INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, 28-29 May 2002Thomas WeberPage 1 Report about financial management of the INTERREG IIC BSR programme 1999 - 2001 Looking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme
Advertisements

INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process
4.1- Plot Points in a Coordinate Plane
Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism Pre-IWG October
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Chapter 5 FUTURE POPULATION TRENDS.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Milestones 1: Mapping (… December 31, 2003) 2: Contact (January 1 – June 30, 2004) 3: Dialouge (July 1 – December 31, 2004) 4: Contract (January 1 – June.
INTERREG III B, PHARE CBC and TACIS CBC Programme -Combination of EU instruments for transnational co- operation in the BSR CEEC\NIS participation in BSR.
Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden QUICK & EASY Money for the Reports - How funds and information flow.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Financial Report BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Rostislav Zatloukal.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Progress report – structure and contents BSR INTERREG III B Joint.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Eligibility of expenditure - Relevant rules and regulations BSR INTERREG.
Figures on student mobility
BANK PROFITABILITY PROGRESS REPORT. I ntroduction collection and dissemination of the BP publication. recent developments co-operation with IMF on the.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET January 2002PMG03 Barcelona – Management Issues 2 Management Issues 0ctober 2001 – January 2002.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
1 OAS Quarterly Resource Management Report December 31, 2012 ( Preliminary and unaudited) Secretariat for Administration and Finance.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Planning, the Balanced Scorecard, and Budgeting.
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0: Trends in the Overall Health Care Market Chart 1.1: Total National Health Expenditures, 1980 – 2010 Chart 1.2: Percent.
Books Program Performance Review Karen Rosenblum Books Subcommittee Meeting 6 January 2009.
UN Strategic Plan on HIV/AIDS Midterm Performance review (2001 – 2003) Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group 29 July 2003.
Counting On Wendy Pallant 2002.
New frontier s e r v i c e s BALANCE SHEET. 2 new frontier s e r v i c e s TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.WHAT IS A BALANCE SHEET? 2.WHAT IS THE USE OF A BS? 3.WHAT.
POWER INTERREGIONAL PROGRAMME Lead Partner Information Days Overview of legal requirements.
1 National Center for the Training of Bank Personnel of Ukraine.
INTERREG III C: Past experiences and future expectations on Interregional Co-operation Brussels, Thomas Wobben Verbindungsbüro des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt.
Planning and use of funding instruments
1 State of play Evaluations undertaken for DG REGIO.
European Commission - DG REGIONAL POLICY Slide n°1 Electronic data exchange with Member States The file interface.
0 - 0.
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
How well do you KNOW your 2 times table ? Play the following game Are you ready ? X MULTIPLYTIMES PRODUCT.
1 ENAC Air Transport Data AIR TRANSPORT DATA École Nationale de l Aviation Civile.
CHAPTER 5 ESSENTIALS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Irwin/McGraw-Hill Chapter 3 Money Management Strategy: Financial Statements and Budgeting.
1 State Fair Park Legislative Audit Bureau November 2004.
The CAP reform process in perspective: issues of the post-2013 debate Carina Folkeson Directorate for Economic Analysis, Perspectives and Evaluations DG.
AGEING AND EMPLOYMENT POLICIES THE NETHERLANDS WORKING BETTER WITH AGE Dutch Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, Wednesday 16 April 2014 Stefano.
Treasurer’s Report Ralph Tingle – Honorary Treasurer Richard Penney – Director of Finance & IS.
Trustee Financial Training 1. Agenda: 1.Overview of the Foundation 2.Define and discuss University-controlled Activities 3.Track a University-controlled.
Action TD1002 European network on applications of Atomic Force Microscopy to NanoMedicine and Life Sciences (AFM4NanoMed&Bio) Management Committee Meeting.
Source: Financial Times of London Global Banks 1999 – 2009 “Changing of the Guard”
Review 1-1 – 1-6. Give expression with numbers substituted then evaluate: a = ⅔b = -3c =5 1.ab – 8c 2. a 2 - bc (⅔)(-3) – 8(5) = -42 (⅔) 2 – (-3)(5) =
Whitecaps, sea-salt aerosols, and climate Magdalena D. Anguelova Physical Oceanography Dissertation Symposium College of Marine Studies, University of.
The EU in the new complex geography of economic systems: models tools and policy evaluation COST Action IS1104 Meeting Urbino Settembre COST.
1 Latvian tourism policy: sustainability check Marina Paņkova Foreign Economic Relations and Trade Policy Department Deputy director Tourism – chances.
Another Presentation © All Rights Reserved.
12 Financial Management 12-1 Financial Planning
Copyright McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005 Legislative Mandate Fiscal Policy and the AD-AS Model Expansionary and Contractionary Fiscal Policy Financing.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Johann Fedderke & Zeljko Bogetic
1 Trends in services for disabled children Carol Robinson SWALD.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INTERREG IIC Community Initiative concerning Transnational Co-operation on Spatial Planning
Experience in Final Reporting from INTERREG III B “Castle Tomorrow” project perspective Marika Rudzite, Project coordinator (Head of Investment and Development.
BALTICOM - BALTIC Transport Communication and Regional Development Klaipeda, 6 to 8 September rd Project Meeting.
Национальная процедура одобрения и регистрации проектов (программ) международной технической помощи (исключая представление информации об организации и.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
Financial Plan & Budgeting Welcome.
Northern Periphery Programme Advice to Lead partners for final reports Lead Partner Seminar 18th September 2013 Scandic Hotel, Skellefteå, Sweden.
INTERREG IIIB project „RAIL BALTICA” Final Conference 10 January 2008 RAIL BALTICA.
Part-financed by the European Union The Baltic Sea Region Programme by the Joint Technical Secretariat BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme.
Part II - Orientation for new project Lead Partners and Financial Officer Christopher Parker, Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 24th- 25th March, 2015,
INTERREG II C Baltic Sea Region Supporting Spatial Planning in the BSR Workshop on Environmental Information in the Baltic Sea Region Hamburg
ESIF Open Data Platform
BANK PROFITABILITY (BP)
Presentation transcript:

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 1 Report about financial management of the INTERREG IIC BSR programme Looking at the work from a Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 2 1. Program level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 1. Programme level perspective Programme composition

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 3 CORRESPONDENCE with the projects > s received/sent = 55.5 average per project (Thomas Weber of JFB only) 1. Program level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 1. Programme level perspective Checking process

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 4 1. Program level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 1. Programme level perspective source: ERDF table, Bank statements Payments

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 5 1. Program level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 1. Programme level perspective source: Database Budget lines and spending pattern

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 6 1. Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 2. Time specific perspective Duration of the reporting periods

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 7 1. Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 2. Time specific perspective Payment intensity by year source: ERDF table Distribution of payments by year

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 8 1. Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 3. Country specific perspective Spending pattern by country

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 9 1. Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective 4. Measure specific perspective Spending pattern by measure

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective Composition of reporting mistakes

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective source: Programme Assessment Sheets How accurate the projects reported (by period)

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage Programme level perspective 2. Time specific perspective 3. Country specific perspective 4. Measure specific perspective 5. Evaluating perspective Quality of the progress reports and/or co- operation between the projects and JFB/CS

INTERREG II C BSR Copenhagen, May 2002Thomas WeberPage 13 BSR INTERREG II C is still accessible on our homepage: