Annamari Ylonen (Evaluation Officer) Evaluation of the project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Westminster Kingsway College QUALITY. Mission of Westminster Kingsway College: To support all of its students in realising their ambitions as learners.
Advertisements

Being explicit about learning Focusing feedback on improvement Gathering evidence of learning Handing on responsibility for learning Participation Dialogue.
Assessment of Learning Often called summative assessment Takes place after the learning Focuses on pupils achievements Is used to provide feedback to.
Use lesson study to develop a novel approach to assessing the learning needs of pupils with learning difficulties. 2 broad and inter-related aims: 1.
 For over a century, St Andrew’s RC Primary has offered a quality education to its pupils. The learning and well-being of children has always been central.
Performance management guidance
Special Educational Needs (SEN) Information Report
Welcome to the British Section of SHAPE International School. Our school is an integral part of the SHAPE International School (SIS) and is situated on.
LEARNING WALKS How we can share good practice and learn from one another. Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
DYSLEXIA Raising Awareness 27 th March 2014 Pupil and School Support.
Evaluation of TEEP Dr Mary K. Sheard. Aim of the Evaluation Evaluation of TEEP Lighting the fire – are teachers providing the spark? Evaluation of TEEP.
Carol Hawman Primary PE and Sport Premium: are you making a difference?
The role of the mathematics subject leader in leading sustainable improvements Thursday 23 rd September 2010 Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
Performance management guidance
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Observing Learning Helen Bacon and Jan Ridgway Inclusion Support Services.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
SMSC and Inspection Spiritual Moral Social & Cultural.
The impact of IWBs on literacy and numeracy teaching in primary schools Professor Steven Higgins School of Education Durham University
Welcome to the Secondary PGCE New Mentor meeting.
A Governor Update The New Ofsted Inspection Framework DEVELOPING EXCELLENCE TOGETHER 1.
Alan Smith Cardonald College. The project: Scottish Funding Council Strategic Development Fund Collaborative partnership arrangement - Lead college Adam.
Impact & Evidence Primary Sport Premium
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Presentation to BESD IDP Leaders
Annamari Ylonen and Brahm Norwich Evaluation of the project.
Nov 2014 Annual Statement Cardinham School Grow your mind; aim high.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling Education Scotland.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from January 2012.
Raising standards, improving lives The new inspection arrangements for maintained schools and academies from January 2012.
Year 7 Settling – in Evening. Assessment Process and Ability Grouping.
Bradfield CE (VA) Primary School School Development Priorities
Level 7 Research Project Laura Bridge Robert Owen EBITT.
Improving relevant standards. Aims and objectives Familiarize ourselves with best practice standards of teaching To think about how we can implement the.
Standards and Quality and Improvement Planning for Session 2014/15 Anne Paterson Education Manager.
A Foundation School and part of the Nottinghamshire Learning Trust with British Geological Survey, University of Nottingham and Skill Force South Wolds.
Differentiation. Produced originally for differentiation and schools.
RAISING THE LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT OF PUPILS WITH MLD USING RESEARCH LESSON STUDY Dr Jeff Jones Development Leader.
1 Health and Wellbeing For All. 2 Katie Paterson Programme Officer - Education NHS Health Scotland.
Middle Leadership Programme Day 1: The Effective Middle Leader.
Exploring Evidence.
Update on Ofsted inspections in schools January 2012.
Manor School Progress Tracking Contents Introduction3 Summary of Findings Free School Meal Progression5 Gender Progression6 Special.
The Second Level Support Service is funded by the Department of Education and Science under the National Development Plan Self Evaluation – focus on classroom.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
Observing Learning. Your experiences of observation Have you been observed as a teacher? Have you observed a teacher? What are the positive and not so.
Belfast VPs’ cluster group Value Added May Why Measure Value Added? As a means of self-evaluation Raising academic standards As a measure of effectiveness.
The 2012 Ofsted inspection framework SCHOOLS North East 14 th October 2011.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
The Project Lesson Study Process Raising levels of achievement amongst students defined as MLD.
What is assessment for learning?
Acklam Grange School A Specialist College of Mathematics and Computing Acklam Grange School A Specialist College of Mathematics and Computing.
RAISING THE LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT OF PUPILS WITH MLD USING RESEARCH LESSON STUDY Dr Jeff Jones Development Leader.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P21 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Measuring outcomes.
Evaluation research findings Annamari Ylonen and Brahm Norwich Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, UK.
Policy & practice Some thoughts There is no assessment panacea. There are strengths and weaknesses for both observation and question- based assessment.
SEND Reforms Meeting for Parents SEND Reforms Meeting for Parents 17 th November 2014 SENDCo: Sandra Coggin Weston Turville CE School.
Copyright © May 2014, Montessori Centre International.
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
Performance Management. Common Misconceptions Appraisal Performance-Related Pay Targets and Objectives Motivation and Discipline.
ASSESSMENT WITHOUT LEVELS IN THE CULM VALLEY FEDERATION.
Supporting the Primary PE and Sport Premium in London.
How to evaluate the impact of CPD? 28 th April 2016.
Planning for Curriculum Framework Implementation.
School Development Plan:
The Hawthorns Primary School Strategic Plan
Introduction to the staff present
Using data and evidence to improve performance
GETTING ‘EVEN’ BETTER: FIVE LEVELS FOR PD EVALUATION
Presentation transcript:

Annamari Ylonen (Evaluation Officer) Evaluation of the project

Aims of evaluation Evaluation will focus on assessing these project aims:  Aim to enhance the achievement of pupils identified with MLD at KS3 (academic, cognitive, motivational and well-being aspects)  Aim to enhance the professional development of participating teachers  Aim to enhance curriculum and pedagogic development and self-development capacity in participating classes and schools A separate, but interlinked aim is to:  Evaluate the usefulness of the MLD category Identification of pupils with MLD: - Recorded in annual census last January; using the Government descriptor of MLD - Pupils at School Action Plus or with Statements, where MLD was main area of SEN

Pupil level evaluation All case pupils will be assessed twice during Phase 1 and once after Phase 1 (baseline assessment and assessment after intervention):  British Ability Scales – verbal/non-verbal cognitive ability (matrices, word similarities, reading, spelling test)  MALS (Myself-as-Learner-Scale) – self-concept as a learner  Resiliency scales – coping in adversity. Personal attributes to assess e.g. optimism, adaptability, sense of trust and comfort with others  Attitudes to class and school survey In addition:  Attainment assessment by teachers  Pupil behaviour in class survey filled in by teachers  Pupil interviews by the evaluation team

Teacher level evaluation  Focus on evaluating the impact of Lesson Study on participating teachers (e.g. opinions of teachers about LS and how it affects teaching & learning; professional development)  Focus on the impact of LS on pupils as assessed by teachers How? 1.Continuous assessment by teachers themselves throughout the project (e.g. records, notes, video recordings) 2.Assessment by the evaluation staff by using surveys (e.g. an online survey tool, Survey-Monkey) and interviews 3.Assessment after LS has been introduced – focus on changes

Class/School level evaluation  Impact of Lesson Study on participating classes: o Teaching, classroom practices – impact on class cohesion, class dynamics, pupil-pupil relationships, teacher-pupil relationships, inclusion, behaviour...  Impact of Lesson Study on participating schools: o Organisation of SEN, general atmosphere, ethos, work ethic, changes, e.g. a shift into a more ‘inclusive school’? How? 1.Assessment by teachers themselves throughout the project (e.g. as part of the Lesson Study method) 2.Assessment by the evaluation staff by using surveys and interviews 3.Observations by the evaluation team of classes and LS teams 4.Assessment after intervention – focus on changes

In conclusion  The evaluation of the Lesson Study and MLD project will be ongoing for the duration of the project  Evaluation is an important part of the project as it aims to assess whether the overall project aims have been met  Outcomes of evaluation will be used to:  Raise awareness about MLD and its definition and use (e.g. as a SEN category, needs of pupils, impact on pupils/teachers/schools)  Raise awareness of the Lesson Study Methodology both nationally and internationally

School visits The project website: