University of Washington

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Math is hard! Gender, mathematics, and implicit social cognition
Advertisements

A Study of Foreign Language Learners Cognitive Style in Multimedia Classroom Wang Qi Northwest Normal University.
Me = Female, Math = Male, therefore Math Me Brian A. Nosek Mahzarin R. Banaji Yale University Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington.
Using Applets and Servlets to Examine Reaction Time on the Internet Brian Nosek Yale University Collaborators: Mahzarin Banaji, Yale University Anthony.
19, February, 2010 Sung Sook Kim( ) Paichai University ( ) APEC-Tsukuba International conference APEC-Tsukuba International conference.
Gender and Educational Attainment in Schools Stephen Machin and Sandra McNally.
What you don’t see can’t matter? The effects of unobserved differences on causal attributions Robert Coe CEM, Durham University Randomised Controlled Trials.
Facts: LD/ADHD Enrolled in 2 or 4 year Colleges Profile of Undergraduates in Postsecondary Education Institutions: (US Department of Education:
Increasing the popularity of gymnastics in Australia
Diversity and inclusion at Edgewood college
The effect of participant age on attitudes toward people with disabilities Lauron Haney and Carrie Burkhardt Hanover College.
Implicit Attitudes: Computational Thought By: Heather B. Roy.
JACOB COOPER AND KARIN SCHUBERT HANOVER COLLEGE 2009 The Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Gender.
Figure 1. A Trial in the Old-Unpleasant IAT Task
Stereotype Definitions: a simple idea that has special meaning about a group of people (not an archetype which is model or ideal from which duplicates.
Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination. Lecture Outline Components of intergroup bias Theories of prejudice and discrimination cognitive, realistic.
The Science of Unconscious Bias
Throughout the course of United States history, racial and ethnic categories have been particularly important dimensions of identity. For most of this.
The Effects of Self-Esteem on Implicit Stereotypes Katie Fisher and Jenny McGuinness.
Culture, Gender, and Math Luigi Guiso Ferdinando Monte Paola Sapienza Luigi Zingales 1.
Unconscious Bias Welcome
Sex Differences in Math Test Performance What Do They Mean? Caitilyn Allen Professor of Plant Pathology and Women’s Studies U. Wisconsin-Madison.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION AT EDGEWOOD COLLEGE IMPLICIT BIAS Click to advance to next slide.
Public Charity as a Proximate Factor of Evolved Reputation- Building Strategy Brittany and Bo.
Figure 3. The average interest of males and females pursuing a science career comparing pre-adolescence and adolescence. Averages were not significantly.
“ MATHEMATICS OUT OF THE BOX” Presenter: Mrs. Yanique Hall – Harriott.
 Statement of Problem – Slide 3  Research Design – Slide 4  Threats to Internal Validity – Slide 5  Threats to External Validity – Slide 6  Proposed.
Locus of Control & Children’s Performance in Schools Jennifer Elias, Don Ghrist, Negar Zivari California State University, Northridge.
EXPERIMENT VS. CORRELATIONAL STUDY. EXPERIMENT Researcher controls all conditions Experimental group – 1 or more groups of subjects Control group – controlled.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 14.
Implicit Social Cognition
Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture 12
EDUCATION CURRENT GENDER STATUS STEM Fields. NATIONAL EDUCATION TRENDS  About 20.1 million women have bachelor's degrees, compared to nearly 18.7 million.
Implicit Vs. Explicit Peer Rejection Megan M. Schad, Amori Yee Mikami, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia We would like to thank the National Institute.
2015 WASHINGTON STATE BECCA CONFERENCE Unpacking Stereotypes and Implicit Bias: What Drives our Behaviors?
Harvard College Click here Click here to visit the Harvard College Web site Presented by: Jack Kenney Project 7: Taking a Tour of a College or University.
Results Section. Write a succinct results section This study examined fine motor skills in 20 children (time required to make origami crane (s)) between.
Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology,
SAT Prep Course English: Mrs. Lowe & Mr. Sorensen Math: Ms. Gilman.
Implicit Preference for White People over Black People Decreases with Repeated Implicit Association Tests (IATs) Emma Grisham, Dylan Musselman, Taylor.
The Implicit Self. Implicit vs. Explicit Attitudes Explicit attitudes are formed by consciously thinking about an issue. Thus, we are consciously aware.
Implicit Bias Discussion Lafayette College. What factors may influence our evaluation of applicants? “Implicit biases are discriminatory biases based.
Project Implicit Mental Health: An online platform to discover mental health associations outside conscious control Bethany Teachman Alexandra Werntz University.
John G. Conway, University of Florida Kate A. Ratliff, University of Florida Implicit Associations Between The Elderly and Warmth Moderate the Effect of.
SAT PREP II. Recap of Hyde SAT Testing How did you feel going into the exam? Coming out of it? Any questions?
Implicit and Explicit Evaluations of Feminist Prototypes Predict Feminist Identity and Behavior Liz Redford, Kate A. Ratliff, & Jordan Rogaliner University.
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Invitational Office Hour Invitations, by Student Number for October 15 th 11:30-12:30, 3:30-4:30 Kenny.
Exploring the effects of stereotype threat in the context of digital gaming Linda K. Kaye & Charlotte R. Pennington (Edge Hill University, UK) Introduction.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 41.
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences January 27 Lecture 41.
Creating Effective Cooperative Groups in 3 rd Grade Math Classes Rebecca R. Kish Dr. Sharon O’Connor-Petruso Brooklyn College CBSE 7202T.
Complex Analysis College of Mathematics and Information Science Lecturer : Cao Huaixin.
Results Introduction The present study focuses on adult attitudes toward children. Many examples of discrimination against children in Western societies.
Unconscious Bias: What Every Hospitalist Should Know
Facts of Life Between 400,000 and 500,000 students drop out of school each year. 40% to 60% of those students are Black. Black students continue to receive.
Jackson County ACT Aspire for Grade 10
Characterising the mathematical confidence
Dr. Lorraine Harbison1 Dr. Joseph Harbison2
Are the future teachers really apt to teach?
Stereotype Definitions:
Stereotype Definitions:
Life expectancy and baseline BP: Male participants
Interrupting Bias Deena Pierott iUrban Teen.
Table 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
Conclusions and Future Implications
Mean theoretical and practical scores of participating female pediatric dentists in comparison with male pediatric dentistsNote: Scores on both theoretical.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

University of Washington Gender Differences in Implicit Attitudes toward Mathematics and Science Brian A. Nosek Mahzarin R. Banaji Yale University Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington Read Title Collaborators Other people to thank Research Assistants -- Cindy Wang and Andrea Gaynor Brief introduction to research Despite equal numbers of males and females in the workplace, there are disproportionately fewer females in science and math related fields. Our research investigates factors like attitudes and beliefs about mathematics that are presumed to be related to these gender differences. However, unlike previous research in this area, our investigations examine attitudes and beliefs about mathematics at an implicit, or unconscious, level. --next slide--

Gender differences in participation in mathematics As level of education increases female participation in math and science declines startling gender differences in participation --NSF report, 1996 uncover bottom half-- tell them what they are seeing in high school participation rates are even (except for physics) in college although females are 54% of degree recipients, they are only 45% of science graduates the differences for doctoral students are even larger with only 30% of degrees going to females by the time females enter the workforce they are only 22% of the total number of peoples employed in the sciences andengineering (representation looks a little better when considering only graduates since 1990 of which 32% of them were female) the sciences as described here include all sciences including those that are not math-intensive such as biological sciences,psychology, and other social sciences participation is not the only arena in which we see a trend of growing differences between males and females. We see a similar trend in performance. -- next slide--

Differential gender participation in the sciences

Gender differences in performance H y d e e t a l . , 1 9 9 e l e m e n t a r y s c h o o l -.06 h i g h s c h o o l . 2 9 a popular meta-analysis by Hyde, Fennema, and Lamon reviewed 100 studies on math performance differences between males and females no differences in elementary school, but differences favoring males emerged in high school and college. Researchers including Jacqueline Eccles, Herbert Marsh, and Claude Steele have offered a variety of models and explanations for the dramatic gender differences in participation and performance in mathematics. These explanations include factors like: attitude differences, the effects of stereotypes on performance, self-identification with mathematics, influence of parents and peers, and gender identity. For this research we took particular interest in measuring two of these factors at an implicit level. -- next slide -- c o l l e g e . 3 2 g i f t e d c h i l d r e n . 4 1 S A T m a t h . 4 F e i n g o l d , 1 9 8 8 Males account for as much as 96% of perfect or near perfect SAT math scores

Explicit vs. Implicit unintentional intentional automatic controlled Explicit Attitudes Implicit Attitudes unintentional automatic indirect measurement no self-report needed not subject to presentational biases intentional controlled direct measurement self-report subject to presentational biases The following are some ways that we can distinguish implicit associations from explicit associations. It is important to clarify that implicit and explicit attitudes are not the same thing -- and yet, neither is more real than the other. They are simply different measures of an individual’s evaluation of social or non-social objects. Explicit is intentional and controlled while implicit is automatic and unintentional. Explicit is direct while implicit is indirect. Previous research has found little evidence of an association between implicit and explicit attitudes and beliefs. Greenwald and colleagues posit that social desirability factors may mediate the presence of relationships between implicit and explicit measures. Since most of the previous research using implicit measures has focused on attitudes with large s.d. components, like racial attitudes, no relationship was observed or expected. Attitudes toward mathematics are not seen as having as significant a component of s.d. as racial attitudes. Thus, we have an opportunity to examine more closely whether a relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes can exist. Our measurement of implicit attitudes and beliefs utilizes a new method of measurement developed by Tony Greenwald and colleagues called the Implicit Association Test, or IAT. --next slide--

Relative Attitude Index = (Math/unpleasant) - (Math/pleasant) RAI = (math+unpleasant) - (math+pleasant) = 750ms - 850ms = -100ms

Attitudes Toward Mathematics Do females hold more negative attitudes toward mathematics than males at an implicit level? Go over: IAT - headings and stimuli why we did both what was expected what a particular response would mean reveal result describe interaction - significant (p < .0001) d =1.03 females - sig (p < .0001) d = 2.03 males - sig (p < .0001) d = .79 Attitudes Toward Mathematics d = 1.03

Do females hold more negative attitudes toward science than males at an implicit level?

Relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes Correlation between implicit and explicit attitudes toward mathematics: .530*** Our third goal was to examine whether relationships between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes toward mathematics could be observed. Why do we see a relationship here? - common explanation: other studies look at domains w/ high s.d. - our data consistent with this explanation --next slide-- Other possible explanations (only if asked a question): - knowledge of att. relative to others - accessibility and availability - methodological - tapping same construct - metrics

Implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes and performance

Attitudes toward mathematics by major and gender In my remaining time I would like to present some exploratory analyses that are exciting demonstrations of the potential for implicit measures to contribute to the investigation of gender differences in orientations toward mathematics. intro major exploration We would expect that individuals who select mathematically oriented majors would show higher implicit liking for mathematics. - groups - who is science and who is non-science, early in college career - not committed to the major - what do scores mean? - what do we expect to see? reveal data - main effect for major group - middle two bars

Comparing Implicit and Explicit Attitudes by Gender and Major In experiment 2 we found a relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes toward mathematics. The strong correlation indicated that positive explicit attitudes toward mathematics were associated with more positive implicit attitudes toward math. So, in general, we would expect to see that explicit attitudes were a reflection of implicit attitudes. However, the finding that science major females in fact had implicit attitudes toward math as negative as nonscience major males led us to wonder about the relationship between science females’ self-reported attitudes and their implicit attitudes. That is, are the self-reported attitudes toward math of science-oriented females consistent with their implicit attitudes? To test this, we standardized the scores of implicit and explicit attitudes toward math. That way the implicit/explicit attitudes could be compared. A group has similar I and E relative to the sample if their std. scores are similar. A difference in the standard scores could be said to reflect a dissociation between I and E attitudes. Positive values on this table indicated more + attitude toward math compared to the rest of the sample. - reveal data - summarize though speculative, this dissociation may be important in females perseverance in mathematical domains. Females have an addt’l burden of overcoming implicit associations that are discouraging their pursuit of their chosen field. This is a question for future research.

Primary findings Gender differences in attitudes toward math can be revealed measuring outside of conscious control Implicit and explicit attitudes about math were related Implicit and explicit measures were related to performance Female science majors’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward math were dissociated some general themes of the research I reviewed today we showed that fem. hold more negative implicit attitudes toward math and are less identified with mathematics than males despite a wealth of evidence that I/E are not associated, our research demonstrates a strong and reliable association. --next slide--