Pragmatics Presentation by Sudha Bhingardive( )

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The people Look for some people. Write it down. By the water
Advertisements

Pragmatics II n Non-Literal Communication. Pragmatics II n Non-Literal Communication n Overstatement: No one understands me. A pig wouldn’t eat this food.
Unit : 22 Perlocution and Illocution.
Review Exercises 1) Do the COMPONENTIAL analysis (not the compositional one) of the following words: hen b) rooster Componential analysis 2) Does ‘A’
The Cooperative Principle
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
Pragmatics.
1 Introduction to Linguistics II Ling 2-121C, group b Lecture 10 Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006.
Pragmatics.
PRAGMATICS. 3- Pragmatics is the study of how more gets communicated than is said. It explores how a great deal of what is unsaid is recognized. 4.
Reference and inference By: Esra’a Rawah
THE REPORTED SPEECH What is it? How do we use it?.
Direct and indirect speech acts
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Chapter Seven Pragmatics
Advanced Spoken English Speech Act Theory What are Speech Acts? Speaking is performative Utterances are functional -Giving orders, instructions -Making.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
 We have been considering ways in which we interpret the meaning of an utterance in terms of what the speaker intended to convey.  However, we have.
Topic 9: perlocution and illocution
FACULTY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE G. TOGIA SECTION ΠΗ-Ω 26/05/2016 Introduction to linguistics II.
PRAGMATICS A: I have a fourteen year old son B: Well that's all right
Chapter 6. Semantics is the study of the meaning of words, phrases and sentences. In semantic analysis, there is always an attempt to focus on what the.
Chapter 6 Pragmatics. 6.1 Introduction Review of semantics  Meaning in lg.  words Mothervs.Mother-in-law  sentence: in, am, I, T-shirt, today.
Levels of Language 6 Levels of Language. Levels of Language Aspect of language are often referred to as 'language levels'. To look carefully at language.
Presupposition is what the speaker assumes to be the case prior to making an utterance. Entailment, which is not a pragmatic concept, is what logically.
Standards Of Textuality And Speech Acts.
SEMANTICS VS PRAGMATICS Semantics is the study of the relationships between linguistic forms and entities in the world; that is how words literally connect.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The terminology and concepts of semantics, pragmatics and discourse.
Presentation about pragmatic concepts Implicatures Presuppositions
High Frequency Words August 31 - September 4 around be five help next
Pragmatics Nuha Alwadaani.
Sight Words.
Pragmatics (1) Dr. Ansa Hameed.
Yule: “Words themselves do not refer to anything, people refer” Reference and inference Pragmatics: Reference and inference.
Lecture 10 Semantics Sentence Interpretation. The positioning of words and phrases in syntactic structure helps determine the meaning of the entire sentence.
Presupposition and entailment.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing See R. Nofsinger, Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991.
REFERENCE AND INFERENCE Words themselves do not refer to anything, people refer.
Unit 6 Apologies (II) Step 1: Opening Remarks Step 2: Explain listening skills in Unit 6 Part A : Micro-Listening Listening for Details.
Introduction to Linguistics
Speech Acts Actions performed via utterances e.g. You are fired
Lecturer: Ms. Abrar A. Mujaddidi P RAGMATICS. W HAT IS PRAGMATICS ?  Try to figure out the meaning of the following dialogue:  A: I have a fourteen.
PRAGMATICS. SCHEDULE May 14: Yule ch. 1, 2 and 3 May 16: Yule ch. 4, 5 and 6 May 21: Yule ch. 7, 8 and 9 May 22: Seminar EXAM Thursday; May 31,
Implicature. I. Definition The term “Implicature” accounts for what a speaker can imply, suggest or mean, as distinct from what the speaker literally.
PRAGMATICS 2.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
To Linguistics Introduction Department of English Level Four
Deixis and distance 2.1 Person Deixis 2.2 Spatial Deixis
PRESUPPOSITION AND ENTAILMENT
SPEECH ACT AND EVENTS By Ive Emaliana
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Three Kinds of Act.
SEMANTICS VS PRAGMATICS
COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE:
SPEECH ACT THEORY: Direct and Indirect.
COOPERATION and IMPLICATURE
Speech Acts.
Welcome back!.
PRESUPPOSITION and ENTAILMENT
Chapter ten Pragmatics
SPEECH ACTS AND EVENTS 6.1 Speech Acts 6.2 IFIDS 6.3 Felicity Conditions 6.4 The Performative Hypothesis 6.5 Speech Act Classifications 6.6 Direct and.
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing
Pragmatics.
Functional Pragmatic Model
Pragmatics.
Pragmatics: Reference and inference
SPEECH ACTS Saying as Doing Professor Lenny Shedletsky
Introduction to pragmatics
Presupposition and Entailment
Presentation transcript:

Pragmatics Presentation by Sudha Bhingardive(114050002) Ramkrishna Bairi (114054 001)

Motivation Watch this video

Where does Pragmatic fit in?

What is pragmatic? “It is the study of speaker meaning” It is concerned with the study of meaning as communicated by speaker and interpreted by listener. “It is the study of contexual meaning” It involves interpretation of what people mean in a particular context and how the context influences what is said. “It is the study of how more gets communicated than is said” This type of study explores how great deal of what is unsaid is recognized as part of what is communicated. “It is the study of the expression of relative distance “ On the assumption of how close and distant the listener is speakers determine how much needs to be said. 4

Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics Study of the relation between linguistic forms, how they are arranged in sequence, and which sequences are well-formed Semantics: Study of the relationship between linguistic forms and entries in the world Pragmatic: Study of relationships between linguistic forms and the users of those forms 5

Topics in Pragmatics Presupposition Implicature Reference Deixis Speech Acts

Presupposition Presupposition is something the speaker assumes to be the case prior to making an utterance. Example: “Mary's brother bought three horses” Presuppositions: 1: Mary exists 2: She has a brother 3: She has only one brother 4: He has a lot of money 7

Presupposition Cont.. It is the relationship between two proposition Uses symbol << to mean “presupposes” Example : A: Mary's dog is cute (p) B: Mary has a dog (q) C: p >> q A: Mary's dog is't cute (not p) C: not p >> q 8

Types of Presupposition Example Presupposition Existential The dog Your car >> dog exists >> You have a car Factive She didn’t realize he was ill I am glad that it’s over >> He was ill >> It’s over Non-factive I dreamed that I was rich He pretended to be happy >> I was not rich >> He wasn't happy Lexical He was smoking He managed to escape >> He used to smoke >> He tried to escape Structural When did she leave? Where did you buy the bike? >> She left >> You bought the bike Counterfactual If you were my friend you would have help me If I weren't ill I would have gone to school >> You are not my friend >> I am ill 9

Conversational Implicature Implicature: It means more being communicated than is said Conversational implicature: a meaning or message that is implicated in a conversation When people oversay (or say more of) or undersay (say less of) something, they produce certain extra meaning or meanings beyond the literal meanings of words and sentences. This extra meaning is conversationally dependent, hence conversation implicature. 10

Conversational Implicature contd.. - An implicature may also be seen as an indirect way of expressing oneself. Example 1: A: Where is the fish? B: The cat looks very happy. Example 2: A: Did you invite John and Mary? B: I invited John Example 3: A: Coming to the wild party tonight? B: My parents are visiting.

Reference Reference is thought as an act in which a speaker, or writer, uses linguistic forms to enable a listener, or reader, to identify something Can I borrow your Shakespeare? Yeah, it’s over there on the table Context: One student ask another Intended referent and inferred referent is not a person, probably a book Where’s the cheese sandwich sitting? He’s over there by the window. Context: In a restaurant, one waiter brings the order of food another waiter and asks him Referent is person, not the thing Brazil wins World Cup Japan wins first round of trade talks Context: News paper headlines Referent in first one is soccer team, not government Referent in second one is government, not the soccer team Words themselves don’t refer to anything, people refer. Anaphoric reference & Cataphoric reference

Deixis ‘Pointing’ via language Eg: What’s that? Context: Hearing a loud sound ‘this’ is deictic expression Eg: I will put this here Not much sense without the context Types: Person deictic me, you, I, he, she, it Spatial deictic here, there I am not here now Makes sense if the context is telephone recording Temporal deictic now, then Back in an hour

Speech Acts Performing actions via utterances The boss utters “You are fired” Performs an act of ending the employment Speech acts can be Command, apology, complaint, compliment, invitation, promise, request etc. “The tea is really cold!” Complaint during winter Compliment during summer

Speech Act (contd…) Illocutionary act Illocutionary force Basic act of utterance Illocutionary force We utter to make statement, request, warning etc “I will see you later” Illocutionary forces Prediction Promise Warning Perlocutionary effect Effect on the hearer “Is there a salt bottle there?” During dinner, the hearer will pass on the salt bottle.

Pragmatics in QA/Information Extraction More precise answers can be generated Not much research work done “Question Answering System of Confucian Analects based on Pragmatics Information and Categories” Paper by Ye Yang, Song Liu, Shingo K, Fuji Ren Extracting pragmatic info based on paragraph acts Meaning of paragraph at the level of illocutionary forces Template based extraction Machine learning techniques to extract some categories automatically

Pragmatics in QA/Information Extraction Domain : “"The Analects of Confucius” dialogue and quotation style records the statements and actions of Confucius and his disciples embodies the political stance, ethics ideas, morale, and education principle of Confucius Technique Classified the documents into categories 12 categories (eg: Humanity, Politics, etc.) Each category characterized by certain keywords Extracted Pragmatics Using annotated documents Manual; via different views expressed in questionnaire

Pragmatics in QA/Information Extraction Chapter number Pragmatics Information Confucian Analects 1-1 Take the study as a pleasure; make the study and the practice united… Confucius said,"To learn and practice what is learned time and again is pleasure, is it not? To have friends come from afar is happiness, is it not? To be unperturbed when not appreciated by others is gentlemanly, is it not? 1-2 The respect for elderly and care for children is the basic manner... Yu Tzu said, "It is seldom that a man of filial piety and brotherly love would be inclined to offend those above. There has not been a man inclined to cause disorder without the inclination to offend those above. The gentleman nourishes the roots. With roots established, the way grows. Are filial piety and brotherly love not the roots of benevolence?"

Pragmatics in QA/Information Extraction

Exercise Morning you hello bring go Go Syntax:  Semantic:  Pragmatic:  Go Pragmatic:  Earth is 8th planet from Sun in our solar system Syntax:  Pragmatic: /  The tree walked and talked to me I am vegetarian Semantic: 

Conclusion Human mind is extremely creative Languages are very powerful This can lead to very many contexts, situations and interpretations Proper understanding of the context is needed to appropriately communicate and understand thoughts Pragmatics play an important role here Back to Video

References “PRAGMATICS”, George Yule, Oxford University Press, 1996. “The Hand book of Pragmatics”, Laurence R Horn, Gregory Ward, Blackwell publishing, 2007 Ye Yang; Song Liu; Kuroiwa, S.; Ren, F.; , "Question Answering System of Confucian Analects based on Pragmatics Information and Categories," Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, 2007. NLP-KE 2007. International Conference on , vol., no., pp.361-366, Aug. 30 2007-Sept. 1 2007 Song Liu; Ren, F.; , "Paragraph act based pragmatic information extraction in question answering," Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS), 2011 IEEE International Conference on , vol., no., pp.153-157, 15-17 Sept. 2011