CONNECTING DOTS AND SEEING THE WHOLE: OUTCOME MAPS AS A NEXUS FOR DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Advertisements

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
MARCH 26, 2014 TASKSTREAM TASKFORCE UPDATE. WORKGROUP OUTCOMES Workgroup training summary What the workgroup learned regarding template and workspace.
Model Curriculum Maps 2012 Curriculum Summit November 13 – 14, 2012 Julia Phelps and Karen White Raising the Rigor of Teaching and Learning.
Are you Using Technology to Assess Learning or Assessing Learning to Improve Technology? Marilee J. Bresciani, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Postsecondary.
Strike while the iron is hot! Bringing Information Literacy into Campus Assessment Efforts (some rights reserved Scott Adams) Jeanne Davidson & Anne-Marie.
Coordinating Center Overview November 18, 2010 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Healthy Heart Project Initiative: Year 1 Meeting 1.
Process and Report Guidelines Concordia University Wisconsin Spring 2008.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Curriculum Renewal in the School of Business. Business School Approach What are the characteristics and capabilities you want Graduates from your Program.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
© Loyalist Certification Services, 2009 Certified Process Design Engineer (CPDE) ®
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
ASSESSMENT WHERE WE ARE AND WHERE WE ARE GOING…...
Mapping Student Learning Outcomes
Curriculum Mapping Kim Anderson ASLO Subcommittee Chair Spring 2011.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
8th Sakai Conference4-7 December 2007 Newport Beach Teaching and Learning Community Gathering Let’s talk Teaching with Sakai.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Assessment Planning. Introduction Assessment is essential to creating a culture of continuous improvement – It provides input for the enhancement.
University Web Portals From accessibility to accountability and life-long connectivity. Paul Kim, Ph.D. Chief Technology Officer Stanford University School.
1 CONCERT 2004 Power to the Librarian Delivering Transparency in the Serials Market Doug McMillan Managing Director Bowker UK Ltd.
Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Addressing Six Critical Questions of Senior Administrators Using WEAVEonline Jeanne Butler,
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Institutional Effectiveness Building on MUSC Excellence.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
LINC Principal Preparation Program Continuous Improvement Process Symposium May 27, 2014 Parke Hotel, Bloomington, Illinois.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
A TALE OF TWO METHODS: COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF FACE- TO-FACE AND ONLINE LEARNING National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2011: Virtual.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
January 26, 2011 Careers Conference, Madison, Wisconsin Robin Nickel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Worldwide Instructional Design System.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Strategies for Conducting Curriculum Review
Curriculum Renewal in the Faculty of the Professions: Overview.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PLAN/REPORT By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Select Slides… Spring 2013 Training Strengthening Teaching and Learning through the Results of Your Student Assessment of Instruction (SAI) For Faculty.
Mapping: Many Uses, Great Value Presented by Dr. Kathleen Fenton August 19, 2010 Prepared by Jean Yerian, WEAVE.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
| wilmu.edu Drexel University Annual Conference on Teaching & Learning Assessment Dr. Ed Guthrie Dr. Bonnie Kirkpatrick September, 2015.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
SAS Curriculum Mapping Trainer (SAS CMT) October 2011.
The Benefit of Transparent and Documented Outcome Linkages in Student Learning “A Guide on How to Eliminate Needing Lots of Coffee to Do It!” Jennifer.
Assessment of Advising Linda Taylor, PhD, LPC, NCC September 9, 2011.
Nuts and Bolts: Functional Variations of Assessment and Evaluation Barbara Hornum, PhD Director, Drexel Center for Academic Excellence Associate Professor,
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
CONVOCATION AUGUST 14, 2014 THE LOOK AND FEEL OF TASKSTREAM.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Colorado Community Colleges Online
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Mary Moser Learning Commons Librarian
Assessing Student Learning
Director of Assessment
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
SACS Working Group Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement August 31, 2011.
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
SACS Working Group Continual Commitment to Accreditation and Educational Improvement October 6, 2011.
Elizabeth Crawford The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Presentation transcript:

CONNECTING DOTS AND SEEING THE WHOLE: OUTCOME MAPS AS A NEXUS FOR DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2012 Yuerong Sweetland, PhD – Director of Assessment, Franklin University

Presentation Overview  Why  What  Process and Template  Challenges  Sustainability  Ownership  Questions & Answers

Background (2)

Definition: Outcome Mapping “…a two-dimensional data recording tool that facilitates the assignment of…outcomes… to core program courses… while identifying the level at which the outcomes are addressed in each course (at the intersection of columns and rows).” Veltri, Natasha F.; Webb, Harold W.; Matveev, Alexei G.; Zapatero, Enrique G. (2011, March 22). Curriculum mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS curriculum The Free Library. (2011). Retrieved May 22, 2012 from mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS...- a http:// mapping as a tool for continuous improvement of IS...- a

Why Mapping?  Curriculum evaluation and improvement  Who is doing what  Alignment with goals  Effectiveness and efficiency  Facilitating teaching and learning

Who Benefits? Scope, sequence, balance Coherence Gap Program Interpret assessment findings Accreditation documentation Assessment & Accreditation Faculty Students Staff (SLC, Advisors) Communication between and among Stakeholders

Status: National  “Far too many institutions have established learning outcomes …. without ensuring that these goals are continuously mapped to, and reinforced by, the teaching and learning process throughout the curriculum ….” Peter Ewell (2009), Assessment, Accountability, and Improvement: Revisiting the Tension.

Status: Franklin University  Franklin University  Centralized academic model  Challenges

Franklin University Outcome Map Template Outcome 1Outcome 2Outcome 3Outcome 4 Course 1 Course 2 Other experiences (1) (e.g., exams, internships) Other experiences (2) Key: "I" = Introduced; "R" = Reinforced; "A" = Assessment Evidence Collected

Levels of Connection First time an outcome is introduced (e.g. Remembering, understanding) Introduced Applying Analyzing Evaluating Creating Reinforced

Mapping Process Draft Maps Gather & Analyze Evidence Discussion Make Improvement

Challenges: Sustainability  Periodical update  Outcomes  Courses  Connections  Established during the design stage  LMS?  CMS?  AMS?

Challenges: Ownership  Faculty ownership  Who collects and helps maintain maps  Assessment Office  Institutional Research Office  Institutional Effectiveness Office  Accreditation Office

Questions or Comments? Dr. Yuerong Sweetland Connecting dots and seeing the whole: Outcome maps as a nexus for data- based decision making