 Definition:  Electoral system in which candidates run for a single seat from a specific geographic district.  The winner is the person who receives.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Politics in France The political system.
Advertisements

Linkage Institutions Political Parties, Civil Society, Interest Groups, Electoral Systems & Elections.
Governance 3 (Presidential vs Parliamentary)
Institutions of the British National Government
Political Institutions Levels of Government Executives, Cabinet, Bureaucracies, Legislatures, Judiciary.
Bell ringer Working Together # 166 Please put your HW on your desk so I can check it.
Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies
Objective State the implications of presidential and parliamentary systems on democracy and the policy-making process. Prime Minister Gordon Brown President.
Political Parties: Constitutional Systems and Parliamentary Government Gregory Mahler Earlham College Richmond, Indiana December 9-11, 2007.
Parliamentary Democracy May have a Prime Minister elected
Linkage Institutions Political Parties, Civil Society, Interest Groups, Electoral Systems & Elections.
Short Paper #1 Due February 4 th !! - all materials for the paper can be found under the “Tutorial #2 folder” on MLS.
Comparative Politics: Structures and Choices 2e
REGIME TYPE Presidentialism & Parliamentarism.
Chapter 1: Principles of Government Section 2
Objective State the implications of presidential and parliamentary systems on democracy and the policy-making process. Prime Minister David Cameron President.
Government What is a government & how does it work?
Comparisons…Sys tems. Electoral Systems: Single Member District Plurality vs. Proportional Representation.
A Chapter-by-Chapter Synopsis
Assoc. Prof. Murat Somer, CASE Fall 2012 Office Hours: Tuesdays, 2:00-4:00pm.
Forms of Government. Confederation Loose union of independent states Each member of a confederation retains its sovereignty (exclusive right to exercise.
Chapter 1: Principles of Government Section 2 Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 3 Chapter 1, Section 2 Learning Objectives 1.Classify governments.
Forms of Government Chapter 1 Section 2.
Democratic Systems. There are three Presidential Parliamentary Presidential- parliamentary.
Political Institutions. Presentation Outline 1) Presidential Systems 2) Parliamentary Systems 3) Mixed Systems 4) Authoritarian Systems 5) Party Systems.
PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEMS
STUDENT NOTES 5 INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE POLITICS.
Democracy. What is Democracy?  Is democracy in the eye of the beholder? Soviets said they had “true democracy” Soviets said they had “true democracy”
The Electoral System Federal and Provincial governments hold elections at least every 5 years. The Prime Minister has the right to choose when to call.
Chapter 14 Parliamentary Government.  Form of govt. found in most countries  The only votes that people vote are for members of parliament  The executive.
Governments Mr. Barrett 7 th grade social studies.
Institutional Design: Electoral Systems and Executive- Legislative Relations Plan for Today 1. Understand the characteristics and democratic consequences.
USA / Canada’s Government style. Limited Government Although they are both limited governments, they are very different in style and make up.
Forms of Government. Presidential Democracies What is a Presidential Democracy?! System of government in which the Executive and Legislative Branches.
Essential Question: How does the structure of modern governments in Europe impact its people? Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the.
Part Three: Political Structures/Institutions “Our political institutions work remarkably well. They are designed to clang against each other. The noise.
British Government Overview unitary state London Britain is a unitary state with political authority centralized in London. three branches of government.
The Comparative Approach Comparing governments instills understanding and helps explain past and current events and predict future events Public policy.
Comparison Systems. Electoral Systems: Single Member District Plurality vs. Proportional Representation.
The Comparative Approach Comparing governments instills understanding and helps explain past and current events and predict future events Public policy.
Copyright © Pearson Education, Inc.Slide 1 Chapter 1, Section 2 Indirect Democracy In an indirect or representative democracy, the people elect agents.
Chapter 1: Principles of Government Section 2. Objectives 1.Classify governments according to three sets of characteristics. 2.Define systems of government.
Chapter 1 – Section 2. Although there are no two governments that are exactly alike, we can use a basic classification system to determine what type of.
Ch. 1 Sec. 2 Principles of Government
Citizen Participation
Part Three (continued): Electoral Systems & Linkage Institutions
INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Section 2: Structure of Government
Part Three (continued): Electoral Systems & Linkage Institutions
Legislatures and Legislators:
AP COMPARATIVE GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS Dr. Afxendiou
Government Institutions in Russia
Parliamentary & Presidential DEMOCRACIES
Parliamentary & Presidential DEMOCRACIES
Government  The group of people who control and make decisions for a country, state, etc.
Power is divided between one central and several regional authorities.
Presidential Democracy & Parliamentary Democracy
Russia: Institutions of Government
INTRODUCTION TO COMPARATIVE POLITICS UNIT I CH. 1
Use the Governments of Europe Chart
“Our political institutions work remarkably well
Welcome To Myappia ©Amy L. Atchison, 2016.
Liberalism Through Democratic Systems Representative Democracy
Chapter 8 Political Parties
Essential Question: How does the structure of modern governments in Europe impact its people? Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the.
What is a government?.
Latin America: Government
Comparison Systems.
Types of Democracies Notes
Comparison Systems.
Presentation transcript:

 Definition:  Electoral system in which candidates run for a single seat from a specific geographic district.  The winner is the person who receives the most votes, whether or not that is a majority  Characteristics:  Usually results in two-party system  Silences minority voters  Creates large catch-all parties

 Definition:  An electoral system in which voters select parties rather than individual candidates and parties are represented in legislatures in proportion to the shares of votes they win.  Characteristics:  Usually results in multi-party systems  Gives voice to minority voters  Wider representation of political views

 Characteristics:  Fusion of Powers  Executive born of legislature—executive branch is populated by members of legislative branch  Parliamentary sovereignty  Collective responsibility  Vote of confidence to remove Prime Minister  High party discipline  No direct election of executive branch  Examples: UK

 Characteristics:  Separation of Powers  Checks and balances  Direct election of president  Lower party discipline  Inefficient policy process  Gridlock more likely  Examples: Mexico, Nigeria, Iran (sort of)

 Role of legislature to enact legislation, so executive needs legislative to pass bills  Executive influences the legislative agenda by drafting bills  Executive is head of government  Legislature can remove the executive  Executive can introduce legislation

Characteristics:  Both a PM and a President  Directly elected president  Separate head of government and state

 Definition:  Concentration of political power in a central government  Examples from AP6  United Kingdom  China  Iran

 Definition:  A system of governance in which political authority is shared between the national government and regional or state governments  Examples from AP6  Russia  Mexico  Nigeria

 Definition:  Multiple groups may represent a single society interest.  Characteristics:  Group membership is voluntary and limited.  Groups often have a loose or decentralized organizational structure.  There is a clear separation between interest groups and the government.  United States is perfect example.

 Definition:  Interest groups are an institutional part of the political structure and are active in policy formation and implementation.  Characteristics  Membership in the peak association is often compulsory and nearly universal.  Peak associations are centrally organized and direct the actions of their members.  Groups are often systematically involved in making and implementing policy.  Key Point: Interest group part of policy process!

 Definition:  A country that obtains much of its revenue from the export of oil or other natural resources  Impact:  Government doesn’t have to be accountable to citizens for income.  Examples from AP6  Nigeria  Russia  Iran