The search for alternative metrics for taxonomy Daphne Duin & Peter van den Besselaar VU university Amsterdam Org Science & Network Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ubiquity of Grey Literature in a Connected Content Context Julia Gelfand University of California, Irvine Paper presented at GL5 Conference.
Advertisements

Challenges of OA in the Next Frontier: ALM & Research Impact Assessment Jennifer Lin Product Manager, PLOS.
Andrea Michalek  Co-founder and CEO #altmetrics.
Chuck Koscher Director of Technology CrossRef ICSTI Annual Member Meeting Philadelphia, PA February FundRef: Structured attribution of scholarly.
Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature a public resource Leading the next frontier of OA: Filtering, Aggregating, and Evaluating.
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Introduction 2013 Sprint to Summit (StoS) Barcelona, 16 April 2013 Alan EDWARDS Earth Observation Sector.
Research evaluation at CWTS Meaningful metrics, evaluation in context
Reference 2.0: Using New Web Technologies to Enhance Public Service Texas Library Association Conference April 17, 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University’s.
Shou Ray Information Service Co., Ltd.
1 Using Scopus for Literature Research. 2 Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer- reviewed literature and quality web sources.
Using Journal Citation Reports The MyRI Project Team.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration nai.nasa.gov NASA Astrobiology Institute1 NAI Website: Statistics and Content Management Marco Boldt Sr.
T H O M S O N S C I E N T I F I C Editorial Development James Testa, Director.
Career Opportunities in Statistics John Borkowski Montana State University Panel Discussion Pattaya Conference on Statistics Pattaya, Thailand.
ISI Web of Knowledge – Update Jan 2009 New features of ISI Web of Knowledge.
Guillaume Rivalle APRIL 2014 MEASURE YOUR RESEARCH PERFORMANCE WITH INCITES.
SharePoint Server 2013 Features and Scenarios for IT Professionals First Lastname, Title March, 2014 Software Assurance Planning Services.
Virtual Biodiversity Research ViBRANT Social Science and Digital Research: Interdisciplinary Insights, March, 12, 2012, Oxford e-Research Centre ‘Wish.
Mary Beth Schell Adam Dodd NC AHEC Digital Library National AHEC: Wednesday June 23, 2010 Using Social Networking Tools to Support Graduate Medical Education:
Abstract Introduction Results and Discussions James Kasson  (Dr. Bruce W.N. Lo)  Information Systems  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire In a world.
Advancing Institutional Repositories A Case Study in Digital Agricultural Publication Management Laura Hanson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Experiences with a bibliometric indicator for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway Gunnar Sivertsen Nordic Institute for Studies.
USERS IN THE SPOTLIGHT: STUDY ON THE USE OF THE DUTCH SCIENTIFIC PORTAL NARCIS, 2009 Elly Dijk, Arjan Hogenaar, Marga van Meel Royal Netherlands Academy.
Reliable Sources Six questions to ask to determine the trustworthiness of an internet source.
Rajesh Singh Deputy Librarian University of Delhi Research Metrics Impact Factor & h-Index.
Bibliometrics and Impact Analyses at the National Institute of Standards and Technology Stacy Bruss and Susan Makar Research Librarians SLA Pharmaceutical.
Supporting further and higher education The UK FAIR Programme: OAI in context Chris Awre OAI3, CERN, February 2004.
1 Scopus as a Research Tool March Why Scopus?  A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources.
 Web 2.0 Technologies: MCH New Media John Richards Georgetown University.
Citation Searching with Web of Knowledge Roger Mills Catherine Dockerty OULS Bio- and Environmental.
The Web of Science, Bibliometrics and Scholarly Communication 11 December 2013
The Cancer Nutrition Network for Texans presents: Creating Cancer Care Teams: A workshop for Cancer Patients and their Family Caregivers The CNNT is funded.
LORRIE JOHNSON U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION (OSTI) ICSTI TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES COORDINATING (TACC) MEETING OCTOBER.
University of Antwerp Library TEW & HI UA library offers... books, journals, internet catalogue -UA catalogue, e-info catalogue databases -e.g.
THOMSON SCIENTIFIC Patricia Brennan Thomson Scientific January 10, 2008.
Web of Science® Krzysztof Szymanski October 13, 2010.
The Romanian National Defence College Bucharest, 1-2 November 2007Romania Ministry of Education, Research and Youth National University Research Council.
Join the Conversation: Active Listening on Social Media By Lauren Cleland New Media Specialist, Explore Georgia #TeamGaSocial.
By Timon Oefelein Springer, Account Development Manager, North Western Europe Altmetrics for Librarians: a publisher dashboard, a university use case.
Citation Searching with Web of Knowledge Roger Mills Catherine Dockerty OULS Bio- and Environmental.
CSA Discovery Services!! Community of Scholars PapersInvited COS Funding Opportunities.
FP7 /1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG Research Nikos Kastrinos Directorate for Research in Social Sciences, Humanities and Foresight of DG Research, European.
Anup Kumar Das Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India Altmetrics and the Changing Societal Needs of Research Communications.
The Web of Science, Bibliometrics and Scholarly Communication
E-Government Services Some Perspectives Randeep Sudan Global ICT Department.
Making use of (alt)metrics Phill Jones, PhD Head of Publisher Outreach @altmetrics.
HAWAII CLEAN ENERGY INITIATIVE ONLINE PRESENCE Cover goes here.
2 February Communicating Science – a Precondition for Democracy The university course „Science Communication“ in Vienna -
Carla Basili - Luisa De Biagi Carla Basili * - Luisa De Biagi * * IRCrES Institute, Rome (IT) *CNR –IRCrES Institute, Rome (IT) Central Library ‘G. Marconi’,
Robyn Gibson EDC 601 Shanghai 09 ThinkQuest Narrative Competition.
Objectives: Trial a new way for all NRENs/global PR network to share, access and showcase use case information using a digital/blog platform Raise awareness.
Build Community. Engage Clients. Add a ‘like’ Add a ‘like’ to Build Community and Engage Clients.
EVALUATING WEB SITES AND SOURCES. Knowledge is Empowerment Today’s objective is to learn how to be critical with each resource you use in your literature.
Measuring Your Research Impact Citation and Altmetrics Tools University Libraries Search Savvy Seminar Series April 9 & 10, 2014 Prof. Amanda Izenstark.
REMOVE THIS SLIDE BEFORE PRESENTATION
Demonstrating Scholarly Impact: Metrics, Tools and Trends
How you know what you’re doing is working… or not working.
Biodiversity in a changing climate: e-learn more
Citation Analysis Your article Jill Otto InCites Other?
Research4Life Programmes: Similarities and Differences!
Altmetrics: Analysis of Library and Information Science (LIS) Research in the Social Media Ifeanyi J. Ezema (Ph.D) Paper Presented at the 1st International.
< < LE:NOTRE Institute tag cloud Resources cloud tag cloud tag
Optimize your research performance using SciVal
An Introducation to ResearcherID
Measuring Your Research Impact
Citation Searching with Web of Knowledge
Research4Life Programmes: Similarities and Differences! (Part A)
Internet Use.
Research4Life Programmes: Similarities and Differences!
Why is Sharing Important on Social Media
Presentation transcript:

The search for alternative metrics for taxonomy Daphne Duin & Peter van den Besselaar VU university Amsterdam Org Science & Network Institute

Altmetrics for research evaluation Quality (impact, relevance, originality) is assessed by relevant audiences – Scholarly – Non-scholarly, such as economic, professional, policy, general public Metrics based on communication – Scholarly publications, citations (not very useful), but this does not work (in all fields), topics, networks Science on the web: altmetrics –> new communication media – Non-scholarly Indicators for societal impact: new metrics needed, based on communication with societal audiences. Eg, website visits/activity

Test

The case Scratchpads are biodiversity research communities on the Web – a research infrastructure Platform for collaboration, data sharing, publishing – Tagging – Data analysis – Blogs – Collaborative writing

Scratchpads Started 2007 – Today > 200 communities and > 3000 registered users, numbers go up every week EU funded Evaluation of research infrastructures – Scholarly use – Societal benefits -> Horlings, Van den Besselaar, review, forthcoming

Questions Can we use web data to identify the relevant audiences of the Scratchpads infrastructure? Can we use web data to study if and how often the sites are used to “produce” content?

The Data We used: Google Analytics reports for all Scratchpads and compared them to the report of one specific site Period Oct 1, 2010-March 31, 2011 Web server log data for 1 day (24 h) to see what people are doing - CMS system with standardised (/add/edit/delete/comment/content)

Results – the audiences I 1 Oct March unique Service Providers came in to Scratchpad domain (no bots); “Average time on site” > 4 seconds Of which 6896 telecom-internet companies (ISPs) Of which 2316 identifiable user organizations = non- ISPs (25%) Clustered in 8 categories

Audiences - all sites 2316 unique Service Providers >200 community sites 1 Oct 10 –April 11

Categories Research/Education = Universities, laboratories, science museums, botanical gardens libraries, schools, colleges Government = National/state/local departments in agriculture, pest control, food security, forest management, environment energy, transport Companies = Food, Pharmaceuticals, Mining, energy companies, pest control products, Accountancy, Consultancy biotechnology Non-profit= conservation environmental agencies, societies Health= Hospitals, health services health/medical research, Art/culture/media = art museums, art academies, broadcasting and media services publishing companies Travel = hotels, airlines, stations (wifi?) Other=Church

Scholarly use Quick test: – Scholarly journals in the field – Authors – Corporate addressed – Are these organizations also scratchpad users? – Yes – but by far not exclusively

Results – the audiences II Same for 1 specific site 276 unique Service Providers 201 are internet/telecom companies (ISPs) 75 are identifiable user organizations (non ISPs) 2 categories

Results – 1 site MicroOrg.info 75 unique Service Providers, commercial one’s excluded

Using the Web is science, to do what? Web data to study the if and how often the sites are used to “produce” content Web sever log data for February 1, 2011 (24h) COMINED WITH POST /node/add/image HTTP/1.1 /add; /edit; /delete; /comment; /content 1148 “producing” actions Feb 1, 2011: 1270 visits registered in Google Analytics

So what does this tell us? I Analysis of Services Providers... Reveals interesting insights on part of the audiences coming to the Scratchpads Such as... Audiences from different educational levels; from diverse scientific disciplines and other professionals, organizations However: 75% through ISP’s

So what does this tell us? II Working on the web, to do what? Scratchpad web sever log data can be used to identify if and how often content “producing” activities occur If combined with numbers on consuming actions this gives a much more comprehensive view of the use of an e-science infrastructure

Discussion Data sets used are rich and analyse discussed here only a start Further research should tell us more about: - interdisciplinary and different educational interest of the sites -which sites or content attract what type of audience (ISP) - Division between producing and consuming actions Issues: – Division of ISPs versus user organizations – Who what type of organizations/companies are have their own ISPs and who not why, what are the trends? – Trends on tele-working and use of wifi in the work enviroment – Percentage of bots in Internet traffic

Acknowledgments We thank the following people for helping us gathering and analyzing the web data for Altmetrics11 Simon Rycroft and the rest of the Scratchpad team at the Natural History Museum London Laura Hollink – TU Delft