Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme Data flow in Natura 2000: the past and the future Current and future data management Diederik.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The NATURE–SDIplus project Best Practice Network for SDI in Nature Conservation Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO Co-funded.
Advertisements

The European Shared Environmental Information System Meropi Paneli
Training on INSPIRE: a real challenge VESTA-GIS / NatureSDI+ 6 November 2008, Genova Danny Vandenbroucke K.U.Leuven (SADL) co-funded by the European Community.
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.
Country Visit LT Towards a Shared Environmental Information System SEIS Bernt Röndell.
Daniel Baláž, Ján Černecký State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic Nature Conservation and River Monitoring in Slovakia.
Natura EU ambitions for a coherent ecological network State of Play and Challenges Saskia Richartz Institute for European Environmental Policy.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Workshop INSPIRE and Reporting under environmental acquis JRC, Ispra.
Update on INSPIRE CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting 2015 Darja Lihteneger Project manager - Data centres and INSPIRE implementation IDM -
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting Stakeholder Workshop 19/20 Nov 2015 Joachim D'Eugenio Steve White DG Environment European Commission.
Biodiversity Data Center meeting Copenhagen 29. Sept How does the BDC support the user needs -by the example of BAP and SEBI - ETC / BD.
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting MIG-P meeting 4 Dec 2015 Joachim D'Eugenio Steve White DG Environment European Commission.
Sum-up of common issues from pilots Different types of exercises when joining statutory reporting & INSPIRE implementation: 1-To explain ‘INSPIRE fitting.
European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity EIONET NRC Meeting on Biodiversity October 2011, Copenhagen Progress.
Common Database on Designated Areas vs. INSPIRE Martin Tuchyňa, Darja Lihteneger INSPIRUJME SE, , Bratislava.
1 The WISE implementation plan and WISE development support by the Technical Group Stefan Jensen WISE GIS workshop Brussels.
WP3 Task 3.2 Adaptation of the Training Material.
Linkvit Project Meeting Template for contents adaptation Author(s) [Name] Organization(s) [Name]
- Progress and planning- European Commission
INSPIRE Data Specification Protected Sites
(see draft MIWP: European Commission
Marine Expert Group meeting Brussels, 6 November 2015
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
WP4 Revision of the Dataflow - Standard Data Form -
Principles and rationale for SAC/SPA designation and management
Martin Tuchyňa Towards an INSPIREd e-reporting & INSPIRE priority datasets in Slovakia INSPIRE conference ,
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
Point 5 Revising the Natura 2000 Standard Data Form
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
‘Basic approach: Reporting and data handling’
MIWP MIWP actions follow-up
MIG-T meeting, 19th April 2016, Ispra End-user applications
Priority List of Data Sets for eReporting Proposal for extension, Issues Gabriele Vincze, 23 November 2017.
Public access to Natura 2000 geo-database
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting
Expert Group on Reporting Nature Directives , Brussels
Work on the coherence of data-flows / improving data-quality
Towards WISE as a distributed system
GISCO Working Party October 2001
WP 4 - Revision of Natura 2000 dataflow
Natura 2000 dataflow (1) QA/QCs for Natura 2000 dataflow is now up and running (completeness & consistency of the tabular data) Individual QA/QCs now uploaded.
Unit D.2 – Water and Marine, DG Environment, European Commission
The Biodiversity Information System for Europe (BISE)
The Biodiversity Information System for Europe - BISE v.0
Carlos Romão | Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives
Expert Group on Reporting under the Nature Directives
WISE - State of the art --- WISE - in the context of SEIS
- Progress and planning- European Commission
Natura 2000: points of information
10th meeting of the Expert Group on Reporting (24 November 2011)
Directive 2007/60/EC Draft concept paper on reporting and compliance checking for the Floods Directive.
New online Natura 2000 viewer
The Biodiversity Information System for Europe (BISE)
Agenda item 1 - Scene setting
Streamlining of monitoring and reporting under WFD, Nitrates Directive and EEA's SoE –concept paper DG Environment.
Submitting national data through Reportnet
Water Information System for Europe
Reportnet 3.0 Database Feasibility Study – Approach
“Access to Natura 2000 Data” -
WP4 Revision of the Dataflow - Standard Data Form -
4th Meeting of the MIG-P, Brussels, June 2016
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
MIWP Action on « List of priority data sets »
WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives
NEW STEPS IN THE PROJECT GIS NATURA 2000
4.1 What is WISE compatible
Nature Directives Expert Group Meeting Brussels, 22 May 2019
Feasibility study on data harvesting using INSPIRE infrastructure
Presentation transcript:

co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme Data flow in Natura 2000: the past and the future Current and future data management Diederik Tirry SADL K.U.Leuven

Overview The Natura 2000 Network Data Flow Validating spatial data System architecture DG ENV Intranet Current N2K Reporting Future N2K data flow

The Natura 2000 network 1.79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds SPA (Special Protection Areas) Designated by MS

4 The Natura 2000 network 2. 92/43/EEC and 97/62/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora pSCI SCI Proposed by MS (Sites of Community importance) SAC (Special Areas of Conservation) Approved by EC

Data Flow

Validating spatial data Checking digital spatial data by comparing:  Spatial boundaries  Descriptive information  GISCO Spatial data Focus on:  Occurence of sites (code and name)  Position of centroid of sites (lat/lon)  Area Common problems:  Centroid position far away or close to another site  Area > 5% difference between recorded and calculated value  Anomalies between descriptive and spatial database

Central database UML

System Architecture

N2K at DG ENV: Intranet

(1) Standard Data Form

(2) Generate an overview map

(3) Interactive Site Selection

(4) Historical Maps

Number of uploaded sites (status 31/07/08)

Reporting N2K: complex process Within a member state

Reporting N2K: complex process Between the MS and the EC

Problem statement The data flow process is complex and time consuming  Resulting in discrepancies of information available at EU and MS level  Resulting in not up-to-date information (N+2 > N-2) The data flow process is not fully harmonised (although standard data forms, guidelines, … exist)  Between spatial and non-spatial  Between SCI and SPA  INSPIRE and SEIS can/should/will help

Streamlining reporting N2K Which data flows are concerned?

Streamlining reporting N2K For SEIS it is crucial to have fast updates of high quality data and time related information series in view of monitoring and reporting obligations Expert Group on Reporting under Nature Directives  DG ENV, EEA, ETC/BD, Member States, other experts Purpose:  Prepare a revision of the dataflow regarding Natura 2000 sites (standard data forms and maps) and switch exclusively to electronic data-flow (also in “legal” terms)  Streamline & modernise data flows Standardisation of required content/data Synchronisation of reporting cycles, merging reports Switch to e-Reporting Ensure links between different data-flows & others  Develop ideas for presentation of the data and their analysis to a wide range of users

Streamlining reporting N2K Topics related to Natura 2000: 1.Identification of problems regarding current data-flow 2.Current and future use/purpose of the SDF information 3.What type of information is really needed – could some of the information be deleted? New types of information to be added? 4.Review content of SDF, proposal for revision 5.How can we in future deal with changes more efficiently? 6.Development of technical guidelines for geographic and descriptive information (link with INSPIRE)

Conclusions and further work Natura 2000 is one of the environmental policy areas It is a reporting mechanism With complex data/information flows It will be part of SEIS It will build also on INSPIRE  EU INSPIRE GEO-PORTAL (internal)  EEA public viewer (external) First focus is on streamlining the reporting Followed by New methods to represent information to the policy makers and the public

co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme Thank you for your attention! Questions???