BREAKING THE COAL HABIT Stefanie A. Brand, Director New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel 31 Clinton St., 11 th Floor P.O. Box 46005 Newark, N.J. 07101 Phone:973-648-2690,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
Advertisements

The Business of Clean Air: Clean Energy Opportunity in Pennsylvania’s Electric Power Sector Conrad Schneider Advocacy Director Clean Air Task Force June.
Southern Environmental Law Center Georgia Air Summit May 4, 2006.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
Regulations to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Philadelphia Diesel Difference June 18, 2007 Arleen Shulman Bureau of Air Quality, Pennsylvania.
State Line Power Station: The Harms Behind Inadequate Regulation of Coal Combustion Brian Warens
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
NRG’s Huntley Plant and a Just Transition Risks Facing Coal-Fired Generators in 2014 and Coming Years David Schlissel Director of Resource Planning Analysis.
“From Plant to Plug” A Legal and Policy Critique of 111(d) Conference of Western Attorneys General July 22, 2014 Karl R. Moor Senior Vice President &
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
China Thermal Power Efficiency Project WB support to the improvement of coal-fired power generation efficiency in China Jie Tang Energy Specialist East.
Texas Lignite Industry. Texas Lignite  Because >95% of lignite mining operations in Texas are in support of electric generation…..whatever impacts the.
Licking County Energy Summit Pat O’Loughlin Buckeye Power Powering the Future of the Region’s Economy.
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Robert L. Burns, Jr., Esq. Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC August 1, 2013 Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal Combustion for Electrical.
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
1 Regulatory Concepts Related to the Control of NOx and SOx From Fossil- fired Electric Generating Units Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
Overview of Environmental Regulations and Drought Impacts in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT July 13, 2015.
American Legislative Exchange Council America’s Clean Air Success Story and the Implications of Overregulation November 28, 2012 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E.,
Governor’s Conference on Energy Federal/State/Local Role in Permitting & Regulating Energy Projects October 16, 2013.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
Beyond Ozone: Integrating Clean Air & Clean Energy in the 21 st Century Bill Holman Director of State Policy Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Environmental.
Since May 2013 Select Clean Air Act Cases. U.S. v. Homer City U.S. v. Midwest Generation, LLC U.S. v. United States Steel CAA Enforcement Cases.
Chapter 25 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
Air Quality 101 Kansas Air Quality Program overview.
© Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1 Programmatic New Source Review November 2, 2005 Malcolm C. Weiss Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP 1900 Avenue.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Permits and the U.S. Acid Rain Program (ARP). Acid Rain Caused primarily by SO2 and Nox, which is generated largely by coal fired plants Harmful to trees,
Increasing the Role of Renewable Energy Sources Bill Abolt Chicago District Manager Shaw Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. May 10, 2007.
Investing in America’s Electric Future Morry Markowitz Group Director, External Affairs New Mexico Utility Shareholders Alliance October 7, 2009.
The Risks of Participating in the AMPGS Coal Plant: February 14, 2008 David Schlissel.
Introducing the Atlantic City Alternative Energy Authority ACAEA A Municipal Utilities Authority Pursuant to NJSA 40:62-12.
Clean Air Act Section 111(d) Indiana State Bar Association Utility Law Section September 4, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner IN Department.
1 Elements of a Settlement. 2 Typically, cases are resolved with: Typically, cases are resolved with: Injunctive relief Injunctive relief Civil penalties.
EPA Cooling System Regulations Hall of States Briefing February 22, 2011.
CLEAN POWER PLAN. OVERVIEW The final rule released in August 2015: Sets first-ever limits on carbon pollution from power plants Sets achievable standards.
Environmental Issues in System Planning Jim Platts – ISO New England NARUC Summer Meeting – New York City July 15, 2007.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
NACAA Fall Meeting October 2012 Innovative and Replicable Initiatives - The Colorado Clean Air/Clean Jobs Act Will Allison, Director CDPHE Air Pollution.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
Vanessa Day, Manager, NRO October 9, 2013 ACE Academy.
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSAL Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants Kerry Drake,Associate Director Air Division, US EPA, Region 9 California.
Use of Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency to Reduce Regional Haze in the West Air Innovations Conference Chicago, Illinois August 10-12, 2004 Rick.
Dependable Power. Dependable People. The mission of Santee Cooper is to be the state’s leading resource for improving the quality of life for the people.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
Progress Energy Issues Overview April 25, 2006 Don Cooke Sr. Environmental Coordinator.
Regulatory Requirements for Coal-Fired Generation in the Province of Alberta Alberta Environment and Parks October 19 th, 2015.
Clean Air Act of 1970 By Larry Toler and Austin Katz.
The Effect of Environmental Regulation upon the Electric Power Industry: A Rating Agency Perspective 23rd February 2005 At the California Public Utility.
Rules and Exceptions - The Costs of “Cheap” Coal.
Air Pollution Challenges Kentucky Coal Association April 29, 2013 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE Commissioner Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Impacts of Environmental Regulations in the ERCOT Region Dana Lazarus Planning Analyst, ERCOT January 26, 2016.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
The Electric Power Generation Association. EPGA is a regionally- focused, Pennsylvania- based trade association of electric generating companies.
111D OPTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR MISSOURI David Weiskopf Sustainable Energy Fellow Natural Resources Defense Council October 28 th.
© 2015 Haynes and Boone, LLP Overview of the EPA Clean Power Plan Suzanne Beaudette Murray February 19, 2016 Tulane Environmental Law Summit.
EPA Methane Regulations Details on the Final Rules and Summary of Impacts May 16, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
Gary J. Pendergrass, PE, RG Chair, Missouri Air Conservation Commission and Principal, GeoEngineers, Inc Missouri Air Compliance Seminar March 11,
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
The Cost of Excessive Regulation in the Coal Industry
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Department of Environmental Quality
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Presentation transcript:

BREAKING THE COAL HABIT Stefanie A. Brand, Director New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel 31 Clinton St., 11 th Floor P.O. Box Newark, N.J Phone: , Fax: Website: 1

Reducing our dependency on coal-fired generation is expensive and difficult but can be accomplished without too much economic pain. Reducing our dependency on coal-fired generation is necessary to address contributing factors to climate change and health impacts of certain pollutants. 2

New Jersey has made the transition over the last decade. Necessary to comply with Federal Clean Air Act Necessary to address health and environmental concerns 3

The entire State of New Jersey is non-attainment for 8-hour ozone standard Source: New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection 4

Urban areas are non-attainment for fine particulates Source: NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection 5

One county in NJ is nonattainment for Sulphur dioxide Source: U.S. EPA 6

Air Pollution Control Act, N.J.S.A. 26:2C-1 et seq. Enacted in 1954 and substantially amended in 1995 in response to the Clean Air Act. Authorizes NJDEP to promulgate rules to ensure compliance with CAA. Requires State of the Art pollution control technology for new or modified facilities. In November 2005, the DEP adopted a new regulation under the authority of New Jersey’s Air Pollution Control Act to classify CO2 as an air contaminant. 7

New Jersey Global Warming Response Act, N.J.S.A. 26:2C-37 to 26:2C-44 adopted statewide limits on greenhouse gas emissions in July The law mandates the statewide reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, approximately a 20 percent reduction, followed by a further reduction of emissions to 80 percent below 2006 levels by

In 2000, NJ had 10 coal plants PSEG Mercer 1&2 PSEG – Hudson 2 City of Vineland Connectiv/Calpine Deepwater BL England 1 &2 Carney’s Point 1&2 PG&E Logan Unit 1 9

Reduction in coal-fired capacity was accomplished through a series of Consent Orders and Agreements: PSE&G Mercer and Hudson– Pursuant to 2006 Consent Order with NJDEP, installed pollution control equipment to reduce SO2, NOx, particulate, mercury and CO2 emissions. Modifications completed in City of Vineland – Converted to natural gas in 2012 after settling emissions violations from 2004 and 2008 Deepwater - After emissions violations in 2007 and 2008, sold by Connectiv to Calpine who agreed to burn only natural gas. 10

BL England 1&2 - Under 2012 Consent Order with NJDEP to resolve CAA violations by previous owners, will shut down of Unit 1 by fall 2013 and convert Units 2 and 3 (oil burning) to natural gas by May Carney’s Point – Cogeneration facility owned by PG&E, providing steam to DuPont Chambers Works plant. Installed state of the art pollution control equipment in Logan 1 – Cogeneration facility providing steam to Ferro Corp. Well controlled with state of the art pollution control equipment. Reduction in coal-fired capacity was accomplished through a series of Consent Orders and Agreements: 11

Source: NJ Energy Master Plan (final)

2011 Energy Master Plan Rejects New Coal Resources “Coal-fired power plants are also expensive to construct. In light of the reduction in natural gas prices and, to a lesser extent, the cost of emission allowances, energy produced from coal plants is no longer much less expensive than energy produced from new CC plants, or even old-style gas-fired steam turbine generators. Many coal plants in PJM have had to retrofit increasingly expensive emission control equipment to meet air quality requirements. Coal plants produce a significant portion of New Jersey’s greenhouse gas emissions. Some units are candidates for retirement; incentives for new generation are designed to shut down these older, dirtier, less efficient plants. While coal plants have historically produced reliability and economic benefits and have balanced the technology mix of generation resources in New Jersey, coal is a major source of CO2 emissions and New Jersey will no longer accept coal as a new source of power in the State. “ p. 79 (emphasis added). Calls for expansion of natural gas generation and renewables. 13

Other measures take to reduce coal plant emissions in NJ Litigation with upwind out-of-state facilities: See, e.g., United States v. Cinergy Corp., 458 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2006), United States v. American Electric Power Service Corp., 137 F.Supp. 2d 1060 (S.D. Ohio 2001 State of New Jersey v. RRI Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings, LLC et al, (E.D. Pa. Dkt. No, 5:07-cv JKG ); Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Environmental Protection et al v. Allegheny Energy, Inc. et al, (W.D. Pa., Dkt. No. 2:05-cv-885. NJDEP filed under section 126 of the Clean Air Act to reduce the impact to New Jersey's air quality from the emissions generated by the Portland Power Plant in Pennsylvania. EPA granted the petition and required reduction in SO2 emissions by 81%. Petition is on appeal. Company has said they will close the plant in Rules implementing SIP require High Energy Demand Day (HEDD) units to achieve 60% reduction in NOx emissions or shut down by

Source: NJ Energy Master Plan (final)

Impact on prices has not been drastic Source: NJ Energy Master Plan (final)

Source: NJ Energy Master Plan (final)

Impact of EPA rules GAO Report: exact costs unknown but likely to be significant (.1% to 13.5%) in some areas. GAO , Jul 17, Brattle Group October 2012 Discussion Paper: impact on wholesale prices will be “not very large“ and “transitory.” No matter how the costs are characterized, it is not disputed that it will be costly to retrofit/replace existing coal units. 18

EPA maintains cost/benefit is there According to GAO report, EPA projected annual compliance costs of $10.2 billion for MATS and $853 million for CSAPR. EPA maintains there will be annual benefits of $150 to $380 billion, including avoiding 18,000-46,000 premature deaths each year. 19

Impacts can be mitigated Time for compliance. Cost recovery mechanisms (regulatory asset, amortization). Closure of uneconomic plants. New natural gas plants operate efficiently, e.g. BL England will generate the same amount of MW with two gas fired units instead of 3. Natural Gas prices at historic low. Impacts of doing nothing could be worse… 20

21

22

Thanks 23