JSR Review Process April 9 2013 Patrick Curran, Mike Milinkovich, Heather Vancura, Bruno Souza.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Project Management IPM (Without IPPD) Intermediate Concepts of CMMI Project meets the organization Author: Kiril Karaatanasov
Advertisements

Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR™) The Systematic Review Data Repository (SRDR™) was developed by the Tufts Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC),
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
KM3NeT, , Pylos © FIM-NewLearning 2007 KM3NeT Management & Reporting Dr. Roland Klein Project Office KM3NeT
Project Plans CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.
Enhancement Request Process Improvements Update
When will our bugs be fixed? When will our new features be added? When will the next release come out? Is my server up-to-date? Users Committers Program.
Human Resources Office of 1 Job Classification System Redesign Information Session Health Care and Animal Care October 28, 2014.
Implementation of Project Governance at the Center Level
Vex Release Review | © 2012 by Vex committers, made available under the EPL v1.0 Visual Editor for XML 1.0 Release and Graduation Review Florian Thienel.
© 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1 August 15th, 2012 BP & IA Team.
INCOSE.ORG MIGRATION SharePoint 2013 Presented by Betty Morimoto.
1 Vendor RFI - Event User Guide. 2 Minimum System Requirements Internet connection - Modem, ISDN, DSL, T1. Your connection speed determines your access.
HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Consolidated CDA Templates for Clinical Notes, Release 2 – US Realm HL7 Balloting Process August 12, 2013.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Open Source Workshop1 IBM Software Group Working with Apache Tuscany A Hands-On Workshop Luciano Resende Haleh.
Compliance Monitoring Audit Tutorial Version 1.0 April 2013.
Full Process: From Application to Finalization
1 Lender Development Program Requirement Understanding Document September 17, 2008.
Dr. Nikos Houssos| National Documentation Centre / NHRF European Network of National Contact Points for Research Infrastructures moving forward The CERIF-based.
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Reporting Guidelines (FP5) Karen Fabbri Scientific Officer Natural & Technological Hazards DG Research European Commission Brussels
Delivering Knowledge for Health Annette Thain. Delivering Knowledge for Health Enable communities and projects set up and manage their own websites or.
® © 2009 Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc. Starting an Interoperability Experiment David Arctur, OGC Director, Interoperability Programs December 8, 2009.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
1 Technical & Business Writing (ENG-315) Muhammad Bilal Bashir UIIT, Rawalpindi.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Guidelines for ENSCONET partners in the use of the e-forum.
Sponsored by the National Science Foundation Substrate Working Group GENI Engineering Conference 4 Miami, FL Peter O’Neil April 1,
© 2002 IBM Corporation Confidential | Date | Other Information, if necessary PTP 2.1 Release Review October 29, 2008.
© 2002 IBM Corporation Confidential | Date | Other Information, if necessary June, 2011 Made available under the Eclipse Public License v Mobile.
ARIP Technical Committee Convener Call 07 April
DevelopersCommitters Users I’m getting the following exception…. Anybody have any clue why??? +1, I like that idea… Source & Binary Code Repository Bug.
1 Adopt a JSR (Full Presentation) Martijn Verburg James Gough On behalf of the LJC and the global JUG program Thanks to SouJava.
Team working in distributed environments M253 Communicating, Cooperating & Collaborating on Line Faculty of Computer Studies Arab Open University Kuwait.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
©2009 ifanos c&p / Hoffmann&Reif. All rights reserved for InWEnt Capacity Building International 20 September 2010 | | Slide: 1 The iDRM Management Platform.
School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
IS2210: Systems Analysis and Systems Design and Change Twitter:
PMC xx/xxxx Project Title & Project Code Presenter:
AutoDESA Presentation Project Documentation October 2005.
Program Assessment User Session Experts (PAUSE) Information Sessions: RSS & Subscription Services October , 2006.
ESSRT In-Process Review September 10, Agenda 1.Work Completed Till Date 2.Scope of future activities and deliverables 2.
Publishing Services Bureau Web Communications Services Tips for managing the publication process Communications Workshop October 23, 2003.
Ideas for the SPDX™ WG 1. Onboarding New Participants SPDX™ WG need to have a plan for onboarding new participating companies. Example:  I am Company.
Get Connected through the My Oracle Support Community Lynn Pionkowski Sr Regional Support Advocate
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
How to complete and submit a Final Report through Mobility Tool+ Technical guidelines Authentication, Completion and Submission 1 Antonia Gogaki IT Officer.
| 1 EBSCOadmin EBSCO Support EDS Wiki Renata Wlodarczyk | EBSCO.
Quarterly Geo/SIG Coordinator Webinar June 25, 2014.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
NPA eMS application – Project Information Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
1 April 14, Starting New Open Source Software Projects William Cohen NCSU CSC 591W April 14, 2008.
1 Putting the Community back into the JCP Your Java User Group JCP Party! Contact with any Location, Date.
How to complete and submit a Final Report through
TOP project – STATUS UPDATE & Workflow demo
Global Grid Forum GridForge
Introduction This seminar is intended to give people an overall view of the capabilities of the Scientific Programme Management System (SPMS), to explain.
BioMedBridges – Work Packages 2 & 12
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSAL.
CHAPTER 4 PROPOSAL.
Teneo Ganymede Simultaneous Release Graduation Review
DSDP Mobile Tools for Java 1
Eclipse IP Due Diligence
Presentation transcript:

JSR Review Process April Patrick Curran, Mike Milinkovich, Heather Vancura, Bruno Souza

2 Agenda Goals Information to be gathered Implementation notes Issues Questions, discussion, next steps

3 Goals

4 Define a formal template for a JSR Review process analogous to that used in Eclipse. Spec Leads would fill this out at defined stages during the life of the JSR. Provide EC members with information (in a standardized form) to allow them to judge the health of a JSR as they vote it through the various stages. Focus more on how the EG is following the process (in particular, on how they are meeting their transparency and participation obligations) than on the technical details. Can also be used for Spec Lead presentations to the EC. – We provide verbal guidelines for these, but Spec Leads seldom follow them faithfully.

5 Information to be gathered

6 About this JSR What is the scope of this JSR? Provide a very high level summary (one slide only) of what the JSR plans to achieve.

7 Introduction Background - where this fits in. Provide the historical and organizational context. – What’s the target platform? Included in a platform? Follow on from a previous JSR? NOTE: much of this information is covered by the JSR submission form. BUG: the original JSR submission form is not always updated to reflect changes over the life of the JSR. – You often cannot even tell by looking at the JSR form what component JSRs are included in a platform! – If we fix this by requiring updated JSR reviews, fold the results back to the JSR page at jcp.org.

8 Justification Why do this JSR? What's the need? How does it fit in to the Java ecosystem? Is the idea ready for standardization?

9 Market/competition Are there other projects/products in this space? – Provide pointers How will this JSR complement or compete with them?

10 History List the significant dates in the history of the JSR. – When submitted? – What stages reached? – What drafts of the Spec published? We have this info in our database. Need to supply to the Spec Lead automatically.

11 Technical scope and features Provide a high-level summary of technical features. – No more than 2 or 3 slides.

12 The Expert Group [How diverse is the EG? Is it representative of the ecosystem?] Who is on the EG and who do they represent? – Industry, JUGs, individuals, open-source groups, academia, etc. – We have this info in our database. Need to supply to the Spec Lead automatically. How does the EG operate? How often does it meet and how (teleconferences, online, f2f?) What collaboration tools are used to facilitate EG communications?

13 Other deliverables Other than Spec, RI, and TCK are you delivering, for example: – Additional documentation? – User's guide? – Sample code? – FAQ? – Other artifacts?

14 Publicity Provide links to FAQs, tutorials, conference proceedings, etc.

15 Collaboration with other community groups Are you working with other community groups or organizations? If so, describe the collaboration activities and the results (with URLs where appropriate.)

16 Implementations How many implementations (apart from the RI) exist? – Provide URLs.

17 Schedule Indicate the expected schedule to completion of the JSR, with milestones and JSR stages.

18 IP flow Provide pointers to the licenses for the the Spec, RI, and TCK. – We have this info in our database. Need to supply to the Spec Lead automatically. How are you handling contributions from non JCP members? What Terms of Use apply to your collaboration tools? Do you have a Contributor Agreement? Any legal issues or concerns?

19 RI and TCK development How are you developing the RI and TCK? If collaboratively (through an open-source project) – How many committers and who? – Distinguish between contributions from the Spec Lead, EG members, and “outsiders”. Is the RI available for public download? (If so, provide URL.) Is the TCK available for public download? (If so, provide URL.) Do you have a source-code repository? (If so, provide URL.)

20 Participation and transparency Provide a pointer to the JSR page on JCP.org – [Reviewers: check that is this up to date. Does it point to the JSR’s project page and/or explain how to participate?] Provide a pointer to the “JSR project website" (eg, on Java.net.) – [Reviewers: how much content is here (how many pages)? Is the online project easy to navigate? Does it clearly explain how to participate?].

21 Adopt-a-JSR Are you participating in the Adopt-a-JSR program? If not, why not? If so, what kind of contributions/help have you received and from whom/which JUGs? – Be specific/provide metrics.

22 Mailing lists or forums How are you communicating with the public and how can they communicate with you? Provide pointers to public mailing list(s) and/or forum(s) Total number of messages, threads? Total number of participants (EG members, non-EG members?) How many messages per month (from Spec Lead, EG members, and non-EG members?)

23 Issue tracker Total number of issues? How many in each state (open, closed, deferred, etc?) Average number of issues logged per month? Average number of issues resolved per month? How many different people logged them? How does this break down between Spec Lead, EG members, and non-EG members?

24 Document archive Provide a pointer to your document archive. Are meeting minutes and materials published? What other materials are available for download? Total number of files available for download? Average number of new files available for for download each month?

25 Other transparency and participation metrics Provide information – including metrics – about any additional transparency and participation mechanisms you use.

26 Implementation notes

27 Implementation notes Create a single template to be used (possibly in subset form) for JSR submission, Public Review, Final Release, and for any intermediate Spec Lead presentations to the EC. Provide the template in both document and presentation forms. Wherever we have data in our database, supply this to the Spec Lead for copying into the template.

28 Issues

29 Issues This is a lot of data to ask for. How can we persuade Spec Leads to cooperate? – Public recognition? – Tie to Star Spec Lead program?

30 Questions, discussion, next steps

Thank You! Thank you!