TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2008 www.PosterPresentations.com Does Pathological CTG Related to Abnormal Umbilical Cord Blood pH? Dr. Rima Anggrena Dasrilsyah, Dr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Interpreting Fetal Heart Rate Tracings
Advertisements

FETAL MONITORING ANTE AND INTRAPARTUM
Kathleen Simpson, PhD, RNC
Fetal Monitoring Review Questions Ana Corona 2009.
The course and conduct of normal labor and delivery
Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring
Prof William Stones Aga Khan University NON REASSURING FETAL STATUS.
DR HANAA ALANI Intrapartum fetal monitoring. The intrapartum period is probably the most dangerous and traumatic period of our lives – a time associated.
Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance.
Perinatal Asphyxia S.Arulkumaran Professor & Head
CTG Masterclass AVMA Annual Clinical Negligence Conference 2012
Done by: Teacher: Ibtesam Jahlan
ABNORMALITIES OF THE UMBILICAL CORD ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IOLNDA ELENA BLIDARU MD, PhD.
Fetal Assessment Fred Hill, MA, RRT. Ultrasound Ultrasound.
NUR 134 M. Johnston, RN-BC, M.Ed.. Types of Monitoring Auscultation- listen to fetal heart rate (FHR) Electronic Fetal Monitoring – use of instruments.
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Why perform fetal monitoring Identify the fetus in distress To avert permanent fetal damage or death.
Cardiotocography as a Test of Fetal Well Being Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD December 2014.
NUR 134 M. Johnston, RN-BC, M.Ed.. Types of Monitoring Auscultation- listen to fetal heart rate (FHR) Electronic Fetal Monitoring – use of instruments.
FETAL MONITORING REASONS TO MONITOR THE FETUS ANTENATAL: 1. MATERNAL INDICATIONS e.g. obstetric cholestasis 2. FETAL INDICATIONS e.g. reduced fetal movements,
Acid base balance & Perinatal Implications S Arulkumaran Professor Emeritus Obstetrics & Gynaecology St George’s University of London.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Introduction Conclusions References 1.Mode of Delivery and Fetal Outcome in Meconium Stained Amniotic.
Monitoring in Labour. Discuss fetal heart rate patterns using Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring (CEFM) tracings.Discuss fetal heart rate patterns.
Fetal Well-being and Electronic Fetal Monitoring
INTRAPARTUM ASSESSMENT
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Does low cord blood pH gasses determines fetal outcome? Dr. Ahmad Tayyib Azizan, Dr. H. Krishna Kumar.
INTRAPARTAL NURSING ASSESSMENT. Maternal Assessment 1. History General health Medications Allergies Obstetrical Labor Birth plan.
Management of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings.
Fetal Monitoring and Fetal Assessment A few new techniques and protocols!
An Introduction to Cardiotocography – “CTG”
Dr. Anjoo Agarwal Professor Dept of Obs & gyn KGMU, Lucknow
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Umbilical artery Pulsatility Index and different reference ranges: Does it really matter? Lo W., Mustafa.
Fetal Monitoring Ann Hearn RNC, MSN Electronic Fetal Monitoring Standard of Care “Nurses who care for women during the childbirth process are legally.
Understanding Cardiotocography – “CTGs” Max Brinsmead MB BS PhD May 2015.
Chapter 16 CTG Dr Areefa Albahri. 2 FHR as a screening test Intrapartum FHR monitoring is a screening test that provides information to alert the clinician.
Fetal Assessment During Labor
intrapartum Fetal Monitoring
Fetal Wellbeing Dr Hsu Chong NIHR Clinical Lecturer in Obstetrics & Gynaecology Warwick Medical School.
Fetal Distress in labor Dr.Maysara Mohamed. What is fetal distress? Fetal distress is the term commonly used to describe fetal hypoxia. Hypoxia may result.
Chapter 18 Fetal Assessment During Labor
Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance UNC School of Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship Case Based Seminar Series.
2015 FIGO CONSENSUS GUIDELINES ON INTRAPARTUM FETAL MONITORING
Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring
Antenatal Assessment of Fetal Well-being
Chapter 17 – Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance
 Prolonged pregnancy  Decreased fetal movements  Hypertension in pregnancy  Diabetes in pregnancy  Fetal growth restriction  Multiple gestation.
Fetal HR Tracings.
Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines SUSANA SANTO1, DIOGO AYRES-DE-CAMPOS2, CRISTINA COSTA-SANTOS3,
BASIC ELECTRONIC FETAL HEART MONITORING
How to read a CTG? Dr Pradeep S Dr Sabitha US.
Fetal Surveillance Objectives:
O&G in a nutshell Dr Laura Lee.
To assess the accuracy of umbilical cord blood
Intrapartum CTG.
From NeoReviews Strip of the Month June 2014
CTG.
بسم الله الرحمان الرحیم
From NeoReviews Strip of the Month January 2016
Prolonged Pregnancy.
Intrapartum CTG.
A. Khan, V. R. N. Ramoutar, B. Bassaw
Dr Kirtan Krishna MS , DNB, Fellowship in Fetal Medicine
Fetal Monitoring and Fetal Assessment
Understanding Cardiotocography – “CTGs”
CTG.
INTRA PARTUM FETAL MONITORING
Electronic Fetal Monitoring
Midwives Training 2019 Hola.  Screening tool  predict fetal hypoxia  Analyse FHR changes during labour  Timely intervention  prevent HIE.
Presentation transcript:

TEMPLATE DESIGN © Does Pathological CTG Related to Abnormal Umbilical Cord Blood pH? Dr. Rima Anggrena Dasrilsyah, Dr. Haslina Sarkawi, Dr. Krishna Kumar Hari Krishnan Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Hospital Tuanku Jaafar Seremban, Negeri Sembilan OBJECTIVES 1.To identify the correlation between pathological CTG and umbilical cord blood pH in determining neonatal acidosis. METHODS This retrospective study was conducted from November 2011 to April 2012 at labour room Hospital Tuanku Jaafar Seremban. 110 of patient with singleton, term pregnancy, fetus in cephalic presentation, absence of known fetal malformation who underwent caesarian section with indication of fetal distress were recruited. Either external or internal cardiotocography (CTG) was used to record the FHR and tocodynamometry was used to monitor the contraction. The CTG tracing interpretation are dependent on the staff in charge. CTG were classified as early deceleration if uniform, repetitive, periodic slowing of FHR with onset early in the contraction and return to baseline at the end of the contraction. Late deceleration is defined as uniform, repetitive, periodic slowing of FHR with onset mid to end of the contraction and nadir more than 20 seconds after the peak of the contraction and ending after the contraction. Variable deceleration is when variable, intermittent periodic slowing of FHR with rapid onset and recovery. Time relationships with contraction cycle are variable and they may occur in isolation. Sometimes they resemble other types of deceleration patterns in timing and shape. Lastly, prolonged deceleration (bradycardia) if an abrupt decrease in FHR to levels below the baseline that lasts at least 60–90 seconds. These decelerations become pathological if they cross two contractions, i.e. greater than 3 minutes. The umbilical blood gas analysis was performed by collecting blood sample from umbilical artery and vein by a heparinized 1 ml syringe in a double clamped segment of the umbilical cord immediately after delivery of the baby and before delivery of placenta. The sample will be kept in icepacks and would be processed within 30 minutes of collection. In general the lower range for normal arterial pH is at least 7.10 and for venous pH is 7.2 (Chan and To, 2009) RESULTS & DISCUSSION The results of the studies is as shown by the table below: CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES This study shows pathological CTG does not completely correlate with abnormal cord blood pH and neonatal acidosis. However the number of samples is relatively small and thus future study with larger number of samples should be done to ensure the reliability of study result. OPTIONAL LOGO HERE 1.Hacker NF, Gambone JC, Hobel CJ (2010) Essential of Obstetrics and gynecology. 5 th Edition Saunders Elsevier. 2.James LS (1958) The acid-base status of human infants in relation to birth asphyxia and onset of respiration. J Paediatr. 3.Chan, SC. and To, WK. (2009) Correlation Between Intrapartum Cardiotocogram Findings and Cord Blood pH in Term and Preterm Labours. HKJGOM, 9 (01), pp. 36­42 4.Anchesci MM, Piazze JJ, Vozzi G, Berretta AR, Figliolini C, Vigna R and Cosmi, EV. (1999) Antepartum Computerized CTG and neonatal acid-base status at birth. International Jounal of Gynaecology and Obstetric, 65, pp. 267­272 5.Costa A, Santos C, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa C and Bernardes J. (2010) Access to computerized analysis of intrapartum cardiotocographs improves clinicians prediction of newborn umbilical artery blood pH. BJOG, 45, pp. 1288­1293 INTRODUCTION Fetal surveillance during labour is an essential element of good obstetric care. Electronic fetal monitoring during labour are developed to detect Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) pattern that were frequently associated with delivery of infants in a depressed condition. Early recognition of changes in heart rate pattern that may be associated with fetal hypoxia and umbilical cord compression would enable physician to intervene and prevent poor neonatal outcome (Hacker et al., 2010) To evaluate neonatal outcome, fetal acid-based status is currently the most reliable indication of asphyxia or acidosis (James, 1958). The umbilical vessel is easily accessible to investigate fetal oxygenation after delivery. However, there is a concern on the reliability of abnormal fetal heart tracing and the implication to abnormalities of cord blood pH. Thus this study is to compare the correlation between these two parameters. According to the study, most of samples had normal umbilical cord blood pH despite of abnormal FHR tracing pattern. Majority of the normal pH samples is from early deceleration and prolonged deceleration contribute to the biggest percentage in abnormal pH pool. In this study, it has been found that intra partum CTG and cord blood pH were rather poorly related. Another study also shows that a lower incidents of metabolic acidosis, despite a much higher incidents of pathological CTG patterns, suggest that abnormal CTG findings tend to be less specific (Chan and To, 2009). In regards of type of sample being collected, most studies preferred umbilical arterial sample than venous, as this will provide acid base status of fetal blood returning to placenta. However the pH difference should be small with a minimal venous- arterial pH difference of 0.02, thus the cord blood sample was not routinely checked (Chan and To, 2009).