US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Armoring Brief Team New Orleans U.S. Army Corps of Engineers July 20, 2011
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Authority Congress stated in the 4 th and 6 th supplement: “…armor critical elements of the New Orleans hurricane and storm damage risk reduction system….” 2
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Definition of Armoring A natural of artificial material placed on or around a levee, floodwall or other structure to reduce the risk to the system or component, to prevent breaching or major damage when confronted with wave attack, overflow and overtopping associated with a greater and 100-yr storm surge event. 3
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Research and Development Colorado State: ► Erected world’s largest wave flume ► Tested erosion resistance of an array of common levee construction and armoring materials Texas A&M: ► Modeling / Analysis of Transition Armoring ► Erosion resistance testing of compacted clay and stabilized soil LSU ► Grass / Root study ERDC ► Flood side erosion technical publication International Subject Matter Experts ► Flume design (Dr. van de Meer) ► Testing methodology (Drs. van de Meer and Hughes) ► Interpret test results / establish performance ranges of armoring materials (Royal Haskoning, Dr. Thornton and Dr. Hughes) 4
HSDRRS Armoring Brief CSU Test Results 5 Material Test No. Material Max. Flow Tested At flow Total Hours Tested Result 1Clay0.2 cfs/ft Failed after 1hr 0.2cfs/ft 2Bermuda Grass4.0 cfs/ft424No Visible Erosion 3Bahia Grass3.0 cfs/ft417No Visible Erosion 4TRM/Bermuda4.0 cfs/ft39.0No Visible Erosion 5HPTRM/Bermuda4.0 cfs/ft39.0No Visible Erosion 6Bermuda Grass w/ruts4.0 cfs/ft36.0No propagation 7Bermuda w/ruts & bare spot4.0 cfs/ft33.0No propagation 8Lime Stabilized Clay4.0 cfs/ft0.30.4Failure at 1.0 cfs/ft 9ACB4.0 cfs/ft33No Visible Erosion 10Dead Bermuda Grass2.5 cfs/ft13.2Failed at 2.0 cfs/ft 11Dead Bermuda Grass w/HPTRM4.0 cfs/ft36.0No Visible Erosion
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Performance Ranges Material Range cfs/ft Grass HPTRM ACB>4 6
HSDRRS Armoring Brief Armoring Types Articulated Concrete Block & TRM Installing Articulated Concrete Block Turf Reinforcement Mat Articulated Concrete Block after 4 months of Grass Growth 7
HSDRRS Armoring Brief Using B.C Spillway Clay, Grass Grown at ERDC & Trucked to CSU Grass Growth & Wave Overtopping Testing at CSU 8
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief 9
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Risk Informed Decision Making Commissioned members of IPET Risk Assessment Team to run probabilistic analyses of flood inundation that might be expected with each of the armoring alternatives in place for 500-yr and 750-yr storm surge events Used IPET risk assessment model to analyze armoring alternatives based on fragilities to make recommendations 10
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternative Formulation Analyzed overtopping rates for storms of varying intensities (500-yr and 750-yr) impacting the perimeter Developed alternative armoring configurations based on performance ranges of armoring materials as established by completed R&D Project Delivery Team included membership of non-federal sponsor and flood protection authorities 11
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternative Evaluation Process Conducted in phases to allow maximum consideration of NFS perspectives Multi-criteria decision analysis Alternatives evaluated against 5 weighted criteria ► Risk and Reliability (Performance) – 45% ► Operation and Maintenance – 30% ► Cost – 10% ► Schedule – 10% ► Environmental – 5% 12
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Armoring Alternative Configurations 500-yr Alternatives Alt 1 – Uniform 500-yr resiliency Alt 2 – Hardened crown, adjust armoring material in accordance with resultant overtopping rate Alt 3. – Uniform 500-yr resiliency plus risk informed additions 750-yr Alternatives Alt 4 – Uniform 750-yr resiliency Alt 5 – Hardened crown, adjust armoring material in accordance with resultant overtopping rate Alt 6. – Uniform 750-yr resiliency plus risk informed additions 13
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternative Evaluation Process (cont.) Analyzed 6 alternatives (25 May) ► Team recommendation: Alternative 3 Summary of outcome provided to NFS (6 June) Follow-up meeting conducted (20 June) Written feedback from NFS provided (24 June) ► Use no TRM or ACB ► Use gravity walls to lower overtopping rate below 1 cfs (within erosion resistance of grass) ► Gravity wall alternative found inconsistent with authorization Exceeds 100-yr system authorization Fails to add resiliency for over topping 14
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Armoring Alternative Configurations Final AEP conducted 28 June – Alternative 7 added to minimize use of TRM / ACB ► Alt 7 – Uniform 500-yr resiliency plus risk informed additions (enhanced grass in lieu of TRM for risk informed additions) 15
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Alternatives RankAlternativeDescription yr Overtopping resiliency and Risk Assessment Results (HPTRMS only) yr Overtopping resiliency + hardened crown yr Overtopping resiliency and Risk Assessment Results (HPTRMS only) yr Overtopping resiliency and Risk Assessment Results (HPTRMS only) + NFS O&M considerations yr Overtopping resiliency + hardened crown yr Overtopping resiliency only yr Overtopping resiliency only 16
HSDRRS Armoring Brief 17
HSDRRS Armoring Brief 18
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Challenges Future Levee Lifts Future Authority for Armoring NFS O&M Concerns Expedited Implementation 19
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Path Forward Re-allocation of Funds for Armoring Complete Design – Dec 2011 Begin Construction – Mar 2012 Armoring In Place – 1 June
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Discussion 21
BUILDING STRONG ® HSDRRS Armoring Brief Sponsor / Stakeholder Participation Project Delivery Team participation since July 2010 Formulation of armoring alternative for evaluation 22