RFC 2050 Working Group. Background Addressing policy is obviously important Documenting that policy is crucial Todays Addressing policy is complex But.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

ICANN ASO Address Council LACNIC III Mexico City, November 2002.

Advertisements

Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process. facilitates the advancement of the Internet through information and educational outreach allocates Internet.

Address Council Operations Santiago, Chile – April 2003.

Address Council Hartmut Glaser LACNIC VI Montevideo – March 2004.

ASO General Assembly Santiago, Chile – April 2003.

LACNIC V – 18 / 20 de noviembre - La Habana, Cuba REPORT ADDRESS COUNCIL - AC ADDRESS SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION

Kuala Lumpur February 2004 APNIC 17 Kuala Lumpur February 2004 APNIC 17 IPv4 /8 Address Space Status.

Axel Pawlik. LACNIC III, November 2002, Mexico City. 1 6bone Address Registry Proposal Axel Pawlik / Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.

The Regional Internet Registry System RIR 101 Ciudad de México November 2002 LACNIC III Overview Evolution Structure Activities and Functions IP Address.

Experimental Internet Resource Allocations Philip Smith, Geoff Huston September 2002.

1 First NIR Meeting Criteria for establishment of new National Internet Registries March 1st, Korea, Seoul.

Broadband Guideline Takashi Arano APNIC WG-BB Chair.

1 IP Policy update - comparative status in all RIR regions Policy SIG 7 Sep 2006 APNIC 22, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Save Vocea.

RFC 2050 Working Group Ray Plzak ARIN On behalf of Mark McFadden.

APNIC 13March APNIC 13 Bangkok Status Report Ray Plzak.

Deploying IPv6: The time is now Are you ready? SFTA 24 May 2012 John Curran President and CEO, ARIN.

Disruption (and Recovery) of the ISP Business Model with IPv4 Depletion PTC12 15 January 2012 John Curran President and CEO, ARIN.

ARIN Update NANOG 55 – 6 June 2012 Mark Kosters Chief Technology Officer, ARIN.

ARIN IP Address Stewardship 3 February About ARIN Regional Internet Registry (RIR) – Established December 1997 by Internet community 100% community.

IP Statistics Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total /24 Equivalents Issued* to ISPs 9,74010,185 12,764 14,120 46,809 to End-users 1, , ,094 Total /24s.

Introduction to ARIN and the Internet Registry System.

Policy Proposals: AfriNIC-10 Public Meeting Vincent Ngundi AfriNIC PDP-MG Chair AfriNIC-10, Cairo, Egypt.

Introduction to IP Addressing & IPv6 Deployment Status.

R I P E N e t w o r k C o o r d i n a t i o n C e n t r e. h t t p : / / w w w. r i p e. n e t. n c r i p e. n e t 1 The Internet Registry System IPv4.

Internet Governance Community Use Slide Deck Courtesy of ARIN May 2014.

CATV/xDSL WG panel. Since the Last Address Policy SIG …. Formed a consensus to have a working group for CATV/xDSL assignment guideline. Called for wg.

Update about the “SHOULDs Analysing Project” in RIPE Policy Documents “Should” we use the RFC 2119 Defined Language in RIPE Policy Documents? Jan Žorž,

IPv4 Depletion IPv6 Adoption 3 February /8s Remaining.

IANA Activities Update Jean-Jacques Sahel | RIPE 70 Amsterdam| 15 May 2015.

IP Address Management The RIR System & IP policy

1 CS 4396 Computer Networks Lab The Internet. 2 A Definition On October 24, 1995, the FNC unanimously passed a resolution defining the term Internet.

Implementation Update Adam Gosling APNIC Policy SIG Meeting Thursday, 18 September 2014.

Transition of U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Stewardship of the IANA Functions to the Global.

1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.

1 The Geography and Governance of Internet Addresses Paul Wilson APNIC.

IPv6 Interim Policy Draft RIPE 42 Amsterdam, The Netherlands 1 May 2002.

PDO Activities Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC RIPE Oct - 4 Nov 2011, Vienna.

ICANN ASO Address Council ICANN Rio do Janeiro, March 2003.

APNIC Depletion of the IPv4 free address pool – IPv6 deployment The day after!! 8 August 2008 Queenstown, New Zealand In conjunction with APAN Cecil Goldstein,

RIR Status Report RIR Status Report IEPG August 2001.

ARIN Registry Update Richard Jimmerson Director of External Relations.

Introducing IANA Managing Number Resources Leo Vegoda Number Resources Manager – IANA October 2009.

ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.

1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.

1 IPv4 Depletion and Migration to IPv6 John Curran Chairman American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)

RFC 2050 Working Group Presentation by Cathy Wittbrodt Packet Design Original presentation by Mark McFadden University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.

A Review of Policy Development Processes in the Asia Pacific Region Address Policy SIG APNIC 15, Taipei, Taiwan 27 February 2003.

The ASO is a supporting organization of ICANN Number Resource Policy Development Process Alan Barrett ICANN ASO Address Council ICANN 46 Beijing April.

Filiz Yilmaz IGF 2006, Athens RIPE Policy History Focusing on IPv4 Filiz Yilmaz Policy Development Officer

Management of Internet Resources ITU Workshop on Developing a Policy and Regulatory Framework for Developing Economies of the Pacific 1 December 2003 Suva,

Address Supporting Organization Seoul, Korea – August 2003.

30 April 2003 ITU SG2, Geneva, Switzerland Axel Pawlik, RIPE NCC Information Document 21-E ITU-T Study Group 2 May 2003 Question:1/2 Source:TSB Title:The.

1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.

Internet Protocol Addresses What are they like and how are the managed? Paul Wilson APNIC.

1 The Internet Introductory material. An overview lecture that covers Internet related topics, including a definition of the Internet, an overview of its.

A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.

ICANN ASO Address Council Status Report APNIC 14, Open Policy Meeting Kitakyushu, Japan September 5 th, 2002.

Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer & Chris Grundemann Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA.

60 Draft Policy ARIN NRPM 4 (IPv4) Policy Cleanup.

IPv6 Adoption Status and Scheduling for Sustainable Development 24 July 2012 Nate Davis Chief Operating Officer, ARIN.

René Wilhelm & Henk Uijterwaal RIPE NCC APNIC21, 18 September 2018

2002/9/3 Ruri Hiromi (JPNIC IP Committee/Intec NetCore, Inc.)

IP Statistics Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total /24 Equivalents Issued*

RIPE Policy Landscape Filiz Yilmaz ESNOG, February 2008.

The Internet Introductory material.

IPv6 distribution and policy update

Policy SIG Thursday 28 August Christchurch, New Zealand

IPv6 Policy Update ~ APNIC community ~

ICANN ASO Address Council

IETF-104 (Prague) DHC WG Next steps

Presentation transcript:

RFC 2050 Working Group

Background Addressing policy is obviously important Documenting that policy is crucial Todays Addressing policy is complex But not so complex that it cant be described Many more people are interested than in the mid-1990s Situation isnt nearly the same CIDR, IPv6, mobile

What Was RFC 2050 Internet Registry IP Allocation Guidelines Edited by Kim Hubbard, Mark Kosters, David Conrad, Daniel Karrenberg and Jon Postel An IETF BCP describing the distribution of globally unique IP addresses and registry operations

Whats In RFC 2050? A few major sections An allocation framework Describing CIDR and hierarchical allocation An assignment framework Describing assignment of blocks of addresses to non-registries – end enterprises

More of RFC 2050 Describes needed utilization rates 25% initial and 50% utilization in first year Also described the documentation required Short section on operational Guidelines for Registries Also includes IN-ADDR.ARPA and a Right to Appeal

Is RFC 2050 Up To Date? Nobody seems to think so Disagreement about how out of date it really is Clearly not current in key areas IPv6 How further policy is developed Registry operations Assignment windows Special cases

Is There a Problem? Maybe not! Just ignore RFC 2050 and move on! Does anyone really care? Seems like the answer is yes Disagreement about what to do to replace RFC 2050

Should RFC 2050 be Updated? Landscape has been changed dramatically Not just IETF and IANA anymore Never really was this way Updating is would be difficult Many more constituents Other registries, ASO AC etc

Has Anything Happened? Active discussions in Taipei in August Proposal made at ICANN ASO meeting in Stockholm Discussion surrounds What would be a replacement How they would be edited And by whom! How they would be published

What Should be Done? ARIN sponsors a working group To discuss inside the ARIN region What should be done about RFC 2050 Propose alternatives And come to consensus within the region

Pertinent Quote Did you hate your life? David Conrad RFC 2050 contributor

RFC 2050 Working Group The objective of the RFC 2050 Working Group is to address the issues relating to relevance of RFC 2050 to the needs of today's Internet registry system The group will evaluate RFC 2050 and propose a method of replacing it with a new document or documents Once consensus has emerged on the process that will be used to replace RFC 2050, the working group will cooperatively develop its replacement The working group will work in coordination with the other Regional Internet Registries who will conduct a similar review process in their respective regions

Mailing List As usual Working Group activity is coordinated through a mailing list Available in the usual way Or Send SUBSCRIBE 2050-WG To

Working Group Milestones I Working group formed (10 Sep 2001) Provide inventory of issues and policies that RFC 2050 addresses (5 October 2001) RFC 2050 Working Group Open Meeting in Miami (29-30 October 2001) NOTE: These have been completed.

Working Group Milestones II Draft requirements document for rewrite (25 January 2002) Draft process for meeting document requirements (25 January 2002) Begin to draft the components of the replacement (February 2002) Work in coordination with the other Regional Internet Registries Public progress report at ASO general assembly meeting (2Q 2002)

Next Step Answer the musical question Any document or documents that purports to replace RFC 2050 must have... A requirements document To be completed prior to RIPE meeting in Amsterdam January 2002

Since We Started RFC 2050 inventory has been published on the list RIPE met in Prague Significant development Rather than have 3 or 4 registries discussing RFC 2050 separately Use a single list Cooperation and coordination

What Next Anyone who is interested in addressing should be involved This means you! Join the mailing list Participate in the discussions in other settings Get as many other people involved as possible Goal: building a useful consensus

Finally Food for thought Have you ever looked at RFC 2050? What should be in a document that describes how addressing works in the internet? Are some of the premises of RFC 2050 out of date? How should the documents look? Who should write them? What should be in them? And, what shouldnt be?