McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Chapter 23 Congestion Control and Quality of Service
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Data Traffic Traffic Descriptor Traffic Profiles
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.1 Traffic descriptors
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.2 Constant-bit-rate traffic
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.3 Variable-bit-rate traffic
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.4 Bursty traffic
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Congestion Network Performance
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.5 Incoming packet
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.6 Packet delay and network load
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.7 Throughput versus network load
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Congestion Control Open Loop Closed Loop
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Two Examples Congestion Control in TCP Congestion Control in Frame Relay
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 TCP assumes that the cause of a lost segment is due to congestion in the network. Note:
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 If the cause of the lost segment is congestion, retransmission of the segment does not remove the cause—it aggravates it. Note:
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.8 Multiplicative decrease
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure 23.9 BECN
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure FECN
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Four cases of congestion
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Quality of Service Flow Characteristics Flow Classes
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Techniques to Improve QoS Scheduling Traffic Shaping Resource Reservation Admission Control
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Flow characteristics
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure FIFO queue
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Priority queuing
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Weighted fair queuing
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Leaky bucket
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Leaky bucket implementation
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 A leaky bucket algorithm shapes bursty traffic into fixed-rate traffic by averaging the data rate. It may drop the packets if the bucket is full. Note:
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Token bucket
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 The token bucket allows bursty traffic at a regulated maximum rate. Note:
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Integrated Services Signaling Flow Specification Admission Service Classes RSVP
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Integrated Services is a flow-based QoS model designed for IP. Note:
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Path messages
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Resv messages
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Reservation merging
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Reservation styles
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Differentiated Services An Alternative to Integrated Services
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Differentiated Services is a class-based QoS model designed for IP. Note:
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure DS field
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Traffic conditioner
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., QoS in Switched Networks QoS in Frame Relay QoS in ATM
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Relationship between traffic control attributes
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure User rate in relation to Bc and Bc + Be
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Service classes
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 Figure Relationship of service classes to the total capacity