Digital Preservation and Library Periodicals Expenses: Eileen Fenton and Roger SchonfeldCNI December 9, 2003* Variance between Non-Subscription Costs for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seize the E-Journal: Models for Archiving Medical Library Association Symposium Washington, D.C. May 26, 2004 Eileen Gifford Fenton The Electronic-Archiving.
Advertisements

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Steering Around the Iceberg: Economic Sustainability for Digital Collections Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC Economics.
Whats Different about the Digital: Community Action via UK LOCKSS Alliance Adam Rusbridge UK LOCKSS Alliance Coordinator EDINA, University of Edinburgh.
Archiving Electronic Journals: A Developmental Approach Eileen Fenton The JISC/CNI Meeting, July 2004.
Strategic issues for digital projects... …or, what are we doing here?
Mimi Calter Assistant University Librarian & Chief of Staff Stanford University Libraries & Academic Information Resources 13 April 2012 Western Regional.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository The HathiTrust Print Monograph Archive Planning Task Force Print Archive Network Forum ALA 2015 Midwinter Meeting.
1 Organisational structure – next steps Mark Haslett University Librarian University of Waterloo February 19, 2004.
Strategy and Leadership in the Transition away from Print Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka Library Assessment Conference August 4, 2008.
BILL GATES’ CONTRIBUTION IN SKILL DEVELOPMENT
Evaluating the Alternative Financing Program Geoff Smith Vice President Woodstock Institute March 18, 2008 WOODSTOCK INSTITUTE.
Digital Preservation and Portico: An Overview Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico Council on Libraries Dartmouth February 1, 2007.
How can a library consortia help your library? Some thoughts on the development of library consortia Sarah Aerni Special Projects Librarian University.
Moving Shared Print to the Network Level Emily Stambaugh ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV June 27, 2014 “Looking to the Future of Shared Print” Shared.
Portico A New Electronic Journal Archiving Service Toni Tracy Director, Publisher Relations 2006 Ingenta Publisher Forum June 6, 2006.
TRAC / TDR ICPSR Trustworthy Digital Repositories.
NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION State of Minnesota Technology Summary February 24, 2011.
CANHEIT | On the EDGE | June 15-18, 2008 | University of Calgary University of Alberta’s Consolidated IT Budgeting Process Rob Lake Information Technology.
Kresge Library Key to a University of Distinction.
The Role of Paraprofessionals in Technical Services in Academic Libraries: A Survey Lihong Zhu Head, Technical Services Washington State University Libraries.
Preserving Electronic Scholarly Resources: Issues and Opportunities Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico Canadian Research Knowledge Network Réseau.
History and Overview of Portico A New Electronic Archiving Service Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico CNI December 6, 2005.
Elizabeth Newbold and Samantha Tillett GL8 New Orleans, December 2006
An Electronic Journal Impact Study: The Factors that Change when an Academic Library Migrates from Print Carol Hansen Montgomery, Ph.D. Dean of Libraries,
Copyright Donald W. King and Carol H. Montgomery This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to.
E-journals: opportunities and challenges Bharati Banerjee.
WESTERN REGIONAL STORAGE TRUST (WEST) BUSINESS MODEL Print Archive Network meeting ALA Annual June 22, 2012.
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
Strategic Plan. April thru November 2011 Strategic Planning Cmmte/Staff Emerging Issues Document Trustee/Staff Meeting Community Listening Campaign SPC/Staff.
Collection Management Initiative A two year grant awarded to the University of California and funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Mellon grant project.
Report for ALA Planning Retreat Sept 11, 2009 – Sept 13, 2009.
Overview of the Mississippi Legislature’s Efforts to Revitalize Performance Budgeting June 11, 2015.
Center for Information and Communication Studies The Link Among Faculty Purposes of Reading, Information Seeking Patterns, Aspects of Use, Value and the.
Rick Moul, PASCAL Executive Director PASCAL Status and Funding Overview March 2009 Ruth Riley, Chair, PASCAL Board of Directors.
Portico: A New Electronic Archiving Service Bruce Heterick Director, Library Relations.
Portico An Electronic Archiving Service Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico What Works In Archiving? Society for Scholarly Publishing November 15,
UK LOCKSS Alliance Today’s scholarly content, secured for tomorrow Adam Rusbridge UK LOCKSS Alliance Coordinator EDINA, University of Edinburgh 19 th October.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
THE ASSESSMENT TWO-STEP: It’s more than a line dance.
Librarian Perceptions of the Function of the Academic Library: Summer-Fall 2006 Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld December 4, 2006.
What Do Faculty Think of the Changing Environment? Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld April 17, 2007.
J. WILLARD MARRIOTT LIBRARY Preserving, Promoting and Presenting Research Posters: USpace’s New Poster Archiving Service Lisa Chaufty Western CONTENTdm.
BAAC – Strategic Needs of the MU Libraries 1. 2 Outline  Overview of the MU Libraries  Current Status of the Libraries  The Case for Library Support.
1 Keeping stuff safe: how can libraries maintain their e-journal collections in the long-term? Richard Gartner King's College London International conference.
The International e-Depot to Guarantee Permanent Access to Scholarly Publications Marcel Ras Tartu, June 2012.
Challenges and Opportunities for Academic Libraries Collaborative Imperatives to Support Collections, Digital Initiatives, and New Services for a Changing.
Faculty Survey 2009: The Format Transition for Scholarly Works Ross Housewright ALA Annual /26/2010.
College Library Statistics: Under Review Teresa A. Fishel Macalester College Iowa Private Academic Libraries March 22, 2007 Mount Mercy College, Iowa.
Portico An Electronic Archiving Service Ken DiFiore, MLS Associate Director of Library Relations, Portico Orbis-Cascade October 6, 2006.
December 1, 2010 Steering Committee Meeting Produced by Re-Imagining Services Task Force.
Background Cornell Institute for Social and Economic Research (CISER): Data and Computing Support for Social and Economic Researchers at Cornell University.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository The HathiTrust Print Monograph Archive Planning Task Force Print Archive Network Forum ALA 2015 Annual Meeting June.
Toward Meaningful Academic Library Ratio Analysis Brinley Franklin Stellenbosch, South Africa 15 August 2007.
The Transition to Electronic-Only Format: Costs and Considerations UKSG April 5, 2006 Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka.
2CUL: EMERGING MODEL OF DEEP COLLABORATION? Anne R. Kenney ASERL Fall 2010 Membership Meeting.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center The ‘Hows’ and ‘Whys’ of Preserving Digital Materials Brian Lavoie Research Scientist OCLC CARL program: “Here Today,
Helping Librarians Make a Secure Transition to e-Resources: Understanding Portico COLD Central Michigan University September 25, 2008 David Fritsch Assistant.
Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory and Practice A Librarian’s Perspective ALA / ALCTS June 27, 2005 Chicago, Illinois Brinley Franklin Vice.
Electronic Archiving & JSTOR Kevin Guthrie e-icolc, Thessanoliki, Greece October
CDL and Portico Ivy Anderson California Digital Library ICOLC Spring 2006 Philadelphia.
Digital Library Program Forum March 31, 2003.
Outline ‘Urgent action’ statement ARL/CLIR survey Portico LOCKSS/CLOCKSS An Australian JSTOR?
NCSU Libraries Collections Budget Presentation University Library Committee October 28, 2013 Greg Raschke Associate Director for Collections and Scholarly.
ETD Preservation and Archiving: Can Old Strategies be Applied to New Media? Third International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations St. Petersburg,
Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium Sustainability and.
Western Regional Storage Trust (WEST) Business Model
PAN Forum June 27, 2014 ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV
When to Hold On and When to Let Go: A Distributed Retrospective Library Assessment Conference, December 6, 2018 Jean Blackburn, Collections Librarian,
Manager of Research, Ithaka
Presentation transcript:

Digital Preservation and Library Periodicals Expenses: Eileen Fenton and Roger SchonfeldCNI December 9, 2003* Variance between Non-Subscription Costs for Print and Electronic Formats on a Life-Cycle Basis * Data Revised as of December 31, 2003

Outline Archiving – Our Definition The Need Components of a Trusted Archive Study: Non-subscription costs for print vs. electronic formats on a life-cycle basis –Methodology –Data –Findings

Definition of Archiving Preservation and Access over Time –Time horizon is extremely long –Beyond the period that the materials are economically productive

The Need Preservation and Access Must Be Ensured: –The community is increasingly reliant upon e- resources. –With growing frequency, the e-version is considered the copy of record. –If e-resources offer opportunities to generate savings, these will not be fully realized without a trusted archiving solution.

Elements of a Trusted Archive 1.Mission –Mission is critical because it drives resource allocation and routine organizational priorities and activities. 2.Business Model –Sustainability is key. –The archive must generate funds adequate to cover the work of the archive from sufficiently diversified sources.

Elements of a Trusted Archive 3.Technical Infrastructure –An infrastructure must be developed which supports the key functions of the archive: Ingest Verification Storage Delivery Migration –It must allow for sufficient replication with appropriate geographic spread.

Elements of a Trusted Archive 4.Relations with Libraries –The archive must meet the needs of the library community and the scholars they serve. 5.Relations with Content Producers –The archive must secure the rights necessary to the archival task and must arrange for timely, secure deposit of content.

Open Issues Progress must be made in several areas simultaneously. –Content –Technical –Business Technical issues have received the greatest level of attention to date.

Open Issues Study launched by JSTOR’s Electronic- Archiving Initiative sought to: –Understand the impact of growing reliance on electronic journals on library budgets. –Our question: How do the non-subscription expenditures for print vs. electronic periodicals differ? –Focused exclusively on non-subscription periodicals costs.

Non-Subscription Costs These are the periodicals-related costs other than the actual cost of the subscription. The largest of these include: The cost of space; The cost of computer workstations and infrastructure; The cost of binding; and, most importantly, The cost of library staff time.

Group Members Eileen Gifford Fenton, Executive Director, JSTOR Electronic-Archiving Initiative. Kevin Guthrie, Chairman, JSTOR. Donald King, Research Professor, University of Pittsburgh. Ann Okerson, Associate University Librarian, Yale University. Roger Schonfeld, Coordinator of Research, Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

Outline Methodology for Data Collection Overview of Data Life-Cycle Approach Life-Cycle Findings Implications for the Future Funded through a grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation

Data Collection Overview Staff logged their time spent on different activities Each institution completed a survey 11 academic libraries participated

Data Collection: Staff Activities 1. Collections development8. Physical Processing 2. Negotiations and licensing9. Stacks maintenance 3. Subscription processing, routine renewal, and termination 10. Circulation 4. Receipt and check-in11. Reference and Research 5. Routing of Issues and/or Tables of Contents 12. User Instruction 6. Cataloging13. Preservation 7. Linking Services14. Other

Data Collection: Excluded Costs Electronic infrastructure. Microform. ILL. We have some evidence on these costs, which suggests that they would not have meaningfully affected the results.

Data Collection: Participating Libraries SmallMediumLarge Bryn Mawr College George Mason University Cornell University Franklin & Marshall College Drexel University New York University Suffolk University Western Carolina University University of Pittsburgh Williams College Yale University

Data Collection: Collections Covered Bryn Mawr (all libraries) Drexel (all libraries) Franklin & Marshall (all libraries) Western Carolina (all libraries) University of Pittsburgh (all libraries)

Data Collection: Collections Covered Cornell (excludes several, including law and medicine) George Mason (excludes law library) NYU (excludes law and medicine) Suffolk (excludes law library) Williams (excludes department libraries) Yale (Sterling collections only)

Overview: Annual Non-Subscription Spending on Periodicals ($ millions)

Overview: Share of Annual Non- Subscription Budget by Format

Life-Cycle Approach: Overview We have used a life-cycle approach for analysis Examined a 25-year period The long-term financial commitment that a library makes when accessioning one year of a typical periodical

Life-Cycle Approach: Overview Grouped costs into one-time and recurring components Calculated costs per title Space occupied by print backfiles is charged at high-efficiency off-campus rates. Net present value analysis, 5% discount rate

Life-Cycle Findings: Print

Life-Cycle Findings: Electronic

Life-Cycle Findings: Format Comparison

Implications: Cost Reduction for Electronic-Only Collection ($ thousands)

Implications: Cost Reduction as % of Total Annual Non-Subscription Costs

Implications: Caveats Underestimated print: –STM omitted at several schools –Duplicate subscriptions omitted –Microform omitted –ILL omitted Underestimated electronic: –Electronic infrastructure Net, we believe this has led us to underestimate print costs

Implications: What Else Is Missing? Electronic archiving. There is no contribution to archiving of electronic periodicals at any of the participating libraries. These are missing only from the electronic and not from the print format.

Conclusions 1.Non-subscription unit costs are lower in the electronic format compared with print. Because: As has been widely foreseen, some manual processes can be eliminated. More electronic costs occur earlier in the life-cycle, while more print costs occur later in the life-cycle.

Conclusions 2.Although there are potential total cost reductions, these are less significant than some have expected. Because: At the larger institutions that have the most print subscriptions, long-standing print operations have already achieved economies of scale. Institutions with smaller print holdings tend to have much larger electronic collections.

Conclusions 3.The potential cost reductions assume no contributions towards electronic archiving. It is important to note that if we value the long-term accessibility of electronic resources, archiving them will somehow have to be paid for. It remains to be seen to what extent any cost reductions might be re-directed towards other purposes, such as electronic archiving.

Conclusions 4.This study has only just been concluded, and we are still considering the implications of our findings. Other conclusions?

Eileen Fenton and Roger Schonfeld