Options for Modalities and Treatment of Special Products.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries FINDINGS FROM A GLOBAL GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL Director, Trade, Equity and Development.
Advertisements

Completing the Doha Round Who Needs to Do What to Ensure Success? NFTC Session WTO Public Symposium April 20, 2005 Prosperity Through Trade.
The Benefits of a New WTO Agreement for Agri-food Trade Shiferaw Adilu Alberta Agriculture and Food.
Non-Agricultural Market Access Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
State of WTO Agricultural Negotiations Meeting on the Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization in the Agriculture Sector February 2003 Note:
The Multilateral Trading System: Opportunities and Challenges for the East African Community (EAC) Countries Anne Kamau Ministry of Trade Department of.
1 Inter-Agency "Data Day"18-19 May 2009 at WTO Geneva, 18 th May 2009 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Ralf Peters DITC UNCTAD, Geneva.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
Regional Workshop on integrating agricultural questions with 2020 round of population and housing census, Noumea, William Okekini Ministry of Agriculture.
Agriculture Negotiations in the WTO Dr Biswajit Dhar Professor and Head Centre for WTO Studies Indian Institute of Foreign Trade New Delhi WTO Cell, IIFT.
32 nd IPC SEMINAR New Delhi, India The Role of South-South Trade November 2003 Shishir Priyadarshi Development Division, WTO.
WTO AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS Portfolio Committee Agriculture and Land Affairs April 2003 Günter Müller Directorate: International Trade National Department.
U.S. Agricultural Policy Joseph W. Glauber U.S. Department of Agriculture Silverado Symposium on Agricultural Policy Reform / Napa, California /January.
WTO Agriculture Negotiations Outstanding Issues for Developing Countries Tim Ruffer Oxford Policy Management
EU-LDC NETWORK CONFERENCE Trade and Poverty Reduction ISSUES FACING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN THE ONGOING WTO NEGOTIATIONS IN AGRICULTURE ’ ‘A POVERTY REDUCTION.
Sample exam paper Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
1 [Giovanni Anania, IAAE Congress, Durban, August 2003] The Fischler reform of the CAP and the WTO negotiations Giovanni Anania Department of Economics.
The Doha Round Lecture 21 The Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Developing Countries and the Doha Round Agricultural Negotiations Lecture 29 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The Doha Round – background and issues Lecture 25 The Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement Lecture 20. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement Lecture 24. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM IN THE WTO The Road Ahead.
What needs to be done to make Doha a Development Round? ATDN - Meeting, , Berlin Marita Wiggerthale Deutschland.
Liberalizing Trade in Agriculture and Food Security Vanderbilt Symposium on Food Security Prof. Christine Kaufmann, University of Zurich Nashville, 16.
Tim Josling ROA Panel Comments Tim Josling Stanford University.
The Ongoing Negotiations on Agriculture: Some Observations
May19,2005 NAPC_TPD by: Mahmoud Babili1 Multilateral trade negotiations and Agricultural policies in the developed economies.
WTO Trade Negotiations Current Status San Antonio, Texas May 23, 2002 USDA-Economic Research Service.
The WTO negotiations: Will developing countries benefit from a new agreement?
Negotiations on Agriculture State of Play by Surabhi Mittal WTO &The Doha Round : The Way Forward 6-7 April, 2006.
Training session - Vietnamese agriculture and WTO - Hanoi - sept The on-going negotiations.
1 Agriculture in July Package: Nepal Presentation by South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment (SAWTEE), Kathmandu.
IPC Seminar Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round MARCELO REGUNAGA Hanoi – October 2005.
CSO analysis and recommendations on ASEAN policies and programs on Food Security and Climate Change.
One law firm around the world One law firm around the world Status of GATS Negotiations David Hartridge Hanoi, Vietnam August 5, 2003.
POSSIBLE MODALITIES FOR THE SPECIAL SAFEGUARD MECHANISM (SSM) By: Raul Q. Montemayor National Business Manager Federation of Free Farmers Cooperatives,
Lecture 2 – Global Trends in Agriculture EconS350 Fall Semester, 2010.
UNCTAD 1 OVERVIEW OF THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED BY DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD
WORKSHOP ON MARKET ACCESS IN THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME Ministry of Foreign Trade & International Cooperation and UNCTAD Guyana, September 2002 WTO NEGOTIATIONS.
Global Agriculture Policy Institute WTO/DDA Negotiations on Agriculture Global Agriculture Policy Institue CHOI, Yong Kyu.
Agriculture Negotiations: Moving Forward Ashok Gulati IFPRI Director in Asia WTO and The Doha Round: The Way forward ICRIER-SRTT Conference 6-7 April,
IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE MULTILATERAL AGRICULTURAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ON CEMAC COUNTRIES By: Ernest BAMOU & Jean Pierre TCHANOU UNCTAD workshop on Trade.
“July Package” & South Asian Agriculture Prof. J. George Faculty of Economics & Development Planning (FEDP), Haryana Institute of Public Administration,
Impact on EU agriculture of Falconer’s draft modalities DG for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
1 Development Dimension in July Package : Concerns of South Asia Posh Raj Pandey CUTS, New Delhi 17 September 2005.
THE ROLE OF TRADE: SOUTH-SOUTH AND GLOBAL Ing. MARCELO REGUNAGA New Delhi, November 2003.
The Doha Round of WTO Negotiations: The U.S. Perspective Robert L. Thompson Chairman International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council and Gardner.
The Developing Countries’ Emerging Role in the Global Market Robert L. Thompson Chairman International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council 24 May.
International Agriculture Negotiations: Indian Perspective Manoj Joshi Counsellor(Economic) Embassy of India.
“The Domestic Politics of Trade: A U.S. Farmers View” Ron Heck, President American Soybean Association “Agricultural Trade Negotiations: Politics and Prospects”
1 THE DEVELOPMENT DIMENSION OF THE DDA Capetown Shishir Priyadarshi 31 August 2005 Development Division World Trade Organisation.
WTO Status of Negotiation, July 2004 Framework... and Beyond Debra Henke USDA/ Foreign Agricultural Service.
WTO Hong Kong Ministerial Gains & Losses for India Pradeep S. Mehta CUTS International Jaipur, India
Insights from the Environmental Goods and Services Debate Erwin Rose Economic Affairs Officer United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
The Prospects of Korean Agriculture post DDA - The Impact of Agricultural Market Opening on Korean Agriculture - The Prospects of Korean Agriculture post.
Common Agricultural Policy European Economics Topic 3.
Non-agricultural market access negotiations Marc Bacchetta ERSD WTO.
Research Strategy. 2 Research Strategy: Basic Premises The future of Indian agriculture depends on successfully facing the challenges of greater market.
Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round A European Perspective Dr Rolf Moehler.
WTO’s Doha Development Agenda and South Asian Agriculture
INTERNATIONAL TRADE POLICY
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement
UN ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR AFRICA
GTAP-AGR Modification occurs in production structure of ag sectors and segregation of factor markets between farm and non-farm uses. Farm production included.
The 2008 Market Access Proposals and Developing Countries
National accounts and SDGs
European agriculture, the future of the CAP and the WTO negotiations
The EU-US Agricultural Framework Agreement
Free Trade Area of the Americas: Status & Prospects
Presentation transcript:

Options for Modalities and Treatment of Special Products

Background  differential levels of development and capabilities in adjusting to market access liberalization between the developed and the developing  degradation of the target reform program in the Doha mandate  differential levels of development and capabilities in adjusting to market access liberalization between the developed and the developing  degradation of the target reform program in the Doha mandate

 … but Doha mandate calls for the full integration of SND  substantial distortions and imbalances will still persist in this Round and beyond  thus the necessity for appropriate shield mechanisms to provide adequate protection to threatened sectors critical to food security, livelihood security and rural development  … but Doha mandate calls for the full integration of SND  substantial distortions and imbalances will still persist in this Round and beyond  thus the necessity for appropriate shield mechanisms to provide adequate protection to threatened sectors critical to food security, livelihood security and rural development

Development of the SP Concept  Early proposals & ideas: Development Box (LMG), Food Security Box (India), ‘Strategic’ Products (AG), Food Security Mechanism (Philippines & Indonesia)  Harbinson’s Text and Special Products  Statement & Declaration, Alliance for SP & SSM (now G33)  Early proposals & ideas: Development Box (LMG), Food Security Box (India), ‘Strategic’ Products (AG), Food Security Mechanism (Philippines & Indonesia)  Harbinson’s Text and Special Products  Statement & Declaration, Alliance for SP & SSM (now G33)

 the 01 August Framework Agreement  flexibility to designate an appropriate number  based on criteria of food security, livelihood security and rural development needs  eligible for more flexible treatment  criteria and treatment will be further specified  the 01 August Framework Agreement  flexibility to designate an appropriate number  based on criteria of food security, livelihood security and rural development needs  eligible for more flexible treatment  criteria and treatment will be further specified

 self-designation and objective criteria  from the three criteria to operational guidelines or indicators (G33 Jakarta Ministerial)  G33’s illustrative, non-exhaustive list of indicators as guidelines for selection of SPs  self-designation and objective criteria  from the three criteria to operational guidelines or indicators (G33 Jakarta Ministerial)  G33’s illustrative, non-exhaustive list of indicators as guidelines for selection of SPs

Debate on Some Basic Issues  ‘SPs as exceptions will diminish expected market access gains’  South-South trade  either SP or SSM  linking SP & SSM to market access liberalization  views on the indicators  ‘SPs as exceptions will diminish expected market access gains’  South-South trade  either SP or SSM  linking SP & SSM to market access liberalization  views on the indicators

Modalities: Coverage  negotiated thresholds of a set of indicators  self-designation within a negotiated number  self-designation guided by indicators within a negotiated number  negotiated thresholds of a set of indicators  self-designation within a negotiated number  self-designation guided by indicators within a negotiated number

Indicators: examples  staples or part of basic commodity basket per laws or statutes  proportion of domestic consumption domestically produced  proportion of food expenditure or income spent at the household level  proportion of domestic consumption to total world exports Indicators: examples  staples or part of basic commodity basket per laws or statutes  proportion of domestic consumption domestically produced  proportion of food expenditure or income spent at the household level  proportion of domestic consumption to total world exports

 proportion of world exports accounted for by the largest exporting country  proportion of domestic production accounted for by small farms (defined)  proportion of small farms (defined)  proportion of low income, resource poor, subsistence or disadvantaged farmers  proportion of world exports accounted for by the largest exporting country  proportion of domestic production accounted for by small farms (defined)  proportion of small farms (defined)  proportion of low income, resource poor, subsistence or disadvantaged farmers

 proportion of agricultural population or rural labor dependent or employed  proportion of gross arable land under cultivation  proportion of production accounted for by disadvantaged regions, vulnerable groups  proportion of agricultural population or rural labor dependent or employed  proportion of gross arable land under cultivation  proportion of production accounted for by disadvantaged regions, vulnerable groups

 proportion of product processing relative to world average  direct contribution to rural living standards and linkages to non-farm rural economic activities  contribution to agriculture GDP  proportion of product processing relative to world average  direct contribution to rural living standards and linkages to non-farm rural economic activities  contribution to agriculture GDP

Modalities: Treatment  the hardline: no further market access commitments for all SPs irrespective of coverage scope  other modalities: nominal cuts, extended implementation periods, TRQs, indicator filters/thresholds  G33 movement: a tiered approach on 20% of agriculture tariff lines as SPs ‘guided by an illustrative, non- exhaustive, non-prescriptive and non-cumulative list of indicators’  the hardline: no further market access commitments for all SPs irrespective of coverage scope  other modalities: nominal cuts, extended implementation periods, TRQs, indicator filters/thresholds  G33 movement: a tiered approach on 20% of agriculture tariff lines as SPs ‘guided by an illustrative, non- exhaustive, non-prescriptive and non-cumulative list of indicators’

G33 flexibility tiers for SPs  50% of SPs (10% of total lines) not subject to tariff reductions  15% (3% of total lines) not subject to tariff reductions by virtue of ‘special circumstances’  a further 25% (5% of total lines) to be subjected to 5% tariff reduction  remaining 10% (2% of total lines) to be subjected to 10% tariff reduction G33 flexibility tiers for SPs  50% of SPs (10% of total lines) not subject to tariff reductions  15% (3% of total lines) not subject to tariff reductions by virtue of ‘special circumstances’  a further 25% (5% of total lines) to be subjected to 5% tariff reduction  remaining 10% (2% of total lines) to be subjected to 10% tariff reduction

Other treatment elements, G33  automatic access of SPs to the SSM  no new TRQ commitments & tariff capping  exported products with notified product-specific AMS  one indicator at the national, regional or household level is enough Other treatment elements, G33  automatic access of SPs to the SSM  no new TRQ commitments & tariff capping  exported products with notified product-specific AMS  one indicator at the national, regional or household level is enough

Task Force WAR Department of Agriculture Republic of the Philippines Task Force WAR Department of Agriculture Republic of the Philippines