Validating the Need for Systemic Change Leaders of Learners March 27-28, 2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Overview of STAAR State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Committee (AADDC) April 16, 2012.

Advertisements

Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)

Preparing for STAAR: End-of-Course Exams North East ISD Spring 2012 Version

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.

1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden

Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.

Ready for STAAR Victoria Independent School District 1.

STAAR 3D Data We just got a bunch of data What do we do with it

January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.

Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.

STAAR/EOC Overview of Assessment Program HISD Professional Support & Development High School Science Team.

© 2011 Region XIII System Support Team Bolding Blasting… into the future … STAAR.

Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.

State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.

STAAR & Accountability 2012 End of Course AYP Grades 3-8 Performance Standards State Accountability.

2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.

STAAR 3-8 Performance Standards ALAST… 3-8 Phase In Standards.

Parent Meeting February STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness Emphasis on college and career readiness standards Began school.

1. We have been down this path before! And each time we needed a little time to learn the new system. And each test added a new layer of rigor and a new.

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.

Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.

February GRADES Reading: Grades 3 – 8 Math: Grades 3 – 8 Writing: Grades 4 & 7 Science: Grades 5 & 8 Social Studies: Grade 8 2 HIGH SCHOOL.

OVERVIEW OF STATE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2010 Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division 1.

1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.

END OF COURSE TESTING WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT Freshman Parent Information Session

Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.

Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.

2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.

Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.

Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.

TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability

Boyd Independent School District 2012 District Performance/AEIS Report.

Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.

© 2015 Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. All rights reserved. January 29, 2015 Presented by: Ann R. Patton Managing Compensation Consultant Compensation.

HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.

There Should be an App for That EOC Cumulative Scoring.

What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Warren Roane Mary Kay Gianoutsos Humble ISD Best Laid Plans: EOC Projections, Results and Consequences Best.

March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.

{ STAAR for Parents December 4, 2012 State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness Elise W. Kail Executive Director of Accountability Midland ISD 1.

Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)

FBISD Grading Policy Changes EIA(Local) Student/Parent Handbook Page 11.

Socorro Independent School District Senate Bill 149 IGC Meeting October 2015 Presented by Secondary Instructional Officers and Dr. Holly Fields.

Validating the Need for Systemic Change: Standard Practice Instructional Leadership Training February 5, 2013.

Accountability Update Ty

March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.

Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.

7 th Grade Promotion Advancing to 8 th Grade Successfully.

Northwest ISD January 11, 2016 The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global.

State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.

The State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness January 2012.

There Should be an App for That EOC Cumulative Scoring Texas Assessment Conference 11/28/2012.

TAKS Release Plan  In 2007 SB 1031 changed the release of tests to every three years  In 2009 HB 3 changed the release of tests to exclude retests 2.

Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.

OVERVIEW OF STATE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2010

A STAAR is Born The TAKS to STAAR Transition

Weslaco East High School

Data Review and Discussion David Holland

Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)

Validating the Need for Systemic Change

Accountability Update

Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process

EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

Student STAARs.

Presentation transcript:

Validating the Need for Systemic Change Leaders of Learners March 27-28, 2013

Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) Level III (Advanced) STAAR Performance Standards Final Level II (2016 and beyond) Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) % % % % Scale Score Percent Correct Grade 8 Reading Level II (Satisfactory) Sufficiently prepared for the next grade level or course Level III (Advanced) Well prepared for the next grade level or course Level I (Unsatisfactory) Inadequately prepared for the next grade level or course

Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) Level III (Advanced) STAAR Performance Standards Final Level II (2016 and beyond) Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) % % % % Scale Score Percent Correct Algebra I Level II (Satisfactory) Sufficiently prepared for the next grade level or course Level III (Advanced) Well prepared for the next grade level or course Level I (Unsatisfactory) Inadequately prepared for the next grade level or course

All tests, grades 3 – 8 and Reading 1 at Level II Final

All tests, grades 3 – 8 and Algebra 1 at Level II Final

Source: AEIS

4- or 5-Year Grad RateRHSP/DAPIndex 4 - Part 1 Overall District Name Total Pts Max Pts Max Pts Total Pts Max Pts Total Pts Max Pts Score Denton Grapevine-Colleyville Hurst-Euless-Bedford Eagle Mountain-Saginaw Grand Prairie Keller Northwest Pflugerville Irving Mansfield Arlington Carrollton-Farmers Branch Fort Worth Birdville Source: Moak Casey, based on 2012 AEIS Projected 2013 District Performance, Accountability Index 4

# tests below minimum # tests met minimum but not passing 01234Total Total students 2015 Cohort EOC Retesting (Number of students remaining after December testing) 277 students must take one or more tests Failing scores on one or more tests

Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) Level III (Advanced) STAAR Performance Standards Phase-in Final Level II (2016 and beyond) Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) % % % % Scale Score Percent Correct Algebra I

Continuous improvement timeline Feb 2003 BISD enters ESC XI Continuous Improvement Consortium with Weatherford and Burleson ISDs Jul 2003Jim Shipley CI overview training for principals Mar 2004 BISD Board Orientation Apr 2004Board approves new goals/objectives, Graduate Profile Apr 2004 HEB and Decatur join consortium Jun 2004 District Department Team training Jun 2004 Campus Leadership Team training (Level I) Oct 2004 Teacher/Student Partnership Training Nov 2004 Campus Leadership Training (Level II) Jan 2005 Campus and Department Systems Checks

Eng III Eng II Eng I 8th8th 7th7th 6th6th 5th5th 4th4th 2nd2nd 1st1st KinderKinder Phase & 2013 Phase & 2015 Final 2016 & beyond Level II Phase-in rd3rd How will we ensure that our current 6 th graders are well prepared for success at the next level? How do we determine whether our kindergarten through grade 2 students are well prepared for success at the next level? Vertical/longitudinal thinking SSI in 2016

Tier 2: of 592 = 65% Level 2 (final): 1582Unsatisfactory 408 of 592 = 69%

Recommended ISIP Grades K-8 January % 20% 5% 47% 23% 30%

The moral imperative Ensure that all students are well prepared for success at the next level of learning This can only be accomplished by changing the learning system