1 Selegiline Transdermal System (STS) FDA Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee October 26, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CR-1 ATACAND ® (candesartan cilexetil) Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Bethesda, Maryland July 18, 2002 C.
Advertisements

09-Sep-2003 Predicting human risk with animal research: lessons learned from caffeine/ephedrine combinations Richard J. Briscoe, Ph.D. Safety Pharmacology.
Basic Design Consideration. Previous Lecture Definition of a clinical trial The drug development process How different aspects of the effects of a drug.
TROPHY TRial Of Preventing HYpertension. High-normal BP increases CV risk Vasan RS et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: Incidence of CV events in women.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Zontivity™ - vorapaxar
Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients A Randomized Trial Journal Club 09/01/11 JAMA, February 4, 2009—Vol 301, No
Methylphenidate Transdermal System (MTS): Safety Issues Robert Levin, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Psychiatry Products Center for Drug Evaluation and.
Drug and Therapeutics Committee Session 7A. Identifying Problems with Medicine Use: Indicator Studies.
1 OTC Omeprazole Magnesium (Prilosec 1 TM ) October 20, 2000 Larry Goldkind MD Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products CDER, FDA.
1 Tolvaptan for the Treatment of Hyponatremia Aliza Thompson, MD Medical Officer Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting June 25, 2008.
Prescription Drug Abuse Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic, Critical Care and Addiction Drug Products Food and Drug Administration.
1 Lotronex ® (alosetron HCl) Tablets Risk-Benefit Issues Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D. Director, Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products.
{ A Novel Tool for Cardiovascular Risk Screening in the Ambulatory Setting Guideline-Based CPRS Dialog Adam Simons MD.
Introduction Nearly 26 million people are diagnosed with diabetes in the United States, roughly 8.5% of the total population (A.D.A. 2013). 2.1 million.
Eureka Pre-Clinical Investigation Animal toxicology Animal pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics Clinical Investigation Phase I Safety and pharmacology Phase.
1 TYRAMINE SAFETY WITH EMSAM Gregory M. Dubitsky, MD FDA Division of Psychiatry Products October 26, 2005.
AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PRIMARY PREVENTION CONTROL PROGRAM OF PHC PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY CLINIC AMONG PATIENTS AT RISK FOR CVD: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
1 Post Marketing Plan Earl Sands, M.D. Vice President and Chief Medical Officer US Research and Development Solvay Pharmaceuticals Earl Sands, M.D. Vice.
Overview of Issues for Psychopharmacological Drugs Advisory Committee June 16, 2003 WBC Monitoring for Clozapine Judith A. Racoosin, MD, MPH Safety Team.
D-1 Pravastatin-Aspirin Combination The Medical Need Thomas A. Pearson, M.D., Ph.D. Albert D. Kaiser Professor of Community & Preventive Medicine University.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
PHARMACOVIGILANCE AND CLINICAL TRIALS DIVISION 20 August 2015 Victoria Falls Protecting Your Right to Quality Medicines and Medical Devices.
PROPRIETARY NAME EVALUATION AT FDA Jerry Phillips, RPh Associate Director for Medication Error Prevention Office of Drug Safety December 4, 2003.
Stop the Clot ™ David Henry and Tom Hogan Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adelphi,
1 Michael V. Novinski President and Chief Executive Officer November 6, 2008 Third Quarter 2008 Earnings Conference Call.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
CLAIMS STRUCTURE FOR SLE Jeffrey Siegel, M.D. Arthritis Advisory Committee September 29, 2003.
1 Can One Evaluate An Outcomes Claim Based On An Active Controlled Study? Pfizer Response Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Rockville,
1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The.
CI-1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 14, 2004 Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July.
CS-1 Safety of Foradil ® Gregory P. Geba, MD, MPH Vice President – US Head RDI Clinical Development and Medical Affairs Novartis Gregory P. Geba, MD, MPH.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting November 29, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
HvC Comparative Effectiveness Project Groups 5 and 6
DIVISION OF REPRODUCTIVE AND UROLOGIC PRODUCTS Physician Labeling Rule Lisa Soule, M.D.
Informed Consent Risk of Cheese Reaction A possible risk of using selegiline is uncontrolled hypertension (high blood pressure), the so-called “cheese.
Cardiovascular Risk and NSAIDs Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting April 12, 2007 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Analgesia, Anesthesia,
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Sertraline Use in Pediatric Population: A Risk Benefit Discussion Steven J. Romano, MD September 13, 2004 Steven J. Romano, MD September 13, 2004 Joint.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Pharmacy Pharmaceutical Care Planning Vocational Training Scheme: Level = Stage 2 Arlene Shaw Specialist Clinical.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Question 1 Pozen estimated an annual incidence of tardive dyskinesia (TD) of up to 0.038% for metoclopramide at a daily dose of mg/day for 72 days/year.
COMET: Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Purpose To compare the effects of carvedilol (a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker) and short-acting.
Praxbind® - Idarucizumab
1 International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology FDA Advisory Committee Meeting Proposed Requirement for Long-Term Data to Support Initial.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
Manufacturer: Amgen Inc FDA Approval Date: August 27, 2015
OVERTURE FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 19, 2002 Milton Packer, M.D., FACC Columbia University College of Physicians.
Consideration of Issues John M. Kane, MD Chairman, Department of Psychiatry The Zucker Hillside Hospital The North Shore–Long Island Jewish Health System.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
C-1 Safety Results S. aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Study Gloria Vigliani, M.D. Vice President, Medical Strategy Cubist Pharmaceuticals.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School, Fall, 2005 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Sample Size and Power Considerations.
Long-term Efficacy for Psychiatric Drugs Frederick K. Goodwin, MD George Washington University Medical Center Frederick K. Goodwin, MD George Washington.
Developing, Pilot Testing & Evaluating RiskMAP Interventions Annette Stemhagen, DrPH, FISPE Vice President UBC Epidemiology & Risk Management The FDA Regulatory.
27 June 2000Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D.1 Risk-Management Options Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D., M.S. Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee 27 June.
Viagra (sildenafil citrate): Extensive Clinical and Post-Marketing Experience Michael Sweeney, MD Senior Medical Director Pfizer Inc.
Storage, Labeling, Controlled Medications Guidance Training CFR § (b)(2)(3)(d)(e) F431.
Number Needed To Treat (NNT)
Efficacy and Safety of Medicines
Eucrisa™ - Crisaborole
A Proven Non-Drug Treatment for Depression
Management of perioperative hypertension
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
LRC-CPPT and MRFIT Content Points:
Goals & Guidelines A summary of international guidelines for CHD
Section overview: Cardiometabolic risk reduction
Section 6: Update on lipid treatment guidelines
Presentation transcript:

1 Selegiline Transdermal System (STS) FDA Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee October 26, 2005

2 Introduction Melissa Goodhead, BSc, RAC Group Director, Regulatory Affairs / Quality Assurance Somerset Pharmaceuticals

3 FDA Questions Do the available data for the EMSAM 20 mg patch support the reasonable safety of this formulation without the need for dietary restrictions? If the EMSAM 20 mg patch formulation could be considered reasonably safe for marketing without the need for dietary restrictions, would it be acceptable to market the 20 mg patch without dietary restrictions and at the same time require dietary restrictions for the 30 and 40 mg patch strengths? 1. 2.

4 Selegiline – Presentation Agenda Overview Safety – Tyramine Physician & Patient Awareness Program Conclusion – Q&A Sheldon Preskorn, MD Lawrence F. Blob, MD Chad VanDenBerg, PharmD Melvin Sharoky, MD

5 Overview Sheldon Preskorn, MD Chairman, Department of Psychiatry University of Kansas, Wichita 5

6 Overview u Clinical Depression u Characteristics of MAOI u Oral MAOI and tyramine u Medical need for MAOI without dietary modifications u Transdermal delivery of MAOI

7 Facts About Clinical Depression u High prevalence u Significant morbidity and mortality u Heterogeneous illness: No single antidepressant works for every patient u 30% do not respond to a series of different antidepressants u Need for additional effective options

8 Characteristics of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors u First antidepressants u Established efficacy u Affect three neurotransmitters u Infrequently used despite their efficacy in part because of dietary restrictions

9 Infrequent MAOI Use u IMS 2005 – 0.1% of all antidepressant prescriptions u APA guidelines 2000 cite dietary restrictions as a reason to limit use u Surveys have shown dietary restrictions as a major deterrent to MAOI usage

10 MAO in the Gut u Barrier preventing systemic absorption of tyramine u Virtually impossible to eat enough tyramine in food to overcome this barrier

11 Oral MAOIs and Dietary Tyramine u Oral MAOIs substantially inhibit intestinal MAO u Tyramine can enter systemic circulation u Systemic tyramine causes release of NE u Large dose of tyramine can cause dramatic rise in blood pressure via NE

12 Hypertensive Crisis u Not chronic or essential hypertension u Medical emergency requiring immediate treatment u Acute elevation in BP >180/120 mmHg leading to end-organ damage u Tyramine-induced hypertensive crisis –onset between 10 minutes and 2 hours after meal

13 Current MAOI Diet Recommendations u Avoid high tyramine foods –Aged cheeses –Fermented or spoiled meats –Some yeast extracts (e.g., marmite) u Maximum tyramine content meal: 40 mg tyramine u The need for the diet and the potential risk of hypertensive crisis discourages MAOI use

14 The Clinical Need The efficacy of the oral MAOIs without the need for a tyramine-restrictive diet

15 Oral versus Transdermal Delivery 20 mg patch skin Oral MAOITransdermal Selegiline

16 Mawhinney et al. J Pharm Pharmacol Inhibition of MAO by Selegiline in Guinea Pigs Cortex Oral Selegiline Transdermal Selegiline DuodenumLiver Percentage inhibition Daily dose (mg/kg) Daily dose (cm 2 /24 h) Percentage inhibition

Can the 20 mg transdermal delivery system for selegiline provide antidepressant efficacy without the need for dietary modification? 17

18 Positive Placebo-controlled Efficacy Trials with Transdermal Selegiline E106P0052P9806 Duration 6 weeks 8 weeks 52 weeks N EMSAM Dose 20 mg 20 mg 20, 30, or 40 mg 20, 30, or 40 mg 20 mg 20 mg Primary Endpoint HAMD-17 p = HAMD-28 p = K-M Relapse † p = † † K-M Relapse = Kaplan Meier time to relapse analysis

19 Safety – Tyramine Lawrence Blob, MD Medical Director, Somerset Pharmaceuticals

20 Safety of Transdermal Selegiline u Oral selegiline: 16 years of safe use with normal diet u Tyramine challenge program shows oral and transdermal selegiline have equally low intestinal MAO inhibition u Food challenges demonstrate tyramine safety of 20 mg transdermal selegiline u Phase III safety data found no hypertensive crises in 2,503 MDD patients at 20, 30, and 40 mg

21 10 mg Oral and 20 mg Transdermal Selegiline u Same active ingredient u Unlike oral, transdermal selegiline achieves antidepressant levels in CNS u Like oral, transdermal maintains the intestinal barrier to tyramine

22 Safety of Oral Selegiline (Eldepryl) u 16 years of safe use in Parkinson’s disease –Approved in 1989 –No dietary modifications –1.5 million patients exposed

23 AERS & IMS Health Records for Oral Selegiline u Pharmacovigilance data ( ) u Rate of hypertensive crisis per 100,000 exposure-years EldeprylParnate

24 AERS: 4 Reports of Hypertensive Crisis u 3 determined not related to tyramine –Case 1: tolcapone, levodopa, carbidopa, bromocriptine, ropinirole –Case 2: ephedrine, theophylline, levodopa, carbidopa, lisuride, maprotiline –Case 3: levodopa, bromocriptine, talipexole u One report: no details available –Must consider tyramine-related u Tyramine-related hypertensive crisis –<0.4 per 100,000 exposure-years

25 DATATOP: Controlled Safety Data u Study of oral selegiline and Vitamin E for the treatment of Parkinsonism u N = 800 u 2,970 patient-years of exposure u No increase in mortality (2.1%) compared to a matched population (2.7%)

26 DATATOP: Cardiovascular/Cerebrovascular Events Incidence per 1000 patient-years Oral Selegiline Placebo MI CVA / TIA

27 Safety of Transdermal Selegiline u Oral selegiline: 16 years of safe use with normal diet u Tyramine challenge program shows oral and transdermal selegiline have equally low intestinal MAO inhibition u Food challenges demonstrate tyramine safety of 20 mg transdermal selegiline u Phase III safety data found no hypertensive crises in 2,503 MDD patients at 20, 30, and 40 mg

28 Tyramine Challenge Studies 14 tyramine challenge studies (N=214) u Time of exposure, up to 96 days u Dose (20 to 40 mg transdermal selegiline) u Fasting versus fed conditions u Comparator drugs –Oral selegiline (Eldepryl) –Fluoxetine (Prozac) –Tranylcypromine (Parnate)

29 Tyramine Pressor Test Model Endpoint: 30 mmHg SBP Baseline tyramine challenge Active drug treatment On-drug tyramine challenge

30 Model: Minimum Pressor Dose Example MinimumPressor dose 200 mg MinimumPressor dose 400 mg Minimum Pressor Dose: Smallest oral tyramine dose to cause 30 mmHg SBP Baseline tyramine challenge Active drug treatment On-drug tyramine challenge

31 Model: Tyramine Sensitivity Factor (TSF) Example: Drug 1 400/200 = TSF of 2 MinimumPressor dose 200 mg MinimumPressor dose 400 mg Baseline tyramine challenge Active drug treatment On-drug tyramine challenge

32 Model: Tyramine Sensitivity Factor (TSF) Example: Drug 2 MinimumPressor dose 10 mg MinimumPressor dose 400 mg 400/10 = TSF of 40 Baseline tyramine challenge Active drug treatment On-drug tyramine challenge

33 Comparator Studies u Crossover studies –Transdermal selegiline 20 mg vs. oral selegiline 10 mg (Eldepryl) –Transdermal selegiline 20 mg vs. tranylcypromine 30 mg (Parnate) u Negative control –Fluoxetine 60 mg (Prozac)

34 TSF: Transdermal 20 mg vs. Oral Selegiline 10 mg Mean Pressor Dose (mg Tyramine) ± ± 1.04 Transdermal Selegiline 20 mg Oral Selegiline 10 mg 338 ± 112 (271, 406) 385 ± 128 (307, 462) 1.75 ± 0.54 (1.43, 2.07) 1.67 ± 1.04 (1.04, 2.30) Tyramine Sensitivity Factor Crossover data

35 Tyramine Sensitivity Factor Fluoxetine 60 mg ± ± ± 1.04 TSF of Fluoxetine 60 mg Transdermal Selegiline 20 mg Oral Selegiline 10 mg 408 ± 131 (325, 492) 1.43 ± 0.56 (1.08, 1.79) 338 ± 112 (271, 406) 385 ± 128 (307, 462) 1.75 ± 0.54 (1.43, 2.07) 1.67 ± 1.04 (1.04, 2.30) Mean Pressor Dose (mg Tyramine)

TSF of Tranylcypromine 30 mg (Parnate) Transdermal Selegiline 20 mg Tranylcypromine 30 mg ± ± ± 0 (10, 10) ± 7.07 (34.56, 45.44) 270 ± 82 (211, 329) 1.86 ± 0.42 (1.57, 2.16) Mean Pressor Dose (mg Tyramine) Tyramine Sensitivity Factor Crossover data

37 TSF Stability Over Time (40 mg dose) Tyramine Sensitivity Factor ± 6.59 (8.17, 14.73) ± 5.13 (8.40, 14.33) 9.33 ± 5.20 (5.84, 12.82) ± 7.07 (34.56, 45.44) Tranylcypromine 30 mg/d Day 8 Transdermal Selegiline 40 mg Day mg Day mg Day 30 Mean Pressor Dose (mg Tyramine)

38 Safety of Transdermal Selegiline u Oral selegiline: 16 years of safe use with normal diet u Tyramine challenge program shows oral and transdermal selegiline have equally low intestinal MAO inhibition u Food challenges demonstrate tyramine safety of 20 mg transdermal selegiline u Phase III safety data found no hypertensive crises in 2,503 MDD patients at 20, 30, and 40 mg

39 64 ± 27 (47.05, 127.9) 172 ± 92 (94.93, 248.8) Pharmacodynamic Effect of Food on Pressor Dose Pressor Dose (mg Tyramine) Pressor Dose mean ± SD (95% CI) Transdermal Selegiline 40 mg Fasting Fed Mean Pressor Dose p =

40 Tyramine Content in a High-Tyramine Meal Sample Meal Portion (g or mL) Tyramine content (mg/portion) Bottled beer Sauerkraut Boiled potatoes Green and yellow peppers Roast Pork Pepper sauce Cheese Camembert Camembert Danish blue Danish blue Pinot Noir Total tyramine in meal 39.8

41 Transdermal Selegiline Transdermal Selegiline 20 mg 21 Days Tranylcypromine 30 mg 10 Tyramine Sensitivity Factor Mean Pressor Dose (mg Tyramine) Transdermal Selegiline Transdermal Selegiline 20 mg 30 Days Pressor Dose Range at Steady State

42 Safety Margin: 20 mg Transdermal, Extremes (Calculated for Fed Conditions) 20 mg N = 2 N = 10 Minimum = 125 mg Minimum = 25 mg 40 mg Tyramine (mg) < 5 mg Tyramine Typical Meal

43 Tyramine Challenge Program Conclusions u 20 mg transdermal and oral selegiline and fluoxetine all have similar TSF, about times less than that of tranylcypromine u 40 mg transdermal selegiline has a TSF 4 times less than tranylcypromine u Patients taking 20 mg transdermal selegiline will be unable to eat enough tyramine-rich food to cause a hypertensive crisis

44 Safety of Transdermal Selegiline u Oral selegiline: 16 years of safe use with normal diet u Tyramine challenge program shows oral and transdermal selegiline have equally low intestinal MAO inhibition u Food challenges demonstrate tyramine safety of 20 mg transdermal selegiline u Phase III safety data found no hypertensive crises in 2,503 MDD patients at 20, 30, and 40 mg

45 Phase III Safety u Exposure in 2500 patients –20, 30, 40 mg transdermal selegiline –No dietary modification u No serious adverse events of hypertensive crisis u No deaths

46 Events of Interest Review Process Step I: Comprehensive Computer Term Search u COSTART terms: Amblyopia, arrhythmia, bradycardia, chest pain, coma, headache (severe), hypertension, migraine, neck rigidity, palpitation, stupor, tachycardia u Blood Pressure: Occurrence of blood pressure  160/100 mmHg anytime during the study Step II: Algorithm u Any patient with AE term hypertension, migraine or severe headache u Any AE terms judged at least moderate in intensity u Any AE requiring treatment u Occurrence of blood pressure  160/100 mmHg anytime during the study Results: No events of hypertensive crisis

47 Analysis of Blood Pressure Increases in Placebo-Controlled Trials u N = 1430 subjects in controlled trials u ↑ 20 mmHg over baseline SBP and SBP >160 Transdermal SelegilinePlacebo Transdermal SelegilinePlacebo 1.4% 1.9% u Incidence of AE Hypertension Transdermal SelegilinePlacebo Transdermal SelegilinePlacebo 0.6% 0.7%

48 Safety Conclusions u 20 mg transdermal selegiline is effective and safe without dietary modifications u 20 mg transdermal selegiline shows a low inhibition of intestinal MAO –Equivalent to 10 mg oral selegiline and 60 mg fluoxetine u No hypertensive crisis in Phase III program u Education program will instruct physicians and patients on proper use of drug

49 Provider / Patient Awareness Chad VanDenBerg, Pharm.D., BCPP Director, Clinical Affairs & Product Information Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 49

50 FDA Question #2 If the EMSAM 20 mg patch formulation could be considered reasonably safe for marketing without the need for dietary restrictions, would it be acceptable to market the 20 mg patch without dietary restrictions and at the same time require dietary restrictions for the 30 and 40 mg patch strengths?

51 Education Plan Goal: 100% awareness of the need for dietary modifications at the higher strengths (30 and 40 mg patches) Major elements u Multiple education and outreach tools –Prescribers –Pharmacists –Patients u Uniquely designed packaging

52 Objective and Considerations u Primary Objective –Dietary modification instructions u Implementation Considerations –Prevent simultaneous use of multiple patches –Appropriate titration instructions

53 Study of Physician and Patient Comprehension of the Need for Dietary Modifications Methodology u 75 Physicians –Psychiatrists and primary care physicians u 70 Patients Results after only one exposure u 96% of physicians and 94% of patients correctly identify the need for dietary modifications at higher doses Plan calls for multiple exposures

54 Prescriber Education Key Elements u Instructions for appropriate product usage consistent with label u Patient education materials u Verbally communicate –Use as prescribed –Apply one patch at a time –Stay on modified diet for two weeks after discontinuation u Write dietary modifications required on prescriptions Continual Monitoring u Bi-weekly assessment of awareness and practices

55 Pharmacist Education Key Elements u Educational programs including teleconferences and mailings u Up-to-date product information available through 3rd party data sources

56 Patient Education u Patient education materials u Patient information leaflet u Patient starter pack u EMSAM website

Dietary Modifications Required 57

58 Pharmacovigilance Program u Education and outreach program u Pharmacovigilance procedures and reporting u Targeted follow up on specific adverse events –Hypertensive crisis and other CV events

59 Provider / Patient Awareness Summary Multi-faceted plan u Enhanced education program –Prescribers –Pharmacists –Patients u Distinctive packaging u Enhanced pharmacovigilance

60 Conclusions Melvin Sharoky, MD CEO and President Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 60