Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services And Clinical Trials (EDICTs CLAS-ACT) Armin D Weinberg Baylor College of Medicine.
Advertisements

WHO Antenatal Course Preparing the new WHO eProfessors.
From Research to Advocacy
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Patients Matter: Engaging Patients as Collaborators to Improve Osteoarthritis (OA) Care in Alberta Alberta Health Services.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
1 Engagement at PCORI: An Overview M. Suzanne Schrandt, JD Deputy Director of Patient Engagement.
Kay Dickersin, MA, PhD December 10, 2012 The Role of Consumers in Guidelines Development.
Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.
The Community Engagement Studio: Strengthening Research Capacity through Community Engagement Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI Executive Director, Meharry.
The SHARE Approach Essential Steps of Shared Decision Making
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
1 Engagement in Clinical Research: The PCORI Engagement Rubric Kim Bailey, Engagement Officer UVA Webinar October 10, 2014.
Begin with the End in Mind
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Summarizing Community-Based Participatory Research: Background and Context for the Review Lucille Webb, MEd Eugenia Eng, DrPH Alice Ammerman, DrPH Meera.
Topic Generation and Research Prioritization Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH, Executive Director Rachael Fleurence, PhD, Scientist Rick Kuntz, MD, MSc, Chair, PDC.
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
1. Objectives Describe ways in which the EPC program has engaged stakeholders to improve relevance and applicability of its products Present methods used.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only Sheffield CCG CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Stakeholder Engagement and Transparency in The Effective Health Care Program Supriya Janakiraman MD MPH AHRQ.
AHRQ’s Role in Comparative Effectiveness Carolyn M. Clancy, MD Director Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Alliance for Health Reform Briefing.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators.
AHRQ Learning Network for Chartered Value Exchanges (CVEs) September 2008 CVEs may wish to tailor this slide deck for use with stakeholders in your community.
Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
Margo Michaels, MPH Executive Director, ENACCT Co PI, Communities as Partners in Cancer Clinical Trials, R13-HS Panel on Use and Implementation of.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Refining Key Questions: Interactive Case Study Quiz C. Michael White, PharmD, FCP, FCCP Professor and Director University of Connecticut / Hartford Hospital.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Idaho Energy Plan Proposal (RFI) Energy Policy Institute (EPI)
Lawrence B. Sadwin Friends of the World Heart Federation Foundation Moving Ahead: Leveraging Knowledge & Action to Improve Healthcare Quality. AHRQ 2012.
11 The CPCRN, DCPC, NCI, and the Community Guide: Areas for Collaboration and Supportive Work Shawna L. Mercer, MSc, PhD Director The Guide to Community.
1 VGIN’s GIS Strategic Plan Dan Widner VGIN Advisory Board Meeting January 6,
THE IOWA MODEL OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE TO PROMOTE QUALITY CARE Jill Collins, Jerilyn Rodgers, Sandy Siebert & Julie Unruh **please refer to page 252.
Creating an Integrated Framework for Reducing Disparities in Health Care Quality Francis D. Chesley, Jr., MD Director Office of Extramural Research, Education.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
1 Maximizing the Impact of Comparative Effectiveness Research: The Role of the DEcIDE Consortia Scott R. Smith, PhD AHRQ Center for Outcomes & Evidence.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER Melissa McPheeters, PhD Co-Director, Vanderbilt EPC Engaging Stakeholders in EPC Work.
Stakeholder Engagement for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Vanessa Jacoby, MD, MAS Associate Professor Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences.
EHealth Initiative Business and Clinical Motivator Work Group January 21, :00 p.m. EDT.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. © All Rights Reserved. This program generously funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Evidence-Based.
Does our organization take the actions possible for utilization of knowledge? Self-assessment tool KTE-TUMS Group.
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education Project updates Marcella Turner-Cmuchal.
Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness Research Danielle Lavallee, PharmD, PhD Research Assistant Professor UW Department of Surgery July.
Health Literacy Summit Madison, WI
Developing a guideline
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
A Path of Learning and Improvement
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
One Voice Central Texas Presentation to CAN Board
Jason Gerson, PhD Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Envisioning Consumer Participation
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Research funding application process
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
Webinar #3P: How you can contribute to research
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Stirling Bryan, PhD Scientific Director, BC SUPPORT Unit
Presentation transcript:

Engaging Stakeholders in the Effective Health Care Program Information and tools for researchers and investigators

Full Course Outline Module I: AHRQ’s Vision for, Theory, and Principles of Stakeholder Engagement Module IV: Skills for Successful Engagement

Module III Points of Engagement in the EHC Program

What to Expect in Module III Module III will outline opportunities for stakeholders to be engaged in the Effective Health Care (EHC) Program. For each EHC Program phase this module will discuss:  Points of stakeholder involvement  Purpose of points of involvement  Engagement opportunities  Potential types of stakeholders to involve

Module III Learning Objectives After completing Module III participants will be able to:  Identify at least three opportunities to involve stakeholders in EHC Program research  Identify the objective of:  Each point of involvement in the EHC Program research process  Involving stakeholders at each point  Describe AHRQ’s goals for stakeholder involvement

AHRQ Expectations

EHC Program Phases of Research Prioritize research topics Refine research topics Conduct research Comment on draft research results Create audience- specific information Disseminate information Use research Suggest a research topics EHC Program

Stakeholder Activities in EHC Program Research Suggest a Research Topic Identify real-world questions for health & health care decisions Provide Insights on Research Priorities Provide input to develop and prioritize research gaps Refine Topics & Develop Key Questions Ensure key questions accurately describe decisional dilemmas Help Develop Research Approach Provide input on methods, clinical relevance and appropriate outcomes to assess Review Draft Research Findings Provide input to improve quality and responsiveness of research reports Shape & Inform Research Products & Tools Help craft meaningful messages Distribute Products and Lead in Implementation Share information with others; take the lead in using evidence to inform health care practices

Topic Identification and Nomination Identify and select relevant topics based on priority-setting criteria for diverse group of stakeholders Purpose Nominate topics online or by mail Frame clinical context of topic Opportunities Patients & consumers, clinicians, policymakers, experts, citizens, others Stakeholders

Topic Prioritization To provide input to develop and prioritize research gaps Purpose Participate in discussions to describe research gaps and prioritize research needs Opportunities Researchers, funders, patients & consumers, clinicians, others Stakeholders

Topic Refinement Clarify and refine key questions to accurately reflect decisional dilemmas Purpose Provide real-world input as key informants Provide input on clinical knowledge, context & controversy during multi-stakeholder meetings Provide public comment via web Opportunities Nominator of topic, patients & consumers, clinicians, policymakers, experts, citizens, others Stakeholders

Topic Refinement & Key Informants Ways to find key informants include contacting: Advocacy organizations and support groups Professional organizations and societies Certification boards Professional networks Private insurers

Research Protocol Development Clinical, methodological, and public input into research and its protocol Purpose Provide methodological & clinical input as a Technical Expert Panel (TEP) member Provide input on important outcomes for assessment Opportunities Patients & consumers, clinicians, policy- makers, researchers Stakeholders

Peer and Public Review Invite both scientific peer and public review of research reviews and reports Purpose Comments requested via web and online Opportunities Patients & consumers, clinicians, policymakers, experts, citizens, others Stakeholders

Report Translation & Dissemination Test and provide input on summary guide development Purpose Participate in focus groups Participate in individual interviews Provide expert review of summary guides Partner to distribute research products Opportunities Patients & consumers, clinicians, policymakers, experts, citizens, others Stakeholders * Eisenberg Center leads stakeholder engagement for translation and dissemination.

Summary of Module III  Identify and Involve stakeholders early in the process  There are multiple opportunities for stakeholder engagement in the EHC Program  Each opportunity serves a unique purpose  In order to ensure valuable and constructive knowledge exchange, consider the most appropriate stakeholders to involve  There are many ways to locate and recruit stakeholders

Module III Quiz To help you review the information presented in Module III, please complete the following quiz. Answers are provided at the end of the module.

Module III Quiz: Question 1 1) Which of the following activities are opportunities for stakeholder involvement in the EHC Program? Select all that apply: a)Suggesting a research idea b)Providing input on inclusion/exclusion criteria c)Discussing key questions d)Illustrating clinical context for a topic

Module III Quiz: Question 1: ANSWER 1) Which of the following activities are opportunities for stakeholder involvement in the EHC Program? a)Suggesting a research idea b)Providing input on inclusion/exclusion criteria c)Discussing key questions d)Illustrating clinical context for a topic

Module III Quiz: Question 2 2. Match the engagement purpose with the appropriate EHC Program phase. Identify nominations relevant to real-world health care decisions: a)Topic Identification & Nomination b)Topic Prioritization c)Topic Refinement d)Research Protocol Development e)Peer/Public Review f)Report Translation & Dissemination

Module III Quiz: Question 2: ANSWER 2. Match the engagement purpose with the appropriate EHC Program phase. Identify nominations relevant to real-world health care decisions: a)Topic Identification & Nomination b)Topic Prioritization c)Topic Refinement d)Research Protocol Development e)Peer/Public Review f)Report Translation & Dissemination

Module III Quiz: Question 3 3. Match the engagement purpose with the appropriate EHC Program phase. Provide clinical and methodological input: a)Topic Identification & Nomination b)Topic Prioritization c)Topic Refinement d)Research Protocol Development e)Peer/Public Review f)Report Translation & Dissemination

Module III Quiz: Question 3: ANSWER 3. Match the engagement purpose with the appropriate EHC Program phase. Provide clinical and methodological input: a)Topic Identification & Nomination b)Topic Prioritization c)Topic Refinement d)Research Protocol Development e)Peer/Public Review f)Report Translation & Dissemination

Module III Quiz: Question 4 4. Match the engagement purpose with the appropriate EHC Program phase. Provide input to develop and prioritize research gaps: a)Topic Identification & Nomination b)Topic Prioritization c)Topic Refinement d)Research Protocol Development e)Peer/Public Review f)Report Translation & Dissemination

Module III Quiz: Question 4: ANSWER 4. Match the engagement purpose with the appropriate EHC Program phase. Provide input to develop and prioritize research gaps: a)Topic Identification & Nomination b)Topic Prioritization c)Topic Refinement d)Research Protocol Development e)Peer/Public Review f)Report Translation & Dissemination

Module III Quiz: Question 5: 5.List three ways in which you could locate and recruit stakeholders.

Module III Quiz: Question 5: ANSWER 5.List three ways in which you could locate and recruit stakeholders. Potential ways to recruit and identify stakeholders include: Patients & consumers Advocacy organizations Support groups Clinicians Professional organizations and societies Certification boards Policymakers Professional networks (MMDLN, MED, DERP, NASADD) Through private insurers

Works Cited Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2009). Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville, MD. Available at: guides-reviews-and- reports/?pageaction=displayproduct&productid=318 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2009). Operating Plan for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funds for Comparative Effectiveness Research as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.