In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

GIS and Transportation Planning
NCHRP Renaissance Planning Group Rich Kuzmyak Chris Sinclair Alex Bell TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6, 2013 Columbus,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
National Household Travel Survey California Data (NHTS-CA)
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS TWO Denver Regional Council of Governments June 30, 2011.
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS THREE Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Lec 7. Ch.3P3 Characteristics of urban travel Trip types (purposes) Three approaches for modeling trips Travel behaviors of men and women Trip purpose/temporal,
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning UTPS (Review from last time) Urban Transportation Planning System –Also known as the Four - Step Process –A methodology.
Norman W. Garrick CTUP. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
GEOG 111/211A Transportation Planning Trip Distribution Additional suggested reading: Chapter 5 of Ortuzar & Willumsen, third edition November 2004.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
18 May 2015 Kelly J. Clifton, PhD * Patrick A. Singleton * Christopher D. Muhs * Robert J. Schneider, PhD † * Portland State Univ. † Univ. Wisconsin–Milwaukee.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
Building and Learning Activity-Based Models Erik Sabina Jennifer Malm Jennifer Malm Suzanne Childress John Bowman DeVon Culbertson.
Model Task Force Meeting November 29, 2007 Activity-based Modeling from an Academic Perspective Transportation Research Center (TRC) Dept. of Civil & Coastal.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FIVE Denver Regional Council of Governments July27, 2011.
2010 Travel Behavior Inventory Mn/DOT TDMCC- Jonathan Ehrlich October 14, 2010.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
From Academia to Application: Results from the Development of the First Accessibility-Based Model Mike Conger, P.E. Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
A New Policy Sensitive Travel Demand Model for Tel Aviv Yoram Shiftan Transportation Research Institute Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Act Now: An Incremental Implementation of an Activity-Based Model System in Puget Sound Presented to: 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
For Model Users Group June 10, 2011 Kyeil Kim, Ph.D., PTP Atlanta Regional Commission.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review TIM 2 Model Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
1 Activity Based Models Review Thomas Rossi Krishnan Viswanathan Cambridge Systematics Inc. Model Task Force Data Committee October 17, 2008.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
TO THE BLACK BOX AND BACK – The TRANS Model October 2008.
Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Transit Service Quality and Transit Use: TBOT, Task 5.
Joint Development of Land Use and Light Rail Stations The Case of Tel Aviv Regional Science Association International -The Israeli Section Daniel Shefer,
Dowling Associates, Inc. 19 th International EMME/2 Users’ Conference – 21 October 2005 Derivation of Travel Demand Elasticities from a Tour-Based Microsimulation.
How Does Your Model Measure Up Presented at TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference by Phil Shapiro Frank Spielberg VHB May, 2007.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
Preliminary Evaluation of Cellular Origin- Destination Data as a Basis for Forecasting Non-Resident Travel 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Estimation of a Weekend Location Choice Model for Calgary KJ Stefan, City of Calgary JDP McMillan, City of Calgary CR Blaschuk, City of Calgary JD Hunt,
Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW CLASS FOUR Denver Regional Council of Governments July 7, 2011.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Trip Generation CE331 Transportation Engineering.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Demand Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
ILUTE A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model Incorporating Inter-Personal Interactions Within the Household Matthew J. Roorda Eric J. Miller UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO.
Responses to Gas Prices in Knoxville, TN Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Vince Bernardin, Jr., Ph.D. Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates Mike Conger, P.E.
CEE 320 Winter 2006 Transportation Planning and Travel Demand Forecasting CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Aktivitetsbaseret modellering af transportefterspørgsel
Yijing Lu (Baltimore Metropolitan Council)
Travel patterns in a city
Improved treatment of special attractors
Travel patterns in a city
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Presentation transcript:

In this presentation, we will: 1.Describe each step the Compass model and show comparable steps in the IRM. Compass = What,, Where, How IRM= Who, What, When, Where, How, Why 1.Take a household through these steps and show how the household is treated differently in the two models. 2.Show how the additional complexity of the IRM provides additional sensitivity (we can test and represent more.) Reality Is more complicated than 4 step models can show. –“Putting on the Glasses”

The New Regional Model - Focus Big Picture Effects of development pattern/design –UGB scenarios –TOD –Urban Centers –“New” Urbanism vs traditional 20 th century suburban patterns –Mixed versus single use

The New Regional Model - Focus Big Picture Explicit modeling of bike/ped. Time of day modeling Person/household characteristics: –Age –Gender –Household population composition Presence and age of children Number of workers

The New Regional Model - Focus Big Picture Number of vehicles Work at home Full induced demand for the first time –Trip/tour suppression/re-structuring –Trip-length changes –Mode changes –Time of day changes –Path changes

The New Regional Model - Focus Details for Tekkies Modeling trips in tours, not separately Each household and job is given a precise location (xy point) Each household/person in the region is represented individually – PUMS-level data

The New Regional Model - Focus Details for Tekkies More / real trip purposes: –Old model: home-based work, home-based non-work, non-home-based –New model: work, school, escort, shopping, eat meal, social-recreation, personal business

The New Regional Model - Focus Bottom Line The model operates at the level at which decision actually are made –Usually the person –Occasionally the household

The New Regional Model - Focus Bottom Line The model operates at the level at which decision actually are made –Usually the person –Occasionally the household

The New Regional Model - Focus Bottom Line disaggregate modeling means recognizing that things are different, and describing them as they are: –Person/household type –Tour/trip type –Location –Time of day

The New Regional Model - Focus Bottom Line better modeling now – better ability to improve in the future – better ability to run scenarios –Example – where will the elderly live? –Example – use of hybrid / electric vehicles.

Compass i. Network Processing ii. Area Type 1. Trip Generation i. Highway/Transit Skims 2. Trip Distribution 3. Mode Choice i. Parking Cost ii. Time-of-Day 4. Highway/Transit Assignment

1. Population Synthesizer Network Skims Aggregate Mode/Destination Choice Logsum Generator Mode Choice Logsum Generator 2. Regular Workplace Location Choice 3. Regular School Location Choice 4. Auto Availability Intermediate Stop Logsum Generator 5. Daily Activity Pattern Choice IRM Exact Number of Tours Choice Work Tour Destination Type Choice Model Work-Based Subtour Generation Choice 6. Tour Primary Destination Choice 7. Tour Main Mode Choice 8. Tour Time of Day Choice Intermediate Stop Generation Choice Intermediate Stop Location Choice 9. Trip Mode Choice 10. Trip Departure Time Choice 11. Assignment

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times?

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations… –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times?

? ? ? What do we know about the people in the households in the Compass model? Answer: nothing. Example Family: Adult - Age? Job status? Adult – Age? Job status? Child – Age? Student status? Relationship To adults?

Example Family: Mother, Age 33 Part Time Service Worker Father, Age 34 Full Time Education Worker Son, Age 4 Pre-School Student Family Income : $61,000 What do we know about the people in the households in the IRM ? Answer: Anything included in the Census.

What do we know about individual people in Compass?

Person Data in the IRM

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system?

Household Data in Compass

Household Data in the IRM

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times?

Ok, so what do we know about household locations in Compass ? Answer: They are located in traffic analysis zones, and…

And what do we know about households in the IRM?

We know a lot more about households in the IRM: why is that better? Households with more drivers and workers own more cars. Households with more cars make different choices than households with fewer cars: –They make more tours –And use drive mode for them more often Point-level location means we actually know: –Walk distance to/from transit –Walk trip distance –Bike trip distance –Short auto trip distance.

We know a lot more about people in the IRM: why is that better? Lots of reasons! –People tend to work in places where there are a lot of jobs in their field. –Kids tend to go to school where their older siblings go. –Workers tend to go to work, students tend to go to school, retired people tend not to do either (etc.) –People with kids tend to cart them around a lot, and drive doing it.

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times

What do we know about where jobs are in Compass? Answer: they are in traffic analysis zones, and…

What do we know about where jobs are in the IRM ?

Job Data in Compass

Job Data in the IRM

What do we know about schools in Compass?

And about Schools in the IRM?

We know a lot more in the IRM: why is that better? Tie the kind of job people have to the kind of company and its location. We know precisely how far the company is from the transit stop. Non-university students tend to go school in their home school district. We know precisely how far the school is from each home.

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times?

What do we know about what people do during their day in Compass? Number of work trips by households in the zone. Number of other kinds of trips made by households in the zone.

Compass Trip Rates Note also: only three types of trips- Home-Based Work, Home-Based Non-Work, and Non-Home Based

What do we know in the IRM? Mostly about things they do when they leave the house: –Exception: we know if they work at home. Out-of-home activities: work, school, shop, eat meal, socialize, escort others, personal business.

Doing what?Primary reason for going out Just making a stop along the way Workingx Going to school Shopping Escorting othersx Socializing Eating outx Personal business IRM Activities in the Day

HOME DAY CARE PARK AND RIDE WORK RESTAURANT Walk TOUR-BASED MODEL 1 home-based work tour 1 work- based meal tour 2 intermediate serve passenger stops TRIP-BASED MODEL 4 non-home based trips Two home-based other trips NHB trip poorly handled... Tours Generated in the IRM

Doing what?Primary reason for going out Just making a stop along the way Workingx Going to school Shopping X Escorting others Socializing Eating outx Personal business IRM Activities in the Day

HOME WORK STORE TOUR-BASED MODEL 1 home-based work tour 1 shopping stop TRIP-BASED MODEL 1 home-based work trip 1 non-home-based trip 1 home-based non work trip Tours Generated in the IRM

Doing what?Primary reason for going out Just making a stop along the way Working Going to schoolX Shopping Escorting others Socializing Eating out Personal business IRM Activities in the Day

passenger HOMEDAY CARE 13 TOTAL TRIPS BY HOUSEHOLD: 1 HOME-BASED WORK 5 HOME-BASED NON-WORK 7 NON-HOME BASED: TOUR-BASED MODEL 1 school tour TRIP-BASED MODEL 2 home-based non work trips TOTAL TOURS BY INDIVIDUAL: WOMAN: 1 HOME BASED WORK TOUR 1 WORK-BASED MEAL TOUR 2 SERVE PASSENGER STOPS MAN: 1 HOME BASED WORK TOUR 1 SHOPPING STOP CHILD: 1 HOME-BASED SCHOOL TOUR Tours Generated in the IRM

Why is it better that the IRM is more detailed in describing why people travel? Able to depict how changes in demographics, like a larger older population, can cause different amounts and types of travel. Able to represent how much accessibility and mixed use density a person’s home zone has to other locations impact the amount of travel they do.

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times?

Table 23: Final HBW Trip Attraction Rates by Income Group Income Group Trip Attraction Rate per: Household Production / Distribution Employee Retail Employee Service Employee Low (Less than $15,000) Middle ($15,000 - $74,999) High ($75,000 or more) Total Source: ATTHBW_R.asc TransCAD file dated 10/22/2003 Notes: 1 Total rates shown only for comparison with models from other regions. To what location do people go to do the activities? In Compass, the trip attractions and productions are used to predict trip origins and destinations.

Tij=trips between TAZ i and TAZ j Pi=productions in TAZ i Aj=attractions in TAZ j Kij=“K-factor” adjustment between TAZ i and TAZ j Fij=“friction factor” between TAZ i and TAZ j i=production TAZ j=attraction TAZ n=total number of TAZs In Trip-based models, the gravity model predicts the number of trips from origin to destination based on the number of productions in the origin zone and attractions in the destination zone. Friction Factors are calibrated so that modeled trip length frequency distributions match observed trip length frequency distributions.

Trip Distribution Output: O-D matrix

Compass model output From Trip Distribution: Home-Based Work Trips from Zone

Compass model output From Trip Distribution: Home-Based Non-Work Trips from Zone

Tour origin Tour destination Where does the woman go during her day? The IRM destination choice models could predict the following for the woman:

The IRM destination choice models could predict the following for the man:

Why is it better how destinations are chosen in the IRM? Can test how desirable a location is by how easy it is to get there by all modes including transit. Can test how mixed use density causes a destination to be more desirable Can test how a person chooses destinations close to their usual work or school zone.

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times?

How does mode choice work in Compass? Each trip purpose has a model (HBW, HBNW, NHB.) All trips between each zone-pair are treated as being identical. Trips that are really in the same tour know nothing about each other. Outputs are trip tables by mode by purpose (and by income for HBW.)

Compass mode choice output: O-D Trips by Mode

HOME DAY CARE PARK AND RIDE WORK RESTAURANT Drive- SR2 Drive to Transit Walk Example IRM Mode Choices for the Woman

HOME WORK STORE Drive Alone Example IRM Mode Choices for the Man

passenger HOME DAY CARE Drive- SR2 Example IRM Mode Choices for the Child

Why is the IRM better at representing mode choice? Has bike and walk modes as a choice Represents how Origin and destination employment density impacts a person’s mode choice Represents how a person’s auto availability impacts mode choice Allows school tours and work-based subtours to have different mode choices than other tours (Compass just has home- based other)

How does the model do its job? It answers these questions: –What kind of people… –In what kinds of households… –Living in what locations... –Working and going to school where and how –Do what kinds of things during their day… –Requiring them to make what kinds of trips… –To what locations… –By what travel modes… –By what paths through the transportation system? –At what times?

When do trips occur? Compass Very Simple Model: Time-of-Day Factors For Example, 68% of Home-Based Work Tours, arrive at work from 6:30 am –9:00 am.

Compass: Time-of-Day Factors applied (based on total observed vehicles hours observed in each period)

Compass Model Time of Day Outputs: O-D Trips by Time of Day

IRM Time of Day Models Tour time-of-day: –Predicts start and end of tour –Higher priority tours run first, block out times of day not available to lower priority toursTour time-of-day: Trip time-of-day: –Predicts departure time from each stop –In-transit time known, so serves as departure time and duration model

HOME DAY CARE PARK AND RIDE WORK RESTAURANT time Time time Example IRM Mode Choices for the Woman

Why are the IRM time of day models better? Can better represent time-shifting due to congestion Can represent how changes in demographics impact time of day choices, i.e. more retired people means less congestion peaking Can represent how a person’s mode choice impacts what time of day they travel, i.e. I can’t take the bus until 3:15 PM

Example Tour Outcomes for the Family : Purpose, Origin, Destination Mode, Time of Day

Finally, in both the IRM and Compass models the choices of where to go, when, by what mode are assigned to the networks. Example AM Peak Highway Flows:

The woman drives with the child to the daycare down 120 th, then takes the bus route 122X to Civic Center, and walks from the station to work down Broadway.

Key Model Differences Trip/tour generation sensitivity. Time-of-day sensitivity. Development pattern sensitivity. Modeling of non-motorized modes and walk access to transit. Trips connected in tours. Person-level decisions made at the person level – using many person characteristics.

Scenario Sensitivity Examples- Why the IRM is better? How does putting on the glasses help us see better? Effects of aging population or other changes in demographics. Effects of neighborhood “gentrification.” Enhanced EJ evaluation. Better evaluation of “induced demand.” “Peak spreading” effects. Effects of transit-oriented development. Effect of built environment on Bike and Ped Movement

Walk Mode Shares Example Output

Bike Mode Shares Example Output

Factors that make a trip more likely to use walk/bike modes Factors that make a trip less likely to use walk/bike modes PERSON CHARACTERISTICS No car in Household Fewer cars than drivers Low income University student Meal or Social Trip Purpose BUILT ENVIRONMENT Mixed use origin/destination Intersection density CBD destination Residential density PERSON CHARACTERISTICS High income Age over 50 Female Preschool age Driving age HS student BUILT ENVIRONMENT Rural origin Long walk/bike time

A Bit on Status All models estimated (around 50 or so.) Database design complete. –Suzanne Childress will talk more about this. Software 2/3 complete. –Jen Malm will talk more about this.