SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Contribution of the Seismological Laboratory National & Kapodistrian University.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SAFER Seismic EArly Warning For EuRope Seismic Early Warning

Advertisements

Rapid magnitude determination for Vrancea early warning system and the April 25, 2009 Ms= 5.3 event (A. Marmureanu, C. Ionescu, Gh. Marmureanu)

Progress on Early Warning Research in Taiwan

Earthquake engineering and real-time early warning: the AMRA perspective. Iunio Iervolino* and Gaetano Manfredi *Assistant Professor of Structural Engineering.

WP 3.4 High Frequency GPS: a potential contribution for monitoring a active faults Test site Irpinia Roma, 24 marzo 2010 Resp. Antonio Avallone M. Marzario,

Real-time data for seismic monitoring at INGV National Earthquake Center S. Mazza et al. Centro Nazionale Terremoti Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia.

Real-Time Estimation of Earthquake Location and Magnitude for Seismic Early Warning in Campania Region, southern Italy A. Zollo and RISSC-Lab Research.

WP 4.3 Estimates of earthquakes source parameters and structure characteristics from massive seismic waveform analysis Task 4 L’Aquila seismic sequence:

Romania Mean Wind Speed / metres per second Mast height – 80 metres Wind Data recorded over 2 years

ASL QC Procedures Status and plans. GSN ANSS Traditional Waveform Review  The “morning run” Daily summarizes problems with availability, timing,

Antelope Relational Database Management System A practical introduction.

Mike Stickney Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Earthquake Studies Office Montana Regional Seismograph Network ANSS IMW RAC 21 August 2006.

UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.

Stress III The domino effect Stress transfer and the Coulomb Failure Function Aftershocks Dynamic triggering Volcano-seismic coupling.

SECOND EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND SEISMOLOGY ISTANBUL | Turkey | Aug , 2014 Feasibility study of a nation-wide Early Warning.

NORSAR Kjeller, Norway Type of organisation: Research Institute Specialising in: Real-time transmission and automatic processing of seismic data from a.

Earthquake Location The basic principles Relocation methods

Earthquakes Susan Bilek Associate Professor of Geophysics New Mexico Tech How to figure out the who, what, where, why… (or the location, size, type)

The Strong Motion Network: Synergy with the broadband seismic network Ioannis Kalogeras, Nikolaos Melis and Christos Evangelidis NATIONAL OBSERVATORY OF.

RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.

SISMA Seismic Information System for Monitoring and Alert Galileian Plus Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano, Italy Politecnico di.

Iranian National Broadband Seismic Network (BIN)

Mr.Santosh Kumar Scientist Web:

Effect of Velocity Models on the Accuracy of Earthquake Hypocenters Sudipta Sarkar, Youshun Sun, M. Nafi Toksöz Earth Resources Laboratory Massachusetts.

Section 2: Studying Earthquakes

BULGARIAN SEISMOLOGICAL NETWORK D. Solakov 1, L. Dimitrova 1, S. Nikolova 1, St. Stoyanov 1, S. Simeonova 1, L. Zimakov 2, L. Khaikin 3 1 National Institute.

Earthquake Science (Seismology). Seismometers and seismic networks Seismometers and seismic networks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake aftershocks Earthquake.

Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Location by Annabel Kelly.

Research opportunities using IRIS and other seismic data resources John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology Michael Wysession, Washington.

1 Cythera M6.7 earthquake (January 8, 2006) in southern Aegean: uneasy retrieval of the upward rupture propagation J. Zahradnik, J. Jansky, V. Plicka,

Using IRIS and other seismic data resources in the classroom John Taber, Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology.

Complex earthquake directivity during the 2009 L’ Aquila mainshock Tinti E., Scognamiglio L., Cirella A., Cocco M., and A. Piatanesi Istituto Nazionale.

Quick fault-plane identification by a geometrical method: The M w 6.2 Leonidio earthquake, 6 January 2008, Greece and some other recent applications J.

Feb 19, John Anderson - CEE/GE 479/679 Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 9. Seismometry, Magnitude Scales, and Seismicity John G. Anderson.

DIGITAL SEISMIC NETWORK OF UZBEKISTAN Ilkhom Alimukhamedov Institute of seismology Academy of Sciences.

Large Earthquake Rapid Finite Rupture Model Products Thorne Lay (UCSC) USGS/IRIS/NSF International Workshop on the Utilization of Seismographic Networks.

Institute of Geophysical Research of the National Nuclear Center of RK Kazakhstan National monitoring system of nuclear explosions and earthquakes Mikhailova.

The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake sequence in Western Corinth Gulf: epicenter relocations, focal mechanisms, slip models The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake.

High Resolution Finite Fault Inversions for M>4.8 Earthquakes in the 2012 Brawley Swarm Shengji Wei Acknowledgement Don Helmberger (Caltech) Rob Graves.

CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.

Seismographs Are instruments located at or near the surface of the Earth that record seismic waves.

NORWAY Coordinating Institute (partner signing the CA): University of Bergen (UiB), Bergen, Norway National team: Following are the 4 core members of the.

An overview of Uganda Seismological Network and current activities

Seismograph Networks in Japan

Seismicity of Norway Seismo group, Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Norway Location of stations in the Norwegian National Seismic.

New Norwegian National Seismic Network Jens Havskov, University of Bergen Jan Fyen, NORSAR Presented at Nordic Detection Seminar, Oslo, June 4-6, 2008.

Indian National Strong Motion Instrumentation Project Principal Investigator Prof. Ashok Kumar Department of Earthquake Engineering Indian Institute of.

Alexandra Moshou, Panayotis Papadimitriou and Kostas Makropoulos MOMENT TENSOR DETERMINATION USING A NEW WAVEFORM INVERSION TECHNIQUE Department of Geophysics.

Gaetano Festa, Aldo Zollo, Simona Colombelli, Matteo Picozzi, Alessandro Caruso Dipartimento di Fisica; Università di Napoli Federico II.

International Seismological Centre: Providing Data Sets for Scientific Research István Bondár ESC 32 nd General Assembly Montpellier, September 6-10, 2010.

Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.

Introduction to seismology Mathilde B. Sørensen and Jens Havskov.

Seismotectonics Mathilde B. Sørensen and J. Havskov.

Reappraisal of single station locations reported by the SANSN

Earthquake monitoring system and Information products

Jordan seismological Observatory (JSO) Engineer Ahmad Algazo

Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake

Institute of seismology, National Academy of sciences, Kyrgyz Republic

Seismic Instrumentation

RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL

Integrated K12-UNR Seismic Network

Conclusions and Further Work

Creating the Virtual Seismologist

SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008

Slip pulse and resonance of Kathmandu basin during the 2015 Mw 7

by J. Galetzka, D. Melgar, J. F. Genrich, J. Geng, S. Owen, E. O

by Wenyuan Fan, and Peter M. Shearer

by Naoki Uchida, Takeshi Iinuma, Robert M

Fig. 1 Postseismic displacements recorded by land and seafloor GPS sites from September 2012 to May 2016 after the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku earthquake. Postseismic.

Presentation transcript:

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Contribution of the Seismological Laboratory National & Kapodistrian University of Athens ATHENS TEST SITE

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris SiteDataMethod(s)Partners Greece, AthensStrong and week motion network 2 arrays a) Tnow network based location approach b) Tc and Pd on- site calculation approach and c) Array based processing approach NIED, NORSAR ATHENS TEST SITE

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris KALI AKOR PLAT LAKA White: Seismographs in real-time transmission, Red: Seismographs in offline mode, Blue: Accelerographs in dial-up mode. Strong & Weak Motion Network

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris

Picking and associating phases Network approach example

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris White: traditionally picked and located events Black: automatic picked and associated events and Tnow located Earthquake locations for earthquakes with M>3 for the period (September 2007 – March 2008)

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris The June (12:25 GMT), Andravida earthquake of magnitude Mw=6.4. Location and rupture zone

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris The calculated slip model revealed more than one seismic sources (Agalos A.) Synthetic PGV map plus relocated seismicity (Papadimitriou et al)

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris recording at Rodini station Instantaneous period estimation at Rodini station Kanamori & Wu 2 s pre-rupture, period ~ 0,6 M=5.2 3 s period ~ 1.4 M=6.7

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris TRISAR and MALES arrays REFTEK DAS 72 CMG-40T-1s GURALP DM24 Mark III CMG-40T-30s

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Array processing scheme developed by NORSAR and implemented by NKUA for the Athens test site

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Andravida Mw=6.4 earthquake.

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Array processing results for the June 6, 2008 Andravida Mw=6.4 earthquake.

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Aftershock activity

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris February 4, 2008 M=5.0 earthquake

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Array processing results for the February 4, 2008 M=5.0 earthquake

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Limiting factors of array performance Temporary nature of installation Timing errors resulting from the absence of a common timing system Complexity and variations of crustal structure in the area. Improvement of travel time tables or location corrections according to azimuth Further tuning of single and multi array location algorithms is needed

SAFER Project final meeting, Potsdam, 3-5 June, 2009 Nicholas Voulgaris Future prospects Continuation of EW algorithm testing using the increasing number of real-time stations becoming available near the test site area and installing accelerometers in tandem. Activating real time transmission of RASMON accelerometer network. Improving latency times Re-initiate array related activities provided that a common time base system can be established.