EDAS 735 Week 4 Lecture Ohio’s Leadership Development Framework & It’s Connection to the Ohio Improvement Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohio Improvement Process - OIP
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
Regional Work & The Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Sharing with ESC Providers September 22 nd, 2008.
Parents as Partners in Education
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Presenters: Jeanne Cowan Janet Hensley
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Collaborative Data Teams
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
Strategy + Planning to Ensure Your Chorus Will Thrive
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
The Method to My Madness Rapid City Area Schools Administrative Retreat August 9, 2010.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
1 Principals’ Student Achievement Meeting April 15, 2009 Leadership for Assessment Literacy From Paper to Practice.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
TOP TEN LIST OF COACHING BELIEFS CURRICULUM 511 DR. PECK BY: HALI PLUMMER.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
4/30/08Huron Middle School Chamberlain 7-1: Lessons Learned and Making Use of PLCs Wednesday April 30, 2008 Huron Middle School.
CSA Retreat July 2012 LEADERSHIP AT THE TOP. Focus District leadership Building leadership Coaching of principals Developing a culture dedicated to improvement.
Knowledgeable and Skillful Leadership
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Changing the Systemic Culture of a School-Based PLC
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Redefining Leadership for Improved Instructional Practice and Student Performance.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
C.L.I.F.S.S. The Fundamental Elements of Effective Schools and the Core Beliefs of ELI Districts.
OLAC Beliefs/Assumptions
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Presentation transcript:

EDAS 735 Week 4 Lecture Ohio’s Leadership Development Framework & It’s Connection to the Ohio Improvement Process

Quick Review What we’ve discussed so far

What is leadership about? It is about relationships –Between those who aspire to lead and those who choose to follow You don’t have to be in a position of power to matter to someone…leadership comes from anywhere It is about development…you developing yourself and others seeing you as someone who can develop them

Our New Problem It’s more than simply improving test scores Our challenge: –New public school curriculum –New assessment methods –New teaching methods This challenge isn’t a Technical one, it is an Adaptive one

There is no school for leaders that will teach them exactly how to make their district into one that will leave no child behind. All adults will need to develop new skills…especially those who are the leaders

Internal & External Risks Re-invention requires external and internal risks External Risk –Movement toward greater purpose, more focus and systematic methods to improve teaching and learning requires risk Internal Risk –The role of the leader isn’t to have all of the answers. –Moving away from compliantly getting along to being actively engaged requires risk

New Challenge Requires New Leadership From random acts of excellence to communities of practice Open dialogue around goals, priorities and professionalism In order to meet our adaptive challenge of re-invention, we must work on our schools and work on ourselves.

Remember… …adaptive change is not about simply applying some sort of model on the system that will alter its course.

Good to Great The Social Sector Application

Defining Characteristics of Collins’ Work Defining “Great” Level 5 Leadership First Who The Hedgehog Concept Turning the Flywheel

Parallel Concept Time…

Hedgehog Concept The Hedgehog Concept is a deep understanding of three intersecting circles translated into a simple, crystalline concept: What you are deeply passionate about What you can be best in the world at What drives your economic engine What you are deeply passionate about What you can be best in the world at What drives your economic engine

The OFCS’ Hedgehog What are you deeply passionate about? What can you be the best in the world at? What drives your engine?

School Leadership That Works The Principal & Superintendent *************** Methodology: Meta-Analyses

Main Findings Finding #1—District leadership isn’t an amorphous blob…it has an impact Finding #2—Goal setting is critical –Make it collaborative –Once agreed upon, consider it non-negotiable –The BOE is in support of it and it is made public –Monitoring is critical –Resources for supporting goals must be aligned Finding #3—Tenure of superintendent is correlated to achievement Unexpected Finding—Defined autonomy (Tight and Loose Leadership)

Goal Setting Findings Non-negotiable—while collaboratively set, everyone must act on them –Student Achievement & Classroom Instruction Board Alignment—publicly adopted; discussed constantly; no personal agendas Monitoring—purposeful and continual checks for implementation and impact Resources—focused towards increasing capacity of staff and know when to turn resources down

Journal Reflection Discussion

Collins—Waters & Marzano Parallels Greatness & Level 5 Leadership –it isn’t a matter of opinion. Certain companies behaved in different ways Certain leadership characteristics increase achievement Hedgehog Concept & Non-negotiable Goals What is your passion, what can you be best at, what drives your engine Be collaborative, but be focused once a commitment is made Put resources only on priorities…be disciplined…do not stray The Flywheel and Superintendent Tenure Stay the course and focus will produce results Superintendent tenure is associated with increased achievement…why? Staying the course and focusing?

Ohio’s Leadership Development Framework & It’s Connection to the Ohio Improvement Process

OLAC Charge What are the essential practices of leadership for the purpose of improving instructional practice and student performance? What are the critical elements of a comprehensive system of development? What tools, products and/or services can the state provide? What are the policy implications affecting the development of a cohesive leadership system in Ohio?

Foundational Beliefs of OLAC All educators have the capacity to lead Essential leadership practices must be implemented by the adults at all levels of the system for improvement to occur Leadership matters and has an impact on learning Ohio’s leadership system must be anchored in teaching and learning Research evidence exists to support leadership behaviors Leadership must be exercised at all levels of the school organization So…how do these fit in: –Relationships –Communities of practice –Open dialogue

Requires Adaptive Change in… District culture to require and support evidence- based practice Beliefs that race, disability and wealth pre- determine student achievement Belief that defining the Great in instruction is a matter of opinion Reframing leadership practices—implementation is continuous and collective across the entire system Adult accountability—the Cause to the Effect

OLAC Developed 6 Processes Data and the Decision Making Process Focused Goal Setting Process Instruction and the Learning Process Community Engage Process Resource Management Process Board Relations and Governance Process

Coherent & Cohesive Leadership Development Support growth of superintendents, principals and teacher leaders Address district system through leadership teams Align leadership initiatives at state level

The Framework Grounded in research Identified several Big Ideas that serve as common threads across Superintendent, DLTs and BLTs Identified essential practices specific to each group

Data and the Decision-Making Process Identify, collect and analyze Construct internal measures to hold adults accountable Continuous monitoring Move past opinion—research based practices

Focused Goal Setting Process Limited number of goals (Hedgehog) Collaboratively set, then non-negotiable Reduce the number of initiatives Develop one plan Internal accountability

Instruction and the Learning Process Focus on 21 st century skills—refer to 1 st lecture Collaborative structures to discuss data and reflect on implementation and practice Access to challenging content for all students and student groups

Community Engagement Process Involve all relevant stakeholders Gain support to sustain focus on goals Access the effectiveness of community engagement process Include internal and external community members

Resource Management Process Direct all resources towards student achievement Include Operations people in decision making Defined autonomy Proactive and highly intentional decision making

Board Development & Governance Process Board openly supports district goals Superintendent continuity increases student performance Engage multiple constituents to sustain focus Moral imperative of maintaining student- centered focus

Ohio Improvement Process From Multiple initiatives Contradictory initiatives Initiatives with little or no relationship to district goals Monitoring implementation doesn’t occur Implementation effects not evaluated Program ownership To Limited initiatives Singular focus Initiatives directly related to district goals and strategies Systematic monitoring Regular review of effectiveness Ownership throughout system due to parallel structures (DLT, BLT, Teacher teams) From Multiple initiatives Contradictory initiatives Initiatives with little or no relationship to district goals Monitoring implementation doesn’t occur Implementation effects not evaluated Program ownership To Limited initiatives Singular focus Initiatives directly related to district goals and strategies Systematic monitoring Regular review of effectiveness Ownership throughout system due to parallel structures (DLT, BLT, Teacher teams)