Curriculum Mapping Kim Anderson ASLO Subcommittee Chair Spring 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Whats Going On? Five Year Reviews and Assessment: Sharing Experiences so Far Ruth Guzley, Mike Ward and Bill Loker, AURA.
Advertisements

SLO Assessment Departmental Tools and Examples from the Field Sacramento City College Fall Flex Workshop 8/21/08 8/21/08Presenters: Alan Keys Faculty Research.
Developing Course-Level Student-Learning Outcomes (SLOs)
THE DIVERGENT BUT COMPLEMENTARY PATHS OF COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation At the 2004 AAHE.
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
Department Plans for Assessment of Student Learning Teachers Talking February 16, 2011.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
2005 CELT Conference1 Strategies from the Assessment Trenches: A Self-Help Clinic presented by AURA.
Making Assessment Meaningful: Using Assessment Results to Improve Student Learning Dr. Elizabeth Wemlinger
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
GEO Course Mapping Dr. Mary Menzel - Germanson Director Myna Frestedt Support Analyst
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Curriculum Mapping.
Mapping Student Learning Outcomes
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
CONNECTING DOTS AND SEEING THE WHOLE: OUTCOME MAPS AS A NEXUS FOR DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2012.
Work Session: Mapping Template for Higher Education ICIU facilitated by Dr. Heidi Hayes Jacobs - March 5, 2015.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Curriculum Design. A Learner Centered Approach May, 2007 By. Rhys Andrews.
Assessing Progress on the Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Quality Enhancement Committee Meeting Department of Academic Effectiveness and Assessment.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost Gainesville, FL THE BASICS OF STUDENT LEARNING.
R EFINING Y OUR A SSESSMENT P LAN : S ESSION 1 Goals and Learning Outcomes Ryan Smith and Derek Herrmann University Assessment Services (UAS)
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Curriculum Mapping November Types of Curriculum Recommended – Standards as defined by experts in their field. Written – State standards, local goals.
Preparing Health Educators to Assets Map: The interface between assessment training and the practice of building community capacity through assets Micky.
Curriculum Mapping November Today’s Agenda Pre-Survey Introduction of CM Team Purpose What is Curriculum? Why Map? CM Concepts Tentative Timeline.
Student learning outcomes Training Subcommittee University Assessment Committee University of Toledo
ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DEGREE PROGRAMS CSULA Workshop Anne L. Hafner May 12, 2005.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Welcome to Curriculum Mapping… The attendee will understand the purpose of curriculum mapping, with a focus on the alignment of instruction with desired.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Department of Secondary Education Program Assessment Report What We Assessed: Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and CA State Teaching Performance.
Program Review A systematic method of analyzing components of an instructional program, including instructional practices, aligned and enacted curriculum,
Personal Use of your SLOs Collin College, August 2009 Matthew Ware Coulter, PhD Professor of History Kathleen Fenton, PhD Quality Enhancement, Outcomes.
S LOs What is New and Due in the Assessment Process: A focus on continued improvement in academic year NOTE: For reference, hyperlinks to resources.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Program Review Training 2015 Petr Lensky and Amanda Corcoran.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
TUTORIAL: USING IS MAPPING FOR CURRICULUM IMPROVEMENT AND ACCREDITATION John H. Reynolds George Nezlek School of CIS, Grand Valley State University Allendale,
Office of Service Quality
HOW INSTITUTIONS MAKE MEANINGFUL CHANGE WITH OUTCOME ASSESSMENT MARCH 21, 2014 MIRAMAR COLLEGE: A CULTURE OF IMPROVEMENT.
Integrated Learning Objectives: David Juergens, M.B.A. Coordinator for Instructional Design, Assessment, and Educational Technology Oklahoma State University.
CURRICULUM MAPPING. WORKSHOP LEARNING OUTCOME PARTICIPANTS WILL USE A CURRICULUM MAP TO DEMONSTRATE HOW STUDENT PROGRESS TO ACHIEVE PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Facult Retreat January 2010 Graham Benton, WASC Coordinator, Accreditation Liaison Officer
Foreign language SLOs Rafael Arias and June Miyasaki March 11, 2008.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Support for Program Review
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Preparing for the NWCCU 10-year Self-Study
Curriculum Analysis Tool
Increase Your Yield: Scaffolding Outreach using Curriculum Mapping
Preparing Future Faculty/FaCET Assessment Session
Assessment Presentation
به نام خدا ارزشيابی برنامه درسی
Curriculum Mapping Best Practices in Jill Allison Kern, PhD
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Support for Program Review
Department Chair: Liz Brown Date of Presentation: 01/20/17
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum Mapping Kim Anderson ASLO Subcommittee Chair Spring 2011

What is it? Comprehensive scheme – process of curriculum analysis – Examine the curriculum – Create an organized sequence of curricular units Presented as a visual graphic/matrix of alignment between two elements and degree of correlation – Support by required courses – Levels of learning engagement – Increases focus on teaching and learning—essential concerns for institution

Generic example  Items 

What Does It Do? Provides helpful design information about a program’s core curricular experiences – Leads to greater depth and breadth of learning – Appreciable connections in learning – Identify overlaps and gaps – Identify needs and demands – Unity and significance of concepts and skills Demonstrates how curriculum alignment is accomplished within a program – Courses to program – Sequential courses within an educational pathway – Increases cumulative effect of learning Demonstrates curriculum alignment throughout the instructional sector of the institution – Programs to institution (mission) Method of assessment of teaching & learning

Why Do It? Describes the degree of alignment and relationship between various curricular levels – Identify gaps and overlaps – Identify needs and demands – Identify level of learning engagement Demonstrates the curriculum’s organization and structure – Reduces redundancy – Increases efficiency Use for various levels – Courses to program – Programs to institution – Sequential courses and learning experiences in an educational pathway Standard assessment process for curriculum and SLOs – Objective evidence of analysis for decision-making

Who Does It? Department Faculty – SLO Officer Stakeholders that may contribute – Students – Advisory Committee – Other discipline faculty

How To Begin? Template Insert items horizontally Insert items vertically Determine alignment and correlation between the elements Identify degree of relationship between the elements – Introduced, Developed, Mastered (for courses)

Sample Course to Program 1.Program SLO2. Program SLO3. Program SLO4. Program SLO 1. Required Course (SLOs) I I & D D 2. Required Course (SLOs) I M M 3. Required Course (SLOs) M D & M 4. Required Course (SLOs) D & M D 5. Required Course (SLOs) 6. Required Course (SLOs) D I D M

Sample Program to Institution 1.EMP2. EMP3. EMP4. EMPIPLO 1IPLO 2IPLO 3IPLO 4 1. Program SLO X X 2. Program SLO X X 3. Program SLO X X 4. Program SLO X X 5. Program SLO X X X

Sample Sequential Courses Pathway Element Course A SLO 1 SLO 2 SLO 3 I & D I Course B SLO 1 SLO 2 SLO 3 D D I Course C SLO 1 SLO 2 SLO 3 SLO 4 SLO 5 D D & M D M I & D Course D SLO 1 SLO 2 SLO 3 SLO 4 M D & M M D Course E SLO 1 SLO 2 SLO 3 SLO 4 SLO 5 M M D & M M

How To Conclude? Analyze results based on evidence vertically and horizontally Investigate organization of units and levels of learning Seek reasonable connections and learning development throughout Take action based on evidence Systematic change based on greater understanding Process not an event