1 Who's filtering health information? The role web masters play in disseminating health information on the Internet Julie Becker, Ph.D., MPH Temple University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of electronic resources. Review of Internet quality issues Nearly anyone can publish information on the Internet so –academic journals sit.
Advertisements

Consumer Involvement in Evaluating a Recovery-based Systems Change Initiative Vicki Cousins, Director Office of Consumer Affairs South Carolina Department.
HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND BULLYING POLICY AND PR0CEDURES Irvington Public Schools Staff Training School Year.
Faith Maina Ph.D. (SUNY Oswego) Kefa Otiso Ph.D. (Bowling Green) Francis Koti Ph.D. (Northern Alabama)
Combatting Information Fatigue: Health Information Resources for Veterans Terri Ottosen Consumer Health Outreach Coordinator National Network of Libraries.
BCERC Message Testing Study Kami J. Silk, PhD Department of Communication COTC, Michigan State University.
Designing Case Studies. Objectives After this session you will be able to: Describe the purpose of case studies. Plan a systematic approach to case study.
By Fitri Ramadhani 12250/ K1-09. Teaching a new language to non-native speakers may be one of the most challenging educational jobs out there, so teachers.
June 12, 2015 ICD-10 Update for Maine Child Health Improvement Partnership (ME CHIP)
Business and Management Research
LEADERSHIP INNOVATION: PREPARING LEADERS THROUGH TECHNOLOGY IN AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT Linda Orozco, Ph.D.
CHUCK YOUNG MANAGING DIRECTOR OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE to AGA BOSTON CHAPTER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE MARCH.
Websites vs. Databases Glenforest Secondary School Library Resource Centre Primary Source: M. Rosettis, St. Augustine.
World Bank, Africa Region, Africa Household Survey Databank - The World Bank - Africa.
Evaluating Websites.
Torrington, Hall & Taylor, Human Resource Management 6e, © Pearson Education Limited 2005 Slide 7.1 Importance of Selection The search for the perfect.
Research and the Internet Adapted from “Research and the Internet”, Online Writing Lab (OWL), Purdue University.
Parental Involvement Requirements A Focused Look at Compliance Spring 2009.
Cognitive Interviewing for Question Evaluation Kristen Miller, Ph.D. National Center for Health Statistics
Internet Research Evaluation AOS 272.  Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie 
Website Evaluation Using the internet for research.
Evaluating Web Sites BTT Mr. Garel. Evaluating Web Sites not all information found on the World Wide Web is accurate and not all web sites, no matter.
Web Site Evaluation (or “What Makes a Good the Kenmore West High School Library Media Center.
Using the Internet as a Research Tool. Group Work Why is it important to evaluate web sources? Why is it important to evaluate web sources? How do you.
Web-Site Evaluation Mrs. Weeks. Why evaluate? Anyone can build a web-site and post it to the Internet Verify information is accurate.
EVALUATING HEALTH INFORMATION ONLINE Lydia N Collins Consumer Health Coordinator.
Combatting Information Fatigue: Health Information Resources for Veterans Terri Ottosen Consumer Health Outreach Coordinator National Network of Libraries.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
Key steps in conducting survey research Decide if a survey is the best design to use Short time, economical, dispersed population, anonymity Report what.
How to evaluate ICT use for small organisations Session 2.
Evaluating a Research Report
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Stakeholder Advisory Committee June 25, 2014 Gerald A. Craver, PhD
Development of a Self-Assessment Method for Patients to Evaluate Internet-based Health Information.
Subject Guides and Subject Librarianship Ndhlovu Phillip Assistant Librarian NUST Library SubjectsPlus ZULC National Workshop December 13, 2011.
Confidential & Proprietary Copyright © 2008 The Nielsen Company Internet Usage & Technology Trends January - December 2008 Panorama Survey Nielsen Media.
1 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand data collection principles and practices. 2.Describe the differences between collecting qualitative and quantitative.
RESEARCH LESSSON/ CAREERS/ENG I BELLFLOWER, MCDANIEL, TROVATO.
Evaluating Web Sites C. Schwartz, LMS November 25, 2013.
Agenda for final meeting for on-going Partnerships  Presentation of participants  Novelties in the LLP  Evaluation  Dissemination and exploitation.
TOP TEST SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS John Fremer, Ph.D. President Caveon Test Security October 25, 2006.
Introduction to Website Evaluation Patricia Heeter EME6415.
Evaluating Web Sites. It’s on the web…but is it true? Nowadays, most students rely heavily on the Internet for research papers Nowadays, most students.
Interviews.
Regional School District 14 Filtering Strategy Audit Conducted by The Trifection Group.
Quantitative Research Qualitative Research? A type of educational research in which the researcher decides what to study. A type of educational research.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Pre-Show, the session will start shortly Real Time Webinar Pre-show “Real Time: The Next Major Advance in Agency Work Flow” will begin shortly.
INTERNAL USE ONLY CIS Web Centre, December 22, Web Content Management Systems A Presentation by Randy Schilling CIS Web Centre.
Are we there yet? Evaluating your graduation SiMR.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Domain Site Visit Team Orientation Office of Quality Performance and Accreditation.
Research Skills for Your Essay Where to begin…. Starting the search task for real Finding and selecting the best resources are the key to any project.
Raising Digitally Literate Citizens Curbar Primary School March 2016.
Chapter 29 Conducting Market Research. Objectives  Explain the steps in designing and conducting market research  Compare primary and secondary data.
Benefits of Internet Access for Pregnant Women: Results from a Pilot Study Natalie A. Brown, BA Julie Becker, PhD, MPH Gala True, PhD Center for Urban.
Aiming High for Disabled Children: improving data Presentation by Karin Lowson, YHEC, University of York Steve Bowring, City of Bradford MDC.
JOBTALKS The Follow-Up Interview Career Search Strategies Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D.
Environmental health and childcare: Examining practices and improving the environment 1) Women's Health & Environmental Network (WHEN), Philadelphia, PA;
Social Media August 2014.
REVISIONS DATE SLIDE CHANGE 11/22/10
Research and Information Fluency
AUTOMATICALLY CITE YOUR SOURCES FOR FREE AT
Using Credible Internet Sources
MODULE A - ADMINISTRATIVE
ABCs of Source Reliability
Job Analysis Chapter 5.
C. Schwartz, LMS December 2016
Differences in the Quality of Information on the Internet about Lung Cancer between the United States and Japan  Yasushi Goto, MD, Ikuo Sekine, MD, PhD,
Beyond Five paragraphs: advanced essay writing skills
Presentation transcript:

1 Who's filtering health information? The role web masters play in disseminating health information on the Internet Julie Becker, Ph.D., MPH Temple University Center for Public Health Philadelphia, PA

2 Purpose  To examine if organizations’ have policies and procedures regarding posting information and creating links on websites  To define those policies and procedures for posting information and creating links  To identify who plays a role in posting information, creating links and developing policies/ procedures

3 Methods  Content Analysis (Study period: June, January 2000)  Development of Website Evaluation Tool  Reliable and validated  surveys  Short surveys with 13 questions including demographic information  Interviews  Semi-structured interviews

4 Results: Content Analysis Number of Web Sites Examined in This Study Number of Parent Sites5 Number of Linked Sites125 Total No. of Sites130 Number of Unique, Non-Duplicate Linked Sites97 Number of Inaccessible Links17 Number of Accessible Links80 Total No. of Websites Reviewed in Study (parents & linked sites) 85

5 Results: Responses from Web Master Survey and Interviews Description of Information FrequencyPercentageSample No. of web sites responded to inquiry % Web sites w/ contact info (n=75) No. of web sites that answered the survey % Web sites w/ contact info (n=75) No. of Web Masters interviewed % Web sites who responded to survey (n=32)

6 Surveys and Content Analysis Compared : Policies and Procedures on Websites (%)

7 Surveys and Content Analysis Compared : P olicies and Procedures on Links (%)

8 Results from Survey: Are policies and procedures available for users to review regarding:Positive Response Posting information 25.0% Creating links 15.6% Researcher could only find12.5% Possible explanation: Respondents may have interpreted the question differently, I.e. not formal policies/ procedures but informal, unwritten ones

9 Characteristics of a “good” website identified by the Webmasters: AccurateVisually Appealing CurrentConfidential CredibleConsistent navigation and searchability Sources, authorship & references Credentials of sources Disclosure of sponsorship Disclosure of conflicts of interest

10 Themes from the Interviews  Few could define a good web site “I know a good web site when I see one”  Respondents cited accuracy, research-based, authorship, and currency as key attributes Yet few had those attributes on their web sites  Few consumers participate in review of content for web posting “knew what consumers wanted”  Part of their job to develop policies and procedures Yet many expressed concern that formal written policies may not exist within their organization

11 Responsibilities of Web Masters (%)

12 Webmasters:  Had multiple duties (90%)  Defined role as an “add-on” responsibility  Grossly underestimated time commitments for development and maintenance of website  Viewed website as an “electronic brochure” and non-innovative

13 Summary  Few formal, written policies and procedures existed  A difference was evident between nominal and operative policies and procedures  The role of webmaster was an “add-on” duty  Little formal training of webmasters  Gross underestimate of time and resources

14 Implications  Content Analysis  Surveys, Interviews  In the majority of sites, only the webmaster and maybe one other person reviewed content or links for posting