1 Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ collaboration Jet Physics at DØ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Isolated Photon Cross Section at DØ Ashish Kumar State Univ of New York at Buffalo On behalf of the DØ Collaboration.
Advertisements

Régis Lefèvre Analysis done with Mario Martínez and Olga Norniella IFAE Barcelona Inclusive Jet Production using the k T Algorithm at CDF IMFP2006 XXXIV.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
QCD Studies at HERA Ian C. Brock Bonn University representing the ZEUS and H1 Collaborations.
Electroweak Physics at the Tevatron Adam Lyon / Fermilab for the DØ and CDF collaborations 15 th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics June 2004.
Jet Physics at the Tevatron Lee Sawyer Louisiana Tech University On Behalf of the CDF & D0 Collaborations.
Diffractive W/Z & Exclusive CDF II DIS 2008, 7-11 April 2008, University College London XVI International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and.
Michele Gallinaro, "QCD Results at CDF" - XXXVIII Rencontres de Moriond, March 22-29, QCD Results at CDF Inclusive Jet Cross Section Dijet Mass.
Measurement of Inclusive Jet cross section Miroslav Kop á l University of Oklahoma on behalf of the D Ø collaboration DIS 2004, Štrbské pleso, Slovakia.
PIC 2001 Michael Strauss The University of Oklahoma Recent Results on Jet Physics and  s XXI Physics in Collision Conference Seoul, Korea June 28, 2001.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
W/Z + jets measurements at D0 On behalf of the DØ Collaboration N.Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
Direct di-  Tevatron On behalf of the & Collaborations Liang HAN University of Science & Technology of China (USTC)
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Monica D’Onofrio University of Liverpool Boson+jets measurements at the CDF experiment "Vector boson plus jets as a signal and background“ Durham, September.
Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Multiple Parton Interaction Studies at DØ Don Lincoln Fermilab on behalf of the DØ Collaboration Don Lincoln.
Recent QCD and Electroweak Results from the Tevatron at Fermilab Prof. Gregory Snow / University of Nebraska /D0 On behalf of the CDF and D0 Collaborations.
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
06/30/05 Mathieu Agelou – LowX’05 1 Sensitivity to PDFs at the Tevatron. Mathieu Agelou CEA – Saclay Low x workshop, Sinaia, Romania.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
April 5, 2003Gregory A. Davis1 Jet Cross Sections From DØ Run II American Physical Society Division of Particles and Fields Philadelphia, PA April 5, 2003.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Some recent QCD results at the Tevatron N. B. Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
1. 2 Tevatron Run II 1fb -1 per experiment on tape ~1.3 fb -1 delivered luminosity Peak luminosity 1.7 x cm -2 s -1 Presented here: ~ 700 pb -1.
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Don LincolnExperimental QCD and W/Z+Jet Results 1 Recent Dijet Measurements at DØ Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ Collaboration.
Diffraction at Tevatron p p  p p p p  p (p) + X p p  p (p) + j j p p  p p + j j.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Recent jet measurements at the Tevatron Sofia Vallecorsa University of Geneva.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Photon and Jet Physics at CDF Jay R. Dittmann Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the CDF Collaboration) 31 st International Conference on High.
1 CMS Sensitivity to Quark Contact Interactions with Dijets Selda Esen (Brown) Robert M. Harris (Fermilab) DPF Meeting Nov 1, 2006.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
RHIC-PV, April 27, 2007 M. Rijssenbeek 1 The Measurement of W ’s at the CERN and FNAL hadron colliders W ’s at RHIC ! W ’s at CERN – UA2 W ’s at FNAL -
Jet + Isolated Photon Triple Differential Cross Section Nikolay Skachkov: “Photon2007”, Paris, 9-13 July 2007 DO Measurement of Triple Differential Photon.
Search for a Standard Model Higgs Boson in the Diphoton Final State at the CDF Detector Karen Bland [ ] Department of Physics,
Gluon polarization and jet production at STAR Pibero Djawotho for the STAR Collaboration Texas A&M 4 June 2013.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
F Don Lincoln f La Thuile 2002 Don Lincoln Fermilab Tevatron Run I QCD Results Don Lincoln f.
Recent QCD Measurements at the Tevatron Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØ Collaborations.
Moriond 2001Jets at the TeVatron1 QCD: Approaching True Precision or, Latest Jet Results from the TeVatron Experimental Details SubJets and Event Quantities.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Recent Electroweak Results from Tevatron Junjie Zhu State University of New Stony Brook For the CDF and DØ Collaborations ASPEN 2008 January 15,
QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for.
Joshua Moss (Ohio State University) on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration ICHEP 2012, Melbourne 6 July 2012 ATLAS Electroweak measurements of W and Z properties.
Top Quark Pair Production Cross Section at Tevatron Viatcheslav Sharyy for CDF and D0 collaboration Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions.
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
Azimuthal Decorrelations and
Tevatron results on Multi-Parton Interactions
Establishing Standard LHC
Photon Cross Sections at Ecm=2TeV
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
DIS 2004 XII International Workshop
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

1 Low-x Meeting July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ collaboration Jet Physics at DØ

2 ● Inclusive Jet Cross- Section ● Photons & Jets ● W + charm

3 The Fermilab Tevatron Interactions/ crossing Bunch crossing (ns)  Ldt (pb -1 /week) 3    Peak L (cm -2 s -1 )  s (TeV) 36  36 6  6 Bunches in Turn Run IIbRun IIaRun I Results based on ~ fb -1 Highest-energy accelerator currently in operation – only place where Top quarks have been produced Data delivered > 4.4 fb -1 – expect to reach fb -1 by the end of the run.

4 Quark and gluon density is described by PDFs. Proton remnants form the Underlying Event (U.E.) We compare to pQCD calculations to NLO ( ) Jet Production in pQCD Jets of particles originate from hard collisions between quark and gluons fragmentation parton distribution parton distribution Jet Underlying event Photon, W, Z etc. Hard scattering ISR FSR p p

5 Jet Measurements at the Tevatron D0 Run II jet results presented here use the Additional midpoint seeds between pairs of close jets improve IR safety 4-vector sum scheme instead of sum E T Split/merge after stable proto-jets found Jet Energy Scale: 2-3% at CDF 1-2% at D0 (after 7 years of hard work using MC tuned to data,  +jet & dijet event balance) Energy Resolution: unsmearing procedure using  /ET measured from dijet data. Midpoint cone algorithm (R = 0.7) Main Systematics to Jet Measurements Compare data and theory at the “particle level”

6 Jet Events at the Tevatron Three jet event at D0 1 st leading Jet (p T ~624 GeV) 2 nd leading Jet (p T ~594 GeV) 3 rd leading jet M jj = 1.22 TeV DØ CDF (at HERA) LHC Complementary to HERA and fixed target experiments DØ jet coverage |  | < 2.4 → very forward jets are available!

7 D0 calorimeter ● Calorimeter is the most important detector for jet measurements ● Liquid-Argon/Uranium calorimeter: – Stable response, good resolution – Partially compensating (e/  ~ 1) ● Gaps covered with scintillator tiles ● Calorimeter structure divides the measurement in three regions: – Central calorimeter (easiest) – Intercryostat region (challenging) – End caps (fine segmentation)

8 Inclusive cross section results ● Largest data set from Run II with the widest rapidity coverage (|y| < 2.4) and smallest uncertainties to date ● Uncertainties competitive with (better than) Run I and CDF ● Jet spectrum presented at particle level with midpoint cone (R cone = 0.7) ● Compared to next-to-leading order (NLO) theory with CTEQ6.5M PDFs and non- perturbative corrections from Pythia

9 Comparison to theory ● Comparing data and theory, the general tendency is to favor MRST2004 PDFs or the lower edge of CTEQ6.5 uncertainty ⇒ less high-x gluon ● CTEQ6.5 reduced PDF uncertainties by ~×2 compared to CTEQ6.1

10 Improvement since 2006 ● The uncertainties have improved by up to factor two and more in the central region since preliminary JES (2006) ● Forward regions not published before, but improvement over factor ten

11 Final results ● Good agreement between data and theory at all rapidities; MRST2004 PDFs and the lower end of CTEQ6.5 PDF uncertainty favored ● Scale uncertainty in next-to-leading order (NLO) theory comparable to experimental uncertainty at low p T

12 DØ and CDF comparison ● The DØ and CDF data are compatible within uncertainties ● Note that the CTEQ6.1 PDF band in the CDF plot is twice as wide as the CTEQ6.5 PDF band in the DØ plot ● Central values of the theory slightly different

13 Uncertainty correlations ● Leading sources are from JES: – EM energy scale (Z  e + e - calibration) – Photon energy scale (MC description of e /  response, material budget) – High p T extrapolation (fragmentation in Pythia/Herwig, PDFs) – Rapidity decorrelation (uncertainty in  - dependence) – Detector showering (goodness of template fits) ● Only five highest out of 23 correlated systematics shown

14 Inclusive Jets: Summary ● Detailed inclusive jet cross section measurement over eight orders of magnitude in range p T = 50—600 GeV with wide rapidity coverage (six bins in |y|<2.4) ● Good agreement with NLO pQCD calculations observed, with reduced high x gluon favored compared to CTEQ6.5M ● Uncertainty correlations studied in detail and correlations found to be high; 23+1 sources provided for global PDF fits ● Request from CTEQ and MRSW groups for data to be incorporated to global PDF fits ● [Re]submitted to PRL. Final acceptance imminent.

15 Direct photons come unaltered from the hard sub-process Allows to understand hard scattering dynamics ElectroMagnetic Shower Detection Higher granularity EM detector Preshower EM Calorimeter EM shower with very little energy in hadronic calorimeter Geometric isolation No associated track R( , Jet) > 0.7 (cone jets, R = 0.7) Photon Identification Background Estimation Origins: Neutral mesons:  o,  + Instrumental: EM jets Shower shape quantities in NN to estimate purity. Photon Production

16 Neural net based on shower shape variables used in distinguishing photon Purity estimated by fitting NN templates to data Systematic uncertainty includes varying fit range Inclusive  + X Production

17 D0 Collab., Phys. Lett. B 639, 151 (2006) Results consistent with NLO theory p T dependence similar to former observations (UA2, CDF) Measurements based on higher stats, ~3 fb -1 with ~300 GeV reach, coming soon Signal fraction is extracted from data fit to signal and background MC isolation-shape templates Data-Theory agree to within ~20% within errors Inclusive  + X Production

18 Also fragmentation: Dominant production at low p T  (< 120 GeV) is through Compton scattering: qg → q+   + jet + X Event selection |   | < 1.0 (isolated) p T > 30 GeV |  jet | < 0.8 (central), 1.5 < |  jet | < 2.5 (forward) p T jet > 15 GeV 4 regions:  g.  jet >0,<0, central and forward jets MET< 12.5 GeV p T (cosmics, W → e ) Probe PDF's in the range < x < 0.8 and p T  = 900 < Q 2 < 1.6 x 10 5 GeV [hep-ex], [Re]submitted to PLB, very near acceptance Inclusive  + jets Production

19 Neural net used to distinguish photons and determine photon purity Inclusive  + jets Production

20 Cross section determined in four rapidity bins and over large Pt range Inclusive  + jets Production

21 Inclusive  + jets Production Similar p T dependence than inclusive photons in UA2, CDF, and D0 Shapes very similar for all PDFs Measurements cannot be simultaneously accommodated by the theory Most errors cancel in ratios between regions (3-9% across most p T  range) Data & Theory agree qualitatively A quantitative difference is observed in the central/forward ratios Need improved and consistent theoretical description for  + jet

22 W + c-jet Production s (90%) or d (10%) c c W-W- W+c-jet is background to top pair, single top, Higgs. It can signal the presence of new physics Direct sensitivity to s-quark PDF Data Selection L = 1 fb -1 W(l )  isolated lepton p T >20 GeV, MET > 20 GeV |  jet | 20 GeV Muon-in-jet with opposite charge to W is a c-jet candidate Systematic errors largely cancel in the ratio Background W + (light) jet WZ, ZZ rarely produce charge correlated jets tt, tb, W+bc and W+b suppresed (small x-sec) [hep-ex] Accepted to PLB – D0 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, (2008) - CDF % difference in CTEQ vs MRST % uncertainty on the CTEQ6.5M set

23 Results from W  e and W   channels ● jet pT is corrected to the particle level ● measurement compared with the theory – ALPGEN: for tree level matrix element calculation – PYTHIA: for parton shower – uncertainty due to CTEQ 6.5M PDFs is 6.6% ● both channels show consistent results

24 ● integrated over all p T and all bins with |y| < 2.5 ● no significant deviation from the theoretical prediction ● recently accepted by – Physics Letters B – arXiv: v1 [hep-ex] – Fermilab-Pub-08/062-E ● CDF’s recently published result: – Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, ● jet p T is corrected to the particle level ● measurement compared with the theory – ALPGEN: for tree level matrix element calculation – PYTHIA: for parton shower – uncertainty due to CTEQ 6.5M PDFs is 6.6% ± (stat.) (syst.) Result

25 Summary The Tevatron experiments are entering the era of precision QCD measurements based on samples in excess of 1 fb -1 Good agreement with pQCD within errors is observed for jet production measurements An improved and consistent theoretical description is needed for  +jets W + charm production measurements are consistent with theoretical prediction Several new results intended to be announced at ICHEP. Stay tuned!