Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison The Wisconsin DOT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to ITS Georgia 2005 Annual Meeting presented by Kenny Voorhies Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August 29,
Advertisements

State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
The Practical Side of Cell Phones as Traffic Probes Dr. Richard Mudge, Delcan-NET October 10, 2005 The information contained in this document is considered.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION South Cascade Drive/Miller Road (Formerly Route 219)/ Cattaraugus Creek Design-Build Project (PIN ,
I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project Project Overview I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project AASHTO SSOM Rick.
INRIX Data Evaluation I-95 Corridor Coalition – Vehicle Probe Project (VPP) I-95 Corridor Coalition – Vehicle Probe Project (VPP) January 3, 2012.
Rick Via Statewide Incident Management Program Manager Office: Leveraging Technology & ITS to Enhance Traffic.
11 April 2013 USDOT Research Data Exchange Dale Thompson, Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, and Gene McHale, Federal Highway Administration.
June 16, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Michael Rose Evaluation of the “COMET” Incident Response Program Oregon Department of Transportation.
Travel Options Online Trip Planner For Statewide Mobility Paula Hammond, P.E. Secretary Washington State Department of Transportation Kathryn Taylor Director.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Interstate 81 Bridges over Route 80 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900023) Town of Tully, Onondaga County.
October 6, :30 – 11:00. MPM Team Agenda Review of MPM program and team MAP-21 and other updates Mobility performance measures reporting On-going.
Truths and Myths about Traffic Data Truths and Myths about Traffic Data ITSA Presentation June 2007 AirSage Proprietary & Confidential.
1 Board Meeting September 29, 2014 Public-Private Transportation Partnership Board.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
“High Speed Rail Implementation - An Update on Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota.” presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March.
March 27, 2007 – Hill Farms March 28, 2007 – NE Region Wisconsin LCS Lane Closure Planning System LCS Oversight Group Meeting Steven Parker - TOPS Lab.
Montgomery County Maryland I-270 Integrated Corridor Management Project Tom Jacobs, University of Maryland Center for Advanced Transportation Technology.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Passenger Rail Planning Activities in Minnesota presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation March 15, 2011.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
Outline Project Background ITS Architecture Overview GVMC ITS Architecture Deployment Plan.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
1 Approaches for Integrating Systems Engineering into Your Agency’s Business Practices Presented by: Amy Tang McElwain August 2, 2007 Talking Technology.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Region 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900020) Broome, Delaware,
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 20, 2008 George Gilhooley.
AASHTO SUBCOMMITTEE ON SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT PHOENIX, AZ – APRIL 2013 SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT TONY KRATOFIL, P.E. MARK GEIB, P.E. STEVE.
A Model for Improving Operations through Archived Data 2005 ITS America Annual Meeting Mark Carter – SAIC Robert Haas - SAIC May 2 nd, 2005 i Florida’s.
Enhanced 511: Beyond the Basics Jerry Woods Florida DOT – District 5 iFlorida - Automated Message Generation Based on Travel Times.
Application of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) for Statewide Traffic and Evacuation Monitoring and Management in Louisiana April 16, 1999.
Southwest Washington ITS Traffic Data Collection & Analysis: A Tale of 3 Projects Jill MacKay ITE Traffic Simulation Roundtable October 4, 2012.
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) in Kentucky ITS Mid- America Fall 2005.
FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development Executing the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Research Program: Enabling Technology September 25, 2013 Deborah.
Wisconsin Department of Transportation Emergency Transportation Operations (ETO) Plan October 16, 2008.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
Cellular Probes Kansas City Evaluation Cellular Probe Feasibility Study Cellular Probe Feasibility Study.
Tennessee DOT SmartWay Update Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006 Presented by: Don Dahlinger, P.E. – TDOT September 2006.
FHWA Perspectives on VII Pat Kennedy Road Weather Management Program Federal Highway Administration VII Weather Applications Workshop II June 21, 2006.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
Robert Brydia Project Lead, I-35 Traveler Information During Construction Texas A&M Transportation Institute WORK ZONES & LARGE TRUCKS THE CENTRAL TEXAS.
October 19, 2010 Workshop #2 WisDOT Central Office.
SAFENET The OSU SAFENET Project The Ohio State University Center for Automotive Research & Center for Intelligent Transportation Research.
Wisconsin Department of Transportation Emergency Transportation Operations (ETO) Plan October 10, 2008.
Presented By: Jeffrey T. Folden, P.E. Assistant Chief, Innovative Contracting Division.
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
Systems Engineering “Understanding Where it Fits in Your Agency” a session in fhwa’s Systems Engineering t3 series aug. 02, 2007.
1 Florida Department of Transportation ITS Performance Measures Breakout Session 2 – Elizabeth Birriel, P.E.
Regional Concept for Transportation Operations: An action plan to address transportation operations in Southeast Michigan Talking Technology & Transportation.
Regulatory Streamlining Task Force Update Discussion Item December 6, 2011 Board of County Commissioners.
December 16, :00 – 2:45. MPM Team Agenda 1.Review of MPM Program and Team 2.Consensus items document 3. Upcoming activities 4. Discussion.
Wisconsin Department of Transportation Emergency Transportation Operations (ETO) Plan REV
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
LCS Objectives Provide a standard interface for lane closure operations, closure tracking, and data retrieval for WisDOT regional offices statewide Provide.
1 Clarus Clarus Nationwide Surface Transportation Weather Observing & Forecasting System Paul Pisano Team Leader Road Weather Management Office of Transportation.
USDOT Transportation Data Palooza May 9, 2013 Gene McHale FHWA Office of Operations R&D Intelligent Transportation Systems Research Data Exchange (RDE)
2007 TRB Annual Meeting January 22, 2007 Washington, DC WisTransPortal V-SPOC Volume, Speed, and Occupancy Application Michael Runnels TOPS Systems Developer.
USDOT ITS and Operations Training Grant Zammit Operations Technical Service Team Manager Office of Technical Services – Resource Center
Arterial Travel Times Using Bluetooth Detection Presented by Amit Sidhaye, P.E., PTOE Project Manager SIGNAL SYSTEMS & ITS ARLINGTON COUNTY May 16, 2013.
Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Crash Data Past, Present,
UW - Madison Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) David L. Kopacz, P.E. Wisconsin Division Office February 20, 2015.
August 10, 2010 Workshop #1 SW Region Madison Office.
CONTRACT AWARD TO ALTA PLANNING AND DESIGN FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO CONDUCT SAFETY OUTREACH AND UPDATE THE SUGGESTED ROUTES TO SCHOOL MAPS FOR THE SAFER.
D Line Project Overview
Presentation transcript:

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison The Wisconsin DOT Mobile Probe Data Evaluation Steven T. Parker, Ph.D. Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Laboratory University of Wisconsin-Madison USDOT Probe Data Workshop II Philadelphia Marriott Downtown September 10-11, 2009

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Outline  WisDOT Mobile Probe Data Overview  Project Timeline  Elements of the RFI and RFP  Contract Awards and the Procurement Process  UW TOPS Lab Evaluation Study  Lessons Learned  Contact Information

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Project Objectives  Compare two different traffic probe technologies Cell-phone based tracking Fleet-based GPS tracking  Cover key intercity corridors Milwaukee - Green Bay Milwaukee – Madison Milwaukee – WI / IL State Line  Evaluate effectiveness for control room operations Real-time link speed data Incident detection 511 traveler information

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Project Management  WisDOT Statewide Traffic Operations Center (STOC) WisDOT Probe Data Project Management ATMS, 511, Statewide Incident Notification  UW-Madison Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Lab RFI / RFP Development Two-Year Probe Data Evaluation Study Probe Data Archiving  TransCore Acceptance Test Phase Management ATMS Integration

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Timeline  July 2006 – RFI Issued  August 2006 – RFI Materials Due, One-on-One Meetings  September 2006 – WisDOT RFP Issued  October Q&A Addendum, Proposals Due  December 2006 – Contract Awards  June 2007 – Inrix SAT / 30-Day Test  August 2007 – Inrix Annual Service Agreement Starts  September 2007 – AirSage SAT I  February 2008 – AirSage SAT II  June 2008 – AirSage Contract Discontinued  September 2009 – Inrix Contract End-Date

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Elements of the RFI  Facilitated by UW TOPS Lab  Looking for Non-Infrastructure Solutions for: Roadway Link Speeds Enhanced Traffic Incident Detection Support for 511 Traveler Information Alternate Route Options Complement Connected Vehicle Options  One-on-One Meetings In Conjunction with the 2006 ITE Annual Meeting and Exhibit in Milwaukee

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Elements of the RFI, Continued  RFI Sought to Clarify: Reliability Coverage Privacy and Data Security Licensing Issues Time Frames Use of Standards Current or Future Projects Business Models Data Ownership Data Packaging Options Costs Archiving Capabilities Physical and Logical Architecture

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Elements of the RFP  Predefined Intercity Corridors  Mobile Oriented Probe Data Technologies  Data Elements / Requirements  Systems Acceptance Test (SAT)  30-Day Acceptance Testing  Contracting Options

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Elements of the RFP  Predefined Intercity Corridors I-90 / 94 – Waukesha to Madison – Interstate Only I-90 / 94 – Waukesha to Madison – Interstate Plus Alternate Routes * I-94 Milwaukee to WI / IL State Line I-94 Milwaukee to WI / IL State Line with Alternate Routes I-43 / US 41 – Milwaukee to Green Bay *  Mobile Oriented Probe Data Technologies Non-Infrastructure Oriented Cellular Phone Based Monitoring Fleet Based GPS Monitoring

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Elements of the RFP  Data Elements / Performance Requirements Near real-time link travel speeds o 1 mile maximum link size (revised to 3 miles) o 3 minute maximum reporting latency (revised to 10 minutes) o 1 minute reporting frequency o +/- 5 mph from “actual” link speeds Incident detection o Sudden speed fluctuations o 911 spikes Optional: highway work zone monitoring Some overlap with existing infrastructure for evaluation purposes

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Elements of the RFP  Systems Acceptance Test (SAT) XML Data Frequency System Time-Out XML Schema Test Speed Accuracy Test Link Size Test Travel Time Test Documentation

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Elements of the RFP  30-Day Acceptance Testing Independent Drive Tests Control Room Map Observations Frequency, Accuracy, Completeness  Flexible Contracting Options Annual Service Fee Start-Up Cost 2 Year Contract, Renewable

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Contract Awards  AirSage Cellular Phone Based Monitoring I-90/94 Milwaukee-Madison – Interstate Plus Alternate Routes Monthly Payments After SAT  Inrix Fleet-Based GPS Monitoring I-43 / US 41 Milwaukee-Green Bay Start-Up Payment + Monthly Payments After SAT

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Evaluation Predefined Intercity Corridors Above: I-90/94 Interstate with Alt. Routes (181 miles), Right: I-41 / US 43 (243 miles)

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Procurement Process - Issues  RFP Selection and Contracting Process TOPS recusal from RFP selection process due to potential conflict of interest Rejoined project for SAT and evaluation study  AirSage SAT Performed two SATs (Sep. 2007, Feb. 2008) Main issues: o Link travel speeds o Incident, weather (flooding) detection Need to refine / amend the performance requirements o Required +/- 8mph on 95% links based on 3-car drive test

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Procurement Process – SAT  Project Team Roles WisDOT – Project Leader TransCore – Certification TOPS Lab – Data Analysis  Data Analysis Tasks Refining performance requirements Making sure everyone was on the same page Independent verification of the data (incidents, flooding, drive tests) Reviewing raw data from probe data provider Clearly defining next steps  TOPS Lab’s Role Data analysis became primary issue in SAT Occasionally communicated directly with probe data provider

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Evaluation Study  Objectives Evaluate performance of mobile probe data systems against RFP requirements Comparative analysis between two different technologies * Two year study *  Focus Does the probe data add value to the STOC? Real-time link speeds on control room map Real-time incident detection Major weather events (flooding, snow) Highway work zone conditions  Other Incorporate probe data into ITS (detector data) archive

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Evaluation Study - Continued  Status SAT experience re-focused scope of evaluation study o Incident, weather, and work zone detection, i.e., non-free flow conditions o Limited to one data provider Second year of evaluation study not funded Final report under development  Issues Incident detection o Onset o Duration o Clearance Probe data (sampling methods) o Short-term events o Longer-term full freeway closure events

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison Lessons Learned  University as neutral partner RFP selection process, SAT process, data archiving / systems evaluator  Annual fee vs. start-up cost payment options AirSage experience  Clarifying performance requirements AirSage experience  Early adoption Inrix experience  Evaluation Study Extended SAT vs. independent evaluation  Complex Process Contracting, deployment and systems integration, archiving, evaluation

Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison WisDOT Probe Data Contact Information Steven Parker TOPS IT Program Manager University of Wisconsin-Madison (608) Doug Dembowski STOC Supervisor Wisconsin Department of Transportation (414)