CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Inventory Uncertainty Quantification using TENDL Covariance Data in Fispact-II.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Inventory Uncertainty Quantification using TENDL Covariance Data in Fispact-II.
Advertisements

Computational Statistics. Basic ideas  Predict values that are hard to measure irl, by using co-variables (other properties from the same measurement.
Application of Bayesian Statistical Methods for the Analysis of DSMC Simulations of Hypersonic Shocks James S. Strand and David B. Goldstein The University.
EMERALD1: A Systematic Study of Cross Section Library Based Discrepancies in LWR Criticality Calculations Jaakko Leppänen Technical Research Centre of.
Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Gaussian Processes I have known
Benchmark test with OKTAVIAN data and Comment on kerma factor Yukinobu Watanabe Department of Advanced Energy Engineering Science, Kyushu University 3nd.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Lecture 4: Mathematical Tools for Econometrics Statistical Appendix (Chapter 3.1–3.2)
Status of Fusion Nuclear Data Development Mohamed Sawan Tim Bohm U. Wisconsin-Madison Fusion Neutronics Team.
Resampling techniques Why resampling? Jacknife Cross-validation Bootstrap Examples of application of bootstrap.
Planning operation start times for the manufacture of capital products with uncertain processing times and resource constraints D.P. Song, Dr. C.Hicks.
Materials for Lecture 13 Purpose summarize the selection of distributions and their appropriate validation tests Explain the use of Scenarios and Sensitivity.
Lecture II-2: Probability Review
Objectives of Multiple Regression
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Simulation of βn Emission From Fission Using Evaluated Nuclear Decay Data Ian Gauld Marco Pigni.
Evaluation and Use of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum and Spectra Covariance Matrices in Criticality and Shielding I. Kodeli1, A. Trkov1, R. Capote2,
Decay Data in View of Complex Applications Octavian Sima Physics Department, University of Bucharest Decay Data Evaluation Project Workshop May 12 – 14,
Status and needs of activation data for fusion Robin Forrest 1 and Jura Kopecky 2 1 Euratom/UKAEA Fusion Association Culham Science Centre, UK 2 JUKO Research,
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
MA and LLFP Transmutation Performance Assessment in the MYRRHA eXperimental ADS P&T: 8th IEM, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 9-11, 2004 E. Malambu, W.
Copyright © 2010 Lumina Decision Systems, Inc. Monte Carlo Simulation Analytica User Group Modeling Uncertainty Series #3 13 May 2010 Lonnie Chrisman,
Basic Probability (Chapter 2, W.J.Decoursey, 2003) Objectives: -Define probability and its relationship to relative frequency of an event. -Learn the basic.
Experimental determination of (n,x) cross sections on germanium (Ge), terbium (Tb) and lutetium (Lu) Dzysiuk Nataliya and Kadenko Igor Taras Shevchenko.
Beta Delayed Neutron Covariances Tim Johnson, Libby McCutchan, Alejandro Sonzogni National Nuclear Data Center.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Status of Neutronics Tools & Data for IFMIF-EVEDA U. Fischer, S. Simakov.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory PREPRO Accomplishments Dermott “Red” Cullen Presented at the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program Technical Conference.
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
LLNL-PRES-?????? This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
J. C. Neuber1 International Conference for Spent Fuel Management from Nuclear Power Reactors, IAEA, Vienna 31/05 – 04/06/2010 Advances in Burnup Credit.
Current Status of Nuclear Data Processing Activities at KAERI Do Heon KIM Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute Consultants’ Meeting on “The New Evaluated.
Lesson 4: Computer method overview
Update of uncertainty file in the EAF project J. Kopecky 1 and R.A. Forrest 2 1 JUKO Research, the Netherlands 2 EURATOM/UKAEA Association, Culham, UK.
TENDL for FENDL Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting December 6-9, 2011, IAEA, Vienna.
Nuclear Data for Fission and Fusion Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands Post-FISA Workshop Synergy between Fission and Fusion research June ,
Filling up FENDL with an all-in-one nuclear data evaluation and validation system around TALYS Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands FENDL-3 meeting.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority EAF-2010 – the best of a generation Jean-Christophe Sublet, Lee Packer Euratom/CCFE.
Luiz Leal, Wim Haeck, GAIA : Nuclear data processing for transport and criticality safety calculations at IRSN Luiz.
Benchmarks for Data Testing of Iron China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing , P.R.China.
Monte-Carlo based Expertise A powerful Tool for System Evaluation & Optimization  Introduction  Features  System Performance.
1/18/2016Atomic Scale Simulation1 Definition of Simulation What is a simulation? –It has an internal state “S” In classical mechanics, the state = positions.
Workshop On Nuclear Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies, ICTP , A. Borella1 Monte Carlo methods.
Plans for Validation and General Observations Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin-Madison 3 rd RCM on FENDL December.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. This work was funded by the RCUK Energy Programme [grant number EP/I501045].
3/2003 Rev 1 I.2.0 – slide 1 of 12 Session I.2.0 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 2Introduction Session 0Part I Table of Contents IAEA Post Graduate.
LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.
ANITA workshop, Uppsala, december 2008 ANITA neutron source Monte Carlo simulations and comparison with experimental data Mitja Majerle Nuclear Physics.
1 FRENCH ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISION (CEA) - NUCLEAR ENERGY DIVISION Nuclear Data Needs, SG26, NEA data bank, 3 May 2006CEA/DER Cadarache Centre Gérald Rimpault.
Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Techniques in Monte Carlo Codes for Multi-Region Criticality Calculations Bradley T. Rearden Douglas E. Peplow Oak Ridge.
CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Modern , d, p, n-Induced Activation Transmutation Systems EURATOM/CCFE.
Pavel Oblozinsky NSDD’07, St. Petersburg June 11-15, 2007 ENDF/B-VII.0 Library and Use of ENSDF Pavel Oblozinsky National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven.
Anders Nielsen Technical University of Denmark, DTU-Aqua Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission An Introduction.
IFMIF d-Li neutron source: Status of codes and nuclear data S.P. Simakov Institut für Reaktorsicherheit, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe IEA Neutronics Meeting,
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Association FZK-Euratom Review of IEAF-2001 Cross Section Data Libraries for IFMIF Activation.
Introduction to emulators Tony O’Hagan University of Sheffield.
1 Alushta 2016 CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n,α) 63 Ni REACTION at CROSS SECTION OF THE 66 Zn(n, α) 63 Ni REACTION at E n = 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 MeV I. Chuprakov,
R. Kass/Sp07P416/Lecture 71 More on Least Squares Fit (LSQF) In Lec 5, we discussed how we can fit our data points to a linear function (straight line)
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.
E. Mendoza, D.Cano-Ott Nuclear Innovation Unit (CIEMAT)
Uncertainty quantification in generic Monte Carlo Simulation: a mathematical framework How to do it? Abstract: Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is the capability.
Overview Modern chip designs have multiple IP components with different process, voltage, temperature sensitivities Optimizing mix to different customer.
1. Nuclear Data Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
Decay Data for Fusion Applications: Status, Issues and Needs
Bayesian Monte-Carlo and Experimental Uncertainties
7/21/2018 Analysis and quantification of modelling errors introduced in the deterministic calculational path applied to a mini-core problem SAIP 2015 conference.
Setting of various sources A
JOINT INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
Statistical Methods For Engineers
Safety Demonstration of Advanced Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants
I.Hill, J.Dyrda, N.Soppera, M.Bossant
The TALYS nuclear model code II
Presentation transcript:

CCFE is the fusion research arm of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Inventory Uncertainty Quantification using TENDL Covariance Data in Fispact-II James W. Eastwood, J. Guy Morgan and Jean-Christophe C. Sublet * Culham Electromagnetics Ltd, * United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority Culham Science Centre Abingdon, OX14 3DB United Kingdom

Simulation in space, energy and time Boltzmann equation transport time independent energy and spatial simulation primary response Bateman equation inventory time dependent secondary response Application Program Interface: interfaces to connect Boltzmann and Bateman solvers for non-linear t- and T-dependent transport MCNP6 US MCNP6 US EASY-II EU EASY-II EU API Multifaceted interface Material evolution TENDL EU TENDL EU 2 TRIPOLI EU TRIPOLI EU SERPENT EU SERPENT EU Carousels Nuclear Data

EASY-II framework FISPACT-II is a modern engineering prediction tool for activation-transmutation, depletion, inventories at the heart of the EASY-II system that relies on the n-TAL collaboration to provide the nuclear data libraries. FISPACT-II was designed to be a functional replacement for the code FISPACT-2007 but now includes enhanced capabilities.  d, p, n-Transport Activation Library: TENDL-2013 from the TENDL collaboration but also ENDF/B, JENDL, JEFF All nuclear data processing is handled by NJOY (LANL), PREPRO (LLNL), and CALENDF (CEA-CCFE) 3

Theory: H. Bateman, Cambridge 1910 Set of stiff Ordinary Differential Equations to be solved Here λ i and σ i are respectively the total decay constant and cross-section for reactions on nuclide i σ ij is the cross-section for reactions on nuclide j producing nuclide i, and for fission it is given by the product of the fission cross-section and the fission yield fractions, as for radionuclide production yield λ ij is the constant for the decay of nuclide j to nuclide i 4

Rate equations: numerical aspects LSODES, Livermore Solver for Ordinary Differential Equations with general sparse Jacobian matrices  Backward Differentiation Formula (BDF) methods (Gear’s method) in stiff cases to advance the inventory  Adams methods (predictor-corrector) in non-stiff case  makes error estimates and automatically adjusts its internal time-steps  Yale sparse matrix solver efficiently exploits the sparsity  ability to handle time-dependent matrix  no need for equilibrium approximation  handles short (1ns) time interval and high fluxes LSODES wrapped in portable Fortran 95 code  dynamic memory allocation  minor changes to Livermore code to ensure portability 5

EASY-II TENDL’s libraries – 200 MeV n-tendl-2013 (2012), multi temperature, 709 group library; 2630 (2434) targets full set of covariances probability tables in the RRR and URR xs, dpa, kerma, gas, radionuclide production JENDL-4.0u, ENDF/B-VII.1, JEFF-3.2, 709 groups libraries; circa 400 targets each g-tendl-2013, 162 groups xs library, 2626 targets p-tendl-2013, 162 groups xs library, 2626 targets d-tendl-2013, 162 groups xs library, 2626 targets a-tendl-2013, 162 groups xs library, 2626 targets 6

EASY-II other libraries Decay-2013, 3873 isotopes (23 decay modes; 7 single and 16 multi-particle ones) Ingestion and inhalation, clearance and transport indices libraries, 3873 isotopes JEFF-3.1, UKFY4.2 fission yields EAF-2010 decay data: 2233 isotopes EAF-2010 ingestion and inhalation, clearance and transport indices libraries, 2233 isotopes EAF-2003 libraries; 293K, 774 targets (20 MeV) EAF-2007 libraries; 293K, 816 targets (55 MeV) EAF-2010 libraries; 293K, 816 targets (55 MeV) EAF’s uncertainty files 7

EASY-II &TENDL & ENDF/B, JENDL or JEFF 8

Processing steps: burnup, transmutation Multi-particles groupwise, multi-temperature libraries with NJOY12-021, PREPRO-2013, probability tables in the RRR & URR with CALENDF-2010  For the inventory code FISPACT-II From a, g, p, d, n-TENDL-2013 (2012) FISPACT-II parses directly the TENDL’s and other libraries covariance information Transport and activation application libraries now stem from unique, truly general purpose files 9

FISPACT-II irradiation scenarios Single irradiation pulse followed by cooling Multiple irradiation pulses  changing flux amplitude  cooling Multi-step  changing flux amplitude and spectrum  changing cross-section (e.g., temperature dependence)  cooling Pathways and sensitivity for all cases 10

What FISPACT-II does Extracts and reduces nuclear and radiological data Solves rate equations for time evolution of inventory Computes and outputs derived radiological quantities Identifies and quantifies key reactions and decay processes: dominant nuclides pathways and uncertainty Monte-Carlo sensitivity and uncertainty reduced model calculations Uncertainty calculation input cross-section and decay uncertainties output uncertainties for all radiological quantities 11

Extract and reduce library data Condense run extracts from decay files:  decay constant λ  decay constant uncertainty ∆λ Collapse constructs flux spectrum weighted averages: 12  Data used in code collapsed cross-section collapsed uncertainty ∆  Library input cross-section vs energy covariances vs energy flux spectrum vs energy

Covariance collapse reactions X and Y energy bins i and j ∈ [1,N] with N = 709 uses Cov (X i,Y j ) for X = ̸ Y only in Monte-Carlo collapse Cov (X i,X j ) to get uncertainty ∆ for Collapse Cov(X i,Y j ) to get Cov(, ) for X ≠ Y Cov data in ENDF file 33 & 40, NI type LB=1, 5, 6 Cov data in wider energy bins k ∈ [1, M], M ~ TENDL, 3 EAF

Covariance, variance The projection operator S i k maps cross-section energy bins to covariance energy bins The ENDF style covariance data forms, different LB’s are read directly without the need of pre-processing 14

Covariance, variance  Using S i k, the formula to construct estimates of the covariance matrix are as follows: The LB=1 case is the one that was applied to the computation of Δ for the EAF’s libraries 15

Uncertainty in FISPACT-II Given{, λ} select irradiation scenario solve for radiological quantities Use {∆X, ∆λ} to estimate uncertainties  method 1: pathways to dominant nuclides  method 2: Monte-Carlo sensitivity  method 3: reduced model Monte-Carlo sensitivity 16

Uncertainty in FISPACT-II Pathways are used to identify the dominant contributors to the activation products for the specific irradiation scenario under consideration. This makes the calculation of uncertainties more practicable for all methods (random-walk approximation and Monte-Carlo). The standard uncertainty output uses a random-walk approximation to estimate error bounds. This estimate is much quicker than Monte-Carlo, but is likely to give larger bounds since it ignores many possible correlations. 17

Uncertainty from pathways given initial inventory and irradiation scenario sort dominant nuclides at end of irradiation phase topxx (=20) controls number 8 categories - activity, heat production, dose, etc. construct pathways from initial to dominant nuclides path_floor (=0.005) and loop_floor (=0.01) iterate on single-visit breadth-first search tree compute inventory contributions of pathways construct error estimate 18

Pathways keep pathways providing > path_floor of target inventory keep loop providing > loop_floor of pathway inventory 19

Error estimate 20 N t (atoms) and q t (radiological quantity) from rate equation Δ tp, N tp, ΔN t from pathways R r and R e pulse averaged reaction rates reactions uncorrelated, fission correlated

Using LB = 6 data The TENDL library contains MF=33, LB=6 data for different reactions X 1, X 2,... for a given parent, i.e., p(n, X 1 )d 1, p(n, X 2 )d 2,.... These covariance data cov(X 1,X 2 ) for X 1, X 2 are stored as fractional values f X1X2 and are tabulated in the same energy bins as used respectively for the LB=5 covariance data f X1X1, f X2X2 for reactions X 1, X 2 If the COVARIANCE keyword is used, FISPACT-II reads these data for all energy bins k and l and corrects for any instances where 21

Using LB = 6 data Then the code uses the corrected data to compute collapsed covariance cov(X 1,X 2 ). Covariances are mapped to MF=10 by assuming that all isomeric daughters of a given pair of reactions with rates X 1, X 2 have the same collapsed correlation function, corr(X 1,X 2 ). Tables of all reactions which have covariance data and their collapsed covariances and correlations are printed by the collapse run. Inspection of these data will show those cases where the assumption of zero correlation between reactions of a given parent is not good. The effect of non-negligible correlations on uncertainties may be introduced into Monte-Carlo sensitivity calculations by choosing distributions of sample cross-sections to have the same variances and covariances as given by the TENDL data. 22

Uncertainty from sensitivity calculation reference run + S inventory calculations independent { ; i = 1,...,I; s = 1,...,S} dependent { ; j = 1,...,J; s = 1,...,S} independent variables selected using random numbers  normal, log-normal, uniform, log-uniform  means X i and standard deviations ∆X i compute summary results:  means  standard deviations  Pearson correlation coefficients output full data for post-processing 23

Monte Carlo approach to sensitivity analysis output mean and standard deviation Pearson correlation coefficient controlled by keywords SENSITIVITY, MCSAMPLE, MCSEED, COVARIANCE 24

Uncertainty from reduced models EAF-2010 decay nuclides, TENDL-2013 decay nuclides calculation includes all nuclides in master index INDEXPATH generates reduced master index from pathways  typically few 10s of nuclides  number adjustable by pathway parameters reduced master index run vs full run to validate discards Monte-Carlo sensitivity for reduced master index runs  faster + comparable answers 25

EASY-II Verification and Validation V&V Differential  C/E with the latest EXFOR, C/C with EAF’s, ENDF’s files  SACS: Statistical Analysis of Cross Section; Kopecky & Forrest legacy systematics. Integral  Criticality TRIPOLI-4.9 ICSBEP suite (130 cases) MCNP6 ‘SvdM NRG’ ICSBEP suite (1900 cases)  Transport, shielding MCNP6 ‘SvdM NRG’ Sinbad and LLNL suites  Activation-transmutation; activity, gamma, decay heat EASY-II validation suite (500 reaction rates, thousands of integral E, time dependent, fusion orientated)  MACS and RI: Maxwellian-averaged cross sections and astrophysical reaction rates, resonance integrals 26

JAEA FNS Assembly; decay heat 14 MeV neutrons are generated by a 2 mA deuteron beam impinging on a stationary tritium bearing titanium target; Fusion Neutron Source FNS Neutron spectra, neutron fluence monitored by 27 Al(n,a)Na 24 Two experimental campaigns: 1996 and 2000; 74 materials 27

Decay power: FNS JAERI Ni 28 random-walk ProductPathways T ½ Path % E/C Co62 Ni62(n,p)Co62 1.5m Co62mNi62(n,p)Co62m 13.9m

Decay power: FNS JAERI Ni 29

Decay power simulation with EASY-II 30

Conclusions FISPACT-II: A powerful activation-transmutation prediction tool Identifies and quantifies important reactions and decays Uses full TENDL-2013 covariance data Uncertainty estimates: pathways to dominant nuclides Monte-Carlo sensitivity reduced model + Monte-Carlo sensitivity Uncertainty on all responses: number density, activity, decay heat, dose rate, inhalation and ingestion indices, …. 31