Kevin Paul Tech-X Corporation Field Emission in the 805 MHz Cavity Update on the eSHIELD Phase I SBIR Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design and Experimental Considerations for Multi-stage Laser Driven Particle Accelerator at 1μm Driving Wavelength Y.Y. Lin( 林元堯), A.C. Chiang (蔣安忠), Y.C.
Advertisements

Inverse Cyclotrons for Intense Muon Beams – Phase I Kevin Paul Tech-X Corporation Don Summers University of Mississippi ABSTRACT: I will summarize the.
Design of a demonstration of Magnetic Insulation and study of its application to Ionization Cooling for a Muon Collider Project 38b John Keane Particle.
The Phase-Resolved Spectra of the Crab Pulsar Jianjun Jia Jan 3, 2006.
Ion Injector Design Andrew Seltzman.
W.S. Graves (MIT) FLS Workshop 3/2012 W.S. Graves MIT March, 2012 Presented at the ICFA Future Light Sources Workshop Intense Super-radiant X-rays from.
COMPUTER MODELING OF LASER SYSTEMS
Effects of External Magnetic Fields on the operation of an RF Cavity D. Stratakis, J. C. Gallardo, and R. B. Palmer Brookhaven National Laboratory 1 RF.
Breakdown – Phase I K. Paul, S. Veitzer, P. Stoltz, D. Smithe (Tech-X) J. Norem (Argonne National Lab) Tech-X Corporation August.
Electron Motion in a RF Cavity with external Magnetic Fields Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory RF Workshop – FermiLab October 15, 2008.
An Introduction to Breakdown Simulations With PIC Codes C. Nieter, S.A. Veitzer, S. Mahalingam, P. Stoltz Tech-X Corporation MTA RF Workshop 2008 Particle-in-Cell.
D. Li and R. Rimmer, RF Workshop, Fermilab, MHz Cavity Refurbishment and suggestions on future tests Derun Li and Robert Rimmer* Lawrence.
WAFER EDGE EFFECTS CONSIDERING ION INERTIA IN CAPACITIVELY COUPLED DISCHARGES* Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner Iowa State University Department.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
VORPAL for Simulating RF Breakdown Kevin Paul VORPAL is a massively-parallel, fully electromagnetic particle- in-cell (PIC) code, originally.
5-Year RF R&D Plan Derun Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory NFMCC and MCTF Phone Meeting Friday, September 18, 2009.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
Mahzad - 8/9/2007 AAC Presentation 1 High Pressure RF Studies Mahzad BastaniNejad Muons, Inc., Old Dominion University Muons, Inc.
Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.
Chapter 24. Electric Potential
Femtosecond low-energy electron diffraction and imaging
Design Concepts for Magnetic Insulation Diktys Stratakis Advanced Accelerator Group Brookhaven National Laboratory NFMCC Meeting – LBL January 28, 2009.
Particle-in-Cell Modeling of Rf Breakdown in Accelerating Structures and Waveguides Valery Dolgashev, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Breakdown physics.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
1 Triggers and mitigation strategies of rf breakdown for muon accelerator cavities Diktys Stratakis University of California, Los Angeles Fermi National.
IRPSS: A Green’s Function Approach to Modeling Photoinjectors Mark Hess Indiana University Cyclotron Facility & Physics Department *Supported by NSF and.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
General Physics II, Additional Questions, By/ T.A. Eleyan 1 Additional Questions Lec. 15,16.
E. Pozdeyev1 Ion Back-Bombardment in RF Guns Eduard Pozdeyev BNL with contributions from D. Kayran, V. Litvinenko, I. Ben-Zvi.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
Updated status of the PSB impedance model C. Zannini and G. Rumolo Thanks to: E. Benedetto, N. Biancacci, E. Métral, B. Mikulec, N. Mounet, T. Rijoff,
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
S.A. Veitzer H IGH -P ERFORMANCE M ODELING OF E LECTRON C LOUD E FFECT AND RF D IAGNOSTICS SIMULATIONS EMPOWERING YOUR INNOVATIONS 1 MEIC Collaboration.
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
Recent progress of RF cavity study at Mucool Test Area Katsuya Yonehara APC, Fermilab 1.
Field enhancement coefficient  determination methods: dark current and Schottky enabled photo-emissions Wei Gai ANL CERN RF Breakdown Meeting May 6, 2010.
DEVELOPMENT OF ION ENERGY ANGULAR DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THE PRE-SHEATH AND SHEATH IN DUAL-FREQUENCY CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS* Yiting Zhanga, Nathaniel.
2 nd harmonic RF perpendicular biased cavity update C.Y. Tan, W. Pellico, G. Romanov, R. Madrak, and D. Wildman 02 Apr 2014.
1 Al Moretti, APC, Fermilab MAP- Winter Meeting February 28 - March 4, 2011 TJNAF Newport News, VA.
Advanced Energy Systems Inc. P.O. Box 7455, Princeton, NJ Phone:(609) Fax:(609) Jangho.
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
1 Computational Modeling in Support of the Magnetic Intervention Concept D. V. Rose,* T. C. Genoni, R. E. Clark, D. R. Welch, and T. P. Hughes Voss Scientific,
of magnetized discharge plasmas: fluid electrons + particle ions
Multipacting Simulation for the Muon Collider Cooling Cavities* L Ge, Z Li, C Ng, K Ko, SLAC R.B. Palmer, BNL D Li, LBNL The muon cooling cavity for the.
1 Current State of Omegatron Analyzer in the HT-7 Tokamak HT-7 ASIPP Ling Bi-li a),Wang En-yao b),Gao wei a),Wan Bao-nian a),Li Jian-gang a) a) Institute.
Multipacting Simulation for the PITZ RF Photo Gun Igor Isaev Unwanted Beam Workshop 2012 Humboldt-University Berlin, The PITZ RF Photo Gun.
“MuCyc” Update Kevin Paul Tech-X Corporation Don Summers University of Mississippi 1 NFMCC Meeting - 27 Jan 2009.
Hard X-rays from Superthermal Electrons in the HSX Stellarator Preliminary Examination for Ali E. Abdou Student at the Department of Engineering Physics.
Basic of muon ionization cooling K. Yonehara 8/29/11HPRF cavity physics seminar - I, K. Yonehara1.
RF Modeling of the LHC Crab Cavity Zenghai Li SLAC Zenghai Li LARP CM20 April 8-10, 2013.
Profiles of density fluctuations in frequency range of (20-110)kHz Core density fluctuations Parallel flow measured by CHERS Core Density Fluctuations.
Electron Cloud Modeling for the Main Injector Seth A. Veitzer 1 Paul L. G. Lebrun 2, J. Amundson 2, J. R. Cary 1, P. H. Stoltz 1 and P. Spentzouris 2 1.
Muons, Inc. Feb Yonehara-AAC AAC Meeting Design of the MANX experiment Katsuya Yonehara Fermilab APC February 4, 2009.
G.Kurevlev - Manchester meeting1 Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
DC Sputtering Disadvantage #1 Low secondary electron yield
Beam dynamics simulation with 3D Field map for FCC RF gun
Peter Stoltz Tech-X Corp. collaborators: J. Cary, P. Messmer (Tech-X)
MICE RF Cavity Simulations and Multipactor
ADVANCES IN HYBRID KINETIC-FLUID SOLVERS FOR GAS DISCHARGE PLASMAS
Effects of External Fields on RF Cavity Operation
Multipacting Simulation for the Muon Collider Cooling Cavities*
Heating in short-pulse laser-driven cone- and nail-capped wire targets
H. Xu, M. A. Shapiro, R. J. Temkin
Electron sources for FCC-ee
Dark current in TESLA linac
Presentation transcript:

Kevin Paul Tech-X Corporation Field Emission in the 805 MHz Cavity Update on the eSHIELD Phase I SBIR Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

Magnetic Insulation Primer 2  Introduced to achieve high voltages in transformers without arcing  F. Winterberg, “Magnetically Insulated Transformer for Attaining Ultrahigh Voltages,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 41, p. 1756, December  E. H. Hirsch, “The Concept of Magnetic Insulation,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 42, no. 9, p. 1371,  F. Winterberg, “On the Concept of Magnetic Insulation,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 43, p. 814, May  Field emitted electrons are confined to a region near the surface  Magnetic field is parallel to high-voltage surface (high electric field)  Thickness determined by Larmor radius  Limited time for acceleration by the electric field (i.e., expect less energy deposition on surface) Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

The eSHIELD Phase I SBIR “ “Magnetic Insulation and the Effects of External Magnetic Fields on RF Cavity Operation in Muon Accelerators” 3 1.Accurate field/secondary emission and heating models  VORPAL (3D Electromagnetic/Electrostatic PIC)  Mostly complete (needs temperature dependent secondary emission) 2.Simulations of emitted electron propagation in cavities  In Progress (Discussed in this presentation!) 3.Coupled small-scale micro-physics simulations with large-scale macro-physics simulations  Currently being studied in terms of non-uniform “mesh refinement”  Early in development (i.e., we ignore space charge for now) 4.Prototype integrated numerical simulations of the magnetic insulation concept  To be developed further in Phase II Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

Simulation Challenges 4  Material and emission modeling / “The Physics”  Temperature-dependent field and secondary electron emission models are parameterized approximations (uncertainty)  Material surfaces must be parameterized in terms of bulk properties  Microscopic surface geometries are unknown and evolve in unknown ways Need to resolve the “small scale” (How “small” is uncertain!)  Multi-scale resolution issues  Microscopic surface properties / asperities: ~10 -6 m  RF Cavities: ~0.1 m to ~1 m  EM PIC time scale (in small-scale simulations):~ s  RF Time Scales:~10 -9 s to s Need “mesh refinement” (Hard in PIC!) – Ignoring space charge (for now)! Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

VORPAL Simulations of the 805 MHz “Button” Cavity 5 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009  Full Diameter: 31.5 cm  Iris Diameter:16 cm  Central Length:~8 cm  Enclosed by windows (asymmetric) y x z

VORPAL Simulations of the 805 MHz “Button” Cavity 6 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009  Full Diameter: 31.5 cm  Iris Diameter:16 cm  Central Length:~8 cm  Enclosed by windows (asymmetric)  Considered 3 points of emission: A.On axis (“button”) B.Off axis / On window (4 cm) C.Off axis / On iris (~8.5 cm)  Emission Spots:~1 mm radius  Fowler-Nordheim (300 K)  Emits for only 1 RF cycle  Magnetic Fields considered: 1.None 2.“Parallel” (x-axis) 3.“Perpendicular” (y-axis) A B C y x z

VORPAL Simulations of the 805 MHz “Button” Cavity 7 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Emission!

CASE A1: On-axis / B = 0 8 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE A1: On-axis / B = 0 9 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Total Energy:7.2 MeV 0.85 MeV

CASE A1: On-axis / B = 0 10 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE A2: On-axis / B x = 1 T 11 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE A2: On-axis / B x = 1 T 12 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Total Energy:7.2 MeV 0.86 MeV

CASE A2: On-axis / B x = 1 T 13 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE A3: On-axis / B y = 1 T 14 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE A3: On-axis / B y = 1 T 15 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Total Energy:0.96 MeV 0.48 eV

CASE A3: On-axis / B y = 1 T 16 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE B1: On-window / B = 0 17 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE B1: On-window / B = 0 18 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Total Energy:7.3 MeV 43 eV

CASE B1: On-window / B = 0 19 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE B2: On-window / B x = 1 T 20 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 SUSPICIOUS!

CASE B2: On-window / B x = 1 T 21 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Total Energy:1.5 MeV 688 eV

CASE B2: On-window / B x = 1 T 22 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE B3: On-window / B y = 1 T 23 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE B3: On-window / B y = 1 T 24 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 NOTHING! Total Energy:6.2 keV

CASE B3: On-window / B y = 1 T 25 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE C1: On-iris / B = 0 26 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE C1: On-iris / B = 0 27 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Total Energy:13.8 MeV 43.5 keV

CASE C1: On-iris / B = 0 28 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE C2: On-iris / B x = 1 T 29 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE C2: On-iris / B x = 1 T 30 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 Total Energy:13.8 MeV 175 keV

CASE C2: On-iris / B x = 1 T 31 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE C3: On-iris / B y = 1 T 32 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

CASE C3: On-iris / B y = 1 T 33 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009 NOTHING! Total Energy:1.15 MeV

CASE C3: On-iris / B y = 1 T 34 Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009

Conclusions & Future Work 35  Preliminary simulations of field emission in the 805 MHz cavity  Not a thorough exploration of configuration space, but…  Most of the energy deposited is on the “near” wall (very little on “far”)  Suggest that “magnetic insulation” can reduce the energy deposited on the near wall by approximately an order of magnitude!  Probably depends (greatly!) on the cavity field-strength, dimensions, etc.  Need to account for space charge  Requires finer mesh  Suggests non-uniform “mesh refinement” techniques (or risk prohibitively large simulations)  Need to include secondary electrons  Multi-pactoring could be significant (amplification and resonance)  Means simulating longer times (many RF cycles)  Need to investigate better data analysis techniques Muon Collider Design Workshop / BNL / Dec 3, 2009