Diploma Supplement ECTS ENIC-NARIC Networks Recommendations on International Qualifications Code of Good Practice of Transnational Education Implementation, practice & training Regional agreements:Baltic States & Nordic Countries (based on principles of LC)

Lisbon Convention Lisbon convention reflects consensus on an agreed framework : international principles & procedures LEGAL GROUNDING FLEXIBILITY a. Can be applied in different educational systems b. Equally to be applied in specialized sectors c. Adaptation to changing environment d. Applicable to input & output

FEATURES To maintain standards and quality: Accountability International accepted standards code of good practice: benchmarking Transparency of procedures and decisions

Basic principles: Mutual trust in educational systems Reversed burden of proof Finished product meets the minimum requirements Respecting differences only: Substantial differences Professional & Academic Recognition

Evolution 1. Equivalence : course by course matching 2. Recognition: recognise fit for purpose comparable level- function,status and content > specific purpose 3. Acceptance : accept results (qualifications) with respect for differences AGREEMENT = FRAMEWORK: FLEXIBLE

Trends Shift from education> learning Learning outcomes/competencies: need for qualification structures & competency systems Assessment of competencies: regardless of learning paths => OUTCOMES => new forms of assessment

FUTURE Develop a new language in assessment Tuning Educational Structures in Europe

NETHERLANDS-FLANDERS QUALIFICATION AREA NL-VL: a national convention Within legal framework: accreditation affects the outcome=> accept each others degrees Accrediation: shift from specific recognition > generic recognition based on acceptance of quality and level Look at outcome rather than learning paths.

SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCES Educational outlook: broad orientation vs specialization (liberal arts or early focus on main academic disciplines) qualification frameworks, learning outcomes, learning paths Elements of qualifications: workload, level, quality and profile national regulations concerning recognition (centralized – non-centralized)

Conclusion? ROAD MAP TOWARDS ACCEPTANCE 1. UNDERSTANDING EACH OTHERS SYSTEMS INFORMATION & CONTACT & MUTUAL TRUST 2. UNDERSTANDING EACH OTHERS PROCEDURES INFORMATION & EXPERTISE & FIND COMMON GROUND 3. FOCUS ON OUTCOMES DEVELOP OUTCOME-BASED METHODOLOGY What kind of agreement will sustain an open qualification area?

Tuning project: Background Higher education institutions should adopt: Easily readable and comparable degrees System of 2 main cycles (undergraduate / graduate) System of European credit transfer (ECTS) Promotion of mobility, quality assurance, European dimension Project was initiated in 2000 by a group of European universities as response to Bologna Tuning Educational Structures in Europe

Current evaluation criteria: Formal duration/study load of the programme Overall level of achievement scan of subjects and their learning goals Structure and profile of the programme Focus at professional vs. scientific experience Admission requirements (based on duration and learning goals of previous education) Formal rights associated with the obtained degree Quality of the programme / institution Credential evaluation: now… Input-based evaluation methodology

Credential evaluation: … and in the future? towards an outcomes-based evaluation methodology? Main evaluation question could be: What level of competence has actually been acquired during the educational process? Potential evaluation criteria: Degree profile Learning outcomes that have been acquired, defined in a certain level of competences Irrespective of how long and which subject modules have been studied Or even irrespective of when, where, and how has been learned (recognition of prior learning)

CoRe Project: Planned activities Evaluation according to 2 methodologies Traditional methodology input-based Using Lisbon Criteria Experimental methodology outcomes-based Using Tuning profiles Required information sources: Diploma Transcript Required information sources: Degree profile Competence descriptions Analysis and comparison of the evaluation results