Portico: A New Electronic Archiving Service Bruce Heterick Director, Library Relations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current State of Play in Digital Preservation Peter B. Hirtle Cornell University Library Society of American Archivists.
Advertisements

Seize the E-Journal: Models for Archiving Medical Library Association Symposium Washington, D.C. May 26, 2004 Eileen Gifford Fenton The Electronic-Archiving.
Archiving Electronic Journals: A Developmental Approach Eileen Fenton The JISC/CNI Meeting, July 2004.
The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
PubMed Central ANCHASL Spring Meeting April 1, 2005 Robert James Associate Director of Public Services Duke University.
Briefing Session Digital Preservation: An Overview Prepared by: Fiona Bennett Head, Rights and New Business Development UKSG Annual Conference,
Digital Preservation and Portico: An Overview Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico Council on Libraries Dartmouth February 1, 2007.
E-Books, E-Journals, Multimedia: New Approaches to Publishing Rachel Yee General Manager of EBSCO Information Services for Taiwan, Hong Kong, & Macao.
Portico A New Electronic Journal Archiving Service Toni Tracy Director, Publisher Relations 2006 Ingenta Publisher Forum June 6, 2006.
The 3-Legged Stool: How JSTOR Balances the Needs of Scholars, Librarians, and Publishers in Maintaining a Sustainable Not-For- Profit Enterprise ACRL/NY.
The Problem: An Introduction to Preservation, Trust and Continuing Access for e-Journals Neil Beagrie Charles Beagrie Ltd With thanks to Randy Kiefer (CLOCKSS)
Case Studies in New Models of Collaboration: CANADA’S UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Carole Moore Chief Librarian, University of Toronto Chief Librarian, University.
Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Preserving Electronic Scholarly Resources: Issues and Opportunities Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico Canadian Research Knowledge Network Réseau.
History and Overview of Portico A New Electronic Archiving Service Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico CNI December 6, 2005.
E-journals: opportunities and challenges Bharati Banerjee.
Trends in Online Publishing New Pricing Models for 2003 as Online Dominates Print John Ben DeVette Asst. Vice President EBSCO Information Services November.
BY OBAJE, ALFRED MICHAEL (DBA., B.SC., M.L.S.) MEDICAL SCIENCES LIBRARIAN 1 Library E-resources Sensitization and Demonstrations for 400 Level Medical.
CLOCKSS, LOCKSS & Barrels of Stuff: Libraries and Publishers share the Task Peter Burnhill EDINA, University of Edinburgh ICOLC, Rome, 13 October 2006.
Bruce Heterick, Director of Library Relationswww.jstor.org CONCERT 2004 Taipei, Taiwan November 11, 2004.
Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). Bepress history Started 10 years ago by University of California at Berkeley faculty to publish scholarly journals.
Publishing in Perpetuity The importance of Digital Preservation for Publishers in Science, Medicine and Technology Drs Eefke Smit International STM Association.
Social Science Data and ETDs: Issues and Challenges Joan Cheverie Georgetown University Myron Gutmann ICPSR – University of Michigan Austin McLean ProQuest.
Digital Preservation and Library Periodicals Expenses: Eileen Fenton and Roger SchonfeldCNI December 9, 2003* Variance between Non-Subscription Costs for.
Portico An Electronic Archiving Service Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico What Works In Archiving? Society for Scholarly Publishing November 15,
LOCKSS/CLOCKSS and Portico What does that content look like? Coalition for Networked Information Fall 2006 Task Force Meeting December 4, 2006.
UK LOCKSS Alliance Today’s scholarly content, secured for tomorrow Adam Rusbridge UK LOCKSS Alliance Coordinator EDINA, University of Edinburgh 19 th October.
E-Resources Subscription for the University System: An initiative from UGC&INFLIBNET By Dr. T. A.V. Murthy
Archiving What is it and why should it be important to me? John Shaw Director, Publishing Technologies SAGE Publications, U.S.
Librarian Perceptions of the Function of the Academic Library: Summer-Fall 2006 Kevin Guthrie Roger C. Schonfeld December 4, 2006.
Publisher’s Perspective: Digitization of print resources, and archiving of digital resources Judy Best, June 13, 2006.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
Current Scholarship Program Today’s scholarship is coming to JSTOR Mary Rose Muccie Director, Current Journals Program JSTOR
JSTOR Current Scholarship Program: Current Issues and e-Books Ken DiFiore, MLS Associate Director Outreach & Participation Services JSTOR | Portico.
The Scholarly Journal Archive TAIPEI 19 OCTOBER, 2005.
Duke University Press Vendor Relations Session ICOLC Spring 2008 Meeting April 15, 2008 Donna Blagdan, Journals Marketing Manager Kim Steinle, Library.
ACS PUBLICATIONS Over a Century of Essential Chemistry on Your Desktop H I G H Q U A L I T Y. H I G H I M P A C T. A C S P U B L I C A T I O N S Robert.
1 Keeping stuff safe: how can libraries maintain their e-journal collections in the long-term? Richard Gartner King's College London International conference.
The International e-Depot to Guarantee Permanent Access to Scholarly Publications Marcel Ras Tartu, June 2012.
Stewardship and preservation of e-journals: what is the role of the academic library? Lisa Otty, EDINA University of Edinburgh Where is the Library? NoWAL.
Faculty Survey 2009: The Format Transition for Scholarly Works Ross Housewright ALA Annual /26/2010.
Stephanie Orphan Director of Publications, Portico Beyond Serials—Lessons Learned and Future Directions for e-Book Preservation.
Portico An Electronic Archiving Service Ken DiFiore, MLS Associate Director of Library Relations, Portico Orbis-Cascade October 6, 2006.
JSTOR’s Perspective Carol MacAdam NASIG 2011, June 3 Collaborating for Sustainable Scholarship: Models that Serve Librarians, Publishers and Scholars.
JISC Collections 01/11/2015 | ICOLC Paris 2009 | Slide 1 Comparative Study of e-Journal Archiving Solutions Safeguarding post cancellation access to e-journals.
Digital Preservation Ontario Consortium of University Libraries (OCUL) Caitlin Tillman OCUL IR Chair With notes from Kathy Scardellato, OCUL Executive.
ELSEVIER SCIENCE & DIGITAL ARCHIVING ICOLC, Nashville Presented by: Karen Hunter Title: Senior Vice President, Strategy Date: September 20, 2002.
UKSG 2006 Archiving scholarly material Gordon Tibbitts President Blackwell Publishing, Inc. April 4, 2006.
Helping Librarians Make a Secure Transition to e-Resources: Understanding Portico COLD Central Michigan University September 25, 2008 David Fritsch Assistant.
March 15, 2015 S. M. Zabed Ahmed Professor and Chair, Department of Information Science and Library Management, University of Dhaka and Librarian (Acting),
Digital Archiving at Elsevier Joep Verheggen, ScienceDirect ICSTI Conference, London, 17 May 2004.
CDL and Portico Ivy Anderson California Digital Library ICOLC Spring 2006 Philadelphia.
The International e-Depot Digital Archiving at the national library of the Netherlands Erik Oltmans Head, Acquisitions & Processing Division National Library.
From ePrints to eSPIDA: Digital Preservation at the University of Glasgow William J Nixon, Service Development DAEDALUS, University of Glasgow DPC: Digital.
Institutional Repositories: the DSpace Experience Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
ACS PUBLICATIONS Over a Century of Essential Chemistry on Your Desktop H I G H Q U A L I T Y. H I G H I M P A C T. A C S P U B L I C A T I O N S Andrew.
Summer 2007 HEG Meeting CAPES Vendor Showcase September 13, 2007 Michael Schluter – Director of Library / Consortia Sales
From Access to Archive Transforming Scholars Portal into an E-Journal Archive.
Portico’s “d-collections” preservation service Stephanie Orphan Positive trends in sustainability? Emerging approaches to archiving commercial databases.
Outline ‘Urgent action’ statement ARL/CLIR survey Portico LOCKSS/CLOCKSS An Australian JSTOR?
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Digital Commons digitalcommons.unl.edu. Digital Commons is: an “institutional repository” (IR) a resource for scholarly communication an opportunity for.
Libraries in the digital age Collection & preservation for generational access part two The LOCKSS Program.
L LAPI l November 18, 2008 JSTOR and Aluka Michael Spinella Executive Director JSTOR November, 2008.
Digital Archiving Solutions for a Small Library NASIG Louisville, KY.
Electronic Resources Collection Development Policy : Need and Challenges.
Publishing from the Library: New Roles for Libraries in Scholarly Communications David Ruddy Cornell University Library September, 2004.
CLOCKSS Controlled LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) CEIRC Datasets Coordinators Forum Melbourne 4 February 2008.
Trust and eJournals.
Presentation transcript:

Portico: A New Electronic Archiving Service Bruce Heterick Director, Library Relations

Digital Preservation: Greatly Desired Teaching and research rely upon access to scholarship of past generations. Preservation of print resources lay primarily with libraries, but today’s scholarship is increasingly published electronically. Both publishers and libraries face the problem of the long-term preservation of electronic information resources for future access.

Importance of Library Role: Ensuring That Electronic Scholarly Research Journals Are Carefully Archived And Available For The Long Term

Concept of a “comprehensive digital archive of scholarly electronic journals” Initial Impression

Concept of a “comprehensive digital archive of scholarly electronic journals” Perceived Value

Introduction Mission Statement - to preserve scholarly literature published in electronic form and to ensure that these materials remain available to future generations of scholars, researchers, and students. Structure - a not-for-profit organization with a mission and singular focus to provide a centralized, permanent archive of electronic scholarly journals. Philosophy - to be a trusted, third-party archive open to all peer-reviewed journals and one that balances the interests of libraries and publishers.

History In 2002, JSTOR initiated a project known as the Electronic-Archiving Initiative, the precursor to Portico. The goal was to facilitate the community’s transition to reliance upon electronic scholarly journals by developing a technological infrastructure and sustainable archive able to preserve scholarly e- journals. Portico was launched in 2005 by JSTOR and Ithaka, with support from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.

History In late 2005, Archive support model for publishers announced; initial group of publisher participants signed. –Currently have 23 publishers entrusting journal content –Over 5,100 titles In 2006, Archive begins to ingest and maintain e- journal content. –Initial content publicly launched in late September –Passwords provided to participating libraries for audit and verification purposes In 2006, Archive support model for libraries announced; initial group of library participants signed. –150+ committed libraries

23 Participating Publishers (as of 11 October 2006) American Anthropological Association American Institute of Physics American Mathematical Society Annual Reviews Association of Learned and Professional Societies Berkeley Electronic Press BioOne Copernicus Publications Elsevier Haworth Press Institute of Physics Publishing Johns Hopkins University Press John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery National Research Council Press (Canada) Now Publishers Oxford University Press Sage SIAM Symposium Journals Taylor & Francis Informa University of Chicago Press UK Serials Group

Approach to E-Journal Archiving Portico preserves the intellectual content of the journal, including the text, images, and limited functionality such as internal linking. “Look and feel” and publishers’ value-add features are not preserved. Publishers deliver to Portico the “source files” of electronic journals (SGML, XML, PDF, etc) shortly after initial publication. –Archiving the richest e-journal content available. –Removes any inconsistencies in e-journal content that may result from a publisher supporting multiple web- based delivery sites. –Reduces or eliminates any dependency on current web browser technology for future viewing of e-journal content.

Approach to E-Journal Archiving Managed Preservation - process is focused on long- term preservation requirements rather than immediate content access. Migration - usability maintained by migrating content to future file formats as technology evolves. Portico converts or “normalizes” the source files from publisher proprietary format to an archival format and deposits the content in the Portico repository. Use accepted standards for maintaining content and metadata: –NLM Archiving and Interchange DTD –Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS)

Archive Access Model Portico offers access to archived content to only those libraries supporting the archive financially. Access is offered only when specific trigger event conditions prevail and when titles are no longer available from the publisher or other sources. Trigger events include: –When a publisher ceases operations and titles are no longer available from any other source. –When a publisher ceases to publish and offer a title and it is not offered by another publisher or entity. –When back issues are removed from a publisher’s offering and are not available elsewhere. –Upon catastrophic failure by publisher delivery platform for a sustained period of time.

Archive Access Model For all libraries supporting Portico, trigger events initiate campus-wide access regardless of whether a library previously subscribed to the publisher’s offering. Libraries may also rely upon the Portico archive for post-cancellation or “perpetual” access, if a publisher chooses to name Portico as one of the mechanisms designated to meet this obligation. Until a trigger event or perpetual access claim, select librarians at participating libraries are granted password-controlled access for archive audit and verification purposes.

Sources of Support Publishers make a financial contribution. –An annual Supporting Publisher Contribution to fund initial conversion tools development and to defray the cost of adding new content as it is published. –Contributions are tiered and vary according to the size of the publisher’s annual journals revenue (subscription and advertising). –Annual contributions range from $250 to $75,000.

Sources of Support Libraries are asked to make an Annual Archive Support (AAS) payment to defray ongoing operations, maintenance and enhancement of the archive’s technological infrastructure, and content migrations as technology evolves. The Annual Archive Support payment is based upon a library’s total Library Materials Expenditures (LME) reflecting Portico’s role in protecting a critical component of library collections.

Annual Archive Support (AAS) Levels Individual Library Total LME AAS $25-30 million$24,000 $20-25 million$19,000 $15-20 million$17,500 $13-15 million$16,100 $11-13 million$15,200 $9-11 million$14,300 $7-9 million$13,000 $5-7 million$11,500 $4-5 million$10,000 Total LMEAAS $3-4 million$8,900 $2-3 million$7,800 $1-2 million$6,700 $750k-1 million$5,400 $ k$4,200 $ k$3,100 $ k$1,500 <$150k1% of LME

Archive Founders Savings and Consortium Savings All libraries that initiate support for Portico in 2006 and 2007 are designated “Portico Archive Founders.” Libraries that initiate Portico support in 2006 receive a 25% savings each year for five (5) years on their Annual Archive Support payment. Libraries that initiate Portico support in 2007 receive a 10% savings each year for five (5) years on their Annual Archive Support payment. Portico is also offering modest savings to consortia (5%) in order to encourage broad-based participation from libraries of all sizes in the system. –Requires executing a Letter of Understanding

Benefits to Libraries Facilitates the transition to reliance upon electronic resources. Provides a practical mechanism to address “perpetual access” needs. Shared infrastructure or “virtual stacks” reduces preservation costs system wide. May enable savings through reduced processing and storage of print resources. Provides a means of assuring access to e-resources over the long term and protects against gaps in library collections.

Bruce Heterick