Supporting scholarship – C-SAP projects past and future Ian Fairweather and Darren Marsh, C-SAP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr Catherine Bovill Academic Development Unit University of Glasgow Dr Kate Morss and Dr Cathy Bulley, Queen Margaret University.
Advertisements

Challenges and opportunities Reflections on a collaborative Comenius 2.1 Action project Induction Mentors Needs – a needs analysis approach: The English.
ICT for Development Conclusions
Meaning and scope of educational development: a conceptual framework grounded in practice Prof. Mariane Frenay Université catholique de Louvain UNESCO.
Sustainability in tourism
AfriMAP’s The Justice Sector and the Rule of Law in Namibia
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Science, Technology and Culture Strategy document October 2006.
Service to the University, Discipline and Community Academic Promotions Briefing Session Chair, Academic Board Peter McCallum.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
Module in Year 3 BA QTS Primary Teaching at Liverpool Hope University Alison Clark.
Improvement Service / Scottish Centre for Regeneration Project: Embedding an Outcomes Approach in Community Regeneration & Tackling Poverty Effectively.
Writing Carrick Institute Learning and Teaching Grants Tips for success Judith Lyons Learning and Teaching Development.
Recognition as a Professional Teacher in Higher Education: The Higher Education Academy professional recognition scheme Helen Barefoot Deputy Head of the.
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
Exchange A7: Linking activity in Europe – UNEP mapping and building sustainability across universities and colleges in Europe Wayne Talbot, WTA Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
The Higher Education Innovation Fund Vinnova and British Embassy seminar 21 March 2006.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Available to our Subscribers Karen Fraser: ULC 2013.
Mark Dooris Director, Healthy Settings Development Unit University of Central Lancashire Investing for Health.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
Heads of Departments of Mathematical Sciences Conference The HEA and Future Development in Learning and Teaching Professor Craig Mahoney Chief Executive,
The International Entrepreneurship Educators Conference Sharing experience across contexts: UK Higher Education Academy Subject Centres.
 Examines the nature of culture and the diverse ways in which societies make meaning and are organized across time and space. Topics include cultural.
Angela Hammond University of Hertfordshire Putting internationalisation into practice: how to inform and develop your teaching. SEDA Spring Conference.
SSHRC Partnership and Partnership Development Grants Rosemary Ommer 1.
Teachers’ and Advisors’ Conference 30 April 2015 The Leeds Curriculum - a voyage of discovery Karen Llewellyn and Caroline Campbell.
1 WERT: WP 5 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010 Aim To pilot and evaluate the content and context of the course material with target groups To help women.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
President’s Office University Strategy University Strategy ‘Leadership through Foresight’ Overview.
Evaluating the Benefits of the Principal’s Teaching Award Scheme Daphne Loads IAD.
Introduction to the UJ- BCURE programme UJ-BCURE Funded by.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Socrates - Erasmus Presentation to Academic Staff Institute of Technology Blanchardstown 29 November 2003 Higher Education Authority An tÚdarás.
Orientation for new Lead Partners and Partners Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 12 June 2008 – Voss, Norway Kirsti.
The Maths, Stats & OR Network Current Perspective Michael Grove Network Manager April 2005.
What should we expect from 2 nd year students? A realistic approach. Tuesday 25 th February 2014 Tutor CPD Seminar.
12/9/10 Pilot assessment impact- paperwork Findings of the expert panels- report + appendix Lessons learned- feedback from pilot institutions Examples.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Teaching in teams: lessons from systematic review training NCRM Training the Trainers Event 4 th June 2007 Angela Harden and Karen Bird MRS Node EPPI Centre,
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
NASCE: Programme requirements Paul Ridgway. Need for NASCE? Cost of Skills training Pressures for training outside service hours Pressures for training.
ACADEMIC PROMOTIONS Promotions Criteria Please note, these slides only contain a summary of the promotions information – full details can be found.
Supporting Communities Strategic Plan Background to Supporting Communities Supporting Communities NI (SCNI) was set up in 1979 as a small estate.
Parent Information Evenings September Our aims for the meeting To ensure a strong partnership between home and school. To update parents on the.
INTERNATIONALISATION OF THE CURRICULUM (IoC) AT THE FACULTY OF EDUCATION Dr. Josef Ploner, Lecturer in international education 2g.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
Teaching Enhancement Project Funding
What is HEA Fellowship? What’s the UK PSF?
Using Technology with under-represented adults
Queen’s Teaching Awards 2017
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
Building momentum towards inclusive teaching and learning:
SPHERE Study Visit: University of Edinburgh (October 2017)
The UKPSF and the HEA Fellowship scheme
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
Introduction to the Global Learning Programme for England
TEACHNG AWARDS 2019 BRIEFING SESSION
TEACHNG AWARDS 2018 BRIEFING SESSION
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
How inclusive is my module... and yours?
Building momentum towards inclusive teaching and learning:
Presentation transcript:

Supporting scholarship – C-SAP projects past and future Ian Fairweather and Darren Marsh, C-SAP

Introduction to C-SAP  HEA Subject Network for Sociology, Anthropology, Politics  With other subject networks also provide support for Criminology  Produce a range of resources: web based and print materials, events and workshops, across a wide range of teaching and learning themes  Project funding always core to C-SAP working principles of encouraging innovation in the disciplines

Introduction to Projects  “Mini-project” funding from 2001  Over x projects funded in first tranche  Distributed evenly between three main subject areas  Trend since then has been on fewer projects funded to greater amount  Approx 50 – 60K each year allocated

Thematic Overview  Original intention to provide:  “a set of broad principles to which projects should adhere, including:  prioritising ‘bottom-up’ change;  embedding innovations;  maximising policy relevance;  utilising disciplinary-specific methodologies.  Challenges to this – HE landscape changes over last 10 years

What We Fund  Release of time from teaching, research or administrative duties.  Research or administrative assistance.  Purchase of training and services.  Reasonable travel and subsistence costs.  Purchase of consumable items. The following will not be funded:  Normal costs of course delivery, as distinct from additional costs of innovation.  Equipment or CIT hardware/software.  Institutional overheads, although the on-costs of salaries are allowed.

Projects reflect wider trends in approaches to practice  For example, in e-learning themed mini-projects:  “Production of a CD/CDROM and Web Resources of Teaching Materials on Weber” (2001)  “The Use Of C&IT in Level 1 Modules” (2001)  “Mobile ICT and the Academic VLE Interface” (2003)  “Evaluating Interactive Teaching Methodologies” (2003)  “Communicating across boundaries: e-communication on Criminal Justice issue” (2006)  “Podcasting in Politics and International Studies” (2007)  Can see a general reflection in projects moving from perspective of technology as:  ‘stand-alone’ resources VLE as ‘new’ Web 2.0 potential

Regional/Thematic Project Funding  Northern Ireland – ESD: Promoting learning about diversity, and cultural competence towards developing sustainable and global education/citizenship in social work students at Queen’s University Belfast  Wales - E-learning: University of Bangor - Adnodd E Ddysgu Dulliau Ymchwil Cenedlaethol/A National e-Learning Research Methods Resource  Scotland – Internationalisation: Napier University - An "unturned stone"? Exams and International students

Process - selection  There is usually a call for ‘expressions of interest in February/ March. Those selected to go through to the second stage and areinvited to attend a project applications workshop.  We assess applications using the following criteria:  Timescale  Aims, Approaches and Activities  Outcomes & Dissemination  Evaluation Plan  Budget  At least two referees read all applications; their comments and suggestions inform the decision of the selection panel.

Process - contracts  Contracts set out the expectations between C-SAP and the project holders  Match funding or institutional support is essential but this could take a variety of forms.  It could be financial support for the project, but it could take the form of administrative support, IT support or training, physical space or contribution to full economic costings.  We strongly encourage applicants to seek letters of support from their institution.

Process – Evaluation and Dissemination  Evaluator can be a member of host department or someone from another institution.  Students can contribute to this process.  Feedback from staff and students useful when applying for further funding to develop the work, or in order to influence policy with institutions.  C-SAP events, themed workshops, our newsletter and e: bulletin.  Mid and Final reports published on C-SAP website and through the projects booklet.  Present findings to host institution as well as to C-SAP.  Promotion of work through visits to other departments and at other events and workshops.  Potential for academic publication from your project.

C-SAP Academic Support to Projects  Promote a scholarly and disciplinary-specific approach to the innovation and reform of learning and teaching in the social sciences.  Help establish networks to share experiences, problems and good practice and act as a link between the disciplinary community and the HEA/subject centre.  Support projects in connecting teaching and learning across the subject disciplines, as well as leading on a range of discipline specific activities.  Encouraging new staff to become involved in projects as part of professional development.  Details of existing and completed C-SAP projects are available at

Workshop Activity  Assess the anonymised project applications in front of you according to the following criteria:  Does the project Fit in with relevant theoretical/educational literature? Encourage disciplinary innovation? Demonstrate explicit learning and teaching dimensions? Support lasting changes in teaching and learning? Have impact both locally and in a wider context?  What are the plans for dissemination and evaluation?  How realistic is the budget?