Drilling down to the nitty gritty details: Developing an Evaluation Work Plan to identify who will do what, and when Amy D’Andrade San Jose State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

ICTN PROJECT WEBINAR SERIES COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDENT PLACEMENT PROGRAM Presented By: Robyn Stringer, Judith Foley-Chell and Helen Johnson.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
The Chronic Disease Map Jann Offer
Talent Pool Succession Planning What Is It?
Creating an Early Childhood System Karen Ponder February 9, 2010 Arizona Early Childhood Task Force.
Using Data to Measure and Report Program Impact Anne Basham, MFA MEMconsultants.
Neighbor to Neighbor Lessons learned from a community- based HIV testing partnership: The HIV Minority Community Health Partnership Presented at American.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Promotores de Salud as New approach to the African American in the County of San Bernardino A partnership between two Community Based Organizations in.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
Phase One Implementation: Katie A. Strategic Plan.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Director Bobby Cagle Georgia Division of Family and Children Services DHS Board Meeting April 15, 2015.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Talbert House Project PASS Goals and Outcomes.
Health Department Orientation Project. Overview Background Background Orientation Goals Orientation Goals Needs Assessment Needs Assessment Policies &
Bridgeport Safe Start Initiative Update Meeting September 23, 2004 Bridgeport Holiday Inn.
Presented by: Kacy Rodriguez – Program Administrator Children’s Power Play Campaign A Free Nutrition Education Resource for Schools and Community Youth.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Assessing Chronic Illness Care in Prison (ACIC-P): A Tool for Tracking Chronic Illness Care in Prison Emily Wang, M.D., MAS Yale University School of Medicine.
Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
Cross Border Animal Health Plan of Action – Kenya and Uganda Four Strategic areas 1. To improve prevention, management and control of cross border animal.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
Evaluation Process/Requirements for CAPP Algebra Project.
that keep families strong
Leaving No One Behind Communicating with Special Populations During Public Health Emergencies Doris Y. Estremera, MPH, CHES San Mateo County Health Department.
Qualitative Evaluation of Keep Well Lanarkshire Alan Sinclair Keep Well Evaluation Officer NHS Lanarkshire.
Fostering School Connectedness Action Planning National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Adolescent and School Health.
Using a Logic Model to Target your Evaluation Amy D’Andrade San Jose State University School of Social Work November 20, 2014.
FOR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOR HEALTHY LIVING FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...
Blending the Theoretical and the Empirical in Evaluation Science: A Case Example from Cancer Control/Prevention and a General Discussion Ross Conner University.
A Fully Accredited Facility Promoting Quality Health Care Snapshot of evaluating a chronic disease self-management tool: Evaluating the implementation.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
We work with you to create the change you envision, planning progress through knowledge and action.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
Welcome to the ER/CalWORKs Webinar! You should have a panel on the right of your screen that shows other attendees and has a box at the bottom to write.
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
Community and Clinician Partnership for Prevention (C2P2) Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, MS Philip Sloane, MD, MPH Rowena Dolor, MD, MHS Tricia L. Trinite’,
704: Conducting Business in Fiscally Challenging Times: Strategies and Tools to Get There PCYA Leadership Academy Presentation March 28, 2012.
Alameda County Reentry Network Annual Plan
Strengthening Connections between Birth Hospitals and WIC Programs to Improve Breastfeeding Outcomes: A Formative Evaluation Amanda Bilski March 4, 2015.
Chronic Disease and Health Promotion Program Integration Rosemarie Henson, MSSW, MPH Deputy Director Kaetz Beartusk, MPH Team Lead, Public Health Practice.
Return on Investment in Worksite Wellness Programs.
Managing programs that promote personal effectiveness.
NIKOLE LOBB DOUGHERTY, MA JESSI LAROSE, MPH OCTOBER 2011 H&AC Promising Strategies: Evaluation & Technical Assistance.
PRESENTATION BY THE GHANA TEAM By Eunice Dapaah Senior Education Specialist World Bank- Ghana Office.
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
Interview Design Four Focal States Connecticut, Indiana, North Carolina, Massachusetts Additional States Arizona, Utah, Washington State Interview Protocol.
Cross-site Evaluation Update Latino ETAC. Goal of Cross-site Evaluation To facilitate and conduct a rigorous evaluation of innovative and effective service.
PROYECTO VIDA BIENESTAR HUMAN SERVICES, FRANK GALVAN, PH.D.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
E VALUATION PLAN FOR COURSE DESIGN Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Module.
16 th April 2015 IITD Best Practice Event Cork. VIDEO INSERT.
1 Supervision: Keys to Supervision for I&A Specialists 2009 ADRC Conference September 22, 2009.
Health, Wellbeing and Pathways to the Future The promotion of healthy living to young people in out of home care Eleanor Pierce Health & Wellbeing Coordinator.
the National Diabetes Prevention Program in the Community
Module 8 CD-JEV immunization campaigns
A Better Start: Enhanced HCP project
Presentation transcript:

Drilling down to the nitty gritty details: Developing an Evaluation Work Plan to identify who will do what, and when Amy D’Andrade San Jose State University School of Social Work March 19, 2015

– Intensive coaching with 3 focus counties: Madera, Los Angeles, Tulare – Peer cluster on-line evaluation webinars – Available by to both groups: Evaluation Coaching Support

Webinar Outline 1.Background context 2.Evaluation element options 3.The evaluation work plan 4.Examples: Focus county plans 5.Experiences and lessons learned

The Logic Model “.. a simple diagram that communicates the rationale for why a program will work.” - Linkages Toolkit

INPUTSOUTPUTSOUTCOMES Program resources Activities Participation/ ShortMedium What we invest What we do Who we reach What results we obtain Long- term

Two Approaches to Evaluation Outcome Evaluation: Using empirical data to assess the impacts or outcomes of programs Process Evaluation: Using empirical data to assess the delivery of programs

Typical process evaluation questions Were program activities accomplished? How well were activities executed? Did the right group participate or receive the activity? Did enough people from the right group participate or receive the activity? What got in the way?

What kinds of data could we use? –Quantitative data (numbers) Administrative data Special reports Forms Surveys – Qualitative data (words) Interviews Observations Beginning to think about data

Creating a logic model takes time All counties felt implementation not as strong as desired All counties selected a process evaluation for their focus No county had ready data to quantify implementation Recurring concerns about outcomes Common Issues and Lessons Learned

Evaluation Element Options Implementation Tracking Process Investigation Outcomes Option Case Studies Dissemination

INPUTSACTIVITIESOUTCOMES Linkages Team DPSS staff CWS staff Service providers Families CFPIC Training for CWS staff on Linkages Identification of shared families Development of coordinated case plan DPSS staff attends TDMs Regular communication between DPSS and CWS workers Case plans and casework draw on knowledge and resources of both divisions Services offered not duplicative Services offered provide for more family needs Greater service availability/ fewer wait- lists Families better able to complete case plan requirements Families more likely to receive needed supports Increased case closure CWS / DPSS Decreased re-entry CWS / renewal DPSS All eligible families receive Linkages services [To Linkages activities 1,2,3]

INPUTSACTIVITIESOUTCOMES Linkages Team DPSS staff CWS staff Service providers Families CFPIC Training for CWS staff on Linkages Identification of shared families Development of coordinated case plan DPSS staff attends TDMs Regular communication between DPSS and CWS workers Case plans and casework draw on knowledge and resources of both divisions Services offered not duplicative Services offered provide for more family needs Greater service availability/ fewer wait- lists Families better able to complete case plan requirements Families more likely to receive needed supports Increased case closure CWS / DPSS Decreased re-entry CWS / renewal DPSS All eligible families receive Linkages services [To Linkages activities 1,2,3] 1 Implementation Tracking

INPUTSACTIVITIES Linkages Team DPSS staff CWS staff Service providers Families CFPIC Training for CWS staff on Linkages Identification of shared families Development of coordinated case plan DPSS staff attends TDMs Regular communication between DPSS and CWS workers 2 Process Investigation Interview DPSS staff to find out why they aren’t attending TDMs.

INPUTSACTIVITIESOUTCOMES Linkages Team DPSS staff CWS staff Service providers Families CFPIC Training for CWS staff on Linkages Identification of shared families Development of coordinated case plan DPSS staff attends TDMs Regular communication between DPSS and CWS workers Case plans and casework draw on knowledge and resources of both divisions Services offered not duplicative Services offered provide for more family needs Greater service availability/ fewer wait- lists Families better able to complete case plan requirements Families more likely to receive needed supports Increased case closure CWS / DPSS Decreased re-entry CWS / renewal DPSS All eligible families receive Linkages services [To Linkages activities 1,2,3] 3 Case Studies For successful families – how did Linkages help? What was the process or mechanism by which it helped?

INPUTSACTIVITIESOUTCOMES Linkages Team DPSS staff CWS staff Service providers Families CFPIC Training for CWS staff on Linkages Identification of shared families Development of coordinated case plan DPSS staff attends TDMs Regular communication between DPSS and CWS workers Case plans and casework draw on knowledge and resources of both divisions Services offered not duplicative Services offered provide for more family needs Greater service availability/ fewer wait- lists Families better able to complete case plan requirements Families more likely to receive needed supports Increased case closure CWS / DPSS Decreased re-entry CWS / renewal DPSS All eligible families receive Linkages services [To Linkages activities 1,2,3] 4 Outcomes Option What % of Linkage cases reunified? What percentage became employed?

5 Dissemination

The Evaluation Work Plan TaskPerson Responsible Estimated Time Involved Time FrameProgress and Next Steps

1 Implementation Tracking

1

2 Process Investigation Sparked by outreach of CW case worker to W2W case manager

2 Process Investigation

How did Linkages help? What did the process look like? 3 Case Studies

3

4 Outcomes Option

4

5 Dissemination

Experiences and lessons learned Amy’s lessons: Distance is challenging Work in process Helpful to get the concrete details down County feedback? Overwhelming or reassuring?

Evaluation Work Plan Resources Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, pdf Examples of Evaluation Plans. The Community Tool Box, Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives. University of Kansas. contents/evaluate/evaluation/evaluation-plan/examples

Questions?