Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_111699.ppt Proximate Modeling of Weekday versus Weekend Ozone CRC Project A-36 16 November, 1999 Greg Yarwood ENVIRON International.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Estimating On-Road Vehicle Emissions Using CONCEPT Alison K. Pollack Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation.

Advertisements

Robert Tekniepe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Air Quality Forum November 14, 2006 Clean Diesel Strategies.

Clark County Ozone February 10, Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard Background 1997 NAAQS for ground-level ozone set at an 8-hour.

Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image area is located 3.19” from left.

` 1 Source Attribution of Mobile Source Air Toxics Eric M. Fujita, David E. Campbell, William P. Arnott and Barbara Zielinska Division of Atmospheric Sciences.

1 The Impact of Using LNG-Derived Natural Gas in the South Coast Air Basin January 2006.

Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.

Mobile Source Inventories for SIPs Matt Laurita Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section EPA Region 4.

Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21,

Air Quality Modeling for Teachers 1 PRESENTER: Robert R. Gotwals, Jr.. The Shodor Education Foundation, Inc. Ozone O3 creation normal decay depletion ~

Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #4 July 30, 2008 SCAQMD Diamond Bar, California.

Comprehensive Air Emissions Inventory Study for the Calgary Region Airshed Zone Xin Qiu 1 and Dennis Stefani 2 1 : Novus Environmental Inc. 2 : Calgary.

Weekend/Weekday Ozone Observations in the South Coast Air Basin Sponsored by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Coordinating Research Council Eric.

PM emissions from mobile Sources a vehicle producer‘s perspective Giovanni Margaria, ACEA presented by Dr. Michael Mrowietz, VW Workshop of the UN/ECE.

Xuexi Tie Xu Tang,Fuhai Geng, and Chunsheng Zhao Shanghai Meteorological Bureau Atmospheric Chemistry Division/NCAR Peking University Understand.

1 One facility, two very different emissions. Module 5. Air Pollutant Emissions in the Mid-Atlantic United States by K.G. Paterson, Ph.D., P.E. © 2007.

1 WILMINGTON AIR QUALITY STUDY Status Update and Introduction to Modeling Protocol Vlad Isakov Todd Sax August 27, 2003 California Air Resources Board.

October 29, 2014 Alison Eyth, Alexis Zubrow, Rich Mason EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.

1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.

1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.

COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,

ARB Vision: CTP 2040 Scenarios

Weekday/Weekend O 3 and PM Differences in Three Cities Outside California CRC Project A-36B Betty K. Pun and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Warren.

1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.

Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.

OTC Attainment Planning Update SIP Steering Committee April 13, 2011.

Henry Hogo Assistant Deputy Executive Officer Mobile Source Division Science and Technology Advancement 2015 International Emission Inventory Conference.

Overview of Load Reduction Estimates for Atmospheric Sources of Pollutants Richard Countess Atmospheric Deposition SCG Lead September 10, 2007.

Presents/slides/alison/awmapaper1.ppt Alison K. Pollack ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California Rich Wilcox U.S. Environmental Protection.

Georgia Environmental Protection Division IMPACTS OF MODELING CHOICES ON RELATIVE RESPONSE FACTORS IN ATLANTA, GA Byeong-Uk Kim, Maudood Khan, Amit Marmur,

Characterization of Emissions In and Near Class I Areas in the West Forum on Sources In and Near Class I Areas.

Diesel Emissions Regulation and Control Impact of ARB Regulation.

Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) Status of 3SAQS Air Quality and Emissions Modeling University of North Carolina.

Why Ozone is Higher on Weekends in the South Coast Air Basin: a 20-Year Perspective Eric Fujita, William Stockwell, Robert Keislar, and Dave Campbell Division.

PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.

Public Meeting to Discuss “Weekend Effect” Research June 23, 1999.

October 6, 2015 Alison Eyth, Rich Mason (EPA OAQPS EIAG*) Alexis Zubrow (Volpe, DOT) * Emission Inventory and Analysis Group.

FINAL1 Inventory, Emissions, and Population July 2, 2003 AIR, Inc.

Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.

January 24, Update to CCAQS PC Final Projects for CCOS & CRPAQS.

Houston Air Quality Challenges John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention

Template Simulation of Wintertime High Ozone Concentrations in Southwestern Wyoming Ralph E. Morris, Susan Kemball-Cook, Bonyoung Koo, Till Stoeckenius.

November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.

Template Update on Progress of FY12-13 Work Plan Activities Presentation to the NETAC Policy and Technical Committees Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood.

SJV PM10 SIP Modeling & Data Analysis December 5, 2002 Policy Committee Meeting.

Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.

1999 Scott County Emission Inventory Iowa Department of Natural Resources Brian Hutchins.

Improvements to the Spatial and Temporal Representativeness of Modeling Emission Estimates: Phase 1 Findings and Recommendations Presented by: Lyle R.

Weekend/Weekday Ozone Observations in the South Coast Air Basin Phase 1 Report Sponsored by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and Coordinating Research.

May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.

1 Neighborhood Assessment: Technical Issues to be investigated in the Wilmington Air Quality Study Vlad Isakov Todd Sax May 06, 2003 California Air Resources.

Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.

Weekday/Weekend O 3 and PM Differences in Three Cities Outside California Betty K. Pun and Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon, CA Warren White Washington.

2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.

November 16, Retrospective Analysis of Ambient and Emissions Data and Refinement of Study Hypotheses –Task 1: Review of Available Emissions Data.

BAY AREA MODELING Status of Modeling Work Technical Committee Meeting November 18, 2003 Bay Area Air Quality Management District and Environ Corp.

Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.

V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: New CAMx 2018 Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team ENVIRON International Corporation Alpine.

1 Near-field NO 2 Impacts due to PM Traps for Diesel Engines Tony Servin, P.E. Atmospheric Modeling and Support Section Planning and Technical Support.

New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.

Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group

Technical Task Update FY16-17

Dynamic Evaluation of CMAQ-Modeled Ozone Response to Emission Changes in The South coast air Basin Prakash Karamchandani1, Ralph Morris1, Andrew Wentland1,

Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025

A Collaborative Process to Develop a 2016 Emissions Modeling Platform

Sector Growth Rates on NONROAD Emissions

NONROAD Model Sensitivity to Temperature

Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol

U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone

Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling

Presentation transcript:

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proximate Modeling of Weekday versus Weekend Ozone CRC Project A November, 1999 Greg Yarwood ENVIRON International Corporation 101 Rowland Way Novato, CA 94945

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt CRC Project A-36: Proximate Modeling Project Team ENVIRON – Greg Yarwood, Till Stoeckenius, Ralph Morris, Alison Pollack AIR – Jon Heuss, Jeremy Heiken, Tom Darlington

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Study Objectives Investigate WD/WE emissions/air quality relationships for LA – Ozone – precursors: HC, NOx, HC/NOx – NOy or NOz, ozone /NOz ratios Evaluate several hypotheses for mid 90s Evaluate most promising hypotheses for mid 80s Project impact of some hypotheses in 2010

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Modeling System

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Modeling Domain

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proposed Simulations Base Case The base case simulation should already be available from Task 1. The objective is to develop a simulation with 6 days. For the base case all the days will be modeled with the standard SCAQMD inventory which is representative of weekday (WD) activity levels:

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proposed Simulations (continued) Hypothesis 1. Reduced mass of NOx emissions on weekends due to reduced truck traffic – Prepare Saturday and Sunday emissions with mobile source NOx emissions reduced to account for less truck traffic. Two model runs will be performed: (1a) NOx emission reduction set #1 (1b) NOx emission reduction set #2 – The different levels of reduction would most likely alter the balance between the Saturday and Sunday reduction levels. The sequence of simulation days would be:

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proposed Simulations (continued) Hypothesis 2. Different diurnal and spatial pattern of onroad mobile emissions on weekends – Prepare Saturday and Sunday emissions with different diurnal profiles and spatial distributions for onroad mobile sources. Five model runs: (2a) diurnal profile set #1 (2b) diurnal profile set #2 (2c) combined diurnal profile and total mass change (2d) different spatial distribution (2e) combined diurnal profile/spatial distribution change – The diurnal profile, total mass and spatial pattern of emissions will be varied independently and in combination and the five simulations shown are one possible set. The sequence of simulation days is:

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proposed Simulations (continued) Hypothesis 3. Difference in the mass and diurnal pattern of onroad mobile emissions on Fridays – Prepare Friday emissions with different diurnal profiles and total mass for onroad mobile sources. Use SAT and SUN emission files from hypothesis 2 (presumably simulation 2e). For Friday emission changes to impact weekend ozone invokes some degree of carryover. To investigate this we propose two simulations that have the same Friday emissions but different weekend emissions: – Simulation (3a) would be compared to (2e) whereas (3b) would be compared to the base case. This will investigate whether any Friday impact on weekend ozone depends on the sequence of days that follows

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proposed Simulations (continued) Hypothesis 4. Carryover of emissions effects – Evaluation of this hypothesis would use FRI, SAT and SUN emission files developed for previous hypotheses (presumably the same as used in hypothesis 3). Only one new simulation is needed for the analysis. The effect on Sunday of carryover from preceding days will be examined by comparing (4a) with (2e) and (3a). The effect on Saturday of carryover from Friday has already been considered in hypothesis 3 by comparing (3a) with (2e).

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proposed Simulations (continued) Hypothesis 5. Increased emissions from recreational activities on weekends – Prepare emission inventories with increased emissions from recreational vehicles and marine vessels. It is unclear whether to also include lawn and garden equipment due to the trade-off between commercial and residential use. One model runs with the sequence of simulation days:

Presents:/slides/greg/crcwdwe_ ppt Proposed Simulations (concluded) Hypothesis 6. Reduced emissions from commercial activities on weekends – Prepare emission inventories with reduced emissions from commercial activities. The main impact is expected to be from the “construction equipment” and “commercial and industrial equipment” sectors. One model runs with the sequence of simulation days: