Kelly Ward Washington State University

Goals for the Session Importance of work/life integration Dual career couples Facts, figures, policies, practices Work/family Early career, mid-career, policy, practice Diapers, car pools, college, eldercare Life course perspectives All career and life stages—not just early career Recruitment, retention, promotion

Life in the academy… Higher Education is in flux 34% of faculty are part-time 28% of full time positions are not tenure track Academics (future academics) lives are complicated Most faculty have partners Desire for work-life integration Dual career couples increasing/more open Institutions of higher education are not altruistic Ideal worker norms abound

Why be “family friendly”? To recruit, promote and retain best faculty Concerns about (under) representation of women and people of color To be responsive to underrepresentation of women in different fields To have higher morale and greater productivity To create more equitable work places Pressure from external sources

More on importance… Makes for a good place to work Recruitment, retention, and career development Mimetic isomorphism Millennial faculty Dual career couples Shared parenting New models for families People are happier/healthier

What is included? Dual career couples (academic and other) Parenthood Birth and babies (leave and day care) Children/family Adoption Sick care (self and others) Elder care Same sex couples/families Personal health and well being All career stages, not just new faculty Men and women

A word about gender…. Work/life concerns tend to be associated with women Women and men impacted in different ways Important to keep needs of women in mind, but also to recognize that all people are affected by work/life issues True change in society and academic settings will take place when men and women shift in thinking and action Traditional norms are shifting, but still prevail Gendered Terrain

Facts, Figures, Policy, Practice

Not all couples are the same 72% of academics are part of a dual career couple 36% of professoriate is partnered to an academic 36% with non academic partner Women are more likely to have academic partners < 30% of academics are single or married to stay-at-home partner Clayman Institute, Stanford

Types of academic couples Academic couples can enter faculty jobs in one of three ways: Dual hires (10%) : Both partners are hired as part of a negotiation. The majority are hired “sequentially” or as “joint hires.” Independent hires (17%) : Those who secured employment separately from their couple status. Often hired without mention of a partner (who also works at the university). Solo hires (9%) : Academic couples where one partner is hired in a tenure track position and the other isn’t currently employed in an academic position. Clayman Institute

Dual career couples and diversity Nearly one-half of faculty respondents in same-sex partnerships have academic partners. Nearly one-third of underrepresented racial/ethnic minority faculty have academic partners. Clayman Institute

Dual Career Couples and Gender Women are more likely than men to be in an academic partnership Dual career hiring higher for women than men Men are more likely than women to have stay-at-home partners Women are more likely to be single. Clayman Institute

Gender and dual careers 50% of men in academic couples and 20% of women view their career as primary 59% of women in academic couples say careers are equal Women less likely to accept a job if partner not accommodated 54% of women and 42% of men perceive loss of mobility as a result of dual career Disciplinary endogamy more prevalent for women (83%) than men (54%) (women more likely to be with other scientists than men with other scientists) Dual career couple policies need to be linked to these realities

Dual career policies/practices Types of “help” Ad hoc, decentralized Relocation assistance (formal and informal) Consortia/networks (Higher Education Recruitment Consortium) Campus resource banks for jobs in community Shared/split positions Bridging positions Creation of non-tenure track or tenure track positions Resources for all types of couples Important to have, know, and use policies.

When dual career hiring works Serendipity/luck Initial hire is really wanted Fit of second hire Meeting needs of units hiring Culture and receptivity of hiring department/campus Willingness/needs of second hire Availability of resources Person-unit fit for both members of couple

Couple considerations… Consider shared/split positions (needs to be raised by the couple) Know advantages/disadvantages of when to reveal couple status Investigate campus cultures (provost, human resources, faculty development websites; hiring packets) Make contacts on campus to try and assess campus culture around dual careers Know what you want in terms of accommodation Know each other’s preferences and bottom lines Be open to other places of work beyond campus

More advice… Be open to possibilities--accommodation can take many forms Know when to compromise Stay updated and look for opportunities at “couple friendly” campuses Explore NSF ADVANCE campuses and resources Finalize couple hire as part of contract/letter of offer Learn from others (FAQ’s, websites) Marry well!

When to reveal? Assess campus culture via websites, personal contacts, interview, and materials Campuses need to know to provide assistance Campuses getting more open about dual careers Advantages/disadvantages of each stage for reveal…. Cover letter (they know BUT if biased could be excluded) Interview (talk to department chair if seems prudent) The offer (negotiations last chance for accommodation) More so than right or wrong answer; know advantages and disadvantages

Best practices--Department chairs Know the policies/resources available on campus Keep informed about dual career couples/work-life policies Follow hiring procedures as close as possible for second hire Faculty involvement Tenure track vs. temporary Make sure you are getting a person you really want Maintain good relationships with other chairs and deans Think strategically about departmental directions, not just immediate needs Think of what’s good for institution not just department Hire based on merit, don’t stigmatize dual career hire

Best practices--Institutions Establish clearly worded, written policy Develop policies in cooperation with faculty and administration Be mindful of affirmative action policies Publicize/disseminate policy to all candidates Educate chairs and deans about policy Provide centralized funding Provide clear funding guidelines Join consortia (HERC) and develop cooperation agreements Evaluate policy

Research, Policy, Practice

Why pay attention? Work and family has been an “either/or” proposition (especially for women) Could wait to have children Could opt not to pursue an academic career Could opt for a less prestigious position How do faculty manage work and family?

Academic motherhood study Interviews with 120 women Research universities, comprehensive colleges, liberal arts, community colleges All with children, all tenure track Variety of fields Longitudinal: Interviewed early career (less than five years) and mid career (5-7 years later) Reviewed institutional policies

Early Career Findings The joy of professional and personal roles Academic work is flexible, but unending Having a child makes people efficient, puts things into perspective Buffering—work buffers family; family buffers work

Early Career Findings Preoccupation with timing The second shift is alive and well Significance of supportive culture Policies are important (but fear around use)

Mid Career Findings Most were successful and thriving Mid Career--more flexibility, less work stress Parental concerns shift Not wanting to deal with politics Pipeline not a natural progression

Mid Career Findings Burnout Need for self care Mentoring and support Served as mentors for new junior faculty and graduate students – path makers Helped to create some institutional policies Mentoring mid career drops off yet still in need of support and professional development

Work family policies Day care – affordable and accessible Tenure clock stop policies Parental/family leave Modified duties Flexible tenure clocks

Common myths… I’ll never get an academic job if I’m in a couple or want/have children Academic jobs are too complicated Having a life and academic careers don’t get along Second hires aren’t as good as the primary hire Work-life concerns and policies are focused on women It’s only possible to get accommodation when first hired Dual career couple and work-family policies are only for early career faculty

Policies Have policies One size may not fit all Creating a culture of use related to work-life and dual career couple policies Professional development for all stages of career Mentorship at all stages of the career Centralized support and local implementation Know thy policy!

Creating environments… Think outside the box Work-family integration is broad Include men and women Acknowledge gendered terrain Families take many forms Career perspectives Maintain conversations

Case Study 1 Jules and Taylor met and fell in love while studying biology at the University of Wisconsin. The had similar interests and the same major professor. It didn’t take them long to realize that they had a lot in common and that they were destined to be a couple. Both Jules and Taylor have impressive C.V’s. They are both strong students, have research and GA experience and both want tenure track careers at research universities. They also are aware of the job market and its difficulties. They figured out a way to each get separate post-docs and still be in the same geographic region. Now, they are ready to conquer the tenure track job market.

Couples perspective: What advice do you have for Jules and Taylor about how they should proceed? What are the things that they ought to do? How can they maximize the likelihood of being successful on the job market? Are there things they shouldn’t do? What are the things they have working for them and against them in this quest?

Department chair perspective: As a senior faculty member or leader in your area, what would you do if you wanted to hire Jules and Taylor? How would you proceed if you wanted to make this happen? What players need to be involved? What are the barriers that you face to making this hire happen? What do you have working in your favor to make this work?

Institutional perspective: What institutional policies would facilitate the hiring of Jules and Taylor? What should central administration do to make this possible? In what ways is it in the institutions best interest to hire both Jules and Taylor? What are the concerns that are raised by this issue?

Case Study 2 Margaret and Joe came to University of Texas, San Antonio 5 years ago. Margaret is doing really well in a tenure track job in Geology and Joe has been working as an adjunct in Engineering. Initially, Joe did not have his Ph.D. so the adjunct position met his needs. Having completed his degree, he is now looking for something more permanent, preferably at UT or within a commutable distance. Although nothing was formalized (but it was implied), the initial intent was for Joe to get his degree and get a tenure track position at UT. The degree took longer to finish than Joe planned and the number of tenure track jobs in his field has been limited. Margaret and Joe really want to stay here, but are not sure what to do.

Couples perspective: What advice do you have for Margaret and Joe about how they should proceed? What are the things that they ought to do to facilitate the likelihood that they can stay together and stay at UT? Are there things they shouldn’t do? What are the things they have working for them and against them in this quest? How is their case different than the first case?

Department chair perspective: As a senior faculty member or leader in your area, what would you do if you wanted to keep Margaret? What steps could you take to make this happen? Who needs to be involved in such a decision? What are the barriers that you face to making this hire happen? What do you have working in your favor to make this work? How is this case different from the first case?

Institutional perspective: What institutional policies would facilitate the hiring of Margaret and Joe? What should central administration do to make this possible? In what ways is it in the institutions best interest to retain both Margaret and Joe? What are the concerns that are raised by this issue?

Help, advice, suggestions

Resources Clayman Institute/Stanford University Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to KnowDual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know Chronicle of Higher Education AAUP: NSF ADVANCE: al-career al-career Books, articles, webinars websites (national/campus) HERC-Higher Education Recruitment Consortium

Shameless self promotion… Rutgers University Press (2013)

Parting thoughts… Do good work Don’t overthink it…all of it Can’t plan for every contingency Be your best self There are lot of good jobs in the world Be open to possibilities Follow your bliss There are a lot ways to be successful Hang loose!!

Questions/Discussion Dual careers Work-family Policies Campus perspectives Individual perspectives Questions? contact Kelly Ward