The reform of the CMO Fruit & Vegetables – Better policy for a stronger Sector PROGNOSFRUIT 2007 Vilnius, Lithuania DG Agri/C.2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Advertisements

1 PROGRAMMING TRANSITION From SAPARD to RDPs and SPDs/OPs.
CAP Reform Ref: CAPreform feb07.
Zuzana Sarvasova National Forest Centre Zvolen
Cofinanced by the European Commission. THE NEW CAP From January 2015 More targeted and adaptable than ever  Large choice of optional schemes and measures.
EU SME policy The “Small Business Act” for Europe and its Review
1 Final Report Results of the on-line Public Consultation of the Conclusions of the 5th Cohesion Report Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
The EU rural development plan and the international context Sabine LARUELLE Ministre des Classes Moyennes et de l’Agriculture FSAGx – November.
After CMO reform F&V: Implications for the EU27 apple market PROGNOSFRUIT 2007 Vilnius, Lithuania DG Agri/C.2.
Overview on the EU Common Agricultural Policy - Page 1May 2008 Seminar „Marketing of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables“ SS 2008 Overview on the EU Common Agricultural.
Bence Tóth, European Commission The situation of the dairy sector in the EU.
Ⓒ Olof S. Evaluating agricultural and rural policies: an EU Commission perspective for CAP2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives.
Simplification of the CAP State of play & next steps Michael Niejahr.
Producer Organizations in the EU: policy issues Jose-Maria Garcia-Alvarez-Coque UPV, Valencia CAL/MED Workshop, October 2007.
CAP reforms Economics of Food Markets Lecture 8 Alan Matthews.
Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES.
EU Milk Policies after End of Quotas Carlos MARTÍN ÓVILO DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission Value Chain in Milk Production and Consumption.
Alan Matthews UNECE Executive Forum May 2004 Implications of enlargement for agricultural trade Alan Matthews Trinity College Dublin Ireland.
2014 Opening Conference of the Hungarian School Fruit Scheme – Budapest - 28/02/2014 European Commission - DG Agriculture Vincent Lariviere - Unit C2 1.
Ⓒ Olof S. Future directions of EU agricultural policies The CAP towards 2020 Tassos Haniotis, Director Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations.
Siemen van Berkum (LEI) and Natalija Bogdanov (UoB) Presentation at the Novi Sad Fair, Novi Sad, 16 May 2012 Serbia on the road to EU accession. Implications.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
1 Cal-Med Consortium Workshop Domestic Policies and Mediterranean Products Washington - December 7 and 8, 2006 Domestic Policy Reform in the EU: What is.
EMFF Operational Programme EMFF programme: 6 main elements 1. Ex-ante conditionalities 2. Ex-ante evaluation 3. SWOT analysis & needs analysis.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on
How the EU is financed EU spends around €140 billion euro per year across the Member States All Member States contribute to the EU budget In 2011, Ireland’s.
Sotiris Koutsomitros 1 Common agricultural policy 2014 – 2020 Impacts on horticulture Sotiris Koutsomitros Agricultural-Engineer MSc Environmental Engineer.
Regulation and the Governance Agenda in the 21 st Century Josef Konvitz, Public Governance Directorate.
April 17, The Midterm Review of the CAP Issues and options Franz Fischler.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
European Commission Opportunities for Conservation Agriculture in the EU Common Agricultural Policy Gottlieb Basch González-Sánchez, E.; Gómez.
Farm policy reform: the European experience Dan Rotenberg, Counselor - Agriculture Delegation of the European Commission to the U.S. Domestic and trade.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Preparation of future ENI CBC programmes - State of Play Vanessa De Bruyn (DG DEVCO) 3 December 2012.
1 Local food systems in the future EU regulation – State of play Frédérique LORENZI 21 April 2013 – Crisan – RuralEst.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012.
1 Cohesion Policy Brussels, 9 June 2009 “ Cohesion policy: response to the economic crisis” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying.
Introduction Following the Rural Development Regulation agreed in Sept 2005, the new RD policy for the period is characterised by continuity and.
KAJ MORTENSEN, HEAD OF SAPARD UNIT, DG AGRI EUROPEAN COMMISSION Pre-accession Assistance for Rural Development.
Ⓒ Olof S. Communication on the future of the CAP “The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future” DG.
JASPERS for CEF Stéphane OUAKI Head Of Unit
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
Multi-stakeholder Dialogue on Benchmarking Water Quality and Services Brussels - 9 September 2014 The ECI 'right2water' Commission response.
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
CAP simplification EESC, NAT section meeting 2 September 2015 Jerzy PLEWA Director-General DG Agriculture & Rural Development.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
2 - Decoupling - A more sustainable system of direct payments European Council Berlin 1999 Agenda 2000 EU Institutions Member States Civil Society European.
Simplification of the CAP State of play 23 October 2015 DG Agriculture & Rural Development.
European Commission Agriculture and Rural Development Rural Development Policy in the period and in the Future Financial Perspectives Pedro.
The CAP towards 2020 Direct payments DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
EuropeAid Migration & Development EU perspective 7 March 2013, Brussels.
Source: Directorate-General for Energy Post Paris: Future of Automotive Fuels Political challenges Philip Good DG Energy - European Commission.
Common Agricultural Policy European Economics Topic 3.
European Union support to the Ukraine Bratislava, 3 June 2016 Livia Vasakova, EC Representation in Slovakia.
CAP 2021 Priorities of the Netherlands
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
Technical Assistance for Development of a Strategy for Alignment with
Current budgetary and regulatory position of the CAP
Animal Welfare EU Strategy
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
The EU Sugar Sector Reform
EU-Project: Trade and Private Sector Development (TPSD)
EU rural development policy
EMBARGO PRESS Preliminary Draft Budget 2009 Financing strategic objectives, Addressing challenges ahead Presentation by Dr. Dalia GRYBAUSKAITE.
Position of the European Farmers on the changes and news within the new CAP François GUERIN | Second National Farmers meeting in Bulgaria 6 February.
Presentation transcript:

The reform of the CMO Fruit & Vegetables – Better policy for a stronger Sector PROGNOSFRUIT 2007 Vilnius, Lithuania DG Agri/C.2

August Better for the … 1. Farmer: Freedom to farm 2. Taxpayer: Sustainable expenditure 3. Citizens: Transparence & coherence

August Better for the … 4. Consumer: Focus on health benefits 5. Environment: Sustaining the effort 6. Global partners: Full WTO conformity 7. Sector: Level playing field

August A Better for the FARMER: Freedom of choice which Producer Organization (PO) to join for which product (fresh & processed) Simplified mergers and cooperation's (transnational, Associations of PO) MS to design ‘National programs’ as overall guidelines for Operational Programs (OP)

August B Better for the FARMER: OP to be elaborated in coherence with MS National strategy setting out overall objectives, priorities and eligible measures Single Payment Scheme (SPS): Integration of all agriculture land in line with respective MS model Application of rules of cross-compliance in line with Rural Development rules (good agriculture practice)

August Share of PO in national F&V production (in 2004, %) Source: AGRI/C.2

August C Better for the FARMER: No ceiling on budget for POs, annual growth rate foreseen due to increased organisation of 50 Mio€ MS with low degree of organisation (under 20% VMP) receive additional aid (e.g. NMS, RUP, PT, EL) New instrument for crises management, managed by PO to provide for security and stability

August Expenditure of Operational Funds (in 2005, Mio€) Source: AGRI/C.2

August Better for the TAXPAYER: Less distortive expenditure: No more export restitutions, EU-funded market withdrawals More sustainable expenditure: 50% co-financing of Operational Programs e.g. for crises management Overall ceiling of max. EU-cofinanced support up to 4,1% of VMP for POs retained Rural Development: No double financing of measures eligible both under CMO and Rural Development

August A Better for the CITIZENS: Decoupling of aid: Processing aid abolished, transferred into Member states national SPS envelopes Coherence: Introduction of performance indicators in Operational Programs Transparency by publication of MS National Programs for comparison

August EU co-funded expenditure per category (in Mio€) Source: AGRI/C.2

August B Better for the CITIZENS: Drastic reduction of withdrawals: - EU-funded only for free distribution and - PO co-funded as part of new crises management instrument (max. 33% of OP budget) Abolishment of export restitutions

August A Better for the CONSUMER: Focus of F&V promotion programs within OP on ‘young consumers’ Free distribution for charitable organisations and also for schools 100% EU-funded Obligatory labeling of country of origin for all fresh F&V

August B Better for the CONSUMER: Within OPs, if the focus of promotion programs is on young consumers, co-financing rate is increased to 60% Increase of indicative budget for direct EC-funded promotional actions under reg. 2826/2000 from 6 Mio€ to 12 Mio€

August C Better for the CONSUMER: Council declaration on School Fruit Scheme: « Commission invite to present as soon as possible a proposal based on the evaluation of the benefits, practicability and administrative costs involved in such a Scheme. »

August A Better for the ENVIRONMENT: Environmental standards (GAP) in line with Rural Development All area under SPS: cross-compliance fully applicable Measures to protect the environment not only cover production but the whole marketing chain (transport, packaging et al.)

August B Better for the ENVIRONMENT: OP measures supporting organic production eligible for 60% co-financing All PO must spend at least 10% of their total Operational Fund on measures to protect the environment Investments with harmful impact on the environment are not eligible for funding within OP

August Expenditure on environmental measures (% of total OF, 2005) Source: AGRI/C.2

August Better for the GLOBAL PARTNERS: All measures in conformity with WTO obligations: No more export restitutions, No more processing aid coupled to production No 100% financing withdrawals except for free distribution Marketing standards harmonized with international rules

August Extra EU-25 trade (Mio €) in fresh vegetables, 2005 Source: AGRI/C.2

August Better for the SECTOR: Transition rules for the decoupling of the processing aid in some Member states Special area-based temporary aid for the restructuring of the soft fruit sector in several Member states

August Background O bjectives of the reform Time table

August  To contribute to achieving sustainable production that is competitive both on internal and external markets  To reduce fluctuations in fruit and vegetables producers' income resulting from crises  To increase consumption of fruit and vegetables in the EU Reform objectives 1

August Reform objectives 2  To continue the efforts made by the sector to maintain and protect the environment  To simplify and where possible reduce the administrative burden for all concerned

August Reform objectives 3 These objectives of the reform have been identified taking into account: - consistency with the reformed CAP, market support and rural development policy, -WTO compatibility, -conformity with the financial perspectives.

August Time table  Commission publishes proposal on 24th January 2007  Discussion in Council Working Group and Special Committee for Agriculture  Political agreement in the Council on 11th June 2007  Adoption by the Council in September 2007  Commission implementing rules elaborated by end 2007  Entry into force by 1st January 2008

August Thank you for your attention ! en.htm