DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CryoLife BioGlue P010003 Lead FDA Reviewer Lisa Kennell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Advertisements

Humanitarian Device Exemptions (HDE) 101 Elizabeth Hillebrenner, MSE Biomedical Engineer IDE and HDE Program Staff Center for Devices and Radiological.
Amplatzer® Septal Occluder
IRB-Investigator/ Research Coordinator Mtg. “CUMC’s New Progressive Policy For Adverse Event Reporting” April 13, 2004 George Gasparis Andrew Wit, Ph.D.
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Effectiveness Evaluation for Therapeutic Drugs for Non-Food Animals
InFUSE ™ Bone Graft / LT-CAGE ™ Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device IDE Clinical Results G Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia.
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Trastuzumab [Genentech Inc.] Labeling Supplement to Include FISH Testing as a Method to Select Patients for Treatment FDA Clinical Review December 5, 2001.
DuraSealTM Dural Sealant System PMA P040034
1 THE UNIQUE ROLES OF IRB IN MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICALL TRIAL Chiu Lin, Ph.D. CITI, May, 2009 CITI, May, 2009.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING Elizabeth Dayag IRB Administrator Naval Medical Center Portsmouth.
Regulatory Considerations for Investigational Assays: Planning for Success Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD/FDA “Next-Generation DNA Sequencing as a Tool.
1 Medical Device Registries: Multiple Applications Thomas P. Gross, MD, MPH Director Division of Postmarket Surveillance Office of Surveillance & Biometrics.
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 Circulatory Support Devices Panel Tuesday, September 11, 2001 CoSeal® Surgical Sealant P
Animal Models for Porcine Xenotransplantation Products Intended to Treat Type 1 Diabetes or Acute Liver Failure CTGTAC #47 May 14, 2009.
Cook Zenith® AAA Endovascular Graft and the H&L-B One-Shot  Introduction System P April 10, 2003 FDA Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting Gaithersburg,
Clinical Trial Designs An Overview. Identify: condition(s) of interest, intended population, planned treatment protocols Recruitment of volunteers: volunteers.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
Approval Criteria for Assays for Testing Blood Donors for West Nile Virus Robin Biswas, M.D. CBER, FDA Blood Products Advisory Committee Meeting March.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Jaro Vostal, MD, PhD Division of Hematology, OBRR,CBER, FDA Blood Products Advisory Committee December 15, 2010 PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR INTERVENTIONS.
Dispute Resolution Panel Meeting Sept 6, 2001 Intergel® Adhesion Prevention Solution Introduction to FDA Presentations.
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CardioSEAL® STARFlex™ Septal Occlusion System with Qwik Load NMT Medical P000049/S3.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
Trial Design Issues Associated with Evaluation of Distal Protection Devices in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts Bram D. Zuckerman, MD, FACC Medical Officer,
1 A review of the safety of Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride Leonard Sacks MD Medical officer/DSPIDP.
Praxbind® - Idarucizumab
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
June 23, 2005Abiomed, H DRAFT. CIRCULATORY SUPPORT DEVICES PANEL Thursday, June 23, 2005 Abiomed, Inc. Abiocor® Implantable Replacement Heart HDE.
September 9, 2002, Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting FDA Lead Reviewer Summary W.L. GORE & Associates EXCLUDER Bifurcated Endoprosthesis A. Doyle.
1 Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Questions June 24, 2008 Ira Krefting, MD.
Advisory Committee for Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs March 7, 2006 Question 1: 1.Has Biogen demonstrated natalizumab’s efficacy on reduced.
HUD and Emergent Use Walter Kraft. Device Classification Significant risk – Often involve an invasive procedure for implantation or use – Requires IDE.
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 Panel Questions-Clinical Trial Design 1.Can the data from the investigator-sponsor studies be considered in the evaluation of high.
Drug Development and IND Process GC 690 Walter Kraft, MD.
CDRH Advisory Committee Meeting: Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel November 20, 2002 INDEPENDENCE™ iBOT™ 3000 Mobility System Independence Technology.
DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CardioSEAL® Septal Occlusion System with Qwik Load NMT Medical P
Circulatory System Devices Panel Questions for Discussion EMBOL·X Aortic Filter October 23, 2002.
1 INTRODUCTION: Proposed Use of HBOC-201 * in the RESUS (Restore Effective SUrvival in Shock) Trauma Trial Laurence Landow MD, FRCPC Medical Officer, Clinical.
Panel questions Study design Effectiveness Safety Labeling.
EXCEPTION FROM INFORMED CONSENT IN CPR DEVICE TRIALS: PROTECTION OF PATIENTS’ RIGHTS Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting September 21, 2004 Elisa.
1 IND Applications for Academic Clinical Investigations John Marler, MD US Food and Drug Administration New Hampshire Avenue White Oak, MD
Main Line Hospitals Institutional Review Board Unanticipated Problems Anne Marie Hobson, BSN, JD, ORA Director Theresa Greaves, ORA Manager.
Intersecting roles CMS and FDA – implications for pharmaceutical and device industries Peter B. Bach, MD, MAPP Senior Adviser, Office of the Administrator.
Clinical trials for medical devices: FDA and the IDE process
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
The CRT of EFS Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Adherence to the Labeling
FDA Pathway to Approval: Clinical Requirements for Renal Denervation
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Balancing Pre and Postmarket Requirements Different Scenarios
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
Adverse Event Reporting: Trials and Tribulations
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Structural Heart Disease and Devices in Japan and USA
Erica Takai, PhD for Andrew Farb, M.D.
Crucial Statistical Caveats for Percutaneous Valve Trials
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Speeding access to therapies
Streamlining IRB Procedures for Expanded Access
Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia
Ethical Considerations for Pediatric Clinical Investigations
Presentation transcript:

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 1 FDA Summary CryoLife BioGlue P Lead FDA Reviewer Lisa Kennell

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 2 Introduction Regulatory history of BioGlue Clinical Summary Non-clinical testing to be discussed Panel Questions

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 3 FDA Review Team Team LeaderLisa Kennell, B.S. Clinical ReviewerPaul Chandeysson, M.D. Immunology Katherine Merritt, Ph.D. FDA SGEHenry Homburger, M.D. StatisticsT.C. Lu, M.S., M.A. ChemistryEllen Chen, Ph.D. and Srilekha Das, Ph.D.

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 4 Regulatory History IDE initially for adjunct to Type A (ascending) aortic dissection repair, submitted in 1998

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 5 Regulatory History Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) submitted June 1999, approved December 1999 for adjunct in repair of Type A and B aortic dissections HDE for treating diseases or patient populations with incidence rate of 4000 or less per year in U.S. no alternatives or alternatives are inadequate FDA reviews only safety and assesses probable benefit Type A and Type B dissections

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 6 Regulatory History After HDE approval, sponsor had protocol deviations in IDE study randomization breaches obtaining patient consent “off label” uses outside of the protocol patient entrance criteria and approved HDE indication began current cardiac/vascular study to address deviations

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 7 BioGlue Indication The indication for use for the BioGlue is “BioGlue Surgical Adhesive is indicated for use as an adjunct to standard methods of cardiac and vascular repair such as sutures (or staples) to provide hemostasis.”

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 8 Clinical Summary

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 9 Clinical Summary BioGlue versus standard hemostasis Superiority Hypothesis 10% improvement in hemostasis with BioGlue 75 patients/treatment group

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 10 Entrance Criteria Include patients needing cardiac or vascular repairs Exclude patients with known hypersensitivity to albumin, bovine products, glutaraldehyde needing intra-cerebral circulation repair needing repair of acute thoracic aortic dissections

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 11 Indication for Surgery Anastomotic Location

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 12 Clinical Summary Primary Endpoint Anastomotic hemostasis (no need for additional agents to control bleeding at any point)

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 13 Clinical Summary Secondary Endpoints Exposure to donor blood products Additional hemostatic agents Re-operation for bleeding Major and Minor adverse events Mortality

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 14 Effectiveness Results Primary Endpoint

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 15 Effectiveness Results Secondary Endpoints

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 16 Effectiveness Results Secondary Endpoints

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 17 Major Safety Results

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 18 Major Safety Results

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 19 Preclinical Data and Discussion Items Immunogenicity

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 20 Summary of Non-Clinical Testing Immunogenicity Buehler hypersensitivity test (no adjuvant) Kligman hypersensitivity test (with adjuvant) Antigenicity in guinea pigs (with ELISA Ag/Ab assay)

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 21 Summary of Non-Clinical Testing Immunogenicity complement activation in vitro Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) concentration after various polymerization times from 1.5 min to 24 hr via bicinchoninic acid (BCA) and Lowry assays Biodegradation in animals

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 22 Results of Non-Clinical Immunogenicity Testing Ag/Ab ELISA assays resulted in low titers of Ab to BioGlue and to BSA in sensitized groups Lowry assay showed unbound protein, but BCA assay did not Animal studies suggest BioGlue encapsulation or reaction limited to local inflammatory response in most, but some animals showed degradation

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 23 Independent Review Henry Homburger, M.D. Section of Clinical Chemistry and Medical Labs, Mayo Clinic What is the likelihood that a clinical immunologic response will occur? Data presented are not sufficient to reach a firm conclusion Animal studies show that antigen-specific T lymphocytes may persist, but this does not necessarily indicate an increased risk of a clinically significant immunologic reaction

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 24 Independent Review Henry Homburger, M.D. Section of Clinical Chemistry and Medical Labs, Mayo Clinic What is the likelihood that a clinical immunologic response will occur? A transitory immune response is not likely to be clinically significant but may prime the immune system for subsequent exposures, which could be clinically significant Persistence of antigen at the surgical site has a theoretical risk of immune complex mediated disease

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 25 Independent Review Henry Homburger, M.D. Section of Clinical Chemistry and Medical Labs, Mayo Clinic Recommendations: It would be difficult to design further animal studies to evaluate the human risk It is “prudent and advisable” to provide extensive product labeling Caution against the repeated use in the same person Recommend post-market testing for specific antibodies and for in vitro measurement of delayed hypersensitivity

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 26 Panel Questions

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 27 Panel Questions- Effectiveness 1.Please discuss the clinical implications of the primary and secondary endpoint data.

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 28 Panel Questions- Effectiveness 2. The sponsor states in the submission that “Our clinical investigators believe that the routine use of BioGlue in these patients will allow them to modify their blood management protocol and should minimize the potentially life-threatening complication of postoperative hemorrhage.” Please comment on whether there is adequate information to support the statement.

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 29 Panel Questions- Effectiveness 3. Based on the information provided in the premarket approval application, please discuss whether the information supports reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the BioGlue.

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 30 Panel Questions-Labeling 4a. Please discuss the findings of the immunogenicity testing, especially as they relate to BOTH the physician and/or any patient labeling. Should patients be advised of specific adverse events to be aware of that may suggest they are experiencing a sensitization reaction?

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 31 Panel Questions- Immunogenicity 4b.Please discuss the immunogenicity data. Are additional pre- or post- marketing studies needed to assess the immune potential of BioGlue?

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 32 Panel Questions-Labeling 5. Please comment on the INDICATIONS FOR USE section as to whether it identifies the appropriate patient population for treatment with BioGlue? “BioGlue Surgical Adhesive is indicated for use as an adjunct to standard methods of cardiac and vascular repair such as sutures (or staples) to provide hemostasis.”

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 33 Panel Questions-Labeling 6.Please comment on the DIRECTIONS FOR USE as to whether they adequately describe how the BioGlue should be used to maximize benefits and minimize adverse events?

DHHS / FDA / CDRH 34 Panel Questions-Labeling 7.Do you have any other recommendations regarding the labeling of this device?