Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
LITERACY STRATEGY P Loddon Mallee Region.
Creating the Annual Comprehensive School Counseling Program (CSCP)Plan
Intelligent accountability for improved outcomes “ We must develop an accountability system that is located from the student level upwards, directly involving.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Performance management guidance
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Appraisal and performance management
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Strategic Partnerships Program Strategic Partnerships Program All Networks Meeting Melbourne Zoo - 29th November 2010 WELCOME.
SUBTITLE DAY, MONTH, YEAR Accreditation Support for Teachers Introduction to Accreditation at Proficient Teacher Module 3 of 5.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Planning for Continuing Professional Development – A Whole School Approach A step by step guide to planning CPD including a framework for Teacher Induction.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Reservoir Primary School Literacy Share Day
Teaching and Supporting Students with Vision Impairments An Australian Universities Teaching Committee Funded Project WAANU Conference March 2005.
O As professionals within the teaching profession, we recognize our responsibilities to continually analyze our practices in the pursuit of excellence.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Term Creating and Supporting a Performance and Development Culture.
Exploring Evidence.
Performance and Development Teacher Librarian Network
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Purpose : Discuss the use of HSTW/MMGW Key Practices and their link to High Performance Beliefs and Foundations in creating High Performing Schools and.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
The Exeter Model of ITE Induction for Initial Teacher Education Coordinators, Mentors, Principal School Tutors, University Visiting Tutors and External.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
YOUR PERFORMANCE PLAN AND ESSENTIAL ALIGNMENTS. THE PDP FOCUS IS : Professional Growth Enhancement of Practice Improved school and student outcomes.
Western Metropolitan Region School Coaches Collegiate Learning Meeting Hosted at Melton Specialist School Friday 28 th August, 2009.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
Internship Information
What it means for New Teachers
What is an Internship and what is expected of me in this placement?
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
School Self-Evaluation 
Leading Teaching and Learning through School Self-Evaluation
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Implementing Race to the Top
Presentation transcript:

Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008

1. Induction program for teachers new to the school 2. Use of multiple sources of feedback 3. Customised individual teacher development plans 4. Quality professional development 5. Belief by teachers that the school has a performance and development culture Performance and Development Culture Elements

Steps in the Accreditation Process Online teacher survey - PDCQ Written application School decides next steps with region Verification Step One Verification Step Two ACCREDITATION

External Verification: Step One On-line staff survey (PDCQ) Recommended response rate 90% teaching staff PDCQ Data Report forwarded to Principal and Region Data analysis and consultation with SEO to inform decision to proceed with application

External Verification: Step Two Application supported by documentation & evidence: 5 elements Describe current practice Evaluate that practice Provide sample documentation Verifiers phone / visit school Verification report with recommendations

Feedback from Schools “The process was a vehicle for us to formalise our practices, policies and procedures, and for us to celebrate the great work we are doing at the school.” “For our school this has been an excellent process and we believe that our school has improved the organisational health of the school by involving staff in the decision making components of P&D Culture.”

The school: has a comprehensive set of induction materials, which are kept up to date ensures that all new teachers participate in an effective induction program, which includes mentoring provides training for staff involved in mentoring and induction monitors and evaluates the induction program on a regular basis ensures that induction and mentoring programs are aligned with VIT and DEECD guidelines Element 1 Induction

PDCQ Element 1 Who completes this section of the questionnaire? Teachers who have joined the school staff, or rejoined the school staff after a substantial period of absence (e.g. more than one year), during the past two years

Possible Documentation Induction policy Induction program and timeline Orientation day agenda A mentor or mentoree’s evaluation of the support provided Guidelines for mentors

Element 2: Multiple sources of feedback The school: ensures that all teachers participate in a feedback program that uses at least 3 data sources including student outcomes data has institutionalised the use of multiple sources of data for teacher development evaluates its feedback program on a regular basis

student outcomes data – academic, personal attributes, qualities as a learner (mandatory) student feedback student self-assessment parent feedback peer observation data attendance data Examples of feedback sources

Statewide testing and teacher judgements eg. AIM, VELS, VCE, VET, VCAL, GAT, literacy and numeracy assessments Attendance and retention Student surveys Student Attitude to School survey PoLT surveys On Track data Class surveys Student self-assessment Peer assessment Student outcomes data

Classroom observation and follow-up reflection Team teaching and reflection Moderation of student work Professional learning team discussions around student data P&D review discussions Feedback from a critical friend Staff Opinion survey data Video and audio technology Peer feedback – some examples

Parent Opinion Survey Internal parent surveys Parent interviews and conversations Communication books Individual Learning Plans Parent feedback

Possible documentation Discussions and written feedback from Performance and Development meetings Student surveys Parent surveys Records of classroom observations Analysis of student outcomes data Professional Learning Team agenda or minutes Specialist or student teacher feedback

Element 3: Individual development plans The school: has current, individually customised development plans for all teachers, informed by multi source feedback regularly reviews and/or updates individual teacher development plans aligns individual teacher development plans to school priorities and improved student learning

Possible documentation Sample individual performance and development review form Performance and development review process/timeline Guidelines for reviewers/critical friends Protocols for review meetings Evaluation of the planning process

Element 4: Quality professional development The school: ensures that all teachers participate in a structured PD program, which is explicitly linked to both individual needs and to school priorities has high quality PD at both group and individual level can demonstrate skill or knowledge transfer into the classroom and positive impact on students links PD to career and succession planning and teacher’s future aspirations ensures that its PD program reflects the Principles of Highly Effective Professional Learning effectively implements PD policy and guidelines evaluates PD programs annually

Possible documentation for the application PD schedule of activities Completed professional learning evaluation form Professional learning team agenda and/or minutes Whole-school/team/individual professional learning program Evaluation of outcomes of the PD program PD policy

The school has over 75% of teachers who feel that the school supports individual professional growth and development Element 5: Staff belief

Possible documentation Staff survey data, quantitative and qualitative Staff meeting agendas that focus on teamwork, data analysis and improving teacher practice Professional learning team reflections and minutes Role and responsibility statements Feedback on performance and development processes Flowchart of school’s communication / feedback / decision making processes

P&D Culture Resources Website panddc/default.htm Self Assessment Framework and Pack Reference School and other case studies Application guidelines The 7 Principles of Highly Effective Professional Learning rn/teacher/ProfLearningInEffectiveSchools.pdftp:// rn/teacher/ProfLearningInEffectiveSchools.pdf 10 statewide Reference Schools Partner schools and other accredited schools SEOs and other regional contacts