Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Guide to Implementation
Advertisements

Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
“The Primary Goal of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District is to become a premier school district in the United States of America.” The Cleveland.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
The Florida Reading Initiative (FRI) is a research-based school wide reform effort committed to providing the professional development and follow up support.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Elizabeth A. Clark, Ed.D. Associate Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Leading Change Through Shared Instructional Leadership
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
Where on the World Are You? Supporting & Developing School Based Math Teacher Leaders NCSM Conference, Washington DC April 21, 2009 Astrid Fossum, Mathematics.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Assistant Principal Meeting September 18, :00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
A Mission of Restoration
Engage, Inquire and Inspire IMSS Leadership Institute Fall 2012.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics 8/18/14.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics 10/6/2014.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
S CHOOL T RANSITION T EAM C OLLABORATIVE L EARNING.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Developed in partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools (MD), Forward is a K–5 instructional system of services, tools, and curriculum. Forward.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING 2015 Board Update ENGAGE EQUIP EMPOWER.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Educator Evaluations DARTEP 2017
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting September, 2013
Educator Effectiveness Summit Evaluation and Support Systems and Common Core State Standards Implementation October 2013.
An Overview April 2012.
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Team Goal Setting Karen Meyers, Director and
Presentation transcript:

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics

Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics Two significant shifts in education policy in Arizona (the adoption of the AZCCRS and the recent legislation directing the evaluation of teachers and principals) are dramatically impacting the practice of classroom teaching and creating an urgent need for specialized professional development for teachers and principals statewide. Instructional leaders who participate in this grant project will be able to develop and coach their teachers throughout the implementation of the AZCCRS in mathematics, provide enhanced coaching and constructive evaluation of AZCCRS mathematics instruction and model effective instructional leadership for other aspiring and practicing school leaders. Two significant shifts in education policy in Arizona (the

 Examine the research-affirmed foundation of mathematics content and process standards to deepen understanding of the AZCCRS in mathematics  Examine the instructional shifts necessary to implement the AZCCRS in mathematics  Examine evidence-based best practices for effective observation, coaching and evaluation of AZCCRS in mathematics  Examine effective practices to develop an understanding of the AZCCRS in mathematics for the parent/guardians, community members and other stakeholders

An ASU & Roosevelt S.D. Partnership for Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics Coherence & Sustainability

Coherence Working Together To Impact Change

Professional Development Year-long professional learning opportunities that included a minimum of six sessions for each cohort Principal Cohort Assistant Principal Cohort Teacher Math Academy Cohorts (K, 4 th, 5 th )

Leadership PD A continuum of learning that focused on: Developing common language and understanding about mathematics Promoting rigor and complexity Examining the AZCCRS-M and the Learning Observation Instrument (LOI) Building leadership capacity to provide teachers meaningful feedback related to math content and pedagogy as aligned to the Leading Observation Instrument (LdOI)

Instructional Rounds Leadership participated in group walk- throughs and engaged in dialogue about: Alignment of Content Mathematical Representations Mathematical Discourse Purposeful Questioning

Teacher Involvement With a year-long focus on mathematics, the leadership sessions were complemented by ongoing professional development and work with teachers : Math Academy PD Days Teacher Institute

Sustainability Moving Forward

Math Task Force Close examination of contributing factors leading to our current reality with student math achievement

Narrowing the Focus Priority Areas 1. Create a system to BUILD and SUSTAIN teacher math knowledge in order to increase student math achievement 2. Create a structure for follow up and/or follow through on initiatives

Teacher Leader Project Identify and support math teacher leaders to Increase capacity on each campus Support colleagues with math instruction, foster collaboration and allow for vertical articulation

A University of Arizona & Sunnyside USD Partnership for Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics Capacity Building & Sustainability Mathematics Leadership Institute Mathematics Leadership Cadre Mathematics Walk Throughs

Mathematics Leadership Institute 2 day institute for leadership teams Summer of 2014 Principals and other site administrators, site-based coaches, teacher leaders, and district leadership

Outcomes of the Institute Build deeper understanding of the shifts and expectations in the Arizona College and Career Ready Mathematics Standards Provide tools for messaging about standards to teachers, parents, and community members

Mathematics Leadership Cadre After the summer mathematics leadership institute, principals requested support in sharing the same experience with all their teachers Schools were clustered and schedule was set for the delivery of six mathematics professional development sessions during early release Wednesdays for school year

Teams for each cluster were identified to attend six trainer of trainer sessions and facilitate professional development sessions. Teams were comprised of 6 to 8 members and included administrators, coaches, and teacher leaders.

Mathematics Walkthroughs Collaborative walkthroughs Quarterly during the school year Clusters of 3 or 4 schools Site leadership and district team members Location for the walkthrough rotated, the hosting principal could determine the focus and schedule for the walkthroughs

Outcomes of the Sessions Analyze mathematics instruction for alignment to standards and implementation of mathematical practices Discuss critical aspects of mathematics instruction and develop leadership skills to provide effective feedback Determine next steps for PD or coaching

A Northern Arizona University & Flagstaff Unified School District, Partnership for Strengthening Instructional Leadership in Mathematics Mathematics Instructional Leadership Mathematics Leadership Development Mathematics Leadership Coaching Instructional Shifts in Mathematics

Phase One Spring of 2014 Mathematics Leadership Needs Assessment Principals, site administrators, site-based teacher leaders, mathematics leaders and district leadership Professional development action plan

Phase One Examine the research-affirmed foundation of mathematics content and process standards to deepen understanding of the AZCCRS in mathematics expectations Focus on the school leader’s role in promoting students’ attainment of the mathematics content and practices in AZCCRS in mathematics Recognize the essential role of collaborative teams to support the transition to the AZCCRS in mathematics and identify key collaborative team activities for AZCCRS in mathematics implementation

Discover the essential instructional shifts necessary to implement the AZCCRS for mathematics Examine evidence-based best practices for effective observation, coaching and evaluation of the AZCCRS in mathematics, both content and pedagogy. It is essential that differentiation with regard to district evaluation be considered. Examine effective practices to develop an understanding of the AZCCRS in mathematics for the parent/guardian, community members and other stakeholders.

Phase Two Summer 2014 through Spring 2015 Explore highly effective leadership strategies to move the AZCCRS in mathematics forward in schools and districts Support and focus the work of collaborative mathematics teams for significant student achievement and improvement Provide explicit guidance and resources on how to lead and exceed the assessment expectations of the AZCCRS in mathematics

Phase Three Summer 2015 through Fall 2015 Leading Change Conference Culminating professional development activities Presentations by participants to spotlight progress Participation by university, community college and private college faculty and mathematics leadership

Sustainability Plan Leader to leader district wide communication Common framework and knowledge base Instructional materials and professional development activities widely disseminated Site leadership and district team members continue together Common mathematics language spoken Leadership preparation program impact

Accessing the learning materials ge/Increasing_Teacher_Quality_ITQ

Q & A Please visit our district/university partners and PLL experts in each of the 4 corners of the room to explore any questions you may have. Thank you!

Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics