WSR‐88D Dynamic Scanning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.
Advertisements

1 Sebastian Torres NEXRAD Range-Velocity Ambiguity Mitigation Staggered PRT and Phase Coding Algorithms on the KOUN Research Radar.
Jess Charba Fred Samplatsky Phil Shafer Meteorological Development Laboratory National Weather Service, NOAA Updated September 06, 2013 LAMP Convection.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
29 COMET Hydrometeorology 00-1 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 19 October 1999 Radar-Derived Precipitation Part 2 I.Radar Representation of.
Contributors to Measurement Errors (Chap. 7) *1) Widespread spatial distribution of scatterers (range ambiguities) *2) Large velocity distribution (velocity.
The Influence of Basin Size on Effective Flash Flood Guidance
Automated Volume Scan Evaluation and Termination (AVSET) Field Test Training Presented by Joe Chrisman (ROC) and Jami Boettcher (WDTB)
VCPs for Staggered PRT Sebastián Torres and David Warde CIMMS/NSSL Data Quality MOU – Technical Interchange Meeting Fall 2008.
Planning under Uncertainty
Colorado State University
RHB C-band radar scan strategy constraints Cloud top height less than 1.5 km altitude Features of interest < 5 km in scale Rapid evolution of cells  fast.
WHAT IS Z?  Radar reflectivity (dBZ)  Microwave energy reflects off objects (e.g. hydrometeors) and the return is reflectivity WHAT IS R?  Rainfall.
WSR-88D Data Status and Plans Michael Istok Radar Improvement Manager NWS Office of Science & Technology Jessica Schultz NWS Radar Focal Point for NEXRAD.
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Data Windowing in ORDA Technical Briefing Sebastián Torres 1,2, Chris Curtis 1,2, Rodger Brown 2, and Michael Jain 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
WWOSC 2014 Assimilation of 3D radar reflectivity with an Ensemble Kalman Filter on a convection-permitting scale WWOSC 2014 Theresa Bick 1,2,* Silke Trömel.
Sebastián Torres Weather Radar Research Innovative Techniques to Improve Weather Observations.
Monday 13 th November GSY/050388/ © BAE SYSTEMS All Rights Reserved ESA Space Weather Applications Pilot Project Service Development.
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
GROUP # 5 UPDATED 02/20/07 Faye Barthold Michelle Benny Ting Sun.
Radar Summary Charts Radar Summary Chart – An example of the radar echo intensity information available every hour from the national radar network is.
Chapter 6 Control Using Wireless Throttling Valves.
The Lightning Warning Product Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Dennis Buechler Geoffrey Stano Richard Blakeslee transitioning.
ROFFG Romania Flash Flood Guidance System. The Romania Flash Flood Guidance System is an adaptation of the HRC Flash Flood Guidance System used in various.
WSR-88D Data Status and Plans Michael Istok NWS Radar Focal Point for NEXRAD NWS Office of Science & Technology 6 February 2014 National Weather Service.
COMET HYDROMET Enhancements to PPS Build 10 (Nov. 1998) –Terrain Following Hybrid Scan –Graphical Hybrid Scan –Adaptable parameters appended to.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Integration Readiness Review NEXRAD Turbulence Detection Algorithm (NTDA) Gary Blackburn, Steven G. Carson, John K. Williams NCAR Research Applications.
Chad Entremont Daniel Lamb NWS Jackson, MS
The Benefit of Improved GOES Products in the NWS Forecast Offices Greg Mandt National Weather Service Director of the Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
Design Storms CE 365K Hydraulic Engineering Design Spring 2015.
CASA Update for MPAR Group David McLaughlin University of Massachusetts – Amherst V. Chandrasakar Colorado State University March 20, 2007 – OFCM/Silver.
AQUARadarERAD 2006 Barcelona Areal homogeneity of Z-R-relations Gerhard Peters, Bernd Fischer, Marco Clemens Meteorological Institute University of Hamburg.
WEATHER SIGNALS Chapter 4 (Focus is on weather signals or echoes from radar resolution volumes filled with countless discrete scatterers---rain, insects,
Interpolation and Extrapolation Interpolation is a way of determining variables on a graph within the given data Extrapolation is a way of determining.
VII Probe Message Processes Roy Sumner. Probe Messages Intent of probes What a probe message contains How they are generated How they are transmitted.
WSR-88D Radar Rainfall Estimation Present and Near Future Daniel S. Berkowitz Applications Branch NWS Radar Operations Center Norman, Oklahoma 1.
Curious Precipitation Curtains within the Inflow Region of a Supercell Thunderstorm: A Status Report Rodger A. Brown NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory,
Travis Smith Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Nowcasting Applications.
METR February Radar Products More Radar Background Precipitation Mode: -Volume Coverage Patterns (VCP) 21: 9 elevation angles with a complete.
After Dual Pol – What’s Next for the WSR-88D?
Travis Smith, Jidong Gao, Kristin Calhoun, Darrel Kingfield, Chenghao Fu, David Stensrud, Greg Stumpf & a cast of dozens NSSL / CIMMS Warn-on-Forecast.
WSR-88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS DENNIS A. MILLER.
Radar Requirements David J. Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory 2013 Warn-on-Forecast Workshop and Technical Guidance Meetings.
Chasing April Showers Convective storms on Wednesday 11 th April, 2012 WCD Friday 4 th May, 2012 Thorwald Stein DYMECS research assistant *Not by running.
Pam Heinselman Weather Radar Research Evaluation of Phased Array Radar Data via Comparisons to the WSR-88D.
WSR-88D Data Status And Plans Michael Istok NWS Office of Science & Technology and Tim Crum WSR-88D Radar Operations Center 21 June 2012 National Weather.
Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (1-minute SPG products) Mike Istok Radar Improvement Manager NWS Office of Science & Technology 4-5 August 2014 National.
Evaluation of CASA (and other gap-filling) Radars Severe Weather Workshop for NWS Warning Decision Making - 11 July 2007 Kurt Hondl DOC/NOAA/OAR National.
Michael Coniglio NSSL Stacey Hitchcock CSU Kent Knopfmeier CIMMS/NSSL 10/20/2015 IMPACT OF ASSIMILATING MPEX MOBILE UPSONDE OBSERVATIONS ON SHORT- TERM.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Eye-tracking during the Forecaster Warning Decision Process: A Pilot Experiment Katie Bowden OU CIMMS/School of Meteorology, Ph.D. Student Pam Heinselman.
Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.
NEXRAD Product Improvement- Update 2008 Bob Saffle: Noblis, Inc. Mike Istok: National Weather Service Greg Cate: National Weather Service AMS 24 th IIPS.
GOES-R in Max The benefits are well known, 5x faster data, 4x better resolution, ~3x more spectral channels What challenges does this new data present?
Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS) Briefing by Ming Xue, Director CAPS is one of the 1st NSF Science and Technology Centers established.
Hypothesis testing March 20, 2000.
Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Hongli Jiang Paul Schultz and ZoltanToth
Cloud conditions for low atmospheric electricity during disturbed period after the Fukushima nuclear accident Akiyo Yatagai1, M. Yamauchi2, M. Ishihara3.
A Real-Time Automated Method to Determine Forecast Confidence Associated with Tornado Warnings Using Spring 2008 NWS Tornado Warnings John Cintineo Cornell.
EG2234 Earth Observation Weather Forecasting.
Hiding under a freeway overpass will protect me from a tornado.
An overview of real-time radar data handling and compression
An Update to the Convective Wind Climatology of
Thunderstorms Features Cumulonimbus clouds Heavy rainfall Lightning
Upper Zone Threshold (bpm) Lower Zone Threshold (bpm)
Presentation transcript:

WSR‐88D Dynamic Scanning - SAILS and AVSET Fred H. Glass

Supplemental Adaptive Intra-Volume Low-Level Scan (SAILS) Automated Volume Scan Evaluation and Termination (AVSET) Dynamic scanning techniques designed to: shorten volume scan times increase frequency of lowest-level scan Benefits are more frequent volume scan updates/data and more low-level “looks” AVSET has been in operation since Spring 2010 SAILS will be implemented in late April-May 2014, and is intended only to support severe weather operations

Automated Volume Scan Evaluation and Termination (AVSET) Operator selectable method to make each volume scan “dynamic” The number of angles/elevations scanned is dependent on the sampled meteorological return Terminates volume scan once returns fall below thresholds of dBZ and areal coverage Shortens time between product updates when no significant data exists on higher elevation tilts VCP31/32 not impacted by AVSET

How AVSET Works Only analyzes data above 5° To terminate, each condition must be met: ≥18 dBZ over < 80 km² ≥ 30 dBZ over < 30 km² areal coverage ≥18 dBZ has not increased by 12 km² or more since the last volume scan If all three conditions are met… AVSET terminates the volume scan after completion of the next higher elevation VCP 212 Example: Below thresholds at 5.1°? Will terminate after 6.4° Now for some details on AVSET’s execution. AVSET only analyzes data above 5°, which means that VCPs 31 and 32, the Clear Air Mode VCPs, are not impacted. For each elevation above 5°, AVSET checks the total areal coverage of returns above both 18 and 30 dBZ. To terminate the volume scan, there are three conditions and all three of them must be met. The coverage at or above 18 dBZ must be less than 80 km2. The coverage at or above 30 dBZ must be less than 30 km2. The coverage at or above 18 dBZ has not increased by 12 km2 or more since the last volume scan. If these three conditions exist, the next slide tells you what AVSET will do!

How Short Can We Go? VCP 12 full volume scan time 4 min, 18 sec AVSET shortest update 3 min, 10 sec You may be wondering how much AVSET could potentially shorten a VCP. Since AVSET begins checking the data for the first elevation above 5.0°, it could be that the returns are below the thresholds on that first elevation. If so, AVSET will terminate the volume scan after the next higher elevation is complete. Examples for VCP 11 and 12 are presented here, with a complete volume scan and the shortest possible termination with AVSET. All the times will vary slightly from site to site. VCP 212 full volume scan time 4 min, 36 sec AVSET shortest update 3 min, 30 sec

AVSET and Range to Weather AVSET with storms at far range Only relevant elevations above 5° used AVSET with storms at close range Entire VCP used The number of elevations not sampled for any given VCP is completely dependent on the range and height of relevant weather features. When there is deep convection at close range, as with the storm on the left side of the graphic, the entire VCP will be used. As the range of storms increases or the height of weather features decreases, AVSET will dynamically control the number of scanned elevations, which will shorten the VCP update time as appropriate. As storms approach or grow, AVSET dynamically adds elevations to ensure complete coverage.

Supplemental Adaptive Intra‐Volume Low‐Level Scan (SAILS) A new dynamic scanning method which is operator selectable Inserts a new low-level scan (0.5°) into the “middle” of the volume scan (wrt time) The goal is to evenly space, as close as possible, the time interval between low-level data updates Only functional in the existing severe weather VCPs 12 and 212 Z, V, SW and Dual Pol variables will be generated and distributed (Level 2) Known as the “Sails Scan”

How Does SAILS Work? Figure 1 In this example, the radar is operating in VCP 12 with a termination angle of 19.5°. The “middle” of the volume scan is ~140 seconds which results in collecting the Supplemental Low‐Level scan after completion of the 3.1° elevation cut. Figure 2 When SAILS is active: the radar scans up through the middle of the volume scan, 3.1° elevation cut in this example (Figure 1) transitions down to collect the supplemental 0.5° split cut data (Figure 2) then elevates to 4.0°, in this example (Figure 3), to resume collecting data to complete the volume scan. Figure 3

How Does SAILS Work? For VCP12

SAILS Implementation To collect the supplemental 0.5° scan adds approximately 35 seconds to the volume scan duration SAILS 0.5° Update Rate: Every ~140 seconds (~105 seconds w/ AVSET) shortens low-level scan update to < 3 minutes; < 2 minutes with AVSET In VCP 12, volume scan completion times range from as short as 225 sec with AVSET (termination after 6.4°) to 285 sec for a full volume scan

VCP 12 with SAILS Insertion Points AVSET Termination Angle = 15.6 AVSET Termination Angle = 12.5 AVSET Termination Angle = 10.0 AVSET Termination Angle = 8.0 AVSET Termination Angle = 6.4 Elevation Angles (VCP 12) VCP 12 Elevation Duration Termination Angle = 19.5 0.5° 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 0.9° 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 1.3° 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 31 Sec 1.8° 15 Sec 15 Sec 15 Sec 15 Sec 15 Sec 15 Sec 15 Sec 0.5° 31 Sec 31 Sec 2.4° 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 0.5° 31 Sec 31 Sec 3.1° 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 0.5° 31 Sec 31 Sec 4.0° 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 5.1° 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 6.4° 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 14 Sec 8.0° 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 10.0° 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 12.5° 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 15.6° 13 Sec 13 Sec 13 Sec 19.5° 13 Sec 13 Sec Duration 243 Sec 274 Sec 261 Sec 248 Sec 235 Sec 222 Sec 209 Sec 0.5 Elevation Update Times 243 Sec * 136 Sec and 138Sec * 136 Sec and 125 Sec * 122 Sec and 126 Sec * 122 Sec and 113 Sec * 108 Sec and 114 Sec * 108 Sec and 101 Sec * * Plus Retrace Time

Benefits of SAILS Significantly reduces low‐level scan update interval, especially for more distant storms Provides more low‐level “looks” during severe weather operations VCP 12 Number of 0.5° Product Updates per Hour Volumetric Product Updates per Hour Standard Operation 14 AVSET 14 ‐ 19 SAILS 24 12 SAILS and AVSET 24 ‐ 32 12 ‐ 16 VCP 212 Number of 0.5° Product Updates per Hour Volumetric Product Updates per Hour Standard Operation 13 AVSET 13 ‐ 17 SAILS 22 11 SAILS and AVSET 22 ‐ 28 11 ‐ 14

Summary Operating in VCP 12, SAILS will add 10-18 additional 0.5° elevation scans per hour During severe weather operations, the frequent low‐level “looks” provided by SAILS will significantly enhance WSR‐88D forecast and warning support, while not impacting WSR‐88D data quality or hardware operations AVSET will be enabled by default with the arrival of SAILS Extend SAILS to result in 2-4 low-elevation scans per volume in Build 16 (April 2015)

Questions ????