Robert Delgado Chris Mui Amanda Smith Presented to: Dr. Sima Parisay Due: October 20 th, 2011 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuesday, March 5 Duality – The art of obtaining bounds – weak and strong duality Handouts: Lecture Notes.
Advertisements

IEOR 4004 Midterm Review (part I)
LINEAR PROGRAMMING SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Lesson 08 Linear Programming
Chapter 5 Sensitivity Analysis: An Applied Approach
Copyright (c) 2003 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. 1 Chapter 5 Sensitivity Analysis: An Applied Approach to accompany Introduction to.
Linear Programming.
Linear Programming Problem
Chapter 2: Modeling with Linear Programming & sensitivity analysis
Linear Programming Sensitivity of the Right Hand Side Coefficients.
1/53 Slide Linear Programming: Sensitivity Analysis and Interpretation of Solution n Introduction to Sensitivity Analysis n Graphical Sensitivity Analysis.
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS.
Optimization Models Module 9. MODEL OUTPUT EXTERNAL INPUTS DECISION INPUTS Optimization models answer the question, “What decision values give the best.
SOLVING LINEAR PROGRAMS USING EXCEL Dr. Ron Lembke.
Operations Management Linear Programming Module B - Part 2
LP EXAMPLES.
19 Linear Programming CHAPTER
Chapter 3 Linear Programming: Sensitivity Analysis and Interpretation of Solution MT 235.
Linear Programming: Fundamentals
1 1 Slide LINEAR PROGRAMMING Introduction to Sensitivity Analysis Professor Ahmadi.
LINEAR PROGRAMMING: THE GRAPHICAL METHOD
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis:
Example 4.4 Blending Models.
Example 15.2 Blending Oil Products at Chandler Oil
Chapter 10. Resource Allocation
 Marketing Application  Media Selection  Financial Application  Portfolio Selection  Financial Planning  Product Management Application  Product.
1 1 Slide LINEAR PROGRAMMING: THE GRAPHICAL METHOD n Linear Programming Problem n Properties of LPs n LP Solutions n Graphical Solution n Introduction.
© Copyright 2004, Alan Marshall 1 Lecture 1 Linear Programming.
Kerimcan OzcanMNGT 379 Operations Research1 LP: Sensitivity Analysis and Interpretation of Solution Chapter 3.
Introduction to Mathematical Programming OR/MA 504 Chapter 3.
Decision Models Lecture 3 1 Lecture 3  Understanding the optimizer sensitivity report  Shadow (or dual) prices  Right hand side ranges  Objective coefficient.
Chapter 19 Linear Programming McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Product Mix Problem Monet company makes four types of frames.
Linear Programming Chapter 13 Supplement.
Special Conditions in LP Models (sambungan BAB 1)
Mathematical Programming Cht. 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 6S Linear Programming.
Linear Programming Topics General optimization model LP model and assumptions Manufacturing example Characteristics of solutions Sensitivity analysis Excel.
Managerial Decision Making and Problem Solving
THE GALAXY INDUSTRY PRODUCTION PROBLEM -
1 Chapter 7 Linear Programming. 2 Linear Programming (LP) Problems Both objective function and constraints are linear. Solutions are highly structured.
Chapter 6 Supplement Linear Programming.
To accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Fourth Edition  1996 Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. All rights.
Linear Programming McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Team 9 Jin woo Choi Philip Liu Nallely Tagle
Operations Research I IE 416 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Operations Research I IE 416 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.
1/24: Linear Programming & Sensitivity Analysis Review: –LP Requirements –Graphical solutions Using MS Excel for Linear Programming Sensitivity Analysis.
Professional software packages such as The WinQSB and LINDO provide the following LP information: Information about the objective function: –its optimal.
Chapter 6 Simplex-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Duality
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Simplex-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Duality n Sensitivity Analysis with the Simplex Tableau n Duality.
1 1 Slide © 2000 South-Western College Publishing/ITP Slides Prepared by JOHN LOUCKS.
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis A Practical Introduction to Management Science 5 th edition Cliff T. Ragsdale.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Supplement 6 Linear Programming.
LINEAR PROGRAMMING.
OPSM 301 Operations Management Class 11: Linear Programming using Excel Koç University Zeynep Aksin
1 Optimization Techniques Constrained Optimization by Linear Programming updated NTU SY-521-N SMU EMIS 5300/7300 Systems Analysis Methods Dr.
BUAD306 Chapter 19 – Linear Programming. Optimization QUESTION: Have you ever been limited to what you can get done because you don’t have enough ________?
LINEAR PROGRAMMING MEANING:
Operations Research By: Saeed Yaghoubi 1 Graphical Analysis 2.
 Marketing Application  Media Selection  Financial Application  Portfolio Selection  Financial Planning  Product Management Application  Product.
1 2 Linear Programming Chapter 3 3 Chapter Objectives –Requirements for a linear programming model. –Graphical representation of linear models. –Linear.
Chapter 2 Linear Programming Models: Graphical and Computer Methods
Linear Programming.
Linear Programming – Introduction
Chapter 19 – Linear Programming
Chapter 5 Sensitivity Analysis: An Applied Approach
Linear Programming SIMPLEX METHOD.
Lecture 4 Part I Mohamed A. M. A..
Optimization Models Module 9.
Presentation transcript:

Robert Delgado Chris Mui Amanda Smith Presented to: Dr. Sima Parisay Due: October 20 th, 2011 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Agenda Problem Statement Summary of Problem Formulation of the Problem Solution using WinQSB Report to Manager Sensitivity Analysis 1 Basic Variable in O.F. 1 RHS Binding Constraint Questions/Comments

Problem Statement Chandler Oil Company Problem #5 on Page 92 of Operations Research Applications and Algorithms textbook

Problem Statement 5,000 Barrels of Oil 1 10,000 Barrels of Oil 2 Quality -10 Quality -5 Quality -8 Sell:$25/barrel Demand: 5 barrels/$1 Adv. Quality -6 Sell: $20/barrel Demand: 10 barrels/$1 Adv.

Summary of the Problem Chandler Oil Company - Oil Information Oil# of barrelsOil Quality Oil Oil Chandler Oil Company - Products Made from Oil Product (Blend) Avg. Quality Level Demand Created per $1 spent on Advertising Selling Price per Barrel Gas85$25 Heating Oil610$20

Formulation of the Problem How much money should be spent in advertising each one of their products? How should they blend each type of product from the available oil?

Formulation of the Problem- Step 1 1) Define Decision Variables a i = dollars spent daily on advertising blend i (i = 1,2) x ij = barrels of oil i used daily to produce blend j (i = 1,2 ; j = 1,2) Sign Restrictions: a i > 0 x ij > 0 VariableName Given x 11 Oil 1 for Gas x 12 Oil 1 for Heating Oil x 21 Oil 2 for Gas x 22 Oil 2 for Heating Oil a1a1 Advertising $ Gas a2a2 Advertising $ Heating Oil

Formulation of the Problem- Step 1 Avg. Quality Level Demand of Barrels Created per $1 spent on Advertising Selling Price per Barrel Product (Blend) Decision Variables 85$25 Gas x 11 x $20 Heating Oil x 12 x 22 OIL12 # of barrels Oil Quality 105

Formulation of the Problem- Step 1 The definition of the decision variables implies: x 11 + x 12 = barrels of oil 1 used daily x 11 + x 21 = barrels of gas produced daily x 21 + x 22 = barrels of oil 2 used daily x 12 + x 22 = barrels of heating oil produced daily

Formulation of the Problem- Step 2 2) Provide explanatory information and assumptions Gas and heating oil cannot be stored, so it must be sold on the day it is produced

Formulation of the Problem- Step 3 3) Formulate Objective Function (O.F) Profit = Revenue – Cost  Daily Revenues from Blend Sales (Sales of Gas and Heating Oil) = $25(x 11 + x 21 ) + $20 (x 12 + x 22 )  Daily Advertising Cost = a 1 + a 2  Daily Profit = Daily Revenues from Blend Sales - Daily Advertising Cost Daily Profit = [$25(x 11 + x 21 ) + $20 (x 12 + x 22 )] – [a 1 + a 2 ]  Simplify Z max = 25x x x x 22 –a 1 – a 2 Gas Heating Oil VariableName Given x 11 Oil 1 for Gas x 12 Oil 1 for Heating Oil x 21 Oil 2 for Gas x 22 Oil 2 for Heating Oil a1a1 Advertising $ Gas a2a2 Advertising $ Heating Oil

Formulation of the Problem- Step 4 4.) Formulate Constraints Constraint 1: Maximum of 5,000 barrels of oil 1 are available for production. Constraint 2: Maximum of 10,000 barrels of oil 2 are available for production. Constraint 3: Gasoline must have an average quality level of at least 8. Constraint 4: Heating oil must have an average quality level of at least 6. Constraint 5: Demand of gas is increased by 5 barrels for every dollar spent on advertising. Constraint 6: Demand of heating oil is increased by 10 barrels for every dollar spent on advertising.

Formulation of the Problem- Step 4 Description EquationType Max Profit Z max = 25x x x x 22 –a 1 – a 2 Objective Function Oil 1 Avail.x 11 + x 12 < 5000Constraint Oil 2 Avail. x 21 + x 22 < 10,000Constraint Gas Quality2x 11 – 3x 21 > 0Constraint H. QualityConstraint Demand Gas x 11 + x 21 = 5a 1 Constraint Demand H.x 12 + x 22 = 10a 2 Constraint

Explanation for Constraint 3 Gasoline must have an average quality level of at least 8. Quality of Oil 1 x Total Barrels of Oil 1 Used for gas Quality of Oil 2 x Total Barrels of Oil 2 Used for gas Total Barrels of Oil used for Gas * Same idea is applied to Constraint 4

Explanation for Constraint 3 Units Using example of 10x 11 in Numerator Using example of x 11 in Denominator -In the numerator we have quality as units -In the denominator we have barrels as units -This means we have quality/barrel in our fraction or “quality per barrel” which is what we are looking for in Constraint 3 on the LHS * Same idea is applied to Constraint 4 Number of barrels of oil 1 for Gas

Explanation for Constraint 3 Gasoline must have an average quality level of at least 8 Simplify so we have a linear equation and not a fraction 1.) Multiply both sides by x 11 + x 21 2.) Distribute 3.) Get variables on one side 4.)Now you have simplified version * Same idea is applied to Constraint 4 1) 2) 3) 4)

Explanation for Constraint 5 DEMAND GAS Equation  x 11 + x 21 = 5a 1 Equation  Supply of Gas (oil 1 + oil 2) = Demand of Gas (5 barrels for every dollar spent in advertising) UNITS Equation  Barrels = x Equation  Barrels = Barrels PURPOSE: To show we do having matching units on both sides of equation. This method can be applied for constraint 6

Formulation of the Problem- Step 4 Create Equality Constraints by Defining: Dr. Parisay’s note: change a1 and a2 names as excess variables to a3 and a4 DescriptionStandard LP Form EquationType Max Profit Z max = 25x x x x 22 –a 1 – a 2 Objective Function Oil 1 Avail.x 11 + x 12 + S 1 = 5000Constraint Oil 2 Avail. x 21 + x 22 + S 2 =10,000Constraint Gas Quality2x 11 – 3x 21 - e 1 + a 1 = 0Constraint H. Quality4x 12 – x 22 - e 2 + a 2 = 0Constraint Demand Gas x 11 + x a 1 = 0Constraint Demand H.x 12 + x a 2 = 0Constraint Slack Variables Excess Variables Artificial Variables

Solution using WinQSB: Input

Solution using WinQSB: Output

Report to Manager To maximize its profit to $323,000 for the current production of gasoline and heating the company should: Produce 5,000 barrels of gasoline by mixing 3,000 barrels of oil 1 with 2,000 barrels of oil 2 Produce 10,000 barrels of heating oil by mixing 2,000 barrels of oil 1 with 8,000 barrels of oil 2 Able to meet exact quality requirements

Report to Manager Oil 1 for Gas- Min $16.83 Oil 1 for Gas- Max $83.17 Oil 2 for Gas- Min $18.88 Oil 2 for Gas- Max $112.25

Report to Manager Oil 1 for H- Min $0 Oil 1 for H- Max $28.17 Oil 2 for H- Min $5.46 Oil 2 for H- Max $26.13

Report to Manager We must pay $1000 in advertisement for gas and $1000 in advertisement for heating oil to generate the demand for the 5,000 barrels of gasoline and 10,000 barrels of heating oil

Report to Manager Optimal if the range of oil 1 usage is from 2,500-15,000 barrels Optimal if the range of oil 2 usage is from 3,333-20,000 barrels

Sensitivity Analysis of OF Coefficient Oil 1 for Gas (Basic Variable) MOTIVATION: has the highest unit profit of $25 c(j) and the highest allowable max c(j) (taking into account correlation) Parsiay’s note: table presentation is not helpful.

Sensitivity Analysis of OF Coefficient This is the current solution. Unit profit is $25 and our max profit is $323,000. This point shows that when unit profit is increased to $83.17 our max profit will be $497,500. This point shows a unit cost value outside the allowable max c(j) range. This flat line shows that the coefficients for x 11 on this line will yield the same max profit.

Sensitivity Analysis of RHS Constraint (Non Binding) Oil 1 Available MOTIVATION: Has the highest shadow price of $29.70 Oil 1 Availability: max RHS of 15,000 barrels Shadow price of $ ,000 x $29.70 = $445,500 increase in profit. Oil 2 Availability Max RHS of 20,000 barrels Only other constraint with a high shadow price of $ ,000 x $17.45 = $349,000 increase in profit. Better

Oil 1 Available (table presentation is not helpful in here) Sensitivity Analysis of RHS Constraint (Non Binding)

This is the current solution. Barrels of oil 1 used is 5,000 and our max profit is $323,000. If we increase barrels of oil 1 to 15,000 our max profit will be $620,000. If we can only obtain 2,500 barrels of oil 1, our max profit will be $248,750. Sensitivity Analysis of RHS Constraint (Non Binding)

Sensitivity Analysis of RHS Constraint (Binding) Parisay: I explained in Word File to skip this discussion MOTIVATION: Sensitivity analysis on Demand Gas because it has the highest shadow price of $.20 between the two binding constraints available COMPARE: - Shadow Price of Demand Gas x Max RHS = Amount of Increased Profit Due to Demand Gas $.20 x 5,000 = $ Shadow Price of Demand H. x Max RHS = Amount of Increased Profit Due to Demand H. $.10 x 10,000 = $1000

Sensitivity Analysis of RHS Constraint (Binding) Parisay: It is better to use graph not table. If demand for gas is equal to 5000 we will have a profit maximization of $323,000 Once our demand goes over 5000 our profit will reduce because we cannot meet demand When gas demand equals 8333 barrels our profit will reduce to $208,333 because more money has to be spent in advertising to create that demand Any demand above 8333 barrels is infeasible.

QUESTIONS and COMMENTS