The Failed Political Economy of Socialism Peter Boettke Econ 828/Fall September
On Reading Hayek Who is his audience? The intellectual elite in the democratic west What does he treat as given? The essential correctness of: Smith’s invisible hand theory of cooperation and coordination within markets The scientific contribution of methodological individualism --- marginalism and subjectivism The Misesian argument on the impossibility of rational economic calculation under socialism What does he argue? The intellectual left had misleadingly believed that they had discredited Smith by highlighting the problems with monopoly and business cycles, and ignoring the modifications to classical doctrine that were made by marginalism and subjectivism in theoretical economics. Because they ignored these modifications to the doctrine they failed to understand Mises’s damaging critique of the socialist project. Socialism wouldn’t be abandoned therefore, but instead would be pursued with a vigor even in those countries which valued political freedom, such as the democratic west. The unintended consequence of this pursuit would be economic depravation and political tyranny. False interpretation of capitalist development False application of war planning to peacetime How successful was he in communicating his message? Ideological icon Analytically ignored
Hayek’s Contribution to Public Choice Since Hayek assumes benevolent intentions does that preclude him from making a contribution to public choice theorizing? Choice and Consequences within the political process Interest groups and the concentration of benefits and dispersed costs Hayek and Arrow on the limits of agreement Hayek and the logic of comparative advantage in discretionary power
Hayek’s Contribution to Economics Market economy as an information processing system as opposed to strictly an incentive system for allocating resources efficiently Use of existing knowledge and the discovery of new knowledge Cognition and Epistemic direction in economic research Subjectivism, context (time and place) and learning Methods and methodology Abuse of Reason project Science and Ideology Fatal Conceit versus Humility
Conclusion Socialism is incompatible with: Economic progress Political Freedom Democratic decision making Rule of law Liberalism requires a reinvigorated defense after socialism: Beyond wooden conceptions of laissez faire International Federalism Competition as a discovery procedure in the market, politics and life