SciDAC Accelerator Simulation project: FNAL Booster modeling, status and plans Robert D. Ryne, P. Spentzouris.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Wake Fields and Beam Dynamics Kai Meng Hock. 2 Overview Research Interests –Wake fields Electromagnetic fields are induced by charged particles interacting.
Advertisements

IIAA GPMAD A beam dynamics code using Graphics Processing Units GPMAD (GPU Processed Methodical Accelerator Design) utilises Graphics Processing Units.
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Helmholtz International Center for Oliver Boine-Frankenheim GSI mbH and TU Darmstadt/TEMF FAIR accelerator theory (FAIR-AT) division Helmholtz International.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
1 IMPACT-Z and IMPACT-T: Code Improvements and Applications Ji Qiang Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
Oliver Boine-FrankenheimSIS100-4: High current beam dynamics studies SIS 100 ‘high current’ design challenges o Beam loss in SIS 100 needs to be carefully.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
PS Booster Studies with High Intensity Beams Magdalena Kowalska supervised by Elena Benedetto Space Charge Collaboration Meeting May 2014.
Astra A Space Charge Tracking Algorithm
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
CLIC RF manipulation for positron at CLIC Scenarios studies on hybrid source Freddy Poirier 12/08/2010.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, High Current Beam Physics Group Simulation of space charge and impedance effects Funded through the EU-design study ‘DIRACsecondary.
1 MaryLie/IMPACT: Status and Future Plans Robert D. Ryne Center of Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SciDAC II, COMPASS collaboration.
Recent Upgrades to BBSIM Code V. H. Ranjbar † † Tech-X Corporation We have made several improvements to BBSIM, a parallel beam dynamics simulation code.
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
 Advanced Accelerator Simulation Panagiotis Spentzouris Fermilab Computing Division (member of the SciDAC AST project)
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Using Online Single Particle Model for SNS Accelerator Tuning Andrei Shishlo, Alexander Aleksandrov.
‘Computer power’ budget for the CERN Space Charge Group Alexander Molodozhentsev for the CERN-ICE ‘space-charge’ group meeting March 16, 2012 LIU project.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
FNAL 8 GeV SC linac / HINS Beam Dynamics Jean-Paul Carneiro FNAL Accelerator Physics Center Peter N. Ostroumov, Brahim Mustapha ANL March 13 th, 2009.
Accelerator Simulation in the Computing Division Panagiotis Spentzouris.
Midwest Accelerator Physics Meeting. Indiana University, March 15-19, ORBIT Electron Cloud Model Andrei Shishlo, Yoichi Sato, Slava Danilov, Jeff.
Simplified Modeling of Space Charge Losses in Booster at Injection Alexander Valishev June 17, 2015.
Accelerator Simulation in the Computing Division Panagiotis Spentzouris.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Emittances Normalised r.m.s. Emittances at Damping Ring Extraction Horizontal Emittance (  m) Vertical Emittance (  m)
3D codes: TraFiC4 and CSRtrack Torsten Limberg DESY Zeuthen 2003.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL ORBIT J. A. HolmesORNL FNAL: September 11, 2001.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
1 IMPACT: Benchmarking Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Space-Charge Collaboration Meeting, May 20-21, 2014.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
A.Saini, K.Ranjan, N.Solyak, S.Mishra, V.Yakovlev on the behalf of our team Feb. 8, 2011 Study of failure effects of elements in beam transport line &
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Python ORBIT in a Nutshell Jeff Holmes Oak Ridge National Laboratory Spallation Neutron Source Space.
 Accelerator Simulation P. Spentzouris Accelerator activity coordination meeting 03 Aug '04.
1 R&D Plans for Impedance Driven Single-Bunch Instabilities (WBS 2.2.1) M. Venturini ( presented by M. Zisman) LBNL LCWS07 DESY, Hamburg May 30 - June.
AAC’08 Santa Cruz CA, July 27th - August 2nd 2008 Beam Break-Up Effects in Dielectric Based Accelerators * Advanced Accelerator Concepts AAC’08 A.Kanareykin.
LIU-SPS Beam Dynamics WG E. Shaposhnikova LIU-SPS coordination meeting
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Toward an Improved Model of the Fermilab Booster Synchrotron A. Drozhdin, J.-F. Ostiguy and W. Chou Beam Physics Department Introduction The Booster is.
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Positron capture section studies for CLIC Hybrid source - baseline
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Sabrina Appel, GSI, Beam physics Space charge workshop 2013, CERN
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB
SuperB e+/e- main linac and diagnostics studies
Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
JLEIC Ion Integration Goals
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
Presentation transcript:

SciDAC Accelerator Simulation project: FNAL Booster modeling, status and plans Robert D. Ryne, P. Spentzouris

2 What are we trying to accomplish? Predict Booster losses injection (few ms time scale) –transverse space charge (?) 2.Longitudinal space charge effects causing distortion of rf potential well and losses when machine ramps 3.Resistive wall instability effects 4.Study effects due to field errors Ability for realistic simulation of Booster from injection to extraction

3 What is the relevant physics? Space charge of long bunches in rings Nonlinear beam dynamics in quads, bends,… Injection painting Impedance effects

4 Modeling issues Systematic treatment of nonlinear dynamics Space charge implementation  Number of kicks  Number of macro-particles (multi-turn injection)  Long bunches: 2.5D? 3D? Multiple reference particle treatment? Initial particle distribution, matching {how “realistic” is the simulation} Diagnostics of simulation results  controlled experiment ?

5 Simulation tool issues 3D parallel space charge routines  First use those in IMPACT (parallel linac code)  Eventually should be able to plug in a choice of solvers from elsewhere that are appropriate for systems with long bunches Interface space-charge code to beam dynamics codes suitable for circular machine modeling  Implement split-operator techniques  Parallelize particle dynamics (presume 3D solvers are parallel) Approach should work for other single-particle optics codes that can calculate maps for circular machines

6 IMPACT uses a method that is extremely efficient for the problem at hand Philosophy:  Do not take tiny steps to push millions of macroparticles  Do take tiny steps to compute transfer maps; then push w/ maps rapidly varying s-dependence of external fields decoupled from slowly varying space charge Split-Operator Methods M=M ext M=M sc H=H ext +H sc M(t)= M ext (t/2) M sc (t) M ext (t/2) + O(t 3 ) Magnetic Optics Multi-Particle Simulation H=H ext H=H sc

7 Current Status MaryLie 3.0 (maps to 3 rd order) modified to use split-operator method and IMPACT 3D space charge routines  Serial version now implemented (will need ~1 month to parallelize in High Performance Fortran)  “auto-slicing of elements” allows space-charge kicks as often as desired  Current implementation has 3D space charge with (1) open boundary conditions in all 3 dimensions or (2) open transversely and periodic longitudinally  Code has been modified to allow for accelerating beam  Added RF cavity model based on on-axis field from Superfish Once parallel, could use the simulation with simple description of Booster lattice (no correctors) to study single bunch propagation at injection, before capture

8 Overall Plan Full parallelization of the space-charge code (in MPI), additional boundary conditions (~6 months) Further code development to allow more realistic modeling of the machine and simulation of capture and acceleration phase Ability to interface the code to other beam dynamics packages New hire in CD Simulation Group and interaction with BD theory group are essential for timely completion of these tasks Need to coordinate with Booster group on design of studies which will help validate the simulation