KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, 2014 1 Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
Advertisements

Proposal for a programme of Neutrino Factory research and development WP-3 The Target The Neutrino Factory Target Lead Author - J R J Bennett CCLRC, RAL.
The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.
KT McDonald Target Studies Weekly Meeting July 10, Power Deposition in Graphite Targets of Various Radii K.T. McDonald, J. Back, N. Souchlas July.
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Solid Targets for the Neutrino Factory J R J Bennett Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK
1 Thermal Shock Measurements and Modelling for Solid High-Power Targets at High Temperatures J. R. J. Bennett 1, G. Skoro 2, S. Brooks 1, R. Brownsword,
K. McDonald LEMC Workshop 22 Apr 2008 From MERIT to a Muon Collider (Front End) K.T. McDonald Princeton U. Low Emittance Muon Collider Workshop Fermilab,
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
Modelling shock in solid targets Goran Skoro (UKNF Collaboration, University of Sheffield) NuFact 06 UC Irvine, August 24-30, 2006.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
K. McDonald 2 nd Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop 6 Nov 2008 High-Power Targets for Superbeams and Neutrino Factories (and Muon Colliders) K.T. McDonald.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory High-Power Targets H.G. Kirk Applications of High-Intensity Proton Accelerators FNAL October 20, 2009.
Primary Target Systems for a Muon Collider / Neutrino Factory. What has the experimental effort taught us thus far. N. Simos, H. Kirk, S. Kahn, P. Thieberger,
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
T2K Target & Secondary Beamline - progress towards a neutrino Superbeam? Chris Densham.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
NuFact2004, Osaka, Japan MATERIAL R&D FOR HIGH-INTENSITY PROTON BEAM TARGETS Nicholas Simos, H. Kirk, W-T. Weng, P. Thieberger, (BNL) K. McDonald, Princeton.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
 Stephen Brooks / UKNF meeting, Warwick, April 2008 Pion Production from Water-Cooled Targets.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
Simulations of Pressure Waves induced by Proton Pulses In search of the answer to the fundamental question: are materials indeed stronger than what we.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory A MW Class Target System for Muon Beam Production AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July 14-18, 2014.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Concept for a Neutrino Factory EMCOG Meeting CERN November 18, 2003.
Target R&D Kirk T McDonald Princeton University Feb. 19, 2014 February 19, 2014 KT McDonald | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1 Scope of.
1 cm diameter tungsten target Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
T2K Secondary Beamline – Status of RAL Contributions Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Vishal Francis, Matt Rooney, Mike Woodward, Martin Baldwin, Dave Wark.
KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Concept for a Neutrino Factory Muon Meeting BNL January 26, 2004.
K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Materials for the Target System Internal Shield K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 27, 2010) Iron Plug Proton.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Post-Irradiation Properties of Candidate Materials for High-Power Targets PAC05 Knoxville, TN May 16-20,
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
WG3 Summary Conveners: J. Pasternak, Imperial College London/RAL-STFC P. Snopok, Illinois Institute of Technology (presenter) J. Tang, Institute of High.
J-PARC neutrino experiment Target Specification Graphite or Carbon-Carbon composite cylindrical bar : length 900mm, diameter 25~30mm The bar may be divided.
Parameters of the NF Target Proton Beam pulsed10-50 Hz pulse length1-2  s energy 2-30 GeV average power ~4 MW Target (not a stopping target) mean power.
Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.
Proton Driver / Project X Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab August 30, 2012.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
High Power Target Experience with T2K Chris Densham T2K Beamline Collaboration including RAL / KEK / Kyoto.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Muon Production and Capture for a Neutrino Factory European Strategy for Future Neutrino Physics CERN October.
Horn and Solenoid options in Neutrino Factory M. Yoshida, Osaka Univ. NuFact08, Valencia June 30th, A brief review of pion capture scheme in NuFact,
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
Horn and Solenoid Options in Neutrino Factory
Beam Window Studies for Superbeams
Meson Production Efficiencies
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
Presentation transcript:

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Specifications from the Muon Accelerator Staging Scenario 6.75 GeV (kinetic energy) proton beam with 3 ns (rms) pulse. 1 MW initial beam power, upgradable to 2 MW (perhaps even to 4 MW). 60 Hz initial rep rate for Neutrino Factory; 15 Hz rep rate for later Muon Collider. The goal is to deliver a maximum number of soft muons, ~ 40 < KE < ~ 180 MeV.

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept Graphite target (ρ ~ 1.8 g/cm 3 ), radiation cooled (with option for convection cooling); liquid metal jet as option for 2-4 MW beam power. Target inside high-field solenoid magnet (20 T) that collects both µ ±. Target and proton beam tilted with respect to magnetic axis. Superconducting magnet coils shielded by He-gas-cooled W beads. Proton beam dump via a graphite rod just downstream of the target. Some of the proton and  /µ transport near the target is in air.

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Stainless-steel target vessel (double-walled with intramural He-gas flow for cooling) with graphite target and beam dump, and downstream Be window. This vessel would be replaced every few months at 1 MW beam power. 15 T superconducting coil outsert, Stored energy ~ 3 GJ, ~ 100 tons 5 T copper-coil insert. Water-cooled, MgO insulated He-gas cooled W-bead shielding (~ 100 tons) Proton beam tube Upstream proton beam window Target System Concept Last Final-Focus quad

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Optimization

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Optimizations High-Z favored. Optima for graphite target: length = 80 cm, radius ~ 8 mm (with σ r = 2 mm (rms) beam radius), tilt angle = 65 mrad, nominal geometric rms emittance ε  = 5 µm. β* = σ r 2 /ε   = 0.8 m. Graphite proton beam dump, 120 cm long, 24 mm radius to intercept most of the (diverging) unscattered proton beam. The 20 T field on target should drop to the ~ 2 T field in the rest of the Front End over ~ 5 m.

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Issues for Further Study Thermal “shock” of the short proton pulse Probably OK for 2 MW and 60 Hz operation; 15-Hz option needs study. Cooling of target, and the W beads. Lifetime of target against radiation damage. Beam windows.  * and beam emittance at the target. To preserve liquid-metal-jet upgrade option, need related infrastructure installed at t = 0.

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Thermal Issues for Solid Targets When beam pulse length t is less than target radius r divided by speed of sound v sound, beam- induced pressure waves (thermal shock) are a major issue. Simple model: if U = beam energy deposition in, say, Joules/g, then the instantaneous temperature rise ∆T is given by ∆T = U /C, where C = heat\ capacity in Joules/g/K. The temperature rise leads to a strain  r/r given by ∆r/r = α ∆T = α U/C, where α = thermal expansion coefficient. The strain leads to a stress P (= force/area) given by P = E ∆r/r = E α U/C, where E = modulus of elasticity. In many metals, the tensile strength obeys P ≈ E, α ≈ 10 -5, and C ≈ 0.3 J/g/K, in which case U max ≈ P C / E α ≈ ∙ 0.3 / ≈ 60 J/g  C: P = 42.4 Mpa, E = 7.2 Gpa, α = 4.8  10 -5, C = 1.4 J/g, U max ≈ 1700 J/g. (α ≈ 1  for carbon-carbon composite) [A nickel target at FNAL has operated with U max ≈ 1500 J/g.] These arguments are from A Short Course on Targetry, KTM, NuFact03 Summer Institute

KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, How Much Beam Power Can a Solid Target Stand? What is the maximum beam power this material can withstand without cracking, for a 6.75-GeV beam at 15 Hz with area 0.1 cm 2 ? Ans: MARS15 indicates that the peak energy deposition in a “pencil” target is essentially just that of dE/dx,  1.5 MeV/(g/cm 2 ) for graphite. Now, 1.5 MeV = 2.4 ∙ J, so 1500 J/g requires a proton beam intensity of (1500 J/g)/(2.4 ∙ J  cm 2 /g) ≈ 6 ∙ /cm 2.  P max ≈ 15 Hz ∙ 6.75  10 9 eV ∙ (1.6 ∙ J/eV) ∙ (6  /cm 2 ) ∙ 0.1 cm 2 ≈ 1 ∙ 10 7 J/s = 10 MW. If graphite cracks under singles pulses of > 1500 J/g, then safe up to 10 MW beam 15 Hz.